Myocardial structural and functional changes in cardiac amyloidosis: insights from a prospective observational patient registry

AIMS

The pathophysiological hallmark of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is the deposition of amyloid within the myocardium. Consequently, extracellular volume (ECV) of affected patients increases. However, studies on ECV progression over time are lacking. We aimed to investigate the progression of ECV and its prognostic impact in CA patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations, including ECV quantification, were performed in consecutive CA patients. Between 2012 and 2021, 103 CA patients underwent baseline and follow-up CMR, including ECV quantification. Median ECVs at baseline of the total (n = 103), transthyretin [(ATTR) n = 80], and [light chain (AL) n = 23] CA cohorts were 48.0%, 49.0%, and 42.6%, respectively. During a median period of 12 months, ECV increased significantly in all cohorts [change (Δ) +3.5% interquartile range (IQR): -1.9 to +6.9, P < 0.001; Δ +3.5%, IQR: -2.0 to +6.7, P < 0.001; and Δ +3.5%, IQR: -1.6 to +9.1, P = 0.026]. Separate analyses for treatment-naïve (n = 21) and treated (n = 59) ATTR patients revealed that the median change of ECV from baseline to follow-up was significantly higher among untreated patients (+5.7% vs. +2.3%, P = 0.004). Survival analyses demonstrated that median change of ECV was a predictor of outcome [total: hazard ratio (HR): 1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047-1.0145, P < 0.001; ATTR: HR: 1.073, 95% CI: 1.015-1.134, P = 0.013; and AL: HR: 1.131, 95% CI: 1.041-1.228, P = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

The present study supports the use of serial ECV quantification in CA patients, as change of ECV was a predictor of outcome and could provide information in the evaluation of amyloid-specific treatments.

Cardiac amyloidosis: a significant blind spot of the H2FPEF score

BACKGROUND

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) often mimics heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Due to very different treatment strategies, an exact diagnosis and differentiation between pure HFpEF and CA-related heart failure (HF) is important. In the present study, we assessed the recently published H2FPEF score in patients with pure HFpEF, transthyretin (ATTR), as well as light chain (AL) amyloidosis-related HFpEF and tested whether it differentiates between these entities.

METHODS

The H2FPEF scores consists of easy-to-assess clinical (Body Mass Index, number of hypertensive drugs, presence of atrial fibrillation, age) and echocardiographic (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, E/E´) parameters. It can be computed in a categorical way resulting in scores between 0 and 9 points (0-1: HFpEF rule out, 2-5: further testing required, 6-9: HFpEF rule in), or in a continual way providing an exact percentage of a patient's HFpEF probability. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and χ2-tests. Diagnostic accuracy was computed from 2x2 tables. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves. A P value of <0.05 was set as the level of significance.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with pure HFpEF, 53 patients with ATTR, and 34 patients with AL CA were included in the present study. Median age (HFpEF: 71.5 years; ATTR CA: 77.0 years; AL CA: 60.0 years; P<0.001), gender distribution (HFpEF [female]: 73.0%, ATTR (female): 18.9%, AL [female]: 38.2%; P<0.001), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (HFpEF: 1045pg/mL; ATTR CA: 1927pg/mL; AL CA: 4308pg/mL; P<0.001) differed significantly between study cohorts. Median H2FPEF scores were highest among HFpEF (categorical: 5.0 points; continual: 95.1%), followed by ATTR (categorical: 4.0 points; continual: 89.0%), and AL CA (categorical: 3.0 points; continual: 31.2%). Respective P values were <0.001. Low H2FPEF scores (0-1 points) were found among patients in the AL CA cohort (29.4%), but not among HFpEF or ATTR CA patients (P<0.001). The majority of patients, irrespective of disease entity were in the intermediate score range (2-5 points, HFpEF: 80.0% ATTR CA: 94.3%, AL CA: 67.9%; P=0.006). High scores (6-9 points) were most often found among HFpEF patients (20.0%), followed by ATTR CA (5.7%) and AL CA (2.9%), (P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The H2FPEF score should be used with caution, as there is a significant overlap between HFpEF and CA-related HF.

Impact of tafamidis on myocardial strain in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy

AIMS

The impact of tafamidis on myocardial strain in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) have been barely investigated. We aimed to determine tafamidis-induced changes using serial speckle tracking echocardiography and to identify imaging parameters for specific therapy monitoring.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ATTR-CM patients underwent serial TTE with two-dimensional (2 D) speckle tracking imaging. Patients receiving tafamidis free acid 61 mg (n = 62) or tafamidis meglumine 20 mg (n = 21) once daily (QD) showed stable measurements at follow-up (61 mg: 8.5 months, 20 mg: 7.0 months) in LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (61 mg: -11.75% vs. -11.58%, p = 0.534; 20 mg: -10.61% vs. -10.12%, p = 0.309), right ventricular (RV) GLS (61 mg: -14.18% vs. -13.72%, p = 0.377; 20 mg: -14.53% vs. -13.99%, p = 0.452) and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (LASr; 61 mg: 8.80% vs. 9.42%, p = 0.283; 20 mg: 8.23% vs. 8.67%, p = 0.589), whereas treatment-naïve ATTR-CM patients (n = 54) had clear signs of disease progression at the end of the observation period (10.5 months; LV-GLS: -11.71% vs. -10.59%, p = 0.001; RV-GLS: -14.36% vs. -12.99%, p = 0.038; LASr: 10.67% vs. 8.41%, p = 0.005). Between-group comparison at follow-up revealed beneficial effects of tafamidis free acid 61 mg on LASr (p = 0.003) and the LV (LV-GLS: p = 0.030, interventricular septum (IVS): p = 0.006), resulting in clinical benefits (six-minute walk distance (6-MWD): p = 0.006, NT-proBNP: p= <0.001), while patients treated with tafamidis meglumine 20 mg QD showed positive effects on LASr (p = 0.039), but no differences with respect to the LV (LV-GLS: p = 0.274, IVS: p = 0.068) and clinical status (6-MWD: p = 0.124, NT-proBNP: p = 0.053) compared to the natural course.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with tafamidis free acid 61 mg in ATTR-CM patients delays the deterioration of LA and LV longitudinal function, resulting in significant clinical benefits compared with natural history. Serial TTE with 2 D speckle tracking imaging may be appropriate for disease-specific therapy monitoring.

Riociguat in pulmonary hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the haemoDYNAMIC trial

AIMS

The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) severely aggravates the clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To date, neither established heart failure therapies nor pulmonary vasodilators proved beneficial. This study investigated the efficacy of chronic treatment with the oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat in patients with PH-HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre DYNAMIC trial assessed riociguat in PH-HFpEF. Patients were recruited at five hospitals across Austria and Germany. Key eligibility criteria were mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure >15 mmHg, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. Patients were randomized to oral treatment with riociguat or placebo (1:1). Patients started at 0.5 mg three times daily (TID) and were up-titrated to 1.5 mg TID. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in cardiac output (CO) at rest, measured by right heart catheterization. Primary efficacy analyses were performed on the full analysis set. Fifty-eight patients received riociguat and 56 patients placebo. After 26 weeks, CO increased by 0.37 ± 1.263 L/min in the riociguat group and decreased by -0.11 ± 0.921 L/min in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference: 0.54 L/min, 95% confidence interval 0.112, 0.971; P = 0.0142). Five patients dropped out due to riociguat-related adverse events but no riociguat-related serious adverse event or death occurred.

CONCLUSION

The vasodilator riociguat improved haemodynamics in PH-HFpEF. Riociguat was safe in most patients but led to more dropouts as compared to placebo and did not change clinical symptoms within the study period.

Impact of Tafamidis and Optimal Background Treatment on Physical Performance in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

In patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, tafamidis was shown to slow the decline in 6-minute walking distance as compared with placebo. We aimed to define the impact of tafamidis and optimal background treatment on functional capacity as determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

METHODS

Seventy-eight consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. They underwent CPET at baseline, and outcome defined as death or heart failure hospitalization was obtained for a time period of up to 30 months. Fifty-four patients completed a follow-up CPET at 9±3 months (range, 4-16 months). Improvement in peak VO₂ at follow-up was defined as ∆peak VO₂≥1.0 mL/(kg·min), stable peak VO₂ was defined as 0≤∆peak VO₂<1.0 mL/(kg·min), and decline in peak VO₂ was defined by ∆peak VO₂<0 mL/(kg·min).

RESULTS

Baseline peak VO₂>14 mL/(kg·min) as well as minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope≤34 were associated with a lower risk of death or heart failure hospitalization (P=0.002, P=0.007, respectively). In 54 patients, who received tafamidis and underwent repeat CPET testing, an improvement in physical performance (P=0.002) was observed at follow-up. When comparing pre and post-treatment parameters, 29 patients (54%) showed an increase in percent predicted peak VO₂ (P<0.0001), an improvement of peak VO₂ (P<0.0001), and better physical performance at follow-up (P<0.0001). Patients with stable or improved peak VO₂ had less advanced heart disease at baseline (P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that baseline peak VO₂ and baseline minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope predict outcomes and an improvement in physical performance as measured by CPET was observed in patients receiving tafamidis, who had less advanced disease at baseline, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis.

Tafamidis treatment delays structural and functional changes of the left ventricle in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy

AIMS

Tafamidis improves outcomes in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). However, it is not yet known whether tafamidis affects cardiac amyloid deposition and structural changes in the myocardium. We aimed to determine disease-modifying effects on myocardial amyloid progression and to identify imaging parameters that could be applied for specific therapy monitoring.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ATTR-CM patients underwent serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging using T1 mapping techniques to derive extracellular volume (ECV). Patients receiving tafamidis 61 mg (n = 35) or 20 mg (n = 15) once daily showed stable measurements at follow-up (FU) {61 mg: 9.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.0-11.0] months, 20 mg: 11.0 (IQR 8.0-18.0) months} in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF; 61 mg: 47.6% vs. 47.5%, P = 0.935; 20 mg: 52.4% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.930), LV mass index (LVMI; 61 mg: 110.2 vs. 106.2 g/m2, P = 0.304; 20 mg: 114.5 vs. 115.4 g/m2, P = 0.900), and ECV (61 mg: 47.5% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.861; 20 mg: 56.7% vs. 57.5%, P = 0.759), whereas treatment-naïve ATTR-CM patients (n = 19) had clear signs of disease progression at the end of the observation period [12.0 (IQR 10.0-21.0) months; LVEF: 53.3% vs. 45.7%, P = 0.031; LVMI: 98.9 vs. 106.9 g/m2, P = 0.027; ECV: 49.3% vs. 54.6%, P = 0.023]. Between-group comparison at FU revealed positive effects in tafamidis 61 mg-treated compared to treatment-naïve patients (LVEF: P = 0.035, LVMI: P = 0.036, ECV: P = 0.030), while those treated with 20 mg showed no difference in the above LV measurements when compared with treatment-naïve (P = 0.120, P = 0.287, P = 0.158). However, both treatment groups showed clinically beneficial effects compared to the natural course [61 mg, 6-min walk distance (6-MWD): P = 0.005, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP): P = 0.002; 20 mg, 6-MWD: P = 0.023, NT-proBNP: P = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

Tafamidis delays myocardial amyloid progression in ATTR-CM patients, resulting in structural, functional, and clinical benefits compared to the natural course. Serial CMR including measurement of ECV may be appropriate for disease-specific therapy monitoring.

Renin Feedback Is an Independent Predictor of Outcome in HFpEF

Drugs which interact with the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) aim to reduce the negative effects of angiotensin (Ang) II. Treatment with these drugs anticipate a compensatory up-regulation of renin; however, it has been shown that there is a large variability in circulating plasma renin (PRA), even in patients with optimal medical therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Our aim was to measure plasma renin activity (PRA-S), its response to RAAS inhibitor (RAASi) therapies and its effects on outcome in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). For this purpose, 150 HFpEF patients were included into a prospective single-center registry. Equilibrium (eq) angiotensin metabolites were measured from serum samples using mass spectroscopy. PRA-S (eqAng I + eqAng II) was calculated and compared in respect to the primary endpoint defined as all-cause death. PRA-S in patients with RAASi therapy was not significantly higher than in patients without RAASi (p = 0.262). Even after adjusting for confounding factors, PRA-S remained predictive for all-cause death in the multivariable model with a hazard ratio of 2.14 (95%CI 1.20–3.82, p = 0.010). We conclude that high PRA-S is associated with poor prognosis in patients with HFpEF, regardless of RAASi treatment, which could ultimately result in hyperactivated RAAS and consecutive negative effects on the cardiovascular and renal system, leading to poor outcome in patients with HFpEF.

What Type of Patients Did PARAGON-HF Select? Insights from a Real-World Prospective Cohort of Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

The PARAGON-HF clinical trial suggested that sacubitril/valsartan may become a treatment option for particular subgroups of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the proportion of real-world HFpEF patients who are theoretically superimposable with the PARAGON-HF population is yet unknown. The present study was performed to define the proportion of real-world PARAGON-HF-like patients and to describe their clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis in comparison with those who would not meet PARAGON-HF criteria. We systematically applied PARAGON-HF inclusion and exclusion criteria to a total of 427 HFpEF patients who have been participating in a prospective national registry between December 2010 and December 2019. In total, only 170 (39.8%) registry patients were theoretically eligible for PARAGON-HF. Patients not meeting inclusion criteria (41.0%) were less impaired with respect to exercise capacity (median 6-min walk distance: 385 m (IQR: 300-450) versus 323 m (IQR: 240-383); p < 0.001) had lower pulmonary pressures (mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP): 31.2 mmHg, standard deviation (SD): ±10.2 versus 32.8 mmHg, SD: ±9.7; p < 0.001) and better outcomes (log-rank: p < 0.001) as compared to the PARAGON-like cohort. However, patients theoretically excluded from the trial (19.2%) were those with most advanced heart failure symptoms (median 6-min walk test: 252 m (IQR: 165-387); p < 0.001), highest pulmonary pressures (mPAP: 38.2 mmHg, SD: ±12.4; p < 0.001) and worst outcome (log-rank: p = 0.037). We demonstrate here that < 40% of real-world HFpEF patients meet eligibility criteria for PARAGON-HF. We conclude that despite reasons for optimism after PARAGON-HF, a large proportion of HFpEF patients will remain without meaningful treatment options.