[Evaluation of the haemostasis before a central block in children: what is the French anaesthesiologist's attitude?]

OBJECTIVE

Because of the lack of controlled studies, there is no consensus regarding the practice of routine haemostasis tests before neuraxial blockade in children. The purpose of this study was to describe the French surgical practice about the preoperative evaluation of coagulation in children who were scheduled for paediatric neuraxial anaesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive analysis of the practice.

METHODS

A telephone survey for coagulation screening was conducted in French surgical paediatric units, known to perform paediatric neuraxial anaesthesia on a routine basis. The aim of the standardized questionnaire was to evaluate the expertise in performance of neuraxial block, the modalities of the preoperative haemostasis screening, and the indications of biological tests and to assess whether a standardized team procedure was used.

RESULTS

Forty-two hospitals (27 universities, 10 general hospitals and five private institutions) were contacted; 61 anaesthesiologists with an expertise with central block answered the survey. Thirty-five institutions used a standardized procedure and 57,1% of them undertook routines tests only in children who are not walking. In the remaining 42,9%, the strategy was to screen systematically all patients whatever their age, familial and personal history as well as physical examination. However, only 54% of the anaesthesiologists performed an extensive physical examination in order to detect symptoms in favour of signs of haemostatic disorders.

CONCLUSION

While numerous data suggest that routine testing does not to provide much extra information in the absence of a positive history, a systematic strategy is still widely applied in children. Guidelines need to be developed to insure the safety of oriented tests.

Postoperative epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl: hourly pain assessment in 348 paediatric cases

BACKGROUND

The objective of this prospective study was the evaluation of the analgesia provided by an epidural infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl after different types of surgery in children.

METHODS

Data were collected from 348 epidural analgesia in 87 children below 2 years of age, in 80 children between 2 and 6 years and 181 above 6 years of age, for a median duration of 43 postoperative hours. Bupivacaine (mean concentration 0.185%) and fentanyl (5 microg.kg-1.day-1) were administered on the surgical ward.

RESULTS

Pain control was considered excellent in 86% of the 11 072 pain hourly assessments. Analgesia was found to be better for children older than 2 years, and the overall quality of their night's sleep was better than that of older children. Higher pain scores were noted for Nissen fundoplication surgery and club foot repairs. Early discontinuation rarely occurred, and only because of technical problems with the epidural catheter (4%) or insufficient analgesia (6%). Complications were minor (nausea/vomiting 14%, pruritus 0.6%, urinary retention 17%) and easily reversed.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of bupivacaine-fentanyl provides safe analgesia after major surgery in children with frequent clinical monitoring. Regular pain assessments of intensity and duration are useful to improve the quality of postoperative analgesia.

[Lyell syndrome after amoxicillin administration in a 2 year old child]

The authors report a toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) due to ampicillin (Agram) in a 2-year-old child. During the acute phase a septic syndrome occurred. The severity of the clinical and biological symptoms led to the administration of antibiotics, their systematic use remaining controversial. Recovery was favourable in a paediatric burn centre. Sequelae were minor. TEN, the physiopathological mechanism of which remaining still unknown, may carry a vital risk.

[Analgesia after surgery of the spine in adults and adolescents]

Postoperative pain after spinal surgeries is highly dependent on the number of vertebrae included in the operation and on its invasiveness, opposing two extremes, discectomies and cyphoscoliosis corrections. Opiates by intravenous route remain the reference, either continuously given in predetermined doses, or better using a patient-controlled device. Nonsteroidal and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely popular for medical approach of sciatalgia and it is quite logical to use them for reducing, even to suppress, opiates after spinal surgeries. Supported by many studies, spinal administration of analgesics (opiates, alpha 2-agonists, corticosteroids) may be of interest in pain treatment of spinal surgeries. In order to prolong locoregional analgesia, a catheter may be inserted into epidural space by caudal route or surgically, before skin closure. Morphine is the most popular agent in this indication. Also, epidural clonidine results in excellent pain relief, but is associated with hypotension and marked sedation. In discectomy, injection of dexamethasone into the operative field has been proposed. Whatever the technique used, early diagnosis of neurological complications of spinal surgery should be not ruled out by postoperative analgesia.