Gene regulatory potential of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) analogues with two side chains

The nuclear hormone 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)) acts through the transcription factor vitamin D receptor (VDR) via combined contact with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), coactivator proteins, and specific DNA binding sites (VDREs). Ligand-mediated conformational changes of the VDR are the core of the molecular switch of nuclear 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) signalling. Studying the interaction of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) analogues with this molecular switch should allow the characterization of their potential selective biological profile. A 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) analogue with two side chains (Ro27-2310 or Gemini) was found to stabilize functional VDR conformations and VDR-RXR heterodimers on a VDRE with a slightly lower sensitivity than the natural hormone. A 19-nor derivative of Gemini (Ro27-5646) showed similar sensitivity whereas 5,6-trans (Ro27-6462) 3-epi (Ro27-5840) and 1alpha-fluoro (Ro27-3752) derivatives were equal to each other, but approximately 30-times less sensitive than Gemini. A des-C,D derivative of Gemini (Ro28-1909) showed only residual activity at maximal concentrations. In contrast to 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3), Gemini and its derivatives showed a differential preference in stabilizing VDR conformations which was found to be modulated by DNA coactivator and corepressor proteins. An analysis of the gene regulatory potential of the VDR agonists in cellular reporter gene systems demonstrated the same ranking as in the in vitro systems, but Gemini and its 19-nor derivative were found to be more sensitive than 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) which indicates that the natural hormone is selectively metabolized. This study used straightforward methods for the in vitro and ex vivo evaluation of the gene regulatory potential of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) analogues. Gemini was highlighted as an interesting drug candidate which could not be optimized through obvious chemical modifications in its A-ring. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 36: 179-190, 2001.

Central role of VDR conformations for understanding selective actions of vitamin D(3) analogues

The vitamin D(3) receptor (VDR) acts primarily as a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) on different types of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)) response elements (VDREs). Therefore, DNA-bound VDR-RXR heterodimers can be considered as the molecular switches of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) signalling. Functional conformations of the VDR within these molecular switches appear to be of central importance for describing the biologic actions of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) and its analogues. Moreover, VDR conformations provide a molecular basis for understanding the potential selective profile of VDR agonists, which is critical for a therapeutic application. This review discusses VDR conformations and their selective stabilization by 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) and its analogues, such as EB1089 and Gemini, as a monomer in solution or as a heterodimer with RXR bound to different VDREs and complexed with coactivator or corepressor proteins.

Agonist-triggered modulation of the activated and silent state of the vitamin D(3) receptor by interaction with co-repressors and co-activators

The nuclear receptor for the hormone 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)), VDR, regulates gene expression via a ternary complex with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and a 1alpha, 25(OH)(2)D(3) response element (VDRE). This complex mediates transcriptional repression through interaction with co-repressor proteins, such as NCoR, and transactivation through agonist-triggered contacts with co-activator proteins, such as SRC-1. This study demonstrates that the interaction of the VDR with NCoR results in a preferential stabilization of the VDR in a non-agonistic conformation (silent state), whereas within a complex with SRC-1 VDR is in its agonistic conformation (activated state). Helix 12 of the ligand-binding domain of the VDR was found to be a critical sensor for the differential stabilization of the activated and silent state of the receptor. VDR agonists that showed similar sensitivity in inducing VDR-RXR-VDRE complex formation were found to mediate a different dose-dependent release of NCoR from these complexes, which correlates with their ability to stabilize the silent state of the VDR in the presence of NCoR. Interestingly, up to 50 % of all VDR-NCoR complexes were found to be stable even in the presence of saturating agonist concentrations. This was confirmed by a quenching effect of overexpressed NCoR on agonist-induced gene activity mediated by VDR-RXR heterodimers. Taken together, co-activator and co-repressor proteins antagonize each other in stabilizing the activated and silent state of the receptor and modulate in this way the sensitivity and potency of the transcriptional activation by the ligand-responsive transcription factor VDR.

Carboxylic ester antagonists of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) show cell-specific actions

BACKGROUND

The nuclear hormone 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)) acts through the transcription factor vitamin D receptor (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) receptor, VDR) via combined contact with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), coactivator proteins and specific DNA binding sites (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) response elements, VDREs). Ligand-mediated conformational changes of the VDR are the basis of the molecular mechanisms of nuclear 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) signaling. Cell-specific VDR antagonists would allow to dissect and fine regulate the pleiotropic 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) endocrine system affecting the regulation of calcium homeostasis, bone mineralization and other cellular functions.

RESULTS

Two carboxylic ester analogues of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3), ZK159222 and ZK168281, which have additional cyclopropyl rings and allylic alcohol substructures in their side chain, were characterized in different 1alpha, 25(OH)(2)D(3) target tissues as functional antagonists of 1alpha, 25(OH)(2)D(3) signaling. In all tested systems, ZK168281 showed lower residual agonistic activity and higher antagonistic effects than ZK159222, but the strength of these effects was cell-specific. Both antagonists were shown to act via the same mechanisms: they selectively stabilize an antagonistic conformation of the ligand-binding domain of the VDR within VDR-RXR-VDRE complexes, which then inhibits the interaction of the VDR with coactivator proteins and an induction of transactivation. Interestingly, cells that have been treated with antagonists were found to contain VDR-RXR heterodimers in a different conformation than cells that were stimulated with an agonist. Moreover, the strength of the functional antagonism of ZK159222 and ZK168281 appears to depend on the VDR/RXR expression ratio and high RXR levels were found to reduce the antagonistic effect of both compounds. In support of this observation, the overexpression of an transactivation function 2 (AF-2) deletion mutant of RXR resulted for both ZK159222 and ZK168281 in a reduced agonistic activity and an increased antagonistic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel, more potent VDR antagonist, ZK168281, was identified, which stabilizes VDR-RXR heterodimers in living cells in a different conformation than agonists. In addition, the VDR/RXR ratio was found as the major discriminating factor for understanding cell-specific effects of VDR antagonists.

VDR-Alien: a novel, DNA-selective vitamin D(3) receptor-corepressor partnership

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a transcription factor that transmits incoming 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)) signaling via combined contact with coactivator proteins and specific DNA binding sites (VDREs), which ultimately results in activation of transcription. In contrast, the mechanisms of transcriptional repression via the VDR are less well understood. This study documents VDR-dependent transcriptional repression largely via histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. Direct, ligand-sensitive protein-protein interaction of the VDR with the nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) and a novel corepressor, called Alien, was demonstrated to be comparable but independent of the VDR AF-2 trans-activation domain. Functional assays indicated that Alien, but not NCoR, displays selectivity for different VDRE structures for transferring these repressive effects into gene regulatory activities. Moreover, superrepression via Alien was found to be affected only in part by HDAC inhibitors such as trichostatin A. Finally, for a dissociation of VDR-Alien complexes in vitro and in vivo, higher ligand concentrations were needed than for a dissociation of VDR-NCoR complexes. This suggests that Alien and NCoR are using different interfaces for interaction with the VDR and different pathways for mediating superrepression, which in turn characterizes Alien as a representative of a new class of corepressors. Taken together, association of the VDR with corepressor proteins provides a further level of transcriptional regulation, which is emerging as a complex network of protein-protein interaction-mediated control.

Antagonistic action of a 25-carboxylic ester analogue of 1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is mediated by a lack of ligand-induced vitamin D receptor interaction with coactivators

A 25-carboxylic ester analogue of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)), ZK159222, was described as a novel type of antagonist of 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) signaling. The ligand sensitivity of ZK159222, in facilitating complex formation between 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) receptor (VDR) and the retinoid X receptor (RXR) on a 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) response element (VDRE), was approximately 7-fold lower when compared with 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3). However, ZK159222 was not able to promote a ligand-dependent interaction of the VDR with the coactivator proteins SRC-1, TIF2, and RAC3, neither in solution nor in a complex with RXR on DNA. Functional analysis in HeLa and COS-7 cells demonstrated a 10-100-fold lower ligand sensitivity for ZK159222 than for 1alpha, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) and, most interestingly, a potency that was drastically reduced compared with 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3). A cotreatment of 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) with a 100-fold higher concentration of ZK159222 resulted in a prominent antagonistic effect both in functional in vivo and in in vitro assays. These data suggest that the antagonistic action of ZK159222 is due to a lack of ligand-induced interaction of the VDR with coactivators with a parallel ligand sensitivity, which is sufficient for competition with the natural hormone for VDR binding.

Response element and coactivator-mediated conformational change of the vitamin D(3) receptor permits sensitive interaction with agonists

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is the nuclear receptor for 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)] that acts as a ligand-dependent transcription factor via combined contact with coactivator proteins (steroid receptor coactivator-1, transcriptional intermediary factor 2, and receptor associated coactivator 3) and specific DNA binding sites [vitamin D response elements (VDREs)]. Ligand-mediated conformational changes of the VDR contribute to the key mechanisms in this nuclear hormone signaling process. 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3), MC1288 [20-epi-1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)], ZK161422 [20-methyl-1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)], and Ro27-2310 (also called Gemini, having two side chains at carbon 20) were used as model VDR agonists. The analysis of agonist-induced VDR conformations and coactivator interactions were found to be insufficient for extrapolating in vivo activities. In DNA-independent assays, such as classical limited protease digestions and glutathione S-transferase pull downs, Gemini seemed to be up to 10,000-fold and the other VDR agonists 10- to 100-fold weaker than in functional in vivo assays. A more accurate description of the gene regulatory potential of VDR agonists was obtained with all tested VDR agonists by analyzing VDR conformations in the context of VDRE-bound VDR-retinoid X receptor heterodimers, in such assays as gel supershift, gel shift clipping, and limited protease digestion in the presence of DNA and cofactor. Coactivators were found to shift the ligand sensitivity (by a factor of 4 for Gemini) and the ratio of VDR conformations in the presence of DNA toward the high-affinity ligand binding conformation (c1(LPD)). In conclusion, the induction of response element- and coactivator-modulated VDR conformations appears to be a key step for the gene regulatory function of a VDR agonist. The quantification of these effects would be of central importance for the evaluation of the cell-specific efficacy of systemically applied 1alpha, 25(OH)(2)D(3) analogs.