A comparison between topical and infiltrative bupivacaine and intravenous meperidine for postoperative analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy

The purpose of the present study is to compare postoperative analgesia offered by the simple instillation of local anesthetic on the surgical wound, its infiltration with the same local anesthetic, and the use of an intravenous opioid. Sixty patients were divided into the three analgesia groups to be studied: instillation of local anesthetic (Group I), injection of local anesthetic (Group II), and intravenous opioid (Group III). The pain was quantified using the visual analogue scale. It was observed that there was better analgesia in Groups I and II during the first 6 hours postoperatively as compared with Group III (P < 0.0001). At the end of the 12 hours the three modes of analgesia proved comparable. However, after 24 hours there was better analgesic development in Group I, whereas Group II had greater postoperative morbidity. We conclude that the instillation of local anesthesia provides analgesia during the immediate postoperative period comparable to local infiltration using the same anesthetic. Both regional analgesia methods are more effective analgesics during the first 6 hours than are intravenous opioids. Furthermore the simple instillation of local anesthetic allows better analgesic evolution of the surgical wound after the first 24 hours considering the lower rate of resulting complications.

Acute hepatitis C complicated by pancreatitis: another extrahepatic manifestation of hepatitis C virus?

In hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection a number of extrahepatic manifestations have been described, generally caused by immune phenomena. Here we report a case of acute pancreatitis, detected during an acute hepatitis C infection, in an elderly female patient.

Comparative post-operative study of prostheses, with and without an anti-reflux valve system, in the palliative treatment of esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Palliative treatment of advanced esophageal carcinoma by esophageal tunnelization with a prosthesis allows immediate relief of dysphagia. However, the procedure is subject to a high rate of morbidity, including gastroesophageal reflux (GER) present in all patients with a prosthesis positioned through the gastroesophageal junction, resulting in complications (pyrosis, aspiration pneumonias, sleep disorders) and reduced quality of life in these patients who already have a lower rate of survival. In an attempt to reduce GER and its complications, the authors created a surgical prosthesis coupled to an anti-reflux valve system, comparing it to the use of an esophageal prosthesis without an anti-reflux valve mechanism.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty-two patients were allocated to 2 tunnelization groups: esophageal prosthesis without an anti-reflux valve mechanism (group 1) and surgical prosthesis coupled to an anti-reflux valve system (group 2). The GER was quantified measuring esophageal-gastric pH, and using fluoroscopy, contrast radiographs and esophageal emptying scintigraphy. Initially, the pH of secretions in S1 (esophagus) and S2 (stomach) was determined using reagent strips after aspirating their contents with different syringes. First with the patient seated at rest in bed, later performing a Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing and forced coughing. The same procedure was performed with the patient in left lateral decubitus, right lateral decubitus, and dorsal decubitus with the head of the bed lowered to 20 degrees. After finishing these maneuvers, 15 ml of 1 molar acetic acid were infused through the catheter positioned in the antrum, and, after 5 min, S1 and S2 material sampling was repeated in the same positions as mentioned above.

RESULTS

The pH values between the various positions and maneuvers performed in each group separately were not significantly different, but, if we compare the 2 groups, and the secretions obtained in S1 and S2, there was a significant difference in pH measures in all positions. In the patients in group 1, S1 presented a mean pH ranging from 2.87-3.62 in the initial measures, and between 2.17 and 3.5 after the infusion of 15 ml of 1 molar acetic acid. On the other hand, in group 2, the mean pH of S1 remained between 6.34 and 8.32 in the initial measures and between 4.99 and 7.33 in the presence of acid infusion. At the level of S2, the pH remained unchanged between 2 and 2.7, in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that the association of an esophageal prosthesis with a valve system significantly reduces GER, as compared with its use alone. Furthermore, it allows marked reduction of the symptoms and resulting complications, and does not interfere clinically with esophageal emptying. It thus significantly improves the quality of life of these patients.