Prophylaxis for Treatment-Induced Gynecomastia in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Treatment-induced gynecomastia is a side-effect that can severely limit quality of life in prostate cancer patients. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to comparing the effectiveness of multiple non-surgical prophylactic treatment for gynecomastia.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A systematic review was performed through MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and meeting abstracts to identify randomized controlled trials comparing treatments for treatment-induced gynecomastia. Treatments included radiotherapy (RT), Anastrozole (ANZ), daily Tamoxifen (TMQD), and weekly Tamoxifen (TMQW), compared to no treatment/placebo (NoTx). The primary endpoint was events of gynecomastia development. Odds Ratio (OR) was the effect size of choice. An NMA was used to compare treatments with random-effects model was used. All tests were 2-sided with an alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies involving 1319 patients were identified with 5 distinct arms: RT (n = 358), ANZ (n = 90), TMQD (n = 321), TMQW (n = 39) and NoTx (n = 511). Gynecomastia occurred in 79.2% (405/511) of patients with NoTx, 65.5% (59/90) with ANZ, 37.7% (135/358) with RT, 19.6% (63/321) with TMQD and 74.4% (29/39) with TMQW. TMQD was significantly better than RT (OR 4.73 [1.53, 14.61]), ANZ (OR 7.21 [2.25,23.06]), TMQW (OR 6.25 [1.07, 36.43]) and NoTx (OR 26.30 [10.42,66.40]). RT were significantly better than NoTx (OR 5.56 [2.58,11.95]), but did not reach significance compared to ANZ (OR 1.52 [0.36, 6.43]) or TMQW (OR 1.32 [0.16, 10.70]). ANZ was significantly better than NoTx (OR 3.65 [1.03,12.93]). TMQW was not significantly better than NoTx. RT, TMQW and ANZ were significantly worse compared to TMQD in terms of preventing gynecomastia development.

CONCLUSION

Daily Tamoxifen was the best prophylactic treatment choice, significantly better than RT, weekly Tamoxifen and Anastrozole. RT, weekly Tamoxifen and Anastrozole were significantly better than No Treatment/Placebo, but not daily Tamoxifen, in terms of prevention of treatment-induced gynecomastia in patients with prostate cancer.

Characteristics and Predictors of Radiographic Local Failure in Patients With Spinal Metastases Treated With Palliative Conventional Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Although local control is an important issue for longer-term survivors of spinal metastases treated with conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), the literature on radiographic local failure (LF) in these patients is sparse. To inform clinical decision-making, we evaluated rates, consequences, and predictors of radiographic LF in patients with spinal metastases managed with palliative conventional EBRT alone.

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed 296 patients with spinal metastases who received palliative EBRT at a single institution (2006-2013). Radiographic LF was defined as radiologic progression within the treatment field, with death considered a competing risk. Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence, and Cox regression analyses determined overall survival estimates, LF rates, and predictors of LF, respectively.

Results

There were 182 patients with follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging; median overall survival for these patients was 7.7 months. Patients received a median of 30 Gy in 10 fractions to a median of 4 vertebral bodies. Overall, 74 of 182 patients (40.7%) experienced LF. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month LF rates were 26.5%, 33.1%, and 36.5%, respectively, while corresponding rates of death were 24.3%, 38.1%, and 45.9%. Median time to LF was 3.8 months. Of those with LF, 51.4% had new compression fractures, 39.2% were admitted for pain control, and 35.1% received reirradiation; median time from radiation therapy (RT) to each of these events was 3.0, 5.7, and 9.2 months, respectively. Independent predictors of LF included single-fraction RT (8 Gy) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.592; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.437-4.675; P = .002), lung histology (HR, 3.568; 95% CI, 1.532-8.309; P = .003), and kidney histology (HR, 4.937; 95% CI, 1.529-15.935; P = .008).

Conclusions

Patients experienced a >30% rate of radiographic LF by 1 year after EBRT. Single-fraction RT and lung or kidney histology predicted LF. Given the high rates of LF for patients with favorable prognosis, assessing the risk of death versus LF is important for clinical decision-making.

Characteristics of Patients and Treatment Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Spinal Tumor Program

Objective: We describe characteristics of patient and treatment recommendations from a spinal tumor board at one institution, including representation from palliative care.

Background: The impact of prospective multidisciplinary input for patients with spinal tumors is poorly understood despite their increasing complexity.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 622 cases sequentially discussed at a weekly spinal tumor board, and abstracted patient and treatment information from the medical record and meeting minutes.

Results: From April 2017 to February 2019, 622 cases representing 438 unique patients were discussed. The median age was 62 years (range 21–92). Most patients had spinal tumors originating from metastases (91.78%), including breast (14.3%), nonsmall cell lung cancer (13.4%), prostate (10.9%), and renal cell cancer (8.8%), and the remainder had primary central nervous system (4.3%) or benign tumors (3.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients were alive at last follow-up. Conventional external beam radiotherapy was the most common treatment recommendation (33.8%) followed by surgery (26.2%), stereotactic body radiation therapy (17.8%), imaging follow-up (16.6%), and vertebroplasty (15.9%). Palliative care was the primary treatment recommended for 4.5%, and no therapy recommended for 4.0%. Treatment recommendation involved two modalities for 29% of cases, and three in 1.3% of cases. In four cases, biopsy to confirm pathology changed management due to unexpected findings of osteomyelitis, hematopoiesis, or new diagnosis of plasmacytoma.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary input is integral to the optimal care of spinal tumor patients. The high risk of death highlights the need to prioritize modalities that optimize quality of life in the context of a patient's individual prognosis.

Impact of primary tumor-specific growth rate on treatment failure for nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prognostic impact of primary tumor-specific growth rate (TSGR) on treatment outcomes after definitive radiation therapy (RT) for nonoropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (non-OPSCC).

METHODS

The diagnostic tumor and nodal volumes of 39 non-OPSCC patients were contoured and compared to corresponding RT planning scan volumes to determine TSGR. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence-free survival were evaluated according to the Kaplan-Meier method; and hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression. Based on the 75th percentile TSGR of 2.18%, we stratified patients into a high TSGR group (≥ 2.18% per day) and low TSGR group (< 2.18% per day).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 22 months (range: 1-86 months) and median time between diagnostic and simulation computed tomography scans was 22 days (range: 7-170 days). Median RT dose was 70 Gy (range: 60-79.2 Gy). Based on the 75th percentile TSGR, OS at median follow-up was 50.0% for the high TSGR group compared to 92.5% for the low TSGR group (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 2.12[1.16-11.42], P = 0.018). There was a trend toward worse DFS at median follow-up for the high versus low TSGR groups, at 55.6% and 82.3%, respectively (HR [95% CI] = 2.29[0.82-6.38], P = 0.103).

CONCLUSION

Our study contributes to growing literature on TSGR as a temporal biomarker in patients with non-OPSCC. Patients with high TSGR ≥2.18% per day have significantly worse OS compared to those with TSGR below this threshold. Efforts to address treatment initiation delays may benefit patients with particularly aggressive and rapidly growing tumors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:2378-2384, 2020.