Comparison of edoxaban and enoxaparin in a rat model of AlCl3-induced thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus

Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT) is an uncommon disease that is usually treated with anticoagulation (heparin, low-molecular heparin, or vitamin K-antagonists). We compared treatment with edoxaban, an oral factor Xa-antagonist, that has not been approved in patients with CSVT, with enoxaparin, a well-established therapy, in a rat model of CSVT. Fifty male Wistar rats were randomized into 5 groups (10 animals each) and subjected to aluminum chloride (AlCl3)-induced thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) or sham procedure. Animals with thrombosis of the SSS were treated with edoxaban, enoxaparin, or placebo. Diagnostic workup included neurological examination, MRI imaging, MR-flow measurements of the SSS, and immunohistochemical staining. Neurological examination revealed no differences between treatment groups. Seven days after initial thrombosis, flow in the SSS was lower in the active treatment group as compared to sham-operated animals (p < 0.05). Flow in the SSS in the active treatment groups (edoxaban 1 h prior to thrombosis: 0.16 cm/s ± 0.06 cm/s; edoxaban 6 h after thrombosis: 0.13 cm/s ± 0.05 cm/s; enoxaparin: 0.13 cm/s ± 0.04 cm/s; placebo: 0.07 cm/s ± 0.02 cm/s) was higher as compared to placebo (p < 0.05), but there were no differences between the active treatment groups (p > 0.05). Immunohistochemical staining showed no differences in the actively treated animals. Edoxaban proved to be similar to enoxaparin in a model of experimental AlCl3-induced CSVT.

Transesophageal Echocardiography - Dysphagia Risk in Acute Stroke (TEDRAS): a prospective, blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dysphagia is common in acute stroke and leads to worse overall outcome. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used in the diagnostic evaluation of stroke with regard to its etiology and is a known cause of postoperative dysphagia in cardiac surgery. The prevalence of dysphagia in acute stroke patients undergoing TEE remains unknown. The aim of the Transesophageal Echocardiography - Dysphagia Risk in Acute Stroke (TEDRAS) study was to assess the influence of TEE on swallowing among patients who have experienced acute stroke.

METHODS

The TEDRAS study was a prospective, blind, randomized, controlled trial that included two groups of patients with acute stroke. Simple unrestricted randomization was performed, and examiners were blinded to each other's results. Swallowing was tested using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) at three different time points in the intervention group (24 h before, immediately after and 24 h after TEE) and in the control group (FEES on three consecutive days and TEE earliest after the third FEES). Validated scales were used to assess dysphagia severity for all time points as primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were randomized: 19 to the intervention group and 15 to the control group. The key findings of the repeated-measures between-group comparisons were significant increases in the intervention group for the following dysphagia measures: (1) secretion severity score (immediately after TEE: P < 0.001; 24 h after TEE: P < 0.001) and (2) Penetration-Aspiration Scale score for saliva (immediately after TEE: P < 0.001; 24 h after TEE: P = 0.007), for small (immediately after TEE: P = 0.009) and large liquid boli (immediately after TEE: P = 0.009; 24 h after TEE: P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate a negative influence of TEE on swallowing in acute stroke patients for at least 24 hours.