The subcutaneous ICD replacement in the clinical practice: preliminary observations from the multicentre RHYTHM DETECT

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Experience with the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is expanding rapidly. However, few data on generator replacement exist.

Purpose

The aim of this analysis was to describe the procedural characteristics of the pulse generator replacement in the current Italian practice and to provide a preliminary insight in the possible acute complications associated with first elective S-ICD generator replacements.

Methods

We analyzed 106 consecutive patients enrolled in the Rhythm Detect registry who underwent elective replacement of the S-ICD generator from September 2019 to July 2021. Procedures were accomplished according to the local clinical practice. A chest X-ray was performed, and the PRAETORIAN score was assessed and compared with the one measured after the first implantation.

Results

All replacements were performed in electrophysiology laboratories, 50% in day-hospital regimen, by 1 or 2 expert operators. Procedures were performed using local (87%) or general anaesthesia (13%). The median procedure duration was 40 (30-45) min. The previous S-ICD generator was in a subcutaneous pocket in 58 (55%) patients, and in an intermuscular pocket in the remaining patients. The PRAETORIAN score of the previous system was low (<90) in 93% of patients and intermediate in 7% of patients. In all patients with the device in an intermuscular pocket, the PRAETORIAN score was <90. During the replacement procedure, 22 S-ICD (3 with PRAETORIAN ≥90 before replacement) were removed from the initial subcutaneous position and placed in an intermuscular pocket. After replacement all patients with intermuscular devices had a score <90, and the overall proportion of patients with low-risk PRAETORIAN score raised to 97%. Defibrillation testing was performed only in 10% of patients, while testing was performed in 77% of patients at the first implantation procedure. No procedure-related complications occurred.

Conclusions

S-ICD replacements seem easy to perform with no peri-procedural complications. The adoption of an intermuscular pocket is associated with optimal positioning according to the PREATORIAN score, and seems preferred also in many cases of generators previously placed subcutaneously. In the Italian clinical practice conversion testing is rarely performed at device replacement.

C1 THE ROLE OF ATRIAL ELECTRO–MECHANICAL COUPLING AS PREDICTOR OF CATHETER ABLATION EFFICIENCY

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) results in electrical and structural remodeling of the atria, and the extent of remodeling has already been found to be associated with higher AF recurrence rate after catheter ablation (CA). Recently, a novel echocardiographic parameter derived from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), called PA–TDI, has been introduced to assess the total atrial activation time, as a non–invasive surrogate of fibrosis and atrial cardiomyopathy. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of PA–TDI interval as predictor of AF ablation efficacy.

Methods

Consecutive patients with persistent or paroxysmal symptomatic AF referred to our Center to perform radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation procedures were prospectively enrolled. In these patients, a complete transthoracic echocardiographic examination was performed before and after the ablation procedure, including assessment of the PA–TDI interval.

Results

From October 2018 to May 2020, 221 consecutive patients (mean age 61 ± 9 years, 74% male, mean BMI 26.5 ± 3.6, mean Ejection Fraction 61 ± 6%) symptomatic for AF, undergoing the procedure ablation (first procedure or re–do) were enrolled. Out of the blanking period, 25% of patients experienced recurrence of arrhythmia during follow–up (mean 16 months). Compared to patients who did not relapse, patients with AF recurrence have a generally longer post–procedural PA–TDI interval (139.6 ± 22.1 msec vs 153.9 ± 33 msec, respectively). In the multivariable analysis only post–procedure PA–TDI and re–do interventions were found to be independent predictors of AF recurrence. A PA–TDI cut–off> 144msec identifies patients at risk of post ablation AF recurrence with sensitivity 58.7% and specificity 73.5% (AUC 0.697).

Conclusions

The PA–TDI interval is an independent predictor of AF recurrence after catheter ablation. This echocardiographic parameter is easily obtainable, low–cost, reproducible, and accessible even in peripheral centers.