Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus nivolumab as organ-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a phase 2 trial

Cystectomy is a standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but it is life-altering. We initiated a phase 2 study in which patients with MIBC received four cycles of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab followed by clinical restaging. Patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) could proceed without cystectomy. The co-primary objectives were to assess the cCR rate and the positive predictive value of cCR for a composite outcome: 2-year metastasis-free survival in patients forgoing immediate cystectomy or Collapse

Key Words

• phase ii trials
• translational research
• bladder cancer
• cancer immunotherapy
• chemotherapy

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Cisplatin/therapeutic use
• Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use
• Disease-Free Survival
• Gemcitabine
• Muscles
• Neoadjuvant Therapy
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Nivolumab/therapeutic use
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Protein

Collapse

Grants

• U24 CA224319 NCI NIH HHS
• U01 DK124165 NIDDK NIH HHS
• U24 CA224285 NCI NIH HHS
• T32 CA078207 NCI NIH HHS
• S10 OD030463 NIH HHS
• P30 CA196521 NCI NIH HHS
• S10 OD026880 NIH HHS
• U24 CA224316 NCI NIH HHS
• U24 CA224331 NCI NIH HHS
• R01 CA249175 NCI NIH HHS
• V Foundation for Cancer Research (V Foundation)
• Bristol-Myers Squibb (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company)
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)/Partnership for Accelerating Cancer Therapies (PACT)

Collapse

Clinical factors associated with outcome in solid tumor patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a single institution retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) remains limited to a subset of patients and predictive biomarkers of response remains an unmet need, limiting our ability to provide precision medicine. Using real-world data, we aimed to identify potential clinical prognosticators of ICI response in solid tumor patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all solid tumor patients treated with ICIs at the Mount Sinai Hospital between January 2011 and April 2017. Predictors assessed included demographics, performance status, co-morbidities, family history of cancer, smoking status, cancer type, metastatic pattern, and type of ICI. Outcomes evaluated include progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to test the association of predictors with outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 297 ICI-treated patients with diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (N = 81, 27.3%), melanoma (N = 73, 24.6%), hepatocellular carcinoma (N = 51, 17.2%), urothelial carcinoma (N = 51, 17.2%), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (N = 23, 7.7%), and renal cell carcinoma (N = 18, 6.1%). In multivariable analysis, good performance status of ECOG ≤ 2 (PFS, ORR, DCR and OS) and family history of cancer (ORR and DCR) associated with improved ICI response. Bone metastasis was associated with worse outcomes (PFS, ORR, and DCR).

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanisms underlying the clinical predictors of response observed in this real-world analysis, such as genetic variants and bone metastasis-tumor microenvironment, warrant further exploration in larger studies incorporating translational endpoints. Consistently positive clinical correlates may help inform patient stratification when considering ICI therapy.

Type, timing, and patient characteristics associated with immune-related adverse event development in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

e15160

Background: Development (DV) of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have been associated (asso/) with (w/) favorable treatment (tx) response, but heterogeneity in clinical presentation remains a concern. We aim to characterize the type, timing, and risk factors asso/ w/ IRAE DV in ICI-treated solid tumor (ST) patients (pts). Methods: The characteristics (char), tx course, and clinical outcomes of ST pts who received at least 2 ICI doses at our institution from 1/1/2011 to 4/29/2017 were reviewed. IRAEs were identified and graded (GR) based on CTCAE (v.4.0). Fisher’s exact test and multivariable regression analyses (MVA) were performed to study the differences between pts w/ versus without (w/o) IRAE. Results: Of the 344 pts identified, 111 pts (32%) had IRAE(s) w/ 145 total events (GR 1: 31%, GR 2: 57%, GR 3: 12%), of which 45% required systemic steroids (SS), 27% lead to ICI discontinuation (DC), and 17% lead to hospitalization (HP, Table). Median time to any IRAE was 12 weeks (w, range 1-149.5w). The most common IRAEs were endocrine (30%), gastrointestinal (GI, 28%), and skin (24%) related. On univariable analysis, antibiotic use, melanoma, and combination ICI use were asso/ w/ IRAE DV; melanoma remained significant on MRA (odds ratio, OR: 3.58 [1.68, 7.64], p = 0.0010). Pts w/ IRAE had higher disease control rate (complete/partial response + stable disease) than pts w/o IRAE (OR: 2.20 [1.29, 3.75], p = 0.0038). Conclusions: Our real-world data showed higher IRAE incidence when compared to those reported in trials, although no GR 4/5 IRAEs occurred. Melanoma was asso/ w/ IRAE DV on MRA, possibly due to the type, dose, and combination of ICIs. These findings warrant further investigation to better identify those at the highest risk to develop clinically significant IRAE. [Table: see text]

The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on health experiences of asylum seekers to the United States

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated preexisting barriers to accessing healthcare and social services faced by asylum seekers to the United States. This study aimed to uncover the impact of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on asylum seekers, including socio-economic stressors and access to medical information, healthcare, and testing.

METHOD

We conducted 15 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with adult asylum seekers to the U.S. and systematically analyzed the resulting transcripts using a consensual qualitative research approach.

RESULTS

The transcripts yielded six domains: (1) knowledge and understanding of COVID-19; (2) attitudes and practices relating to COVID-19 precautions; (3) experience of COVID-19 symptoms; (4) current physical and mental health; (5) access to and interaction with health care; (6) discrimination based on asylum status.

CONCLUSIONS

Although participants had knowledge about COVID-19's communicability and regularly used masks, their living conditions frequently hindered their ability to quarantine and isolate, and their lack of insurance was often a deterrent to them seeking medical care. Notably, immigration status was not a significant factor discouraging participants from seeking care during the pandemic. The findings build on existing knowledge about this community and may help define areas where support and services can be expanded in current and future pandemics.

Effect of concurrent beta-blocker use in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

Stress-induced adrenergic signaling can suppress the immune system. In animal models, pharmacological beta-blockade stimulates CD8 + T-cell activity and improves clinical activity of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in inhibiting tumor growth. Herein, we investigated the effect of BB on clinical outcomes of patients receiving ICB in advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with solid tumors treated with ICB at our institution from January 1, 2011 to April 28, 2017. The primary clinical outcome was disease control. Secondary clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), and duration of therapy (DoT). The primary predictor was use of BB. Association between disease control status and BB use was assessed in univariable and multivariable logistic regression. OS was calculated using hazard ratios of BB-recipient patients vs. BB non-recipient patients via Cox proportional hazards regression models. All tests were two-sided at a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 339 identified patients receiving ICB, 109 (32%) also received BB. In covariate-adjusted analysis, odds of disease control were significantly higher among BB recipients compared to BB-non-recipients (2.79; [1.54-5.03]; P = 0.001). While we did not observe significant association of OS with the use of BB overall, significant association with better OS was observed for the urothelial carcinoma cohort (HR: 0.24; [0.09, 0.62]; P = 0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent use of BB may enhance the clinical activity of ICB and influence overall survival, particularly in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Our findings warrant further investigation to understand the interaction of beta adrenergic signaling and antitumor immune activity and explore a combination strategy.

Clinical efficacy of immunotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors in patients with chronic kidney disease

e15109

Background: Regulatory T cells play a key role in protecting kidney cells from ischemic injury. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may increase the risk of acute kidney injury via inhibition of regulatory T cells [1, 2]. Prospective clinical trials have largely excluded patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); thus, we have limited knowledge of the safety and efficacy of ICI in these patients. Herein, we hypothesize that patients with CKD receiving ICIs have worse clinical outcomes. Methods: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included adult patients with solid tumors who were treated with ICIs at The Mount Sinai Hospital between 2011 and 2017. Clinical endpoints [response to treatment, progression of disease (POD) on treatment, mortality] were compared between patients with and without CKD using multivariate logistic regression. Odds ratios were controlled for demographics, primary tumor type, presence of cardiovascular comorbidities, smoking status, incidence of renal adverse events, and a composite of stage of illness with indication for treatment [localized—neoadjuvant, localized—adjuvant, regionally advanced, metastatic disease]. Data were analyzed using R version 3.5.1 with the following packages: readr, dplyr, broom, lubridate, tableone. Results: 420 patients met inclusion criteria: 399 patients without CKD and 21 patients with CKD. Cohorts are well matched for demographics, smoking status, stage/indication for treatment. The CKD cohort has a higher proportion of patients with urothelial cancer compared to patients without CKD (33% vs 11%) as well as a higher proportion of patients with HTN (81% vs 53%), HF (14% vs 3%), and DM (48% vs 21%). There was no statistical difference in odds of response to treatment [OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.26-2.23], POD [OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.15-1.17], or mortality [OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.71-5.96] between the CKD and non-CKD cohort. Conclusions: The data suggest the presence of CKD is not associated with worse clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICIs. As a small retrospective study, the conclusions are hypothesis-generating but support continued use of immunotherapy in CKD in clinical practice and the inclusion of patients with CKD in immunotherapy clinical trials to further clarify safety and efficacy. [Table: see text]

What happens at radiographic disease progression in patients with metastatic cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors? A single institution analysis

e15157

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely adopted for multiple indications across various malignancies. Despite the surge in their use, what occurs at radiographic progression (rPOD) remains poorly characterized. Herein, we describe patients at our institution that experienced rPOD on ICIs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients (pts) with solid tumors that received at least 2 doses of ICI at our institution from 12/01/2010 to 04/25/2017. Patients’ demographic data, medical history, ICI course, and outcomes were recorded. Characteristics at rPOD included change in tumor size by metastatic site, symptoms, and hospital utilization. Additionally, we characterized outcomes of pts who continued ICIs after rPOD. Fisher’s exact test was performed to identify potential clinical predictors of hospitalization at rPOD. Results: Of the 361 evaluable pts, 238 experienced rPOD. In this cohort, the most common primary sites of disease are: genitourinary (24%), thoracic (24%), skin (21%), and hepatobiliary (15%). At rPOD, 71 (30%) patients were hospitalized within 30 days, with infection (27%) and pain (18%) being the most common reasons. Median survival of pts with hospitalization was 2 months (mos; 95% CI: 0-4), compared to 10 months (95% CI: 8-12) for those not hospitalized (p<0.001). Forty-six (19%) pts continued ICI treatment after rPOD (median duration = 2.8 mos), with eleven (5%) pts continuing for at least 6 months (median duration = 8 mos). Conclusions: In our study of real-world cancer pts treated with ICI, a higher than expected proportion was hospitalized within 30 days after rPOD, and this population had a worse overall survival compared to those that were not. A subgroup of pt with rPOD did not experience clinical progression, and thus treatment was continued, although further benefit was limited to a small subset. Further studies are needed to better understand the underlying mechanism to identify those who benefits from treatment beyond rPOD. [Table: see text]

Effect of concurrent beta-blocker use in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced solid tumors

e15068

Background: Stress-induced adrenergic signaling suppresses the immune system. In animal model systems, pharmacological beta-blockade stimulated CD8+ T-cell activity, and further, it improved clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in inhibiting tumor growth. Herein, we investigate the effect of beta blockers (BB) on clinical outcomes of patients receiving ICI in advanced solid tumors. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with solid tumors treated with at least 2 doses of ICI at our institution from December 2010 to April 2017. The primary outcome was disease control rate (DCR), as defined by radiographic complete response, partial response, or stable disease, by RECIST 1.1 criteria. The primary predictor was use of BB (β1-selective BB vs. no BB; non-selective BB vs no BB). The primary predictive variable was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression model controlling for several parameters including patient demographics, co-morbidities, ECOG performance status, and tumor type and location of metastases. All tests were two-sided at the significant level of 0.05. Results: We identified 298 evaluable patients with median age of 66.5 (31-95). Of these patients, 200 (67%) did not use BB, 75 (25%) used β1-selective BB, and 23 (8%) used non-selective BB. In multivariate analysis, use of β1-selective BB was significantly associated with improved DCR compared to no BB (ORR 2.43, 95% CI 1.31-4.51, P = 0.005), while use of non-selective BB was not associated with improved DCR (ORR 1.71, 95% CI 0.65-1.47, P = 0.27). Conclusions: The concurrent use of BB may enhance the clinical activity of ICI, particularly β1-selective BB. Our findings warrant further investigation to understand the interaction of β1- and β2-adrenergic signaling and antitumor immune activity, and potentially explore a combination strategy of ICI and BB.

Smoking status and immunotherapy outcomes in smoking-associated cancers

e15097

Background: Improved immunotherapy (IO) outcomes have been observed among non-small cell lung cancer patients with a current or former smoking history. This is thought to be a consequence of increased immunogenic mutation burden among smoking-related cancers. We set out to explore the association between smoking status and immunotherapy outcomes in lung and other smoking-associated cancers. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients with advanced, smoking-associated solid tumor types, treated with single-agent anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy at a single center between July 2014 and February 2018. The primary outcome was overall survival from date of IO initiation. The secondary outcome was overall response, defined as radiographic complete response or partial response, by RECIST 1.1 criteria. The primary predictor was smoking status (former/current smoker vs. never smoker). The primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and multivariable logistic regression models, respectively. Models were adjusted for age and sex, and stratified by cancer type. Results: The majority of patients were male (64%) with a history of smoking (72%); the average age was 67.1 ± 11.4 years. Cancer types represented were: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, N = 81), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, N = 41), urothelial carcinoma (BLCA, N = 39), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC, N = 21), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC, N = 18). Over a median follow-up of 11.3 months (range 0.5-53.2), there were 96 deaths and 27% of evaluable patients achieved radiographic response. Response was not evaluable in 27 patients. In multivariable regression analysis, smoking status was not significantly associated with overall survival nor overall response in any cancer type examined (Table). Conclusions: Smoking status was not associated with outcomes in our cohort of IO-treated patients with smoking-associated cancers, though sample size was limited. [Table: see text]

Co-primary endpoint analysis of HCRN GU 16-257: Phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab with selective bladder sparing in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)

447

Background: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) plus systemic therapy has been known for decades to achieve durable bladder-intact survival in a subset of patients with MIBC but efforts to advance this paradigm have been complicated by a lack of (a) prospective studies, (b) rigorous approaches to assess and define clinical complete response (cCR), and (c) integration of novel therapies. Methods: Eligible patients were cisplatin-eligible with cT2-T4aN0M0 urothelial bladder cancer. Patients received 4 cycles of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab followed by clinical restaging including urine cytology, MRI/CT of the bladder, cystoscopy and bladder biopsies. Patients achieving a cCR (normal cytology, imaging, and cT0/Ta) were eligible to proceed without cystectomy and receive nivolumab q2 weeks x 8 followed by surveillance. Patients not achieving cCR were recommended to undergo cystectomy. Coprimary endpoints included (1) cCR rate and (2) association between cCR and 2-year outcomes. The key secondary endpoint was the impact of pre-specified baseline genomic alterations on outcomes. Additional biomarkers to refine patient selection were also explored. Results: Between 8/2018-11/2020, 76 patients were enrolled at 7 sites (male 79%, median age 69; cT2 = 56%, cT3 = 32%, cT4 = 12%). Median follow-up is 27 months. 72/76 patients underwent clinical restaging and a cCR was achieved in 33/76 (43%; 95% CI: 32%, 55%). One cCR patient opted for immediate cystectomy (ypTaN0M0). Outcomes are summarized in the Table. Baseline ERCC2, ATM, FANCC, or RB1 alterations were not, but tumor mutational burden ≥ 10 mutations/mb was, significantly associated with the composite endpoint of ypT0 (immediate cystectomy) or 2-year bladder-intact metastasis-free survival (BIMFS). On landmark analysis, VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging–Reporting and Data System) score (3-5 versus 1-2) on restaging MRI (central blinded review) was associated with inferior BIMFS (HR 4.5; p = <0.01) and MFS (HR 19.3; p <0.01). Circulating tumor DNA data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: TURBT followed by gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab achieves stringently defined cCR in a substantial subset of patients with MIBC. ≥2-year bladder-intact survival is achieved in the majority of patients with a cCR. Clinical trial information: NCT03558087 . [Table: see text]