Effects of green light supplementation with red and blue combinations of LED light spectrums on the growth and transcriptional response of Haematococcus pluvialis

Light management strategy is crucial for improving microalgal production in terms of higher biomass and economically valuable bioactive molecules. However, green light has received less attention in developing light managements for algae and higher plant due to its low absorption rate by chlorophyll. In this study, the effects of green light supplementation, in the combination with red and blue light were investigated in Haematococcus pluvialis. 10% and 20% of green light supplementations were applied in 3:2 ratios of red and blue LED light combinations as an expense of red-light. Growth rates, chlorophyll concentration, and dry weight were measured to assess the growth kinetics of H. pluvialis along with the relative transcript accumulations of four mRNAs: Rubisco, PTOX2, PsaB, and PsbS. Growth rates, chlorophyll concentrations and dry weight were found significantly higher in presence of 10% green light supplementation compared to red and blue light combinations. The relative transcript accumulations of Rubisco and PsbS genes showed significant upregulation at the end of the experiments (with the fold change of 42.91 ± 12.08 and 98.57 ± 27.38, respectively, relative to the beginning of the experiments) compared to combinations of red and blue light (fold change of 19.09 ± 3.0 and 47.77 ± 14.21, respectively, relative to beginning of the experiments). PsaB and PTOX2 transcripts did not show significant accumulation differences between treatments. It seems that green light has a dose dependent additive effect on the growth rate of H. pluvialis. The upregulation of Rubisco and PsbS may indicate green light dependent carbon assimilation and light-harvesting response in H. pluvialis.

Abstract OT3-04-03: KEYNOTE-756: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab versus placebo in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk early-stage ER+/HER2– breast cancer

Background:Although ER+/HER2– breast cancer has a better overall prognosis than other breast cancer subtypes, there is a high-risk subpopulation characterized by high-grade tumors and decreased sensitivity to endocrine therapy, higher responsiveness to chemotherapy and worse prognosis. A large meta-analysis of prospective studies focusing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for treatment of stage I-III breast cancer demonstrated that increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates at surgery were associated with improved survival. This correlation was observed across triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), HER2+ breast cancer, and high-grade HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Specifically, patients with a pCR after NAC had a 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of 90%, whereas patients who did not achieve a pCR had a 5-year EFS rate of 60%.Therefore, increasing pCR rates after NAC may have a substantial impact for patients with high-risk early-stage HR+/HER2– breast cancer. KEYNOTE-756 is a global, randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab (vs placebo) + chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by pembrolizumab (vs placebo) plus endocrine therapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk, early-stage ER+/HER2– breast cancer.

Methods: Patients with T1c-2 cN1-2 or T3-4 cN0-2 grade 3 or grade 2 with Ki-67 ≥30%, invasive, ductal ER+/HER2– breast cancerwill be stratified by lymph node involvement (positive vs negative), tumor PD-L1 status (positive vs negative), ER positivity (≥10% vs <10%), and anthracycline dosing schedule (Q3W vs Q2W), and then randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo in combination with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 QW) for 4 cycles followed by (doxorubicin [60 mg/m2] or epirubicin [100 mg/m2]) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) Q2/3W for another 4 cycles. After definitive surgery (± radiation therapy, as indicated), patients will receive adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W) or placebo for 9 additional administrations, in combination with endocrine therapy, which can be given for up to 10 years. Co-primary end points are pCR rate and EFS. Secondary end points are safety and overall survival. The global study will open in North America and Latin America, Europe, and Asia Pacific in the second half of 2018.

Citation Format: Cardoso F, Bardia A, Andre F, Cescon DW, McArthur H, Telli M, Loi S, Cortés J, Schmid P, Harbeck N, Denkert C, Jackisch C, Jia L, Tryfonidis K, Karantza V. KEYNOTE-756: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab versus placebo in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk early-stage ER+/HER2– breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-04-03.

Abstract MS1-2: New clinical approaches for TNBC

Over the last decade, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been the subject of intense clinical investigation. Importantly, an improved understanding of the critical role of DNA damage repair deficiency in TNBC has led to effective therapeutic strategies to target BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated TNBCs with platinum chemotherapy agents and PARP inhibitors. A major area of increasing clinical relevance focuses on the treatment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated breast cancers after the development of resistance to platinum and PARP inhibitor therapy. Lurbinectedin, a novel marine derived DNA damaging agent, has shown activity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated cancers, including those with platinum resistance.

While therapeutic strategies for TNBC patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have increased, most TNBC patients lack an underlying germline mutation in these genes and continue to have high unmet clinical need. Multiple lines of investigation are currently underway. Androgen receptor (AR) blockade has shown preliminary proof-of-concept in AR expressing TNBCs. While monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors has shown modest activity in metastatic TNBC, multiple studies are exploring the role of these agents in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapies and other immunotherapeutic agents. Given the high prevalence of TP53 mutations in TNBC, strategies to target additional cell cycle checkpoints including ATR, ATM, Wee1 and others may hold promise. Antibody-drug conjugates targeting Trop-2, LIV-1 and GPNMB expressing TNBCs have also shown clinical activity and are advancing in clinical development.

Citation Format: Telli M. New clinical approaches for TNBC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr MS1-2.

Abstract OT2-6-16: A pivotal multicenter, randomized, study evaluating the novel antibody-drug conjugate CDX-011 in patients with metastatic, triple-negative, high GPNMB over-expressing breast cancer

Background: GPNMB is an internalizable transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in multiple tumor types where it is a poor prognostic factor. Its functions appear to include mediating intercellular adhesion, promoting tissue repair, and regulating cell growth and differentiation. In tumor cell lines including breast cancer (BC), GPNMB enhances tumor growth and bone metastases. Relative to other BC subtypes, triple-negative BC (TNBC) highly over-expresses GPNMB in tumor epithelium where it correlates with a higher risk of recurrence. CDX-011 (glembatumumab vedotin) is a fully human GPNMB-specific monoclonal antibody drug conjugate combining the tumor-targeting GPNMB antibody with the potent cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor, monomethylauristatin E (MMAE). In the Phase II EMERGE study, 122 patients (pts) with heavily pre-treated BC (2-7 priors) and GPNMB-expression by IHC in ≥ 5% of either the tumor epithelial or stromal cells in archival tissue were randomized 2:1 to receive CDX-011 or “investigator's choice” (IC) single-agent chemotherapy, with crossover to CDX-011 permitted. CDX-011 as compared to IC, demonstrated higher objective response rates, with ORR of 8/25 (32%) vs 1/8 (13%) for high GPNMB expression (defined as expression in ≥25% of epithelial tumor cells) and 5/27 (19%) vs. 0/9 (0%) for TNBC. In the presence of both TNBC and high GPNMB, ORR was 4/12 (33%) vs 0/4 (0%) which corresponded to a doubling of median progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.008) and median overall survival (OS, p = 0.003). CDX-011 was well tolerated with less hematologic toxicity (neutropenia: 29% vs 44%; leukopenia: 10% vs 27%; thrombocytopenia: 4% vs. 15%) but more rash (47% vs. 2%) and neuropathy (23% vs 12%) than IC. Methods: The current pivotal study aims to evaluate CDX-011 in metastatic GPNMB-over-expressing TNBC defined as ER and PR < 1%, HER2 negative (0-1+ IHC, or FISH ratio < 1.8). Eligibility criteria include >25% tumor epithelium GPNMB expression by central IHC; taxane and anthracyline resistance; ≤1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced BC; measurable disease by RECIST 1:1 and no persistent treatment-related toxicity of ≥ Grade 2 severity. 300 pts will be randomized (2:1) to receive CDX-011 (1.88 mg/kg IV q 21 days) or capecitabine (2500 mg/m2 daily for d1-14, q21 days) until progression or toxicity. Disease assessments are performed every six weeks for 6 months, and every 12 weeks thereafter. All pts are subsequently followed for survival. Endpoints are ORR and PFS (co-primary), duration of response, OS, safety, pharmacokinetics, and quality of life; tumor response assessments will be assessed by central review per RECIST 1.1. The trial has 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.64 for PFS with α = 0.01 and/or a 30% increase in ORR (from 15% to 30%) with α = 0.04. For further information, contact info@celldextherapeutics.com.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT2-6-16.

Abstract OT1-4-04: A phase II randomized, open-label, neoadjuvant study of LCL161, an oral antagonist of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) negatively regulate cell death through a variety of mechanisms. LCL161 is an oral small-molecule antagonist of IAPs that has demonstrated single-agent activity and synergy with paclitaxel in breast cancer tumor models. In preclinical studies, a gene expression signature has been shown to enrich for response to LCL161. The recommended dose of LCL161 1800 mg once weekly has demonstrated preliminary antitumor activity with paclitaxel in an ongoing Phase Ib study in patients with breast cancer.

Trial design: This is a Phase II, randomized, open-label study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel with or without LCL161 in women with operable, newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer (NCT01617668). Key inclusion criteria include women with histologically confirmed diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer; clinical stages T2, N0–N2, M0; candidates for mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery; ECOG performance status ≤1; known status of the LCL161-predictive gene expression signature (positive and negative gene signature is a stratification factor); and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Key exclusion criteria are: bilateral or inflammatory breast cancer; locally recurrent breast cancer; patients currently receiving systemic therapy for any other malignancy, or having received systemic therapy for a malignancy in the preceding 3 months; impaired gastrointestinal function that may affect the absorption of LCL161; or uncontrolled cardiac disease.

Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive paclitaxel IV (80 mg/m2 weekly) with or without oral LCL161 (1800 mg once weekly) for 12 weeks (corresponding to 4 treatment cycles). Each treatment arm is stratified 1:1 based on gene expression signature status (positive or negative).

Endpoints: The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast after 12 weeks of therapy, analyzed separately in the gene expression signature positive and negative groups. The key secondary endpoint is the pCR rate following treatment with LCL161 and paclitaxel in gene expression signature-positive or -negative tumors. Other secondary endpoints include: pCR rate in breast after 12 weeks of therapy in the full study population, and in patients with gene expression signature-positive and -negative tumors treated with paclitaxel alone; pCR rate in breast, regional nodes and axilla; biomarker evaluation including caspase 3 activation in tumor; safety; and pharmacokinetics of LCL161.

Statistical methods: pCR analysis will be performed according to treatment group and gene expression signature status. An absolute increase of at least 7.5% in pCR rate of the experimental arm over the control arm will be considered as evidence of clinically relevant efficacy.

Target accrual: Approximately 200 patients will be randomized into this study. Recruitment is ongoing across America, Europe, and Asia.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT1-4-04.

Prospective cardiotoxicity screening during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for renal cell carcinoma: An institutional experience

e16003

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can lead to cardiotoxicity either directly by causing left ventricular dysfunction, or indirectly by increasing blood pressure. In light of prior studies at our institution documenting a high rate of symptomatic heart failure in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing treatment with sunitinib, we instituted a prospective screening protocol to characterize the incidence and natural history of TKI-associated cardiotoxicity. Methods: From March-December 2008, patients receiving TKI therapy for renal cell carcinoma received cardiac biomarker screening (NT- BNP and Troponin I at baseline and after week 4 of each cycle) and transthoracic echocardiography (baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter). If biomarkers were elevated or a decline in ejection fraction was observed, patients were referred for cardiology evaluation. Results: Twenty-six patients have been included since the protocol's initiation. No elevations in cardiac troponin I have been observed to date. Eight patients (31%) had elevations in NT-BNP (a sensitive marker for heart failure). The TKIs involved included sunitinib (5 patients), sorafenib (2 patients), and bevacizumab (1 patient). One patient who was treated with sunitinib had frank left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Seven of the eight patients with elevated NT-BNP values had baseline hypertension, and five patients had significant increases in blood pressure during TKI treatment. In all patients with follow-up biomarkers, NT-BNP levels fell after initiation of heart failure therapy. TKI treatment appeared to ‘unmask’ previously subclinical cardiac injury, including prior silent myocardial infarction (one patient), left ventricular hypertrophy (four patients), and valvular disease (three patients). Updated data from the ongoing screening protocol will be presented. Conclusions: The Stanford TKI screening protocol identified a high rate of subclinical cardiotoxicity and allowed for early initiation of heart failure therapy. Further studies are needed to determine if this approach can decrease cardiac morbidity and improve oncologic outcomes by preventing discontinuation or dose interruption of TKI therapy.

[Table: see text]