3
|
Iavazzo C, Fotiou A, Tsiatas M, Christopoulou A, Spiliotis J, Sugarbaker P. Survey on the current gynaecological approach of ovarian cancer patients: The utility of HIPEC. Pleura Peritoneum 2020; 5:20190029. [PMID: 32821775 PMCID: PMC7410114 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2019-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this survey was to acquire an overview of the current management of ovarian cancer with an emphasis on the utility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).Methods: An email was sent to Oncologists prior to PSOGI International Symposium on Advanced Ovarian Cancer, Athens 11-13 April 2019. Doctors submitted responses on the relevant website. The self-report survey contained 17 questions. RESULTS In total, 467 Medical Oncologists, Surgical Oncologists or Gynaecologic Oncologists were participated and answered to this survey. The resectability of disease was evaluated by laparoscopy from 48.5% of the participants, while 51.5% answered that they stage their patients pre-surgically with the use of CT or MRI. The preferred first intervention in advanced ovarian cancer patients is the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (72%). Regarding the use of HIPEC, almost half of the participants answered that there is role of HIPEC use in ovarian cancer patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, while almost 70% answered positively about the utility of HIPEC use in ovarian cancer recurrence. As for the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients, half of the responders answered negatively. Finally, only 25% of the participants responded that they always check the BRCA status of their ovarian cancer patients, despite the possible differentiation of treatment based on the molecular profiling (80%). CONCLUSIONS The results of this survey indicate the utility of HIPEC in treatment of ovarian cancer patients and the differences in the overall management of ovarian cancer patients in the current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Iavazzo
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Alexandros Fotiou
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - M. Tsiatas
- Medical Oncology Department, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece
| | | | - John Spiliotis
- Surgical Oncology and HIPEC Department, European Interbalkan Medical Centre, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Paul Sugarbaker
- Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsiatas M, Kalogeras KT, Manousou K, Wirtz RM, Gogas H, Veltrup E, Zagouri F, Lazaridis G, Koutras A, Christodoulou C, Pentheroudakis G, Petraki C, Bafaloukos D, Pectasides D, Kosmidis P, Samantas E, Karanikiotis C, Papakostas P, Dimopoulos MA, Fountzilas G. Abstract P1-07-03: Evaluation of the prognostic value of CD3, CD8 and FOXP3 mRNA expression in early breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p1-07-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been shown to be of prognostic value in several cancer types. In early breast cancer, TILs have a prognostic utility, as well, especially in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TILs presence is broadly associated with improved survival, however there is controversy regarding TILs subpopulations. In general, T cell infiltration is higher in non-luminal and more aggressive tumors, like the basal-like subtype. Among TILs subpopulations, CD8-positive T cell infiltration is associated with better outcome, whereas high numbers of FOXP3-positive T regulatory cells are associated with worse outcome in ER-positive tumors and better outcome in HER2-positive and TNBC tumors.
Patients and Methods: Early breast cancer patients, treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy within two randomized trials (HE10/97 and HE10/00) were included in the study. We evaluated, by qRT-PCR, 826 macrodissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples for mRNA expression of CD3, CD8 and FOXP3for potential prognostic significance in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). TILs were evaluated in whole sections as percent of total cells.
Results: Median age was 52.7 years, while 54.2% of the patients were postmenopausal and 79.0% ER/PgR-positive. After a median follow-up of 133.0 months, 255 patients (30.9%) had died and 314 (38.0%) had disease progression. All three mRNA markers were positively correlated with TILs (Spearman's r=0.52 for CD3, 0.41 for CD8 and 0.47 for FOXP3, all p-values <0.001), while Ki67 protein expression was greater in tumors with high mRNA expression (median cut-off) of the markers (Mann-Whitney, all p-values <0.001). Additionally, tumors of higher histological grade and negative ER/PgR status were more frequent in patients with high CD3, CD8 or FOXP3 mRNA expression, as compared to patients with low expression, (chi-square, p-values <0.010). In the univariate analysis, high CD3 and CD8 mRNA expression was found to be of favorable prognostic value for DFS (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92, Wald's p=0.007 and HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.95, p=0.016, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the association of high CD8 mRNA expression with increased DFS was retained (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99, p=0.048), whereas that of high CD3 mRNA expression was of marginal statistical significance (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.59-1.01, p=0.059). Moreover, a significant interaction was observed between HER2 status and CD3 mRNA expression with respect to DFS (interaction p=0.032). In the HER2-positive subgroup, the hazard ratio associated with high CD3 mRNA expression was of greater magnitude (HR=0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.76, p=0.002) compared to the hazard ratio presented above, for the entire cohort. No significant findings were observed for FOXP3 in terms of DFS, while none of the studied markers were of prognostic value for OS.
Conclusions: High CD3 and CD8 mRNA expression in early breast cancer patients is of prognostic value for decreased risk for relapse and, in the future, could potentially be of importance in deciding the most appropriate therapeutic strategy in light of the recent immune-related treatment developments.
Citation Format: Tsiatas M, Kalogeras KT, Manousou K, Wirtz RM, Gogas H, Veltrup E, Zagouri F, Lazaridis G, Koutras A, Christodoulou C, Pentheroudakis G, Petraki C, Bafaloukos D, Pectasides D, Kosmidis P, Samantas E, Karanikiotis C, Papakostas P, Dimopoulos M-A, Fountzilas G. Evaluation of the prognostic value of CD3, CD8 and FOXP3 mRNA expression in early breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tsiatas
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - KT Kalogeras
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - K Manousou
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - RM Wirtz
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - H Gogas
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - E Veltrup
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - F Zagouri
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - G Lazaridis
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - A Koutras
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Christodoulou
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Petraki
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Bafaloukos
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Pectasides
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - P Kosmidis
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - E Samantas
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Karanikiotis
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - P Papakostas
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - M-A Dimopoulos
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - G Fountzilas
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece; STRATYFIER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gavalas NG, Tsiatas M, Tsitsilonis O, Politi E, Ioannou K, Ziogas AC, Rodolakis A, Vlahos G, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Terpos E, Antsaklis A, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A. VEGF directly suppresses activation of T cells from ascites secondary to ovarian cancer via VEGF receptor type 2. Br J Cancer 2013; 107:1869-75. [PMID: 23169339 PMCID: PMC3504940 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor action in tumour angiogenesis is well characterised; nevertheless, it functions as a key element in the promotion of the immune system’s evasion by tumours. We sought to investigate the possible direct effect of VEGF on T-cell activation and through which type of VEGF receptor it exerts this effect on cells isolated from ovarian cancer patients’ ascites. Methods: T cells isolated from the ascites of ovarian cancer patients were cultured with anti-CD3 and IL-2, with or without VEGF for 14 days and the number of viable T cells was counted. Cytotoxic activity of cultured T cells and expression of VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), was assayed. Results: The addition of VEGF in cultures significantly reduced the number and proliferation rate of T cells in a dose-dependent manner and CD3+ T cells expressed VEGFR-2 on their surface upon activation. Experiments with specific anti-VEGFR-2 antibodies revealed that the direct suppressive effect of VEGF on T-cell proliferation is mediated by VEGFR-2. We also showed that VEGF significantly reduced the cytotoxic activity of T cells. Conclusion: Our study showed that ascites-derived T cells secrete VEGF and express VEGFR-2 upon activation. Vascular endothelial growth factor directly suppresses T-cell activation via VEGFR-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N G Gavalas
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School, University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, 80 Vas. Sofias Avenue, 115 28 Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bamias A, Dafni U, Karadimou A, Timotheadou E, Aravantinos G, Psyrri A, Xanthakis I, Tsiatas M, Koutoulidis V, Constantinidis C, Hatzimouratidis C, Samantas E, Visvikis A, Chrisophos M, Stravodimos K, Deliveliotis C, Eleftheraki A, Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Dimopoulos MA. Prospective, open-label, randomized, phase III study of two dose-dense regimens MVAC versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with inoperable, metastatic or relapsed urothelial cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study (HE 16/03). Ann Oncol 2012; 24:1011-7. [PMID: 23136231 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combinations of methotrexate, vinblastine, Adriamycin, cisplatin (Pharmanell, Athens, Greece) (MVAC) or gemcitabine, cisplatin (GC) represent the standard treatment of advanced urothelial cancer (UC). Dose-dense (DD)-MVAC has achieved longer progression-free survival (PFS) than the conventional MVAC. However, the role of GC intensification has not been studied. We conducted a randomized, phase III study comparing a DD-GC regimen with DD-MVAC in advanced UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred and thirty patients were randomly assigned between DD-MVAC: 66 (M 30 mg/m(2), V 3 mg/m(2), A 30 mg/m(2), C 70 mg/m(2) q 2 weeks) and DD-GC 64 (G 2500 mg/m(2), C 70 mg/m(2) q 2 weeks). The median follow-up was 52.1 months (89 events). RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) and PFS were 19 and 8.5 months for DD-MVAC and 18 and 7.8 months for DD-GC (P = 0.98 and 0.36, respectively). Neutropenic infections were less frequent for DD-GC than for DD-MVAC (0% versus 8%). More patients on DD-GC received at least six cycles of treatment (85% versus 63%, P = 0.011) and the discontinuation rate was lower for DD-GC (3% versus 13%). CONCLUSIONS Although DD-GC was not superior to DD-MVAC, it was better tolerated. DD-GC could be considered as a reasonable therapeutic option for further study in this patient population. Clinical Trial Number ACTRN12610000845033, www.anzctr.org.au.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bamias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|