The first case of breast cancer in thalassemic patient: case report and review of literature

Thalassemias are genetic disorders characterized by decreased synthesis of one of the globin chains. Beta-thalassemia is caused by impairment in the production of beta-globin chains leaving the excess alpha chains unstable. With better treatment approaches and improvement in chelation therapy, thalassemic patients are living longer. As a consequence, new complications and associations with other conditions including malignancy have emerged. The occurrence of malignancies in thalassemia has rarely been reported, and our review of the literature revealed only few cases. We report the first case of a thalassemic patient developing breast cancer and discuss the possibility of a link between the two disease entities. This case is intended to alert physicians of the possibility of a malignancy in thalassemia patients.

Screening-detected breast carcinoma in a patient with Cowden syndrome

Cowden syndrome is a hereditary genetic disease whose incidence is still not precisely defined; it is due to a germline mutation in the PTEN gene. We reported a case of breast tumor caused by a PTEN gene mutation, which was detected within a National Screening Program; the diagnosis of Cowden syndrome was made on the basis of patient's particular clinical history. The identification of new genetic mutations has allowed clarification of some of the mechanisms that increase the risk of developing some types of tumors. Furthermore, new kind of mutations recently reported in the literature raise questions about their prognostic significance and how their carriers can be better screened, counseled and managed. These problematic issues will be encountered with increasing frequency in the near future, since many other more mutations are sure to be discovered. The PTEN gene mutation has been implicated in various human tumors, mainly in the breast and the thyroid gland. In the course of a screening program, the early identification of patients affected by a genetic mutation, which is rare, improves the definition of the prognosis and the therapeutic options.

Cisplatin, epirubicin, and lonidamine combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study

We assessed the activity and tolerability of a cisplatin, epirubicin, and lonidamine combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy in 28 advanced breast cancer patients. The schedule of treatment was as follows: 60 mg/ m2 epirubicin followed by 40 mg/m2 cisplatin given on days 1 and 2 every 21 days, with 450 mg lonidamine being given per os (three tablets) on days of chemotherapy administration and in the period intervening between one cycle and the next. Patients received a median of 5 (range 1-6) cycles. Overall, 22 patients were evaluable for response and 28, for toxicity. Four patients refused to continue the treatment after the first course, one was lost to follow-up, and one died due to toxicity (septic shock). The incidence of grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting was found to be greater than that expected with epirubicin and lonidamine alone. The addition of cisplatin resulted in an increase in platelet and hemoglobin toxicities, whereas the WBC toxicity did not differ from that expected with epirubicin and lonidamine. The hematological toxicity was found to be cumulative, leading to treatment delay in about 50% of patients at the fifth and sixth courses. The activity of this cytotoxic regimen was noteworthy, with the overall response rate being 81.8% (31.8% complete responses and 50.0% partial responses) in evaluable patients. This response rate decreased to 64.2% when all registered patients were included according to an intent-to-treat analysis. In conclusion, the association of cisplatin, epirubicin, and lonidamine given on the schedule described herein, appears to be very active but substantially toxic. We are now testing this combination in a randomized comparison, with the cisplatin dose being reduced to 30 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 2.

Prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer patients obtaining objective response or disease stabilization after first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin. Evidence for a positive effect of maintenance hormonal therapy on overall survival

Randomized trials suggest that the outcome of metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients is not affected by the currently available therapies. Although response rates per se may be associated with survival prolongation, patients experiencing objective response may be those patients fated to have the longest natural disease history. The separation of responders from progressing patients after first-line chemotherapy could allow the selection of a more homogeneous subgroup in which further treatment strategies might achieve a better control of the disease. This study investigated the influence of some patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and previous treatments on the outcome of non progressing patients after first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin administration. We also evaluated the effect of the maintenance endocrine therapy in improving response rate and overall survival (OS). From May 91 to May 93, 207 patients were enrolled in a randomized trial aiming to compare the activity of epirubicin (120 mg/sqm) +/- lonidamine (600 mg/daily). Among the 169 patients attaining complete (CR), partial response (PR) or disease stabilization (SD), 65 were not randomly submitted to maintenance endocrine therapy (MET). Liver involvement, previous adjuvant chemotherapy and previous hormonal therapy (administered in adjuvant setting or for advanced disease) were found to negatively influence OS both in univariate and multivariate analysis. Differences in OS stratifying patients according to DFI, estrogen receptor status and PS did not attain statistical significance. Patients receiving MET survived significantly longer than those submitted to observation and this difference maintained the statistical significance also within patient subsets homogeneous for specific prognostic features. In conclusion, most prognostic factors for advanced BC have been confirmed in our series of patients obtaining CR, PR or SD to full dose epirubicin. The positive prognostic impact of MET is impressive and deserves confirmation in randomized studies.

Lonidamine significantly increases the activity of epirubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer: results from a multicenter prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

Some evidence in vitro and in vivo shows that lonidamine (LND) can positively modulate the activity of doxorubicin and epirubicin (EPI). On this basis, a multicenter prospective randomized trial was performed in patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) to determine if the addition of LND to EPI could increase the response rate of EPI alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 1991 to May 1993, 207 patients were enrolled onto this study and randomized to receive intravenous (IV) EPI (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) alone or with LND (600 mg orally daily). EPI administration was repeated every 21 days until tumor progression or for a maximum of eight cycles. LND was administered continuously until chemotherapy withdrawal.

RESULTS

Response rate was significantly superior for the EPI plus LND scheme compared with the single-agent EPI either considering assessable patients (60.0% v 39.8%; P < .01) or including all registered patients according to an intention-to-treat analysis (55.3% v 37.5%; P < .02). The distribution of the response rate according to the site of disease did not show any significant difference between the treatment arms, except for the patient subgroup with liver metastases in which the combination EPI plus LND resulted in a significant improvement of responses than EPI alone. Toxicity was moderate, and except for myalgia, no adjunctive side effects were observed in the EPI plus LND arm. Overall survival and time to progression were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms in vivo that the administration of EPI is enhanced by the concomitant LND administration.

[Diagnostic imaging in non-palpable breast lesions. Targeted++ ultrasonography versus direct radiologic magnification]

The main target of mammography in asymptomatic women is the early diagnosis, or rather the identification, of non-palpable breast cancers. Doubtful or suspicious findings on conventional mammograms with no clinical evidence call for radiologic or other complementary imaging techniques to assess the exact lesion nature. Direct magnification and US are targeted techniques to employ as additional investigations after conventional mammography. Fifty consecutive patients were referred to our department of radiology for the preoperative localization of non-palpable breast lesions previously identified on conventional mammograms. The diagnostic or complementary roles of direct magnification and of US were thus investigated. US was always repeated during the preoperative localization; a 10-MHz immersion sectorial probe was used. Magnification was performed if absent or poor in conventional mammograms. The contribution of each technique to conventional mammography was graded as valuable (A), medium (B), or null (C). The lesions were grouped according to their structure: microcalcifications (a), nodules (b), scars (c), and complex lesions (a+b, a+c, b+c, ecc.). Six cases are included in our series which had been diagnosed as questionable or suspicious on previous mammograms. In our department, they were diagnosed as benign. Two of them were operated on because biopsy was required by the gynecologist and the other underwent stereotaxic FNB: negative cytology was considered the final diagnosis. Forty-six histologic and 4 cytologic examinations diagnosed 25 malignant and 25 benign lesions. Direct magnification was of great value in all cases, whereas US was useless in microcalcifications and useful in nodular or complex lesions, especially those with a nodular component. However, the incidence of US false-negatives was high, even in very suspicious cases on mammography, which suggests that US negativity cannot be considered an adequate sign to rule malignancy out.