Prevalence and risk factors for viral blipping in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleos (t) ide analogues

The clinical relevance of viral blipping during nucleos (t) ide analogue (NA) treatment is unclear in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We investigated the prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes for those with viral blipping during NA treatment. A retrospective cohort study investigated consecutively treated CHB patients from May 2008 to February 2015 on the NAs such as entecavir (ETV), tenofovir (TDF) and lamivudine (LAM). Included patients were previously treatment naive. Viral blipping was defined as serum HBV DNA >20 IU/mL on one occasion, and not >200 IU/mL, with subsequent measurement returning to undetectable levels, that is <20 IU/mL. A total of 242 treatment-compliant CHB patients were included with 44 (18.2%) experiencing viral blipping. In multivariable Cox regression, Asian race (HR=7.40, 95% CI 1.01-54.29, P<.049), LAM therapy (vs ETV/TDF, HR=2.53, 95% CI 1.29-4.95, P<.007), higher creatinine (per SD, HR=1.47, 95% CI 1.21-1.79, P<.001), HBeAg positivity (HR=2.68, 95% CI 1.39-5.03, P<.003) and longer time to achieve undetectable HBV DNA (per month, HR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, P=.001) were associated with an increased risk of viral blipping. Viral blipping did not show any significant association with viral breakthrough, HBsAg loss, ALT flares or disease progression. Viral blipping is a frequent event during NA therapy; however, it did not lead to any clinically significant outcomes. Thus, it may not require more frequent blood work and patient visits in clinical practice.

A65 ENDOSCOPIST-TARGETED INTERVENTIONS TO OPTIMIZE ADENOMA DETECTION RATE - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Background

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) has emerged as the strongest quality assurance metric that has consistently been shown to be inversely associated with the development of colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Unfortunately, marked variability in ADR exists among endoscopists. A multitude of interventions targeted at endoscopists to optimize their ADR have been reported, including but not limited to withdrawal time, in room observers, physician report cards, and quality improvement and training programs. However, it is unclear which of them are truly effective.

Aims

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopist-targeted interventions to improve adenoma detection rate (ADR) or polyp detection rate (PDR).

Methods

Systematic searches of major databases were conducted through to March 2018 to identify potentially relevant studies. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. Data for ADR and PDR were analyzed on the log-odds scale using a random-effects meta-analysis model using restricted maximum likelihood (with Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect meta-analysis used for fewer than 4 studies). Statistical effect-size heterogeneity was assessed using a Chi2 test and quantifying the relative proportion of variation using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed by the Harbord regression test.

Results

From 4299 initial studies, 24 were included in the systematic review and 13 were included in the meta-analysis representing a total of 55,090 colonoscopies. Physician report card interventions (7 studies) and withdrawal time focused interventions (6 studies) were meta-analyzed. The pooled odds ratio for ADR for report card interventions was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.50; p&lt;0.0001), favoring report cards to detect more adenomas. Statistical heterogeneity was detected with substantial relative effect-size variability (Chi2, p&lt;0.0001; I2=80.1%). No statistical evidence of publication bias was found. 6 studies reported data for PDR using withdrawal time focused interventions, with 3 of these reporting data on ADR. The pooled odds ratio for ADR was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.22; p=0.81) and for PDR was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.88, 1.31; p=0.51) which were not statistically significant. Statistical heterogeneity was detected in both groups (Chi2, p&lt;0.001; I2=82.2% for ADR and I2=89.4% for PDR) and there was statistical evidence of publication bias. Figures 1 and 2 represent Forest plots for the effect of pre-and post-report card and withdrawal time focused interventions on ADR.

Conclusions

Our study provides evidence that the distribution of colonoscopy quality report cards to physicians significantly improves overall ADR and should strongly be considered as part of quality improvement programs aimed at optimizing colonoscopy performance.

Funding Agencies

None

A246 BALLOON-OCCLUDED RETROGRADE TRANSVENOUS OBLITERATION FOR PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS OF GASTRIC VARICEAL BLEEDING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background

Gastric variceal (GV) bleeding is an infrequent but serioous complication of cirrhosis that is associated with high mortality. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is an effective treatment to prevent rebleeding from GV. The role of BRTO for primary prophylaxis of GV bleeding has not been established.

Purpose

The aim of the current study is to establish the efficacy and safety of BRTO for primary prophylaxis of GV bleeding.

Method

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 2021. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving adults with cirrhosis related GV that had never bled and were treated with BRTO were included. Studies without clinical outcomes or those not reporting primary prophylaxis outcomes separately were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Result(s)

We identified 791 unique citations with 9 eligible studies after a full-text review. A total of 577 patients were included from 9 observational studies (1 prospective, 8 retrospective). Technical success after the first procedure ranged from 82.4-100% (7 studies) and GV eradication on follow-up endoscopy ranged from 88.2-100% (4 studies). GV bleeding occurred in 0-7.3% of patients with follow-up ranging from 15.8-66.2 months (9 studies). Eight studies were considered at high risk of bias due to the lack of a control group or poor comparability between the cohorts.

Conclusion(s)

BRTO appears to be effective for primary prophylaxis of GV bleeding. Further controlled studies are needed before BRTO can be routinely performed for primary prevention of gastric variceal bleeding.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

None

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

A225 INFERIOR VENA CAVA STENOSIS AFTER HEPATIC LOBECTOMY: A RARE CAUSE OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION AND REFRACTORY ASCITES

Background

Inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis is a rare occurrence in post-liver transplant patients, affecting less than 3% of recipients. IVC stenosis is rarely described in non-transplant patients or considered in the differential of portal hypertension and refractory ascites. Patients with IVC stenosis may experience lower extremity edema, dyspnea, ascites and other signs of portal hypertension.

Aims

We describe a case of portal hypertension and refractory ascites secondary to IVC stenosis following hepatic lobectomy.

Methods

Case report.

Results

We report a 61-year-old woman with a history of diabetes, obesity status post sleeve gastrectomy and solitary neuroendocrine tumor of the right hepatic lobe, adjacent to the porta hepatis with no evidence of metastasis. She underwent a laparoscopic right hepatectomy with wedge resection (&lt;5 cm) in segment 4 to remove the neuroendocrine tumor in 2016. Surgery also included an intraoperative cholangiogram and placement of intra-ductal stent using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) technology as well as significant adhesiolysis along the IVC, right hepatic vein and biliary tract. In February 2020, the patient was referred to Hepatology for evaluation of new ascites. Imaging did not demonstrate evidence of tumor recurrence or features of cirrhosis but identified a new findings of portal hypertension and moderate ascites. Common causes of chronic liver disease were excluded and hepatic synthetic function was normal. Paracentesis revealed a high serum albumin ascites gradient (SAAG; 20 g/L) and a high ascitic fluid protein (34 g/L). Although these findings were suggestive of cardiac ascites, a 2D echocardiogram was normal. A trans-jugular liver biopsy was attempted in July 2020. The right atrial pressure was 8 mmHg and inferior vena cava (IVC) pressure was 22 mmHg at the level of the liver. Loss of pulsation suggested hemodynamically significant stenosis of the hepatic IVC. The wedged hepatic venous pressure was 3 mmHg and the calculated portal systemic gradient was 4 mmHg. A trans jugular biopsy failed due to unfavourable anatomy. These findings, taken in conjunction with previous results, suggested non-cirrhotic post-hepatic portal hypertension. Subsequent computed tomography imaging confirmed stenosis of the hepatic portion of the IVC and this was felt to be the ultimate cause of the portal hypertension. She has since been referred back to interventional radiology (IR) for consideration of balloon angioplasty dilation of the IVC stenosis as well as additional testing to determine if there is any underlying hepatic fibrosis related to congestive hepatopathy.

Conclusions

IVC stenosis post hepatic lobectomy is a rare phenomenon described in the literature but warrants high suspicion in cases of refractory ascites.

Funding Agencies

None

Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns and Survival in Canadian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) globally. We described and evaluated the outcomes of patients with CHB-HCC in Canada. In this retrospective cross-sectional cohort study, data were analysed from CHB mono-infected subjects seen between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2022, and entered the Canadian Hepatitis B Network Registry. Descriptive analysis and chi-squared modelling were used to compare cohorts, followed by multivariable survival analysis regarding survival post-diagnosis. Statistical analyses were completed in R version 2.2. Of the 6711 patients with CHB who met inclusion criteria, 232 (3.5%) developed HCC. Compared with the CHB cohort, the majority of CHB-HCC cohort were male, SEA and HBeAg negative and born in endemic area (80% vs. 56%, 73% vs. 55%, 84% vs. 54%, 64% vs. 40% and all p < 0001). Overall, median HBV DNA level was log 2.54 (IQR: 0-4.04). Advanced liver disease, defined as minimum Fibrosis stage F3, was seen in 9.4% of overall cohort, but 92% of HCC cohort. At diagnosis, median tumour size was 2.5 cm (IQR: 1.7-4.0) and mean tumour number was 1.33 (SD: 1.33), with 81% of patients BCLC 0-A. Fifty-three per cent of patients were diagnosed with HCC as part of surveillance protocols. The survival rate after HCC diagnosis was 78.7%, during the median follow-up of 52.9 months (IQR: 17-90). In multivariable analysis, survival was significantly correlated with diagnosis through the screening programme. In this large cohort of patients with CHB-HCC, the majority of patients were detected with early-stage HCC and received treatment with curative intent, resulting in strong survival rates.

A224 COVID-19 INFECTION IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: CLINICAL FEATURES, HOSPITALIZATION, AND MORTALITY FROM A CANADIAN MULTICENTRE COHORT

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant challenges to clinicians caring for liver transplant (LT) recipients. Researchers have sought to better understand the risk and clinical outcomes of LT recipients infected with COVID-19 globally, however, there is a paucity of data from within Canada.

Aims

Our multi-center study aims to examine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of LT patients with COVID-19 in Canada.

Methods

We identified a retrospective cohort of adult LT recipients with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 from 7 Canadian tertiary care centers between March 2020 and June 2021. Demographic and clinical data were compiled by clinicians within those centers. We identified liver enzyme profile at the time of COVID-19 infection, immunosuppression type and post-infection adjustments, rate of hospitalization, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death.

Results

A total of 49 patients with a history of LT and COVID-19 infection were identified. Twenty nine patients (59%) were male, the median time from LT was 66 months (1, 128) and the median age at COVID-19 infection was 59 years (52, 65). At COVID-19 diagnosis, the median ALT was 37 U/L (21, 41), AST U/L was 34 (20, 37), ALP U/L was 156 (88, 156), Total Bilirubin was 11 umol/L (7, 14), and INR was 1.1 (1.0, 1.1). The majority of patients (92%) were on tacrolimus monotherapy or a combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); median tacrolimus level at COVID-19 diagnosis was 5.3 ug/L (4.0, 8.1). Immunosuppression was modified in 8 (16%) patients post-infection; either the tacrolimus dose was reduced or MMF was held. One patient developed acute cellular rejection which recovered after re-initiation of the prior regimen. Eighteen patients (37%) required hospitalization, 6 (12%) were treated with dexamethasone, and 3 (6%) required ICU admission and mechanical ventilation. Four patients (8%) died due to complications of COVID-19. On univariate analysis, neither age, sex, co-morbidities nor duration post-transplant were associated with risk of hospitalization.

Conclusions

In our national retrospective study, approximately 40% of patients required hospitalization with a mortality rate of &lt; 10%. Previous studies have shown proximity to LT as an independent factor for mortality with COVID-19; the median time from LT for our patients was 5 years, which may explain the lower mortality rate. Of note, the median tacrolimus levels were much lower in comparison to the target of 8–10 ug/L used in the first year post-transplant. As the landscape of COVID-19 changes with vaccination, evolving treatments, and increasing rates of variant transmission, additional studies are required to continue identifying trends in clinical outcomes.

Funding Agencies

None

A217 TREATMENT ADHERENCE OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS B PATIENTS WITH HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA FROM THE CANHEPB NETWORK

Background

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide.

Aims

The primary aim of this study is to explore the degree of treatment adherence to the American Association For The Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) HCC treatment guidelines for patients with CHB-HCC.

Methods

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of available data (2005–2020) in patients mono-infected with CHB collected from the Canadian HBV Network; a national consortium across 8 Canadian provinces. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics along with parametric and nonparametric statistical methods with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Of the 6500 patients, 132 (2.0%) patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 64 (IQR: 53.5- 71.5) with 101 (76%) being male. The median ALT was 40 (IQR: 26–59.5) and the median tumor number was 1(IQR: 1- 2) with a median tumor size of 2.6 cm (IQR: 1.9- 4.5). 98 (74.5%) patients were HBeAg negative with a median viral load of 3.8 logs (IQR 1.9 – 5.8). 58 (43%) patients had cirrhosis at diagnosis. 36% of patients were diagnosed with HCC on their first screening imaging whereas 39% were found to have HCC on repeated surveillance imaging. 116 (87.9%) were on treatment at the time of diagnosis or after (70 (60.3%) NA and 46 (39%) Combination therapy with double NA or NA plus interferon). Out of the 132 patients, BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C represented 30 (23%), 42 (32%), 17 (13%), and 5 (4%) patients, respectively, with 38 (28%) patients with unknown BCLC stage. The overall adherence to AASLD guidelines was 61%. The HCC treatment adherence rate for patients with BCLC stage 0, A, B were 63%, 97.5%, and 23.5%, respectively. BCLC stages C and D did not have a sufficient sample size for analysis. The adherence rate ranged from 53% (Eastern Canada) to 71% (Western Canada) across Canada.

Conclusions

In this retrospective nationwide cohort study of patients with CHB-related HCC, the overall treatment adherence rate to AASLD guidelines was low with notable regional differences. Further analysis will determine the cause of regional differences.

Funding Agencies

None

A113 ANNUAL COLONOSCOPY VOLUME IS NOT PREDICTIVE OF COLONOSCOPY QUALITY - FINDINGS FROM THE SOUTHWEST ONTARIO COLONOSCOPY COHORT

Background

Performing a minimum number of colonoscopies annually has been proposed by some jurisdictions as a requirement for maintaining privileges. However, this practice is supported by limited evidence.

Aims

The objective of this study was to determine if annual colonoscopy volume was associated with colonoscopy quality metrics.

Methods

A population-based study was performed using the Southwest Ontario Colonoscopy cohort, which consists of all adult patients who underwent colonoscopy between April 2017 and Oct 2018 at 21 academic and community hospitals within the health region. Data were collected through a mandatory quality assurance form completed after each procedure and pathology reports were manually reviewed. Physician annualized colonoscopy volumes were compared by correlation analysis to each quality-related outcome, by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), and logistic regression. The prognostic value of colonoscopy volume was also adjusted for case-mix and potential confounders in separate regression analyses for each outcome. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate (PDR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSPDR), and cecal intubation.

Results

A total of 47,195 colonoscopies were performed by 75 physicians (37.5% by gastroenterologists, 60% by general surgeons, 2.5% others). There were no clear relationships between annual colonoscopy volumes and study outcomes. Colonoscopy volume was not associated with ADR (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96–1.10, p=0.48) and corresponded to an AUROC not significantly different from the null (AUROC 0.52, 95% CI 0.43–0.61, p=0.65). Multi-variable regression adjusting for case-mix also demonstrated no predictive value of annual colonoscopy volume for the primary outcome (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94–1.12, p=0.55). Similarly, analyses of secondary outcomes failed to find an association between colonoscopy volume and PDR, SSPDR, or cecal intubation (Table 1).

Conclusions

Annual colonoscopy volumes do not predict ADR, PDR, SSPDR, or cecal intubation rate.

Results of unconditional and conditional approaches for examining the predictive value of annual colonoscopy volume for quality related outcomes.

Funding Agencies

None

A117 PROPOFOL SEDATION DOES NOT IMPROVE MEASURES OF COLONOSCOPY QUALITY – FINDINGS FROM THE SOUTHWEST ONTARIO COLONOSCOPY COHORT

Background

The use of propofol during colonoscopy has gained increased popularity due to deeper anesthesia compared to conscious sedation. Prior studies examining the use of propofol sedation during colonoscopy have primarily focused on anesthesia outcomes. Whether propofol sedation is associated with improvements in colonoscopy outcomes is uncertain.

Aims

The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were the detection of any adenoma (conventional adenoma, sessile serrated polyp, and traditional serrated adenoma), sessile serrated polyp detection rate, polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and perforation rate.

Methods

The Southwest Ontario Colonoscopy cohort consists of all patients who underwent colonoscopy between April 2017 and Oct 2018 at 21 hospitals serving a large geographic area in Southwest Ontario. Procedures performed in patients less than 18 years of age or by endoscopist who perform &lt;50 colonoscopies/year were excluded. Data were collected through a mandatory quality assurance form that was completed by the endoscopist after each procedure. Pathology reports were manually reviewed.

Results

A total of 46,634 colonoscopies were performed by 75 physicians (37.5% by gastroenterologists, 60% by general surgeons, 2.5% others) of which 16,408 (35.2%) received propofol and 30,226 (64.8%) received conscious sedation (e.g. combination of a benzodiazepine and a narcotic). Patients who received propofol were likely to have a screening indication (49.2% vs 45.5%, p&lt;0.0001), not have a trainee endoscopist present and be performed at a non-academic centre (32.2% vs 44.6%, p&lt;0.0001). Compared to conscious sedation, use of propofol was associated with a lower ADR (24.6% vs. 27.0%, p&lt;0.0001) and detection of any adenoma (27.7% vs. 29.8%, p&lt;0.0001); no difference was observed in the detection ofsessile serrated polyps (5.0% vs. 4.7%, p=0.26), polyp detection rate (41.2% vs 41.2%, p=0.978), cecal intubation rate (97.1% vs. 96.8%, p=0.15) or perforation rate (0.04% vs. 0.06%,p=0.45). On multi-variable analysis, the use of propofol was not significantly associated with any improvement in ADR (RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.74–1.10, p=0.30), detection of any adenoma (RR=0.93, 95% CI 0.75–1.14, p=0.47), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (RR=1.20, 95%CI 0.90–1.60, p=0.22), polyp detection rate (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.90–1.11, p=0.99), or cecal intubation rate (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.80–1.26, p=0.99).

Conclusions

The use of propofol sedation does not improve colonoscopy quality metrics.

Funding Agencies

None

A218 THE RISK OF RECURRENT HEPATOCELLULAR CARDINOMA IN POST-LIVER TRANSPLANT PATIENTS RECEIVING CAPECITABINE TREATMENT

Background

Little is known on how to reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence post liver transplantation (LT). We examined if adjuvant oral Capecitabine reduces the risk of recurrent HCC in a high-risk group post-LT.

Aims

To examine if adjuvant oral Capecitabine reduces the risk of recurrent HCC in a high-risk group post-LT.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed from a pre-existing liver transplant database from the Liver Transplant Unit at London Health Sciences Center, London; Canada. This database contains demographic, clinical parameters and follow-up of all patients transplanted for HCC. Data was extracted for patients who underwent LT between January 2000 – April 2018 and included follow up until May 31^st, 2020. High-risk of tumor recurrence was defined as a RETREAT score ≥5 or PARFITT score ≥10.5. Log rank test compared the recurrence of HCC or death among patients who were and were not prescribed Capecitabine.

Results

Out of 168 LT for HCC, 25 patients were identified as high-risk group for recurrence. The median age was 63 years (IQR=60–65). 19 (76%) patients had viral hepatitis including Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C as their primary disease while 4 (16%) patients had NASH. The remaining 2 (8%) patients had Autoimmune Hepatitis. 7 (28%) patients received Capecitabine while 18 (72%) did not. All patients were followed for a median of 22 months (IQR=8.9–57.5). No statistical significance difference was found between the two groups with respect to HCC recurrence or death (p=0.56).

Conclusions

Among patients with high risk features for recurrence of HCC, adding Capecitabine therapy added to conventional immunosuppression had no overall effect on reducing overall tumor recurrence or survival.

Funding Agencies

None

A3 TREATMENT IN DISPROPORTIONATELY MINORITY HOSPITALS IS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INCREASED MORTALITY IN END STAGE LIVER DISEASE

Background

Racial and ethnic disparities continue to remain a barrier in delivery of health care across the United States. Care for minority patients tends to be clustered into a small number of providers at minority hospitals, which has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in several conditions. However, the outcomes of treatment in end stage liver disease (ESLD) patients at predominately minority hospitals is unknown.

Aims

To evaluate in-hospital mortality rate among ESLD patients treated in minority hospitals compared to non-minority hospitals.

Methods

We utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to conduct a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis. All patients &gt;18 years of age admitted with ESLD were included in the analysis. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to study the mortality rate among ESLD patients treated at minority hospitals compared to ESLD patients treated at non-minority hospitals.

Results

A total of 53,281,467 hospitalizations from the 2008–2014 NIS sample were analyzed. There were 163,470 patients with ESLD that met inclusion criteria. There were 10,178 (6.2%) and 31,226 (19.1%) ESLD patients treated at Black and Hispanic minority hospitals, respectively. In hospital mortality rate for all races were 8.0% and 8.1% in Black and Hispanic minority hospitals, respectively, compared to 7.3% in non-minority hospitals (p&lt;0.01). On multivariate analysis, treatment of ESLD in Black and Hispanic minority hospitals were associated with a 11% (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03–1.20; p&lt;0.01) and 22% (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.09–1.37; p&lt;0.01) increased odds of death, respectively, compared to treatment in a non-minority hospital regardless of patient race.

Conclusions

ESLD patient treated at minority hospital are faced with an increased mortality rate regardless of a patients race. The current study highlights a quality gap that needs improvement to effect overall survival among ESLD patients.

Funding Agencies

None

Treatment Modalities to Manage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Vein Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) have poor outcomes and an effective treatment strategy has not been established. The aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of available treatment options in preventing mortality.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2007 to 2022. Articles were screened to identify studies of HCC patients with PVT that reported on all-cause mortality using radical intent treatments. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool (ROBINS-1). Mortality rates at prespecified timepoints between 6 and 24 months were extracted and summarized using a random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model. This review was registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42022290708).

RESULTS

The impact of radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) is similar to all other treatments including sorafenib. When comparing sorafenib to local modalities (Y90 and RT), the local treatments had a better OS (OR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.11 - 4.39), but this difference disappeared after 6-months. Indeed, within 6 months, Y90 provided the best OS. No significant differences were noticed from 12 to 24 months. Combination treatments appeared to provide a significant additional OS benefit with TACE+RT having an improved OS over TACE alone and RT alone, with the benefit extending to 24 months.

CONCLUSION

this analysis of HCC patients with PVT reports on six cohorts, with a total sample size of 2,356 patients. The addition of localized treatment to systemic treatment appears to improve survival. Combining TACE and RT was also better than either modality alone. Further investigations should be conducted, to further understand the role of localized treatments.

A120 NO EVIDENCE OF A FRIDAY EFFECT ON COLONOSCOPY QUALITY OUTCOMES

Background

Colonoscopy quality may be influenced by operator fatigue. Prior studies have shown lower adenoma detection rates for procedures performed at the end of the day. However, it is unknown if colonoscopy quality is impaired at the end of the work week.

Aims

We investigated whether colonoscopy quality-related metrics differ at the end of the work week using the South West Ontario Colonoscopy Cohort.

Methods

Between April 2017 to February 2018, 45,510 consecutive colonoscopies from 20 academic and community hospitals in our health region were captured to form the cohort. In Canada, outpatient endoscopies are generally performed between Monday to Friday, taking Friday, or the last business day, as the last day of the work week compared to the rest of the work week. When a statutory holiday occurred on a Friday, Thursday was designated the last day of the work week. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), and secondary outcomes were sessile serrated polyp detection rate (ssPDR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and failed cecal intubation. Outcomes were presented as unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios derived from modified Poisson regression and adjusting for physician-level clustering, and characteristics of the patient (age, sex, severity), procedure (hospital setting, trainee presence, indication, sedation, bowel preparation quality) and physician (experience and specialty).

Results

During the observation period, 9,132 colonoscopies were performed on the last day of the work week compared to 36,378 procedures during the rest of the work week. No significant difference was observed for ADR (26.4% vs. 26.6%, p=0.75), ssPDR (4.5% vs. 5.0%, p=0.12), PDR (44.1% vs. 43.1%, p=0.081), or failed cecal intubation (2.8% vs. 2.9%, p=0.51) for colonoscopies performed on the last day of the work week compared to the rest of the week, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, there were no significant differences in the ADR (RR 1.01, 95% CI [0.88, 1.15], p=0.94), ssPDR (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.70, 1.14], p=0.38), PDR (RR 1.00, 95% CI [0.92, 1.09], p=0.94), or failed cecal intubation (RR 0.92, 95% CI [0.72, 1.18], p=0.51) for colonoscopies performed on the last day of the work week compared to the rest of week, respectively.

Conclusions

Colonoscopy quality metrics, including ADR, ssPDR, PDR, and failed cecal intubation are not significantly different at the end of the week.

Funding Agencies

None

A225 VACCINE-PREVENTABLE DISEASES IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE LIVER DISEASE/CIRRHOSIS: A NATIONWIDE COHORT ANALYSIS

Background

Cirrhosis is associated with immune dysfunction, which increases susceptibility to infection and subsequent hospitalization. Vaccination of this high-risk patient population can mitigate the risk of infection.

Aims

Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was analyzed to compare the prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) among hospitalized patients both with and without cirrhosis.

Methods

The 2013 NIS database was interrogated using ICD-9-CM codes to identify patients with cirrhosis and VPD. Baseline characteristics were compared (see: Table 1). Univariate and multivariate regression models identified risks associated with VPD adjusting for survey procedures.

Results

313,710 patients were hospitalized for VPD, including 13,080 patients (4.1%) with cirrhosis (see: Table 1) Patients with cirrhosis were more likely to be hospitalized with pneumococcal pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45 [95% CI 1.29 – 1.63], P <0.001), hepatitis A (OR = 7.04 [95% CI 5.96 – 8.31], P <0.001) and hepatitis B (OR = 14.41 [95% CI 12.53 – 14.36], P <0.001) infections compared to patients without liver cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis were less likely to have an infection with influenza (OR = 0.55 [95% CI 0.49 – 0.62], P <0.001), human papillomavirus (HPV) (OR = 0.57 [95% CI 0.43 – 0.75, P < 0.001) and varicella zoster (OR = 0.78 [95% CI 0.69 – 0.89], P <0.001). Minimal differences in hospitalizations for haemophilus influenzae or meningococcal infections were noted between groups.

Odds ratios for VPD adjusting for age, sex, race, patient location, patient income, hospital type and bed-size, mortality risk, type 2 diabetes mellitus, malignancy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), organ transplantation and immunodeficiency:

pneumococcal pneumonia (OR = 1.27 [95% CI 1.13 – 1.44], P < 0.001), hepatitis A (OR = 5.99 [95% CI 5.02 – 7.15], P < 0.001); and hepatitis B (OR = 11.07 [95% CI 10.24 – 11.97], P < 0.001).

Conclusions

These results emphasize the importance of vaccinating patients with cirrhosis against pneumococcal pneumonia, hepatitis A and hepatitis B infections to reduce hospitalization

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients with cirrhosis and without cirrhosis presenting with a vaccine preventable disease.

Funding Agencies

None