Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials

BACKGROUND

Randomised trials comparing the efficacy of standard endocrine therapy (ET) versus experimental ET + bevacizumab (Bev) in 1st line hormone receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer have thus far shown conflicting results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We pooled data from two similar phase III randomised trials of ET ± Bev (LEA and Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40503) to increase precision in estimating treatment effect. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed within subgroups defined by patients with recurrent disease, de novo disease, prior endocrine sensitivity or resistance and reported grades III-IV hypertension and proteinuria.

RESULTS

The pooled sample consisted of 749 patients randomised to ET or ET + Bev. Median PFS was 14.3 months for ET versus 19 months for ET + Bev (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.91; p < 0.01). ORR and CBR with ET and ET + Bev were 40 versus 61% (p < 0.01) and 64 versus 77% (p < 0.01), respectively. There was no difference in OS (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.77-1.18; p = 0.68). PFS was superior for ET + Bev for endocrine-sensitive patients (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; p = 0.004). Grade III-IV hypertension (2.2 versus 20.1%), proteinuria (0 versus 9.3%), cardiovascular (0.5 versus 4.2%) and liver events (0 versus 2.9%) were significantly higher for ET + Bev (all p < 0.01). Hypertension and proteinuria were not predictors of efficacy (interaction test p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

The addition of Bev to ET increased PFS overall and in endocrine-sensitive patients but not OS at the expense of significant additional toxicity.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.Gov NCT00545077 and NCT00601900.

Abstract PD6-06: Impact of BRCA mutations on chemotherapy-induced loss of ovarian reserve: A prospective longitudinal study

Background: The BRCA1/2 genes are key members of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-mediated DNA double strand break (DSB) repair pathway. Recent research showed that germline mutations in these genes result in DNA repair deficiency in oocytes, leading to accelerated ovarian aging as manifested by lower ovarian reserve and earlier age at natural menopause. Because we discovered that oocyte DNA repair is similarly critical in chemotherapy-induced ovarian follicle loss, we hypothesized that women with pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 genes may experience larger declines in ovarian reserve after chemotherapy. To gauge the degree of the chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage, we utilized serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), which is the most reliable current marker for assessing oocyte reserve.

Methods: Women with early stage breast cancer were enrolled before chemotherapy (Trial registration number: NCT00823654) between January 2009 and November 2017. Sera were obtained at baseline, before the initiation of treatment, and 18 to 24 months after the completion of chemotherapy. Stored sera were assayed at once for anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and the results were adjusted for the women's age at sample collection. Of the 235 enrolled, 117 evaluable women were stratified into three groups, those never tested (based on NCCN Guidelines V 1.2018 ; n=38) and those negative (n=65) or positive (n=14) for a pathogenic BRCA mutation. Ovarian recovery was defined as the geometric mean of the post chemotherapy age-adjusted AMH levels compared to baseline.

Results: Compared to the lower risk (BRCA-untested) control group, AMH levels averaged 76% and 66% in those negative or positive for BRCA mutations (p=0.078). The geometric mean recoveries for the three groups (not tested, BRCA negative and BRCA positive) were 3.7%, 5.2% and 1.6%, respectively. The mean recovery in the BRCA mutation positive group was about one-third the 4.6% recovery in the other two groups combined (two group ANOVA, p=0.034, F=4.89). Given the potential of the ovarian recovery to be dependent on type of chemotherapy, the data were reanalyzed for all three BRCA groups after restriction to those treated with the AC-T (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel) regimen. Of the 108 women in the previous analysis, 83 (77%) were treated with AC-T; 25, 46 and 12 women in the three groups, respectively. The geometric mean AMH recoveries for these new groups were 3.2%, 4.7% and 1.3%. When the BRCA mutation positive group was compared with other two groups, the former had significantly worse recovery of serum AMH levels (ANOVA, p=0.044, F=4.2).

Conclusions: These data show that women with breast cancer and pathogenic BRCA mutations have striking liability to chemotherapy-induced ovarian reserve loss and may have to be preferentially counselled on fertility preservation methods. In addition, taken together with the previous data showing that women with BRCA mutations may have accelerated ovarian aging, even unaffected reproductive age individuals may have to be proactive about family building or early preservation of their fertility (Supported by NIH R01HD053112).

Citation Format: Oktay K, Bedoschi G, Goldfarb SB, Taylan E, Titus S, Palomaki GE, Cigler T, Robson M, Dickler MN. Impact of BRCA mutations on chemotherapy-induced loss of ovarian reserve: A prospective longitudinal study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-06.

Abstract P2-07-05: A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive advanced stage breast cancer treated with first-line endocrine therapy

Purpose: Endocrine based therapy is an effective strategy to manage hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, nearly all patients exhibit/develop either de novo or acquired resistance. While prognostic biomarkers of endocrine responsiveness are well established for the adjuvant treatment in ER+ breast cancer, less is known regarding prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response in the first line ABC setting. We sought to develop a clinical calculator based on clinical criteria for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of women with HR+/HER2- ABC who will be receiving endocrine monotherapy as first-line treatment for ABC.

Methods: The development of the clinical calculator will be based on data from modern clinical trials in women with HR+/HER2- ABC. The studies to be included in the final analyses are given in Table 1. The control arm data from trials1-6 will form the training dataset (N = 1,223) and be used to construct the clinical prediction models. Variables considered include age, race, ECOG status, disease measurability, body mass index, disease-free interval, number of metastatic sites, locations of metastatic sites, prior endocrine therapy, and prior chemotherapy. Missing values will be imputed using single imputation with all variables included in the imputation model. For continuous variables, restricted cubic splines will be used to determine if non-linear effects may be more appropriate. The Lasso regression will be used as a variable selection technique to reduce the dimensionality of covariates; initially all pairwise interactions will be included in the model. Following Lasso regression, the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models will be constructed for PFS and OS including only variables retained in Lasso. The final model will be internally validated for discrimination and calibration using 10-fold cross-validation. External validation will be performed using control arm data from EGF 30008 (N = 536).

Results: To date, control arm data from four trials (trials 1-4) have been received. The preliminary results presented here are based on pooled data from C40503 and LEA, for which data elements have been harmonized. Models for predicting PFS and OS have good calibration and are associated with bias-corrected C-indices of 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. These models will be updated using pooled data from trials 1-6.

Conclusions: Our preliminary data demonstrate that clinical calculators based on baseline clinical factors can provide accurate prediction of PFS and OS in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC treated with first-line ET. If validated, these tools may be used for risk stratification in future clinical trials and to identify patients who may require more or less aggressive therapy.

Table 1:Studies to be includedTrial NumberTrial NameTrial PISample Size in Control Arm1C40503Maura Dickler152 (letrozole)2LEAMiguel Martin179 (letrozole)3FACTJonas Bergh188 (anastrozole)4FALCONJohn Robertson194 (anastrozole)5S0226Rita Mehta345 (anastrozole)6MONARCH 3Matthew Goetz165 (nonsteroidal AI)7EGF 30008Stephen Johnston536 (letrozole)

Citation Format: Polley M-YC, Dickler MN, Johnston S, Goetz MP, de la Haba J, Loibl S, Mehta RS, Bergh J, Roberston J, Barlow W, Liu H, Tenner K, Martin M. A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive advanced stage breast cancer treated with first-line endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-05.

Abstract P6-18-19: Real-world survival of heavily pretreated patients with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving single-agent chemotherapy - A comparison with MONARCH 1

Background

In MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490), abemaciclib demonstrated promising single-agent activity and tolerability in a population of heavily pretreated women with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC).1 Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 19.7% (95% CI: 13.3, 27.5) and at 18 months minimum follow-up median overall survival (OS) was 22.3 months. Due to the single-arm trial design of MONARCH 1, there is a need to view these results in clinical context relative to available treatment options. This study compared the OS results of abemaciclib in MONARCH 1 vs that in a real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort with similar patient and disease characteristics.

Methods

MONARCH 1 study design and key eligibility criteria were previously described.1 The real-world cohort was based on Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived, nationally representative (USA-based) database comprising patient-level structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction, for patients with MBC between January 1, 2011 through February 28, 2018. A real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort was created based on the key eligibility criteria of MONARCH 1 and included patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2- MBC who received single-agent chemotherapy (eribulin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) following 1-2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting, had an ECOG PS of 0-1, and no prior CDK4 & 6 therapy. The index date was the start of the eligible single-agent chemotherapy, and patients were followed from the index date until date of death, loss to follow-up, or end of the database, whichever occurred earlier. OS results were adjusted using 2 methods (Mahalanobis distance matching and entropy balancing with bootstrapping) to account for baseline demographic and clinical differences between the real-world and trial cohorts.

Results

A real-world cohort (n=281) with eligibility criteria similar to the MONARCH 1 population (n=132) was identified. A subsequent matching based on Mahalanobis distance was performed to match MONARCH 1 population (n=108) with the real-world cohort (n=108). The matched cohorts demonstrated similar patient and disease characteristics. Median OS was 22.3 months in the abemaciclib arm vs 13.6 months in the matched cohort with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.77). Results of a sensitivity analysis performed using entropy balancing were consistent with an adjusted median OS of 12.7 months in the real-world cohort (n=281)with HR of 0.57 (95% CI from bootstrapping: 0.44, 0.78).

Conclusion

Methodological advances to adjust for potential biases, and improvements in data quality, have evolved enabling the ability to leverage a real-world cohort as an external comparator arm. This study demonstrates the ability to create a real-world chemotherapy cohort suitable to serve as a comparator for MONARCH 1. These exploratory results suggest a survival advantage and adequately place the clinical benefit of abemaciclib monotherapy in clinical context.

References

Dickler et al, CCR 2017

Citation Format: Rugo H, Dieras V, Cortes J, Patt D, Wildiers H, O'Shaughnessy J, Zamora E, Yardley DY, Carter GC, Sheffield KM, Li L, Andre VA, Derbyshire RE, Li XI, Frenzel M, Huang Y-J, Dickler MN, Tolaney SM. Real-world survival of heavily pretreated patients with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving single-agent chemotherapy - A comparison with MONARCH 1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-19.

Abstract P5-11-01: Phamacodynamic and circulating tumor DNA evaluation in a phase I study of GDC-0927, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist/ degrader (SERD)

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER positive breast cancer. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. Based on preclinical and clinical data, SERDs are expected be effective in patients harboring ESR1 mutations. Biomarker analysis was performed on plasma and tumor samples from the Phase I study of GDC-0927 in metastatic breast cancer (Dickler et al, SABCS 2017) with the goal of evaluating activity in both ESR1 mutant and wildtype tumors, and to assess ER pathway modulation.

Methods: Hotspot mutations in ESR1, PIK3CA, and AKT1 were analyzed in baseline, on-treatment and end of treatment plasma derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using the BEAMing assay in patients treated at multiple dose levels of GDC-0927. A subset of samples was analyzed with Foundation Medicine's next generation sequencing ctDNA assay (FACT), which covers genomic alterations in 62 commonly altered genes. Paired pre- and on-treatment biopsies were collected to assess ER pathway modulation. ER, PR, and Ki67 protein levels were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Gene expression analysis was performed using Illumina's RNA Access library preparation kit followed by paired-end (2x50b, 50M reads) sequencing on the HiSeq.

Results: Baseline and on-treatment plasma samples were available for 40 patients. ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations were observed in 52% and 33% of patient baseline samples, respectively (BEAMing method). Mutant allele frequencies (MAF) generally declined in the first on-treatment samples collected for both ESR1 (16 out of 21 samples) and PIK3CA (7 out of 12 samples). The majority of the reductions were greater than 95% relative to baseline. Increases in ESR1 MAFs were observed in later time-points and were not associated with any particular ESR1 mutation. There were six instances for which an ESR1 mutation was detected in an on-treatment sample that was not detected in the baseline sample, three at L536P and one each at D538G, L536H, and S463P, and four out of six with MAFs close to the limit of detection. The FACT assay also detected alterations in CDH1, NF1, PTEN, and TP53 in baseline samples. The relationship between MAF changes and clinical benefit to GDC-0927 will be presented. A predefined, experimentally-derived set of ER target genes were evaluated in pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsy pairs from six patients. Four of the six patients showed evidence of suppression in ER pathway activity, one patient treated at the 1000 mg dose level and three at the 1400 mg dose. The degree of pathway suppression was associated with pre-treatment pathway levels and decreases of ER and Ki67 protein levels.

Conclusions: We report here evidence of consistent reduction of ESR1 and PIK3CA ctDNA in patients treated with GDC-0927. ER pathway suppression was observed at both the transcript and protein level confirming pharmacodynamic activity of the SERD.

Citation Format: Spoerke JM, Daemen A, Chang C-W, Giltnane J, Metcalfe C, Dickler MN, Bardia A, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Liu L, Li R, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Lackner MR. Phamacodynamic and circulating tumor DNA evaluation in a phase I study of GDC-0927, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist/ degrader (SERD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-01.

Abstract PD5-10: A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), GDC-0927, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC)

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER+ BC. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. ER antagonists that are efficacious against ligand-dependent and ligand-independent, constitutively active ESR1 mutant tumors may be of substantial therapeutic benefit. GDC-0927 (formerly known as SRN-927) is a novel, potent, non-steroidal, orally bioavailable, selective ER antagonist/ER degrader (SERD) that induces tumor regression in ER+ BC patient-derived xenograft models.

Methods: A phase I dose escalation study with 3+3 design was conductedin postmenopausal women with ER+ (HER2-) metastatic BC (progressing ≥ 6 months on endocrine therapy and with ≤ 2 prior chemotherapies in the advanced or metastatic setting) to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GDC-0927. Pharmacodynamic (PD) activity was assessed with [18F]-fluoroestradiol (FES)-PET scans. Plasma PK samples (after single dose and at steady state), CT scans, and when feasible, pre and on-study tumor biopsies were obtained

Results: From March 16, 2015 to March 17, 2017 patients (pts) with a median age of 53 years (range 44-69) and a median number of prior therapies for MBC 4 (range 1-7) were enrolled at 3 total daily dose levels (600, 1000, 1400 mg) once daily (QD) given orally with fasting (n = 12). Increases in GDC-0927 exposure were approximately dose proportional. Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were all grade 1 or 2. The most common treatment-related AEs were nausea (54%, n = 7), diarrhea (46%, n = 6), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (39%, n = 5) and anemia, constipation, (each 31%, n = 4). Treatment interruption was required for 2 pts due to nausea and vomiting. Of those pts with FES-PET avid disease at baseline (9 of 12), all post-therapy scans showed complete or near complete (&gt; 90%) suppression of FES uptake to background levels, including pts with ESR1 mutations. Evidence of reduced ER levels and Ki67 staining was observed in on-treatment biopsies. Five of 12 pts (1 at 600 mg and 4 at 1400 mg) were on study ≥ 24 weeks (CBR = 41.6 %) with the best overall response of stable disease with 1 patient (ESR1 mt+ D538G) on study for over 490 days. There were no dose limiting toxicities and no SAEs related to study drug. R2PD was 1400 mg and was selected for single arm dose-expansion which is now complete with last patient enrolled on March 17, 2017. Updated results from dose-escalation and dose-expansion will be presented at the meeting (N = 43).

Conclusions: GDC-0927 appears well-tolerated to date with PK exposure supporting QD dosing, evidence of robust PD target engagement, and encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with advanced or metastatic ER+ BC, including pts with ESR1 mutations.

Citation Format: Dickler MN, Villanueva R, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez-Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Giltnane J, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Spoerke JM, Metcalfe C, Liu L, Li R, Morley R, McCurry U, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Bardia A. A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), GDC-0927, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-10.

Abstract P6-12-01: Phase II study of taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: Analysis by PIK3CA and ESR1 mutation status from circulating tumor DNA

Background:

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is frequently dysregulated in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC), with activating mutations of PIK3CA detected in ~35–45% of patients (pts). Acquired mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes estrogen receptor α, may be associated with resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Taselisib is a potent and selective PI3K inhibitor, with greater selectivity against mutant PI3Kα isoforms than wild-type (WT) via a unique mechanism. In phase I studies, taselisib plus fulvestrant had clinical activity and manageable tolerability in pts with HR-positive BC. We report exploratory analyses of PIK3CA and ESR1 from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

Methods:

In this phase II, open-label, single-arm study (PMT4979g; NCT01296555), pts were postmenopausal with HER2-negative, HR-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC and progression or non-response to ≥1 prior endocrine therapy in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Pts received taselisib (6 mg capsule orally, daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, then Day 1 of each 28-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PIK3CA-mutation testing on archival tumor tissue used the cobas® PIK3CA Mutation Test. The Sysmex Inostics' BEAMing Digital PCR platform was used for ctDNA analysis of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations (pre-dose on Cycle 1, Day 1). Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in all pts and those with PIK3CA mutations. ORR was confirmed complete response (cCR) and confirmed partial response (cPR). CBR was cCR, cPR, or stable disease for ≥6 months. Secondary endpoints included safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory biomarker analysis.

Results:

60 pts were enrolled. Median age was 61.5 years (range 31–82). In the metastatic setting, pts had received prior chemotherapy (21.7%) and prior hormonal therapy (50.0%). 86.7% of pts had received prior treatment with an AI. 45 pts had PIK3CA mutation status from archival tumor tissue and ctDNA testing; concordance was 86.7% (39/45). ctDNA analysis, vs archival tumor tissue testing, identified 4 pts and 9 pts with PIK3CA mutations from pts with WT and unknown PIK3CA mutation status, respectively.

Based on ctDNA analysis (N=60), 13 pts (21.7%) had mutations in both ESR1 and PIK3CA, 21 pts (35.0%) were 'mutation not detected' (MND) for both genes, 8 (13.3%) had ESR1 mutations and PIK3CA MND, and 18 (30.0%) had ESR1 MND and PIK3CA mutations.

In pts with measurable disease at baseline, confirmed responses (all partial) were: PIK3CA mutation, 38.1% (8/21); PIK3CA MND, 8.7% (2/23); all pts, 22.7% (10/44). CBRs were: PIK3CA mutation, 42.9%; PIK3CA MND, 17.4%; all pts, 29.5%. ORR and CBR from ctDNA analyses were similar to archival tumor tissue data.

Conclusions:

ctDNA analysis identified PIK3CA mutations in pts with previously unknown or WT mutation status from archival tumor tissue; ORR and CBR were similar to those from archival tumor tissue suggesting that PIK3CA mutation testing from ctDNA may be used as a surrogate when tissue is unavailable. 21.7% of pts had mutations in both ESR1 and PIK3CA.

Citation Format: Dickler MN, Saura C, Oliveira M, Richards DA, Krop IE, Cervantes A, Stout TJ, Jin H, Savage HM, Wilson TR, Baselga J. Phase II study of taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: Analysis by PIK3CA and ESR1 mutation status from circulating tumor DNA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-01.

Abstract P4-21-34: Phase II study of gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer after prior pertuzumab-based therapy

Background: The combination of taxanes with trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) for first line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment per physician's choice with anti-HER2 therapy after second line therapy is associated with a median PFS of 3 months. While continued use of H in therapeutic combinations after progression on H-based therapy is common, the efficacy of continuing HP-based treatment after progression on P-based therapy is unknown.

Methods: This is a single arm phase II trial of gemcitabine (G) with HP. Eligible patients had HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or FISH ≥ 2.0) MBC with prior HP-based treatment and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapies. Patients received G (1200 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a q 3 week (w) cycle, and H (8 mg/kg load → 6 mg/kg) and P (840 mg load → 420 mg) q3w. The primary endpoint is PFS at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include OS, safety and tolerability. An exploratory endpoint is to compare PFS by RECIST criteria versus 18-F FDG-PET response criteria. Using a Simon optimal 2-stage design, 21 patients were enrolled in stage 1. The successful 3-month PFS rate for stage 1 was set at 57% to allow accrual to stage 2 for a total of 45 patients. The study therapy will be considered successful if at least 27/45 (60%) patients are progression free at 3 months.

Results: As of June 9, 2016, 28 patients are enrolled; 21 are evaluable at 3 months and 7 have not had 3-month evaluation. At 3 months, 16/21 (76%) are progression free; 5 patients have progressed. The 3 month-PFS results for evaluable patients will be updated. There are no cardiac or febrile neutropenic events to date. Initially, 5 of 22 (23%) patients required G dose reduction (4 due to grade 3 neutropenia and 1 due to grade 3 vomiting) and the study was amended to lower initial G dose to 1000 mg/m2.

Conclusions: The preliminary 3 month-PFS is 76% (95% CI 55% to 89%) in evaluable patients, and updated data will be presented. These findings suggest clinical benefit when P is continued beyond progression.

Citation Format: Iyengar NM, Smyth L, Lake D, Gucalp A, Singh JC, Traina TA, DeFusco P, Dickler MN, Fornier MN, Goldfarb S, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Troso-Sandoval T, Argolo D, Jack K, Ulaner G, Jochelson M, Baselga J, Norton L, Hudis CA, Dang CT. Phase II study of gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer after prior pertuzumab-based therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-21-34.

Abstract P2-16-12: An exploratory analysis of the role of dasatinib in preventing progression of disease in bone in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Introduction: The role of dasatinib, an oral SRC inhibitor is being explored for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In a phase I study, we previously established that the combination of dasatinib and weekly paclitaxel was feasible. The activity of this combination is currently being explored in an ongoing phase II trial. Since Src kinase has a major role in osteoclast function and dasatinib has established anabolic and anti-resorptive effects in bone in vitro, we hypothesized that patients receiving this combination would have good control of osseous metastases and primarily develop progression of disease in sites other than bone.

Patients and methods: Patients were included in this analysis if they participated in the phase I or II metastatic breast cancer studies and received dasatinib at or above the recommended phase II dose of 120mg with paclitaxel (80mg/m2 day 1 and 8 of each 21day cycle). Patients who discontinued therapy for reasons other than progression were excluded. Per protocol, patients were required to discontinue bisphosphonates or other bone modulating agents for the first 8 weeks of study due to the potential for hypocalcaemia. Thereafter, they were permitted to receive these agents at the discretion of their treating physician. Patients provided serum samples for correlative studies. Assessment of N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (NTX), a product of mature bone collagen that reflects bone specific resorption, is planned.

Results: The median age of the 24 patients who met criteria for analysis was 50y (37 - 66y). Of these, 15 (63%) had ER+ disease, and 24 (100%) were negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2). At study entry, 17 (71%) patients had bone involvement. Following the initial eight week moratorium, 7 (29%) patients received a bisphosphonate or rank ligand inhibitor during treatment with dasatinib + paclitaxel. Patients received a median 2 months (range 1-23) of dasatinib + paclitaxel therapy. To date, 3 (13%) continue on therapy, and 21 (88%) have had progression of disease. Among patients who progressed, 18 (86%) have progressed in visceral sites and only 3 (14%) progressed in bone. Analyses of serum NTX levels are ongoing and will be compared by site of progression.

Conclusion: The potential role of serum NTX as a predictive biomarker of benefit from dasatinib and paclitaxel is being explored and updated results will be presented.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-12.

A Phase I dose-escalation study of the VEGFR inhibitor tivozanib hydrochloride with weekly paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer

Tivozanib is a potent selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3. This Phase Ib study investigated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity of tivozanib with weekly paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). MBC patients with no prior VEGFR TKI treatment received daily oral tivozanib (3 weeks on, 1 week off) with weekly paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2). Standard 3 + 3 dose escalation was used; tivozanib cohorts (C) included C1 0.5 mg, C2 1.0 mg, and C3 1.5 mg. Assessments included Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response, PK, and vascular function. Eighteen patients enrolled. Toxicities in >20 % of patients included fatigue, alopecia, nausea, diarrhea, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and hypertension. Grade 3/4 toxicities in >15 % of patients included fatigue and neutropenia. Maximum tolerated dose was tivozanib 1.5 mg with paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2). Four patients withdrew because of toxicity and one due to progressive disease. Thirteen patients were evaluable for response: four (30.8 %) had confirmed partial response; four had stable disease ≥6 months (30.8 %). PK data suggest no influence of paclitaxel on tivozanib concentrations. Tivozanib plus weekly paclitaxel was tolerable at all dose levels, supporting their combination at full dose. Activity in this small population was encouraging.

OT3-02-04: TBCRC 012: ABCDE, a Phase II Randomized Study of Adjuvant Bevacizumab, Metronomic Chemotherapy (CM), Diet and Exercise after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Background Patients (pts) with residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are at increased risk of recurrence; no proven risk-reduction strategies exist, supporting exploration of novel therapies in the post-preoperative setting. Bevacizumab (B) combined with chemotherapy is active in metastatic disease; ongoing studies are exploring the efficacy of adjuvant combination chemotherapy and B. DFCI 05–055 (Mayer et al, ASCO 2007, 2008) demonstrated the feasibility of 1 year B after preoperative chemotherapy. Also, increasing data support risk reduction through lifestyle interventions (Segal, Ligibel et al, ASCO 2011). The ABCDE trial was designed to evaluate extended adjuvant B in a high risk post-preoperative cohort, and also assess the contribution of exercise to a dietary intervention.

Eligibility Criteria Eligible pts have HER2− breast cancer and have received preoperative anthracycline and/or taxane-based chemotherapy with residual invasive disease at surgery. Acceptable stages include: triple negative if preop stages I-III, or ER+/PR+ if stage III preop or IIB postop. Acceptable organ function and standard B exclusions apply. Registration must occur between 28–180 days after last surgery.

Specific Aims Primary endpoint is recurrence-free survival at a median follow-up of 6 years. Secondary endpoints include B pharmacogenomics, evaluation of the impact of exercise on quality of life and biomarkers associated with recurrence, and prospective examination of cardiac toxicity. Residual tissue-based predictors of outcome will be extensively explored, including PAM50, Ki67, and VEGF hypoxia signature.

Methods This is a 2 × 2 randomized study with a first randomization to 6 months (mo) B 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks (wks) plus 6 mo CM (C 50 mg daily, M 2.5 mg twice daily days 1, 2 each wk), followed by 2.5 years B 15 mg/kg every 6–8 wks, versus observation. A second randomization is to a 1 year telephone-based lifestyle intervention, offering dietary modification alone, or in combination with a structured exercise program.

Statistical Methods and Accrual Total sample size is 660 pts within the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium. Overall power is 0.80 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.59−0.68, depending on pt population. Accrual initiated early 2011 and is expected to continue for the next 36 months.

Conclusions Patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy are at high risk of recurrence and have unmet medical needs. To our knowledge, this is the only trial testing a prolonged but less intensive adjuvant B schedule in this clinical setting. Results of this study could have critical implications for the management of this patient population and for the design of future clinical trials with anti-angiogenic agents.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-04.

Abstract P5-08-01: Oncology Clinicians’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Fertility Preservation

Background:

Many breast cancer survivors of child-bearing age wish to become parents after therapy and are concerned about the possibility of treatment-induced infertility. Educating patients about the effects of therapy on fertility, early menopause, and fertility preservation options prior to treatment may optimize a survivor's quality of life after treatment. It is unclear whether oncologists feel qualified to discuss fertility issues with their patients, and if not, what barriers prevent such discussions.

Methods:

An IRB approved cross-sectional survey was developed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in order for clinicians to self-evaluate their knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding fertility preservation. Survey items were derived from existing surveys in the literature and input from a multidisciplinary committee. The web-based survey was systematically administered to all MSKCC ambulatory clinicians. Repeated email reminders were sent to optimize responses.

Results:

76 breast cancer clinicians at MSKCC and our regional network sites completed the survey between 2/9/09 and 2/25/09. Among respondents, there was widespread agreement (97% (70/72)) that patients should be informed of fertility preservation options, but fewer respondents (51% (37/72)) consistently discussed effects of treatment on fertility with their patients. Only 47% of clinicians (35/74) reported access to information about effects of treatment on fertility. Many physicians cited lack of training in fertility preservation, time constraints, and lack of referral information as barriers to educating patients. No significant difference existed in practice or knowledge between physicians who were practicing for ≤ 5 years vs ≥ 5 years.

Conclusions:

Physicians report that lack of education, resources and insufficient time hinder fertility preservation discussions with patients. Physicians might benefit from educational efforts regarding the effects of treatment on fertility and new fertility preservation techniques in order to effectively counsel their patients. Time limitations may be overcome by developing educational resources and collaborating with other clinical staff (e.g., nurses) to provide this vital information to patients. These findings are informing an institution-wide educational fertility program.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-01.

Evaluation of the correlation of baseline blood pressure (BP) and plasma renin activity (PRA) with bevacizumab (B)-mediated hypertension in patients with early-stage breast cancer

602

Background: Although hypertension (HTN) develops in 20–30% of bevacizumab (B)-treated cancer patients, no accurate clinical predictors of B-mediated HTN have been identified. We evaluated baseline blood pressure (BP) and plasma renin activity (PRA) as potential predictors of B-mediated HTN among breast cancer patients enrolled in an adjuvant chemotherapy-B study. Methods: In this phase II study, B was administered concurrently (10 mg/kg IV q2wk x 8) with pegfilgrastim-supported chemotherapy (AC at 60/600 mg/m2 q2wk x4 then nab-paclitaxel at 260 mg/m2 q2wk x4) and continued at 15 mg/kg q3wk thereafter for a total one year of B therapy. The primary endpoint was cardiac safety. A secondary endpoint was the prospective exploration of PRA as a predictor of HTN. Patients with baseline BP >150/100 mmHg were excluded from the study. Peripheral blood for PRA was collected at baseline, week 8, week 16 and every 3 months during B administration. In this preliminary analysis, baseline data was available for 65 of the 80 enrolled patients. Baseline BP and PRA values for those who did and did not develop grade 2–4 HTN were evaluated by Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The baseline characteristic medians are: age 45y (27–75), baseline diastolic BP 70 mmHg (52–95), baseline systolic BP 120 mmHg (90–146), and number of B cycles administered 20 (1–21). Twenty-one patients (32%) developed grade 2–4 HTN. Median diastolic and systolic BP among patients with grade 2–4 HTN was 78 and 124 mmHg, respectively, versus 70 and 115.5 mm Hg, respectively, among patients without grade 2–4 HTN (p = 0.0256 and p = 0.0228). There was no significant association between baseline PRA values and the development of grade 2–4 HTN versus not (p = 0.2917). Conclusions: At the time of this preliminary analysis, both baseline diastolic and systolic BP appear to positively predict the development of B-mediated grade 2–4 HTN while baseline PRA does not. Studies exploring the relationship between serial PRAs and the development of HTN for all study participants are ongoing.

[Table: see text]

Bone scintigraphy (BS) may no longer be relevant in the era of integrated PET/CT for women undergoing evaluation for suspected metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Abstract #5007

Background: &#x2028; The accurate detection of osseous metastases frequently has significant prognostic and therapeutic implications at metastatic breast cancer (MBC) diagnosis. However, the ideal paradigm for accurate detection of osseous metastases has not yet been determined. In this retrospective, single-institution study, we compare the diagnostic performance of integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) versus bone scintigraphy (BS) for women undergoing extent-of-disease (EOD) evaluation for suspected MBC.&#x2028; Methods:&#x2028; Women undergoing EOD evaluation for suspected MBC with integrated PET/CT and bone scintigraphy (BS) between January 1, 2005 and Dec 31, 2007 were identified through institutional databases. Patients with PET/CT and BS imaging completed within 30-days of each other were included. Women with a prior history of MBC or an active second malignancy were excluded. Electronic medical record (EMR) reports were reviewed and classified as positive, negative or equivocal for detecting osseous metastases. All EMR reports deemed potentially equivocal were reviewed by 2 investigators and consensus reached regarding the final classification. Bone biopsy data, where available, was also recorded.&#x2028; Results:&#x2028; The median age of the 62 eligible women was 54y (33-90y). Overall, PET/CT and BS demonstrated a high degree of concordance. Of the 41 concordant studies, 13 (21%) and 28 (45%) were reported as positive and negative for osseous metastases, respectively. No studies were classified as equivocal by both modalities. Ten positive PET/CT studies were negative by BS, but no PET/CT-negative studies were positive by BS. Of the 10 patients with PET/CT-positive, BS-negative studies, 4 had subsequent bone biopsies, all of which confirmed osseous metastases.&#x2028; &#x2028; Conclusions:&#x2028; This study supports the diagnostic performance of integrated PET/CT in detecting osseous metastases when EOD evaluation for suspected MBC is considered. Whether PET/CT may supplant BS entirely in this setting has not yet been determined.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5007.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of exemestane in combination with raloxifene in postmenopausal women with a history of breast cancer

PURPOSE

Raloxifene is a second-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator that reduces the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, decreases contralateral new breast cancers in postmenopausal women when taken in the adjuvant setting. Preclinical evidence suggests a rationale for coadministration of these agents to achieve complete estrogen blockade.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We tested the safety and tolerability of combination exemestane and raloxifene in 11 postmenopausal women with a history of hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Patients were randomized to either raloxifene (60 mg PO daily) or exemestane (25 mg PO daily) for 2 weeks. Patients then initiated combination therapy at the same dose levels for a minimum of 1 year. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for plasma estrogens, raloxifene, exemestane, and their metabolites were collected at the end of single-agent therapy and during combination therapy.

RESULTS

Plasma concentration-time profiles for each drug were unchanged with monotherapy versus combination therapy. Raloxifene did not affect plasma estrogen levels. Plasma estrogen concentrations were suppressed below the lower limit of detection by exemestane as monotherapy and when administered in combination with raloxifene. The most common adverse events of any grade included arthralgias, hot flashes, vaginal dryness and myalgias.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study, coadministration of raloxifene and exemestane did not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of either agent to a significant degree in postmenopausal women. The combination of estrogen receptor blockade and suppression of estrogen synthesis is well tolerated and warrants further investigation.

Adjuvant (adj) bevacizumab (B) plus dose-dense (dd) doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by nanoparticle albumin- bound paclitaxel (nab-p) in early stage breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): Cardiac safety

567

Background: Dose dense, q2 wk AC-paclitaxel (T) is superior to q3 wk therapy (Rx) (Citron, JCO 2003). The risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) with ddAC-T is not increased at <1%. In MBC, B improves PFS when added to T (Miller, SABCS 2005). It is unclear if doxorubicin plus B increases risk of CHF. Hence, we are testing the cardiac safety of ddAC-nab-p with concurrent B as adj therapy. Based upon the accepted cardiac event (CE) rate of ≤4% in trials with adj trastuzumab (an agent with known cardiac toxicity), we designed this study with similar monitoring & tolerability thresholds. The primary endpoint is cardiac safety, defined as discontinuation of B due to cardiac death from LV dysfunction or symptomatic CHF (dyspnea and LVEF<50%). Secondary endpoints: toxicity, disease-free & overall survival. Methods: Eligible pts have resected HER2(-) BC and normal LVEF. Rx consists of q2wk AC (60/600 mg/m2) ×4 then nab-p (260 mg/m2) x4 with pegfilgrastim on Day 2 plus B for one year (10mg/kg IV q2wk ×8 with chemoRx then B 15mg/kg q3wk); radiation & endocrine Rx per standard of care. MUGA obtained at baseline & mos. 2, 6, 9, 18. Pts with significant asymptomatic ↓LVEF during Rx may have B held per protocol. These pts are not counted as CEs but will have long-term cardiac monitoring. Accrual goal is 75 pts. If ≥3 CE (∼4.7%) or >1 cardiac death from LV dysfunction, B + ddAC-nab-p will not be considered safe. Results: 44 pts have enrolled, median (med) age 46.5 yrs (33–67). 28 pts have baseline & month 2 LVEF data: med baseline LVEF 68% (61–82), med LVEF at mo. 2 after ddAC+B 68% (53–75); 1 pt had an 18 point asymptomatic drop to 53% - B held but reinitiated in 4 wks with repeat LVEF 63%. 12 pts completed nab-p+B but none have reached the 6 mo. MUGA. Rx-related Gr 3/4 toxicity: neutropenia gr4 (6.8%), diarrhea gr3 (2.3%), hypertension gr3 (2.3%), neuropathy gr 3 (2.3%), fatigue gr 3 (2.3%), mucositis gr 3 (2.3%). 4 pts have withdrawn from study Rx, but only 1 due to toxicity including gr3 fatigue, mucositis & neuropathy. Conclusions: No LV dysfunction has been observed with B + ddAC-nab-p; this trial is on-going. Long-term follow-up and analysis of troponin, renin and circulating endothelial & tumor cells are planned.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Change in circulating endothelial cells (CEC) predicts progression free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving letrozole (L) and bevacizumab (B)

3039

Background: Antiangiogenic therapy has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment (tx) of metastatic breast cancer. Mechanism-based biomarkers of antiangiogenic therapy, if clinically validated, offer the potential to optimize this novel therapy. CECs have been proposed as a marker of tumor progression and/or response to antiangiogenic therapy with B. We performed a feasibility study testing B combined with L for the tx of hormone receptor-positive MBC. To explore markers of activity and response, we assayed CECs and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) at weeks (wks) 0 (baseline), 3, 12, and then Q 12 wks. Methods: CECs were defined as CD34/31+, CD45-. Progenitor (CD133+) (CECp) and activation markers (CD106+) were also measured. For CECs, 50 ul of blood was stained with the indicated MAbs; after RBC lysis, flow cytometry (FC) was performed for total CEC and CECp. For CTCs, 20 ml of blood was subjected to immunomagnetic capture using anti-EpCAM ferrofluid, followed by FC for EpCAM, CD45, and nucleic acid content. The log rank test was used to test for significant differences related to response. Results: 32 of 42 pts have been enrolled. As separately reported, prior non-steroidal AI (NSAI) use without progression is permitted; median (med) time on L before start of B was 6 mo (1–52). 28 pts have at least baseline and week 3 CEC and CTC along with clinical response data. Med CEC level at baseline was 10.4 CEC/ul (4–38); the peak value at any time point was 107. CTC levels were much less frequent with a med of 0.3 CTC/ml (0–95, and highest value 1153). An increase in CECs at wk 3 compared to wk 0 predicted worse PFS (p = 0.015). CTCs were ≤ 0.1 at study start in 40% of pts and ≥ 1.0 in only 17%, likely due to length of prior L; change in values at wk 3 did not correlate with PFS in this pretreated group. Conclusions: Consistent with our previous results in a separate trial of B containing treatment in MBC, changes in CEC levels appear to be a biomarker of response/progression on antiangiogenic therapy. CTCs did not reflect response or progression in this population of patients, likely due to lengthy prior exposure to letrozole. Supported in part by Genentech and Novartis.

[Table: see text]

The MORE trial: multiple outcomes for raloxifene evaluation--breast cancer as a secondary end point: implications for prevention

Breast cancer is a common disease in the United States and Europe and is therefore a major target for prevention strategies. Estrogen plays a central role in its pathogenesis, and treatment with estrogen deprivation has long been recognized to be an effective therapy. Tamoxifen is the first selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) to be widely used for the treatment of breast cancer and has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women. Raloxifene is a second-generation SERM that has estrogenic effects on bone and lipid metabolism, and antiestrogenic effects on breast tissue. Unlike tamoxifen, raloxifene displays antiestrogenic effects on the endometrium and may serve as a safer alternative to tamoxifen in the prevention setting. The MORE trial is a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial designed to determine whether 3 years of raloxifene reduces the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. As a secondary end point of the trial, raloxifene was shown to reduce the risk of both in situ and invasive breast cancer by 65% (RR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.21-0.58; P < 0.001). The benefits were most significant in women who developed estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancers, with a relative risk of 0.10 (95% CI = 0.04-0.24). This reduced incidence of breast cancer may be due to an anticarcinogenic effect or to a slowing of growth of occult ER-positive cancer, with a shift to the right in the time-to-cancer curve. A second large-scale prevention trial in breast cancer comparing tamoxifen to raloxifene is presently enrolling cancer-free, but high-risk postmenopausal women (the STAR trial). Future directions include combined estrogen blockade of the breast by the addition of an aromatase inhibitor to a SERM. New trial designs, including those based on biochemical changes at the tissue level, will be required to allow future progress in this field with adequate rapidity.

Immunogenicity of a fucosyl-GM1-keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugate vaccine in patients with small cell lung cancer

Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly responsive to chemotherapy, relapses are common, and most patients die within 2 years of diagnosis. After initial therapy, standard treatment is observation alone. We have been investigating immunization against selected gangliosides as adjuvant therapy directed against residual and presumably resistant disease persisting after chemotherapy and irradiation. Previously, we reported that the presence of anti-GM2 ganglioside antibodies is associated with a prolonged disease-free survival in patients with melanoma, and that SCLC patients immunized with BEC2, an anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody that mimics the ganglioside GD3, had a prolonged survival compared with historical controls. In the present trial, fucosyl-alpha1-2Galbeta1-3GalNAcbeta1-4(NeuAcalpha2-3) Galbeta1-4Glcbeta1-1Cer (Fuc-GM1), a ganglioside expressed on the SCLC cell surface, was selected as a target for active immunotherapy. Fuc-GM1 is present on most SCLCs but on few normal tissues. SCLC patients achieving a major response to initial therapy were vaccinated s.c. on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 16 with Fuc-GM1 (30 microg) conjugated to the carrier protein keyhole limpet hemocyanin and mixed with the adjuvant QS-21. Ten patients received at least five vaccinations and are evaluable for response. All patients demonstrated a serological response, with induction of both IgM and IgG antibodies against Fuc-GM1, despite prior treatment with chemotherapy with or without radiation. Posttreatment flow cytometry demonstrated binding of antibodies from patients' sera to tumor cells expressing Fuc-GM1. In the majority of cases, sera were also capable of complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Mild transient erythema and induration at injection sites were the only consistent toxicities. The Fuc-GM1-KLH + QS-21 vaccine is safe and immunogenic in patients with SCLC. Continued study of this and other ganglioside vaccines is ongoing.

Adjuvant therapy of malignant melanoma

The incidence of malignant melanoma continues to rise steadily in the United States, with approximately 40,300 new cases expected in 1997. A significant number of patients with deep primary lesions or regional lymph node metastases are at high risk for developing recurrent, metastatic disease despite adequate surgical intervention. Therefore, approaches to adjuvant therapy including immunotherapy, such as interferon, levamisole, and vaccines and chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy have been investigated in high-risk patients. The key adjuvant trials are reviewed, with emphasis placed on randomized trials. High-dose interferon-alpha has recently been shown to modestly improve disease-free and overall survival in a prospective randomized trial of high-risk patients and has been approved by the FDA for this indication. Vaccines, which currently remain experimental, may prove to be equally effective but less toxic options for adjuvant therapy. Also, the identification of more high-risk patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy may be facilitated by sentinel lymph node biopsy and the reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for tyrosinase.

A deletion/insertion polymorphism in the human BCR gene on chromosome 22

Images

Heterogeneity of genomic fusion of BCR and ABL in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia occurs in two molecular forms, those with and those without rearrangement of the breakpoint cluster region on chromosome 22. The molecular abnormality in the former group is similar to that found in chronic myelogenous leukemia. To characterize the abnormality in the breakpoint cluster region-unrearranged form, we have mapped a 9;22 translocation from the Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line SUP-B13 by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and have cloned the DNA at the translocation junctions. We demonstrate a BCR-ABL fusion gene on the Philadelphia chromosome. The breakpoint on chromosome 9 is within ABL between exons Ia and II, and the breakpoint on chromosome 22 is approximately equal to 50 kilobases upstream of a breakpoint cluster region in an intron of the BCR gene. This upstream BCR breakpoint leads to inclusion of fewer BCR sequences in the fusion gene, compared with the BCR-ABL fusion gene of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Consequently, the associated mRNA and protein are smaller. The exons from ABL are the same. Analysis of leukemic cells from four other patients with breakpoint cluster region-unrearranged Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia revealed a rearrangement on chromosome 22 close to the breakpoint in SUP-B13 in only one patient. These data indicate that breakpoints do not cluster tightly in this region but are scattered, possibly in a large intron. Given the large size of BCR and the heterogeneity in breakpoint location, detection of BCR rearrangement by standard Southern blot analysis is difficult. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis should allow detection at the DNA level in every patient and thus will permit clinical correlation of the breakpoint location with prognosis.