[Ethical recommendations for a difficult decision-making in intensive care units due to the exceptional situation of crisis by the COVID-19 pandemia: A rapid review & consensus of experts]

Ante la situación excepcional de salud pública provocada por la pandemia por COVID-19, desde el grupo de ética de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) se ha promovido un trabajo de consenso con el objetivo de encontrar algunas respuestas desde la ética a la encrucijada entre el incremento de personas con necesidades de atención intensiva y la disponibilidad efectiva de medios.

En un periodo muy corto de tiempo se ha cambiado el marco de ejercicio de la medicina hacia un escenario de «medicina de catástrofe», con el consecuente cambio en los parámetros de toma de decisiones. En este contexto la asignación de recursos o la priorización de tratamiento pasan a ser elementos cruciales, y es importante contar con un marco de referencia ético para poder tomar las decisiones clínicas necesarias. Para ello, se ha realizado un proceso de revisión narrativa de la evidencia, seguida de un consenso de expertos no sistematizado, que ha tenido como resultado tanto la publicación de un documento de posicionamiento y recomendaciones de la propia SEMICYUC, como el consenso entre 18 sociedades científicas y 5 institutos/cátedras de bioética y cuidados paliativos de un documento marco de referencia de recomendaciones éticas generales en este contexto de crisis.

Ethics and empathy: The relationship between moral reasoning, ethical sensitivity and empathy in medical students

High-quality clinical practice includes not only improving clinicians' expertise in scientific and technical aspects but also managing values, ethical sensitivity and skills for assessing and dealing with ethical conflicts. The reviewed literature suggests the presence of an "ethical erosion", according to which ethical competence and empathy decrease or do not progress during medical training. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between ethics (moral reasoning and ethical sensitivity) and empathy in a group of medical students and to determine the relationship with other variables such as academic year and sex.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 193 medical students from different academic years, who were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Rest sociomoral dilemma test, clinical vignettes to measure ethical sensitivity (Problem Identification Test [PIT]) and a cognitive and emotional empathy test (test de empatía cognitiva y afectiva, TECA).

RESULTS

We found a direct and significant relationship between moral development, ethical sensitivity and greater empathy. We detected an increase in moral reasoning and ethical sensitivity among first and third-year students, with no increase between the third year and later academic years. There were no significant differences between these variables and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a correlation between moral reasoning, ethical sensitivity and empathy and a lack of progression of the first 2 variables in the last years of the medical degree.