Automated immunohistochemical estrogen receptor in fixed embedded breast carcinomas

The authors immunohistochemically assessed the presence of estrogen receptor (ER) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 68 breast carcinomas by an automated method using Pronase (CalBiochem, La Jolla, CA) predigestion and alkaline phosphatase detection (Method 1). These results were compared with those obtained by an automated peroxidase-antiperoxidase method with DNAse pretreatment of fixed embedded sections (Method 2), with ER immunostain on frozen sections (Method 3), and with biochemical results (dextran-coated charcoal cytosolic [DCC] assay). Compared with the DCC assay, Methods 1, 2, and 3 gave sensitivities of 54%, 25%, and 89%, respectively. The sensitivity for Method 1 was increased to 74% in those cases with DCC results showing greater than 50 fmol/mg protein. These findings indicate that ER immunohistochemical studies on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (as assayed by Method 1) provide useful clinical information when the results are positive. A negative result, especially if surrounding normal elements are not positive, may indicate no receptors, receptor levels less than 50 fmol/mg protein, or improper tissue preservation. In the absence of fresh tissue for ER assay by DCC assay or of frozen sections for immunostaining, and with an understanding of its limitations, this method may be useful.

Image analysis for quantitation of estrogen receptor in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of breast carcinoma

Monoclonal antibody to human estrogen receptor (ER) provides a useful immunohistochemical tool for the evaluation of ER content in breast carcinoma, but visual interpretation is subjective. Computer-assisted image analysis has proved effective in immunohistochemical quantitation of ER in fresh tumor imprints and cryostat sections. We examined the usefulness of this technique in 5-microns-thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 66 cases of primary breast carcinoma previously assayed by dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) analysis. Immunohistochemistry was automated and performed on a Code-on slide stainer (Instrumentation Laboratories, Lexington, MA) using Pronase predigestion, a monoclonal antibody (ER-ICA; Abbott, Chicago, IL), and a biotin-labeled secondary antibody. Detection was achieved with an avidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate and nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) bromochloroindoyl phosphate (BCIP) substrate. The immunohistochemical ER staining was analyzed visually and with the CAS/200 image analyzer (Elmhurst, IL). The visual semiquantitative histologic scores (HSCORE), the automated quantitative assays including the percentage of positive nuclear areas (PNA), and the quantitative immunocytochemical scores (QIC SCORE = PNA x % of positive stain/10) were compared with the corresponding DCC results. Linear correlations were demonstrated between all immunohistochemical assays and the logarithm of DCC, the strongest correlation seen with PNA (r = 0.91). Threshold points for positive HSCORE, QIC SCORE, and PNA assays were extrapolated using DCC as the reference. ER immunodetection by PNA as compared with visual examination alone was enhanced by 18% (up to 88%) in sensitivity and 34% (up to 94%) in specificity, and the DCC concordance rate increased by 26% (up to 91%). A comparative chart extrapolating DCC from PNA was thus established.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Automated immunohistochemical estrogen receptor in fixed embedded breast carcinomas. Comparison with manual immunohistochemistry on frozen tissues

Estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast carcinomas determines prognosis and treatment. Biochemical ER assays are expensive and time-consuming and require fresh tumor. Immunohistochemical ER was assessed in 68 breast carcinomas, by an automated method using routinely processed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, and manually with the use of snap-frozen tissues with a monoclonal anti-ER and peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique. The paraffin sections were digested with DNase to enhance development of signal. Positive nuclear ER was obtained in 9 (13%) fixed tissues and 36 (53%) frozen tissues. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a positive test result, as compared with the biochemical assay, were 25%, 100%, and 100% for the paraffin section technique, and 89%, 88%, and 89% for the frozen sections. Although it is specific, lack of sensitivity, resulting from loss of ER with fixation and room temperature handling, renders this immunohistochemical technique unacceptable on fixed tissues. However, ER immunostain on frozen tissue is an acceptable alternative to biochemical assay.