1
|
Mendoza E, Cano-Ott D, Altstadt S, Andriamonje S, Andrzejewski J, Audouin L, Balibrea J, Bécares V, Barbagallo M, Bečvář F, Belloni F, Berthier B, Berthoumieux E, Billowes J, Boccone V, Bosnar D, Brugger M, Calviño F, Calviani M, Carrapiço C, Cerutti F, Chiaveri E, Chin M, Colonna N, Cortés G, Cortés-Giraldo M, Diakaki M, Dillmann I, Domingo-Pardo C, Durán I, Dzysiuk N, Eleftheriadis C, Fernández-Ordóñez M, Ferrari A, Fraval K, Furman V, Gómez-Hornillos M, Ganesan S, García A, Giubrone G, Gonçalves I, González E, Goverdovski A, Gramegna F, Griesmayer E, Guerrero C, Gunsing F, Gurusamy P, Heftrich T, Heinitz S, Hernández-Prieto A, Heyse J, Jenkins D, Jericha E, Käppeler F, Kadi Y, Karadimos D, Katabuchi T, Ketlerov V, Khryachkov V, Koehler P, Kokkoris M, Kroll J, Krtička M, Lampoudis C, Langer C, Leal-Cidoncha E, Lederer C, Leeb H, Leong L, Lerendegui-Marco J, Licata M, Losito R, Manousos A, Marganiec J, Martínez T, Massimi C, Mastinu P, Mastromarco M, Mengoni A, Milazzo P, Mingrone F, Mirea M, Mondelaers W, Paradela C, Pavlik A, Perkowski J, Plompen A, Praena J, Quesada J, Rauscher T, Reifarth R, Riego-Perez A, Robles M, Roman F, Rubbia C, Ryan J, Sabaté-Gilarte M, Sarmento R, Saxena A, Schillebeeckx P, Schmidt S, Schumann D, Sedyshev P, Tagliente G, Tain J, Tarifeño-Saldivia A, Tarrío D, Tassan-Got L, Tsinganis A, Valenta S, Vannini G, Variale V, Vaz P, Ventura A, Vermeulen M, Versaci R, Vlachoudis V, Vlastou R, Wallner A, Ware T, Weigand M, Weiss C, Wright T, Žugec P. Measurement of the 241Am neutron capture cross section at the n_TOF facility at CERN. EPJ Web Conf 2017. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714611022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
2
|
Berglöf C, Fernández-Ordóñez M, Villamarín D, Bécares V, González-Romero EM, Bournos V, Serafimovich I, Mazanik S, Fokov Y. Spatial and Source Multiplication Effects on the Area Ratio Reactivity Determination Method in a Strongly Heterogeneous Subcritical System. NUCL SCI ENG 2017. [DOI: 10.13182/nse09-87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. Berglöf
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Reactor Physics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - D. Villamarín
- CIEMAT, Nuclear Innovation Group, Avda. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - V. Bécares
- CIEMAT, Nuclear Innovation Group, Avda. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Victor Bournos
- National Academy of Sciences, Joint Institute for Power and Nuclear Research, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Ivan Serafimovich
- National Academy of Sciences, Joint Institute for Power and Nuclear Research, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Sergei Mazanik
- National Academy of Sciences, Joint Institute for Power and Nuclear Research, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Yurii Fokov
- National Academy of Sciences, Joint Institute for Power and Nuclear Research, Minsk, Belarus
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fernández-Ordóñez M, Tenías JM, Picazo-Yeste J. [Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in the surgical treatment of inguinal hernia. Cost-effectiveness analysis]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 61:254-61. [PMID: 24529683 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2013.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Revised: 11/19/2013] [Accepted: 11/28/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the costs related to the clinical effectiveness of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia in inguinal hernioplasty ambulatory surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS An observational, retrospective cohort study measurement and analysis of cost-effectiveness, in the ambulatory surgery unit of a general hospital. All patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with primary inguinal hernia and scheduled for unilateral hernioplasty between January 2010 and December 2011 were included. Duration of anesthetic induction, length of stay in both the operating room, and in the post-anesthesia care unit, the anesthetic effectiveness (the incidence of adverse effects and the patient's comfort level), and variable economic costs associated with the use of drugs, as well as the use of human resources, were compared. RESULTS The final analysis included 218 patients, 87.2% male, with a mean age of 53 years (range: 18-85 years). Of these, 139 (63.76%) received subarachnoid anesthesia and 79,(36.2%) general anesthesia. The length of time a patient remained in the post-anesthesia care unit was 337.6±160.2min in the subarachnoid anesthesia group, and 210.0±97.5min for the general anesthesia group (P<.001). Costs of drugs for general anesthesia were higher than that for subarachnoid anesthesia (86.2±8.3 vs. 18.7±7.2). The total cost difference between the 2 techniques was €115.8 more for subarachnoid anesthesia (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Both techniques showed similar effectiveness. The overall costs for subarachnoid anesthesia were greater than for the general. The cost-effectiveness of general anesthesia is better for outpatient inguinal hernia repair surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fernández-Ordóñez
- Departamento de Investigación, Docencia y Formación, Complejo Hospitalario Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, España.
| | - J M Tenías
- Departamento de Investigación, Docencia y Formación, Complejo Hospitalario Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, España
| | - J Picazo-Yeste
- Departamento de Cirugía, Complejo Hospitalario Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, España
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chiaveri E, Calviani M, Vlachoudis V, Weis C, Andriamonje S, Andrzejewski J, Audouin L, Avrigeanu F, Barbagallo M, Bécares V, Beĉvář F, Belloni F, Berthoumieux E, Billowes J, Boccone V, Brugger M, Calviño F, Cano-Ott D, Carrapiço C, Cerutti F, Chin M, Colonna N, Cortés G, Cortés-Giraldo M, Diakaki M, Dillmann I, Domingo-Pardo C, Duran I, Dzysiuk N, Eleftheriadis C, Fernández-Ordóñez M, Ferrari A, Fraval K, Ganesan S, Giubrone G, Gómez-Hornillos M, Gonçalves I, González-Romero E, Gramegna F, Griesmayer E, Guerrero C, Gunsing F, Heil M, Jenkins D, Jericha E, Kadi Y, Käppeler F, Karadimos D, Kokkoris M, Krtička M, Kroll J, Lederer C, Leeb H, Leong L, Losito R, Lozano M, Manousos A, Marganiec J, Martinez T, Massimi C, Mastinu P, Mastromarco M, Meaze M, Mendoza E, Mengoni A, Milazzo P, Mirea M, Paradela C, Pavlik A, Perkowski J, Praena J, Quesada J, Rauscher T, Reifarth R, Riego A, Roman F, Rubbia C, Sarmento R, Tagliente G, Tain J, Tarrio D, Tassan-Got L, Tsinganis A, Valenta S, Vannini G, Variale V, Vaz P, Ventura A, Vermeulen M, Versaci R, Vlastou R, Wallner A, Ware T, Wright T. Present status and future programs of the n_TOF experiment. EPJ Web of Conferences 2012. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20122103001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|