In situ expression of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 on langerhans cells and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells (IDEC) in atopic dermatitis

The functional expression of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells may be a key event in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). Recently, the expression of CD86 (B7-2/B70) has been demonstrated on CD1a+ epidermal dendritic cells (DC) in AD lesions by immunohistological and functional analysis. Therefore, we sought to further characterize the in situ expression of costimulatory molecules on these cells, considering the two subpopulations of (1) CD1a+++/CD11b- Langerhans cells (LC) containing Birbeck granules and (2) CD1a+/CD11b+++ inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells (IDEC), devoid of Birbeck granules, from AD and other inflammatory skin diseases. Flow cytometry, skin mixed lymphocyte reactions (SMLR) and immunohistological analysis were performed, and showed that IDEC and not LC are the relevant cells expressing the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 in situ. This expression varied with the underlying diagnosis, with AD showing the highest expression of both CD80 and CD86 in situ. Furthermore, the expression of CD80, CD86 and CD36 were significantly correlated. With short-term culture, both CD80 and CD86 were further upregulated on LC and IDEC. Finally, anti-CD86 antibody reduced the stimulatory activity of epidermal DC. These results indicate that costimulatory molecules on LC and IDEC might play a role in the pathogenesis of AD.

Phenotyping of epidermal dendritic cells allows the differentiation between extrinsic and intrinsic forms of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a clinically characteristic, chronic inflammatory skin disease of unknown origin. IgE-mediated uptake and antigen focusing of environmental allergens by dendritic cells (DCs) is assumed to be a central immunopathogenetic event. A so-called intrinsic type of AD (IAD) has been delineated from the more common extrinsic AD (EAD) by normal serum IgE levels, negative RAST tests and negative immediate-type skin reactions towards environmental allergens. The recently characterized human autoantigen Hom S 1 has been proposed to play a part in the pathogenesis of IAD.

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and laboratory data between patients with IAD and EAD, and to investigate potential differences in the inflammatory micromilieu of the epidermal compartment in IAD and EAD lesions.

METHODS

Epidermal DC phenotyping, a recently validated technique based on the three-colour flow cytometric analysis of Langerhans cells and the so-called inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells from epidermal single-cell suspensions, was performed on samples from 69 patients with AD (seven with IAD and 62 with EAD) and 94 controls.

RESULTS

Patients with EAD tended to have an earlier onset of disease but similar disease duration and family history of atopic diseases. Quantitative analysis of CD36 expression on DCs as a marker of inflammation, as well as the percentage of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells in the CD1a+ epidermal DC pool, indicated a comparable disease activity in IAD and EAD. EAD was characterized by a significantly higher FcepsilonRI expression on the CD1a+ epidermal DCs than IAD. Using the FcepsilonRI/FcgammaRII expression ratio as a disease marker for AD, values for IAD fell below the diagnostic cut-off level of 1.5 for this ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

While IAD is clinically similar to EAD, the inflammatory microenvironment in this condition seems different from classical EAD and can be distinguished by phenotyping of epidermal DCs.