Intrathecal low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine-clonidine combination in outpatient knee arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia for knee arthroscopy can be produced with a low dose of bupivacaine, but additional intrathecal drugs are often required to lower the risk of failed blocks. We investigated the effect of the addition of clonidine (0, 15 or 30 microg) to 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine on the duration of the motor block, analgesic quality and ability to void after the surgery in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients received spinal anesthesia using either 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (B5C0), 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine with 15 microg clonidine (B5C15) or 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine with 30 microg clonidine (B5C30). The primary outcome was the duration of the motor block. Secondary outcomes included the time until spontaneous voiding, and the need for additional analgesia or general anesthesia.

RESULTS

The mean time to complete regression of motor block was 70 (+/-43) min in group B5C0. Adding 15 and 30 microg of clonidine increased the motor block duration by 25 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2-48] and 34 (95% CI: 11-57) min, respectively, but resulted in better analgesic quality. The mean time until spontaneous voiding was 177 min in the B5C0 group. This time increased with 18 (95% CI -13 to 49) and 44 (95% CI 15-74) min in group B5C15 and group B5C30, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The addition of 15 microg clonidine to 5 mg of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine prolongs the duration of motor block and improves the quality of the block.

First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection is associated with higher morbidity rates than transhiatal esophagectomy. This morbidity rate could be reduced by the use of minimally invasive techniques. The feasibility of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RTE) with mediastinal lymphadenectomy was assessed prospectively.

METHODS

This study investigated 21 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RTE using the Da Vinci robotic system. Continuity was restored with a gastric conduit and a cervical anastomosis.

RESULTS

A total of 18 (86%) procedures were completed thoracoscopically. The operating time for the thoracoscopic phase was 180 min (range, 120-240 min), and the median blood loss was 400 ml (range, 150-700 ml). A median of 20 (range, 9-30) lymph nodes were retrieved. The median intensive care unit stay was 4 days (range, 1-129 days), and the hospital stay was 18 days (range, 11-182 days). Pulmonary complications occurred in 10 patients (48%), and one patient (5%) died of a tracheoneoesophageal fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

In this initial experience, robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy was found to be feasible, providing an effective lymphadenectomy with low blood loss. Standardization of the technique and increased experience should reduce the complication rate, which is in the range of the rate for open transthoracic dissection.

Interrater reliability of diagnosing complex regional pain syndrome type I

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) is based on clinical observation of symptoms. As little information is available on the reliability of CRPS I diagnosis, we evaluated the agreement between therapists with regard to the presence and severity of CRPS I and its symptoms.

METHODS

The interrater reliability was evaluated in 37 presumed CRPS I patients by three observers; one consultant anesthesiologist and two resident anesthesiologists. Patients were assessed on the basis of Veldman's CRPS criteria.

RESULTS

The interrater reliability for diagnosing CRPS I was good for the majority of observer combinations. The percentage of agreement for the absence or presence of CRPS I was good (88%-100%). Cohen's Kappa's ranged from 0.60 to 0.86. The agreement for the mean symptom score ranged from 70.2% to 88.6%; Kappa's were lower and showed more variation. Interrater reliability for assessment of the severity of CRPS I and its symptoms was poor. Factors influencing the interrater reliability were symptom type, individual observers and sample population.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosing CRPS I can be performed on the basis of clinical observation. Further assessment of severity of CRPS I and its symptoms should be performed with reliable and valid measurement instruments.