Results of a hybrid cardiovascular rehabilitation program (in-hospital plus home) in patients with low income

Background

One of the main problems facing cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) is patient care and adherence. However, due to the low level of economic income of the patients who are cared for in our center, the possibility of going to CR in a conventional way is very difficult since they do not have the necessary resources to cover transportation, cost of the sessions, among others.

It has been shown that the greater the number of sessions attended by the patient, the greater the reduction in cardiovascular risk, however the role of a hybrid program with a decreased number of face-to-face sessions has not been established.

Purpose

Present the results of a hybrid training program (in-hospital plus home) in a low-income population. Education through supervised sessions plus home physical training in a patient with bases for exercise can improve their adherence with better results.

Methods

A cohort of patients with heart disease who were referred to the Cardiovascular Rehabilitation program between May 2017 and February 2019 was included. The socioeconomic level was classified into 6 strata according to occupation, income, housing, economic dependents, place of origin and family health status. After risk stratification, the patients participated in a hybrid program that consisted of 6 in-hospital sessions, once a week, in which the training to be carried out at home was prescribed by means of a triptych. An exercise test was performed before and after completing the program, as well as psychological and nutritional intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0 software. All p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

In the study period, of the total number of patients discharged for heart disease from the hospital, 61% were referred to cardiovascular rehabilitation, of which only 45% (n=39) completed the program, the reasons for dropping out were multiple and the lowest socioeconomic level (1) was the most frequent (figure 1). The main referral diagnosis was ischemic heart disease in 82%. The majority of patients were men, 95%. A significant improvement was observed in load METs, maximum heart rate, heart rate recovery (figure 2).

Conclusion

The implementation of a hybrid cardiovascular rehabilitation program (in-hospital + home) was associated with an improvement in the exercise test parameters of patients who successfully completed the program.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

P639Benefits and safety of exercise training in patients with severe three coronary vessels disease

Background

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in the world. Nowadays, there are still patients with untreatable coronary obstructions and exercise therapy could be an option to improve their quality of life and probably diminish mortality. Cardiac rehabilitation programs are recommended worldwide due its effectiveness and safety. However very high risk patients are often not included.

Purpose

To evaluate the benefit and safety of exercise therapy as a part of a cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with untreatable severe coronary heart disease.

Methods

A cohort of patients with coronary heart disease included in a cardiac rehabilitation program were studied. Those with severe coronary heart disease (Syntax score ≥33, group A) were identified. Patients were stratified using clinical records and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. They trained for 30 minutes, five times a week of aerobic exercise (cycle ergometer) and this therapy was complemented with general strength, coordination, balance and flexibility maneuvers. After twenty exercise sessions, a second cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed. Symptom limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing was undertaken using a ramp Balke protocol and cardiopulmonary variables were recorded. These patients were compared with their counterparts without severe coronary heart disease (Control group, group B). Studied variables were presented as frequencies (%), mean (SD), median (range) as appropriate. Comparisons between groups were made using chi square or paired T test as needed. All p values <0.05 were considered stochastically significant.

Results

From a total of 546 patients, seventy-one had severe coronary heart disease (Syntax score ≥33). There were no significant differences between groups on change of METs value and number of sessions assisted. No major adverse cardiovascular outcome was observed. The percentage of exercise induced arrhythmias was 75% in very high risk group vs 76% in control group, (p>0.05). Results are shown in table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics between groups Patients Group A (n=75) Group B (n=471) p value Assisted training sessions 15±7 14±6 ns Increment in MET (ml/kg/min) 1.32±1.34 1.35±1.56 ns Arrhythmias, n (%) 56 (75) 370 (76) ns Angor/ST depression, n (%) 11 (15) 15 (3) <0.01 Differences in workload (Watts) 20±13 22±13 ns

Conclusion

Exercise training could be performed in an effective and safe manner in patients with very high risk untreated coronary heart disease.