4
|
Knop S, Liebisch P, Wandt H, Kropff M, Jung W, Kroeger N, Sezer O, Straka C, Fingerle-Rowson G, Einsele H. Bortezomib, IV cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VelCD) as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Results of an interim analysis of the German DSMM Xia trial. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.8516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8516 Background: Cytoreductive induction followed by HD-MEL and ASCT is considered standard of care for younger patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). The success of this combined procedure partially depends on the efficacy of induction treatment. Bortezomib-containing induction regimens have already been shown to be superior to standard VAD. In order to further improve the efficacy of induction treatment we combined Vel with intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (C) and dexamethasone (D). Methods: This trial is an open, prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled phase II/III study with a planned recruitment of 400 pts. The first 30 pts were included in the dose finding study to determine the optimum dose of IV C in conjunction with Vel and D. The following 170 pts up to 60 years of age with untreated MM were enrolled to receive 3 cycles of induction with Vel 1.3 mg/m2 IV d1, 4, 8, 11; D 40 mg/d d1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12; and C 900mg/m2 IV d1. Primary study objective is response rate (≥ PR) to VelCD according to the EBMT criteria. Results: Data from the first completed 200 pts (mean age: 52 years; 74% stage III) from 36 German centers were analyzed as ITT population. Response rates are given in Table and were documented in 82% of the subjects with 13q-, in 94% with t(4;14) and in 70% with 17p-. SAEs (n=84) occurred in 24.5% of the pts and were related to Vel, C or D in 16%, 14.5% or 9.5% respectively. The mortality rate of 1% is low, 53% of the patients experienced grade 3 + 4 AEs, infections of grade 3 and 4 were reported in 2% and grade 3 paraesthesia occurred in 2%. Conclusions: This interim analysis demonstrates that bortezomib combined with dexamethasone and intravenous cyclophosphamide (VelCD) is a highly effective induction regimen for pts ≤ 60 years with newly diagnosed MM regardless of cytogenetic risk factors. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Knop
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - P. Liebisch
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - H. Wandt
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - M. Kropff
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - W. Jung
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - N. Kroeger
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - O. Sezer
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - C. Straka
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - G. Fingerle-Rowson
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| | - H. Einsele
- University Hospital, Wuerzburg, Germany; University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; Klinikum Nord, Nuremberg, Germany; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany; Clinic Dr. Argirov, Berg, Germany; Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kropff M, Chatelain R, Muller CP, Wagner A, Wenzler T, Böhmer H, Böcking A. Monitoring DNA cytometric parameters during the course of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1991; 13:433-9. [PMID: 1807286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The prognostic value of three DNA cytometric parameters--stemline ploidy (STL), stemline shoulder fraction (SSF) and "proliferative" fraction (PRF)--for the prediction of disease transformation and survival was examined for 20 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) during the course of their disease and compared with two commonly used hematologic parameters (degree of leukocytosis and percentage of circulating leukemic progenitor cells). With disease progression, STL and SSF increased significantly, whereas PRF showed a steady decrease from diagnosis to blast crisis. The most significant part of these changes took place during the chronic phase, before the clinical onset of disease transformation. Hematologic parameters, in comparison, revealed significant changes later, shortly before blast crisis. The remaining duration of the chronic phase diminished from 25.5 months at the time of diagnosis, when the median STL was 2.0c, to 19.6 months for patients showing an STL of 2.1c, to 15.0 months with an STL of 2.2c and to 1.0 months for those with an STL of greater than or equal to 2.3c. Prognostically relevant limits for SSF and PRF were at 20%. When the SSF passed this limit or the PRF fell below it, the mean remaining chronic phase of these patients amounted to only 14.1 and 10.1 months. Interactive cytometry allows analysis of the DNA cytometric equivalent of changes in leukemic progenitor cells, which are well known from cytogenetic and cell kinetic studies. These three DNA cytometric parameters reflect the "natural history" of CML with the development of a cytogenetically hyperdiploid clone during disease progression in most patients and a simultaneous loss of proliferative potential on the level of myelobasts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kropff
- Institute of Pathology, Aachen University of Technology, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|