Sacubitril/valsartan therapy and supraventricular arrhythmias detected through remote monitoring in heart failure patients

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) has demonstrated a significant benefit in decreasing mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) when compared to angiotensin inhibition. Recent studies demonstrated that the benefits of S/V encompass a positive cardiac remodeling, leading to a reduction of ventricular arrhythmias. The effect of S/V on the supraventricular arrhythmic burden is still unknown. 

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the supraventricular arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) and remote monitoring. 

Methods

The SAVE THE RHYTHM is a multicentre, observational, prospective registry is enrolling all patients with HFrEF, ICD or CRT-D actively followed through remote monitoring and starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. All patients are followed-up at least one year after sacubitril/valsartan start. The primary endpoint is the number of sustained atrial tachycardia or AF (AT/AF). Secondary endpoints include incidence of AT/AF in the total population, total burden of AT/AF (defined as the percentage of time in AT/AF per day), mean number of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) per hour and percentage of biventricular pacing per day (in patients with CRT-D).  All primary and secondary endpoints are collected through remote monitoring.

Results

At the time of the second ad interim analysis, 188 patients (85.2% male, age 68 ± 10 years) were consecutively enrolled. In patients without permanent AF, treatment with S/V was associated with a reduced incidence of AT/AF episodes,  which changed from 32.6% (before treatment start) to 24.3%, 20.5% and 6.9% according to the sacubitril/valsartan dose (24/26 mg, 49/51 mg and 97/103 mg respectively; p= 0.041). A significant decrease in the median annual number of AT/AF episodes was also seen in these patients (16/year before treatment; 12/year at 24/26 mg; 6/year at 49/51 mg and 1/year at 97/103 mg; p = 0.046). No significant differences were reported in terms of PVC or biventricular pacing (all p = NS). Patients with permanent AF experienced no benefits from sacubitril/valsartan therapy in terms of arrhythmic burden reduction. No new diagnosis of clinical AF was made after starting treatment with sacubitrl/valsartan in all patients.

Conclusions

Preliminary data suggest that therapy with S/V could reduce the episodes of AT/AF in patients with HFrEF and remote monitoring, and the benefit seems related to the maximum tolerated dose of S/V. No positive effect has been noted in patients with permanent AF.

Sacubitril/valsartan reduces atrial fibrillation and supraventricular arrhythmias in patients with HFrEF and remote monitoring: preliminary data from the SAVE THE RHYTHM

Background

Sacubitril/valsartan, the first combined angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, has demonstrated a significant benefit compared to angiotensin inhibitor in decreasing ventricular arrhythmias and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). At present, there is no study which evaluates the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the supraventricular arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients with an ICD or cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) and remote monitoring.

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the supraventricular arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients with an ICD or CRTD and remote monitoring.

Methods

The SAVETHERHYTHM ((SAacubitril Valsartan rEal-world registry evaluating THE arRHYTHMia burden in HFrEF patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator) is a multicentre, observational, prospective registry enrolling all patients with HFrEF, ICD or CRT-D actively followed through remote monitoring and starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. All patients are followed-up for at least one year after sacubitril/valsartan start. The primary endpoint is the mean number of sustained atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) episodes per month. Secondary endpoints include the total burden of AT/AF (defined as the percentage of time in AT/AF per day), the mean number of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) per hour and the percentage of biventricular pacing per day (in patients with CRT-D). All primary and secondary endpoints are collected through remote monitoring.

Results

At the time of the first ad interim analysis, 60 patients (85.2% male, age 69±10 years) were consecutively enrolled. After treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, patients with at least one episode of AT/AF per month decreased from 32.8% to 21.3% (p=0.015). A significant decrease in number of AT/AF episodes (from 4.3 to 1.2 per year), in AT/AF burden (from 12% to 9%) and in number of PVC (from 83 to 74 per hour) were seen in patients with a previous diagnosis of paroxysmal or persistent AF (n=15; all p<0.05). Patients with permanent AF (n=7) experienced no benefits from sacubitril/valsartan therapy in terms of arrhythmic burden reduction. Patients with no previous history of AF (n=38) showed a decrease in number of AT/AF episodes (from 2.0 to 0.8 per year) and in number of PVC (from 77 to 49 per hour, all p<0.05). No new diagnosis of clinical AF was made after starting treatment with sacubitrl/valsartan, and patients with subclinical AT/AF episodes decreased from 8% to 3%.

Conclusions

Preliminary data suggest that therapy with sacubitril/valsartan could decrease arrhythmic burden in patients with non-permanent AF and reduce subclinical AT/AF episodes in patients with no history of AF. No positive effect has been noted in patients with permanent AF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

[An independent observatory in Vendée on ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction (the OVISCA Register). A Departmental evaluation of demographic trends, mortality and delays before treatment]

AIM

Mortality from acute myocardial infarction has been falling during the past 30 years. The aim of the study was to evaluate the temporal trends of demographics, mortality rates, and time to treatment in patients admitted for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Vendée.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2008 to 2016, 1994 patients hospitalised in CHD Vendée for STEMI <48hours were included. Two groups were compared, 838 patients admitted between 2008 and 2011 (group 1), and 1156 admitted between 2013 and 2016 (group 2).

RESULTS

Between the 2 periods, mean age was comparable (63.8 vs. 64.4 years), the gender ratio decreased (from 3.15 to 2.79 ; P=0.25). The mean duration of hospital stay was 0.8 day shorter (P=0.008). Treatment at discharge was optimum in 97.5% patients versus 92% (P<0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction was comparable (50.6% vs. 50.2%). There was a non-significant trend to a decrease in hospital mortality (from 6.3% to 4.4%; p=0.12), and 6-month mortality (from 6.9% to 5.9%; P=0.51). There was a reduction in the use of emergency call-outs (74.9% to 68.9%; P<0.01), but an increase in direct presentations from 44% to 48.7% (P<0.05). The time before calling was comparable (2.5hours vs. 2.3hours; P=04.7). The "door-to-balloon" time decreased (0.71 vs. 0.55hour; P<0.001). The mean time between pain and angioplasty increased (5.7 vs. 6.8hours; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In vendee, from 2011 to 2016, hospital and 6-month mortality of STEMI trend to decrease non-significantly. The door to balloon time decreased, although emergency call-out rates and delays did not. Considerable efforts are still required with respect to patient information and education. Our registry offers an excellent tool to improve practices, the aim being to ensure its integration in the CRAC-France PCI registry.

Osteoporosis prevention: where are the barriers to improvement in a French general population? A qualitative study

We conducted a qualitative study with French men and women in order to provide insight into individuals' experiences, behaviors, and perceptions about osteoporosis (OP) and OP care. The data showed that both sexes, but especially men, were unfamiliar with OP, did not always feel concerned, and mistrusted pharmacological treatments.

INTRODUCTION

To engage actively in osteoporosis (OP) prevention, people need to have basic knowledge about the disease. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore knowledge and representations of OP care and prevention among both men and women.

METHODS

Focus groups were conducted in the Rhône-Alpes Region, France, with women aged 50-85 years and men aged 60-85 years, with or without a history of fragility fracture and/or an OP diagnosis (respectively referred to as "aware" or "unaware"). A total of 45 women (23 "aware" and 22 "unaware" in 5 and 4 focus groups, respectively) and 53 men (19 "aware" and 34 "unaware" in 3 and 4 focus groups, respectively) were included. A thematic analysis of transcripts was performed to explore knowledge and representations about OP, risk factors, prevention, and treatment.

RESULTS

The data showed that both sexes, but especially men, had limited knowledge of OP and considered it as a natural aging process not related to fragility fractures. They generally did not feel concerned by OP and no important difference was observed between "aware" and "unaware" patients. Women expressed their fear of the disease, associated with aging and the end of life, while men considered it to be a women's disease only. Both sexes were aware of OP risk factors, but were suspicious towards treatments because of the associated side effects.

CONCLUSION

Understanding people's representation of OP might help to provide patients with relevant information in order to optimize their preventive behavior and decrease the burden of the disease.