Survival and Evolution of Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients From Type II Asystolic Donations: A Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

In recent years, stagnation in the number of kidneys from after brain-dead donors (DBD) has stimulated the use of non-heart beating donors (NHBDs). Herein we present our 5-year experience with type II Maastricht NHBDs in renal transplantation.

METHODS

All patients (n = 50) in this study received type II Maastricht NHBD kidneys (March 2012 to February 2017), with a median follow-up of 33 months.

RESULTS

Mean donor age was 39 ± 12 years, mean creatinine 1.24 ± 0.2 mg/dL, and the most frequently observed blood group (donors and recipients) was type A (64%). Recipients were slightly younger (51 ± 11 years old), with mean time on dialysis of 30 ± 24 months. Almost all were primary transplants. Pre-transplant panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) were <25%; initial immunosuppression was thymoglobulin, corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and delayed introduction of tacrolimus. Six percent were nonfunctioning kidneys; 79.6% presented with delayed renal function (mean duration 14 ± 9 days). Acute rejection was seen in 6% of patients. Mean creatinine at month 3 was 1.7 ± 0.8 mg/dL, and 1.5 ± 0.8 mg/dL in the first year. The last available mean creatinine was 1.54 ± 0.7 mg/dL. Proteinuria in the third month, first year, and third year was 0.70, 0.41, and 0.26 g/d, respectively. Recipient survival at the first, third, and fifth year was 100%, 100%, and 86%, and when graft-censored for death was 94%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection during first year was 6%, and 2% in the second year. Exitus incidence was 4% and cytomegalovirus infection was 21.3%. BK viremia between 1000 and 10,000 copies/mL was seen in 4.3%, and reached >10,000 copies/mL in 2.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Type II NHBD has shown limited frequency of nonfunctioning kidney and high functional delay. The results in survival and renal function are very acceptable, comparable with levels seen in donation after brain death.

Results of living kidney donation in Andalusia: 2006-2009

Renal transplantation is the best therapeutic choice in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with donation from living donors the alternative that offers the best medium- and long-term results. Because of the limited number of cadaver donors and the progressive increase in donor age, transplantation from living donors has become the renal replacement treatment of choice. Several studies have demonstrated that donation does not increase the donor's risk of developing ESRD in the long term. Some studies have asserted that a donor's life expectancy increases as a result of the comprehensive study and screening process they must undergo. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the vital status and onset of chronic renal disease in 101 living kidney donors in Andalusia, Spain, during 2006-2009, based on data obtained from the Sistema de Información de la Coordinación Autonómica de Trasplantes de Andalucía (Regional Transplants Coordination of Andalusia). Donor survival was 99%, and the only death, from lung cancer, was not associated with the surgical procedure. Only 5 transplants failed during this period, and no donors developed ESRD. Neither the probability of survival nor the risk of developing ESRD in donors was influenced by kidney donation.

Alendronate in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis following a renal transplant is an important cause of morbidity. Several studies have demonstrated the efficiency of diphosphonates for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

We evaluated the effect of alendronate treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with osteoporosis (lumbar spine and/or hip t-scores < or = -2.5). Two study groups were established: group A (n = 13), patients treated orally with vitamin D, calcium, and alendronate (70 mg/week) and group B (n = 12) patients receiving only vitamin D and calcium. The immunosuppression regimen mostly used was steroids and cyclosporine. BMD was determined at the lumbar spine and hip using a Hologic 4500 QDR densitometer at the start of treatment and after 1 year.

RESULTS

The study groups showed no significant differences in age, sex, menopause, or transplant time. Group A received a mean of 1.80 +/- 1.3 microg vitamin D/week and 1.3 +/- 2.1 g calcium/d, compared to 1.1 +/- 1 microg and 1.25 +/- 2.3 g, respectively for group B (NS). After a mean of 411.15 +/- 107.75 days of treatment, a significant increase in BMD at the femoral neck was recorded in group A, but not at the level of the spine (+5.57% +/- 3.5%, P < .05 and -0.42% +/- 12%, NS, respectively). No significant changes were observed in group B (-1.45% +/- 8% femoral neck and +1.69% +/- 3.5% hip, NS). Dyspepsia was reported by 7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary analysis, alendronate produced, improvements are so far limited to an increased BMD in the hip.

[Treatment of hyperphosphatemia with sevelamer in patients with chronic renal failure]

Sevelamer is a recent phosphate binder that is mineral-free, and represents a great advance in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with hypercalcemia and/or gastric intolerance to calcium-based phosphate binders. The communications about the experience with the use of sevelamer in patients non-yet in dialysis is scanty. The aim of our study is to investigate retrospectively the gastrointestinal tolerance of sevelamer, their efficacy as phosphate binder and other parameters in a group of 89 patients with chronic renal failure in predialysis. We have analysed the effects of sevelamer at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months on the following data and parameters: calcium, phosphate, intact PTH, venous bicarbonate, urea, creatinine, creatinine clearance, side-effects, number of patients that were discontinued, and co-treatment during the study period with phosphate-based binders, calcitriol, lipid-lowering drugs and sodium bicarbonate.

RESULTS

19 patients (21.3%) refused to continue with sevelamer at the first month (16 patients had digestive intolerance and 3 several symptoms). Serum phosphate fell at 3 months (5 +/- 0.8 mg/dl basal vs 4.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dl, p = 0.02) and 6 months (5 +/- 0.8 mg/dl basal vs 4.7 +/- 0.9 mg/dl, p = 0.07). Serum calcium fell at 6 months (9.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dl basal vs 9.4 +/- 0.6 mg/dl, p = 0.03). Venous bicarbonate and iPTH were unchanged, but the quantity of sodium bicarbonate administered increased significantly. Blood cholesterol fell at 1 months (193 +/- 49 mg/dl basal vs 173 +/- 52 mg/dl, p = 0.001) and 3 months (205 +/- 49 mg/dl basal vs 170 +/- 49 mg/dl, p = 0.004), in spite of a significant reduction of the dose of statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevelamer is an effective phosphate binder in predialysis patients and also reduces significantly the serum cholesterol, improving the blood lipid profile. The levels of venous bicarbonate remained unchanged, at expenses of an increment in the dose of sodium bicarbonate supplementation.