Memory support training and lifestyle modifications to promote healthy aging in persons at risk for Alzheimer's disease: a digital application supported intervention (Brain Boosters)

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based interventions to protect against cognitive decline among older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are urgently needed. Rehabilitation approaches to support memory and behavioral/lifestyle interventions are recognized as promising strategies for preserving or improving cognitive health, although few previous interventions have combined both approaches. This paper describes the protocol of the Brain Boosters intervention, which synergistically combines training in compensatory and healthy lifestyle behaviors and supports implementation and tracking of new behaviors with a digital application.

METHODS

The study utilizes a single-site, single-blinded, randomized controlled design to compare a structured lifestyle and compensatory aid intervention to an education-only self-guided intervention. We plan to enroll 225 community-dwelling adults (25% from underrepresented groups) aged 65 + who endorse subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and low baseline levels of healthy lifestyle behaviors. Both interventions will be administered in group format, consisting of 15 two-hour classes that occur weekly for ten weeks and taper to bi-monthly and monthly, for an intervention duration of 6 months. Participants in both interventions will receive education about a variety of memory support strategies and healthy lifestyle behaviors, focusing on physical and cognitive activity and stress management. The structured intervention will also receive support in adopting new behaviors and tracking set goals aided by the Electronic Memory and Management Aid (EMMA) digital application. Primary outcomes include global cognition (composite of memory, attention, and executive function tests) and everyday function (Everyday Cognition Questionnaire). Data will be collected at baseline and outcome visits, at approximately 6, 12, and 18 months. Qualitative interviews, self-report surveys (e.g., indicators of self-determination, health literacy) and EMMA data metrics will also be used to identify what components of the intervention are most effective and for whom they work.

DISCUSSION

Successful project completion will provide valuable information about how individuals with SCD respond to a compensation and preventative lifestyle intervention assisted by a digital application, including an understanding of factors that may impact outcomes, treatment uptake, and adherence. The work will also inform development, scaling, and personalization of future interventions that can delay disability in individuals at risk for ADRD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT05027789, posted 8/30/2021).

Examining the Efficacy and Safety Profile of Palliative Radiotherapy Using 30 Gy in 5 Fractions

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Higher biological equivalent doses of radiotherapy (RT) can improve symptom palliation and local control in select tumor sites. However, not all patients meet criteria for treatment with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Furthermore, SABR is a resource intensive technique which may limit its use in many centers. The 30 Gray in 5 fractions regimen (30/5) stems from a modification of 5-fraction SABR regimens. It is a conformal, homogenous hypo-fractionated regimen that delivers higher dose than conventional palliative RT while still respecting the normal tissue constraints for 5-fraction SABR. It uses streamlined contouring and planning with less stringent requirements for immobilization and image guidance, compared to what is required for SABR. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of patients receiving 30/5.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A single institution retrospective review of clinical and treatment data was performed for patients who received 30/5 from October 2020 to August 2022. Local control (LC) was calculated for all treatment courses. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated for all patients. Survival analyses were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and curves compared by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using cox-regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients and 92 courses of 30/5 were available for analysis. The most common primary tumor was lung (44%), followed by gastrointestinal (GI; 20%), breast (10%), and genitourinary (10%). The median age of patients was 64 years (range: 37-93). The median tumor size treated was 11.4 cm^3 (range: 0.3 - 210.9 cm^3). Treatment sites included lung (31%), lymph nodes (22%), non-spine bone (20%), and spine (15%). At median follow-up of 10.1 months (mo), 25 deaths occurred. Median LC after receiving 30/5 was 18.5 mo (95% CI: 15.7-21.3 mo), median DMFS was 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-8.6 mo), median PFS was 6.4 mo (95% CI: 4.9-8.0 mo), and median OS was 18.1 mo (95% CI: 13.1-23.1 mo). Median time to initiating, restarting, or changing systemic therapy was 12.8 mo (95% CI: 7.6-18.0 mo). Radiosensitive (lung, prostate, breast, gynecological, and head/neck) tumors had better LC than radioresistant (GI, renal cell, sarcoma, melanoma) tumors (median 20.9 vs 12.1 mo, p < 0.02). Six grade 2 toxicities occurred (6.5% of all treatments). No grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred.

CONCLUSION

The 30/5 regimen is a safe, well-tolerated, and resource efficient regimen with effective local control. This may serve as a practical alternative for patients who require palliative RT but not optimal candidates for SABR. As expected, radiosensitive tumors had better local control than radioresistant tumors. Future research can further explore the safety, efficacy, and indications of 30/5 as a palliative RT option.

The Smooth Away From Expected (SAFE) non-inferiority frontier: theory and implementation with an application to the D3 trial

BACKGROUND

In a non-inferiority trial, the choice of margin depends on the expected control event risk. If the true risk differs from expected, power and interpretability of results can be affected. A non-inferiority frontier pre-specifies an appropriate non-inferiority margin for each value of control event risk. D3 is a non-inferiority trial comparing two treatment regimens in children living with HIV, designed assuming a control event risk of 12%, a non-inferiority margin of 10%, 80% power and a significance level (α) of 0.025. We consider approaches to choosing and implementing a frontier for this already funded trial, where changing the sample size substantially would be difficult.

METHODS

In D3, we fix the non-inferiority margin at 10%, 8% and 5% for control event risks of ≥9%, 5% and 1%, respectively. We propose four frontiers which fit these fixed points, including a Smooth Away From Expected (SAFE) frontier. Analysis approaches considered are as follows: using the pre-specified significance level (α=0.025); always using a reduced significance level (to achieve α≤0.025 across control event risks); reducing significance levels only when the control event risk differs significantly from expected (control event risk <9%); and using a likelihood ratio test. We compare power and type 1 error for SAFE with other frontiers.

RESULTS

Changing the significance level only when the control event risk is <9% achieves approximately nominal (<3%) type I error rate and maintains reasonable power for control event risks between 1 and 15%. The likelihood ratio test method performs similarly, but the results are more complex to present. Other analysis methods lead to either inflated type 1 error or badly reduced power. The SAFE frontier gives more interpretable results with low control event risks than other frontiers (i.e. it uses more reasonable non-inferiority margins). Other frontiers do not achieve power close (i.e. within 1%) to SAFE across the range of likely control event risks while controlling type I error.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAFE non-inferiority frontier will be used in D3, and the non-inferiority margin and significance level will be modified if the control event risk is lower than expected. This ensures results will remain interpretable if design assumptions are incorrect, while achieving similar power. A similar approach could be considered for other non-inferiority trials where the control event risk is uncertain.

MR Imaging Findings in a Large Population of Autoimmune Encephalitis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Autoimmune encephalitis is a rare condition in which autoantibodies attack neuronal tissue, causing neuropsychiatric disturbances. This study sought to evaluate MR imaging findings associated with subtypes and categories of autoimmune encephalitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases of autoimmune encephalitis with specific autoantibodies were identified from the medical record (2009-2019). Cases were excluded if no MR imaging of the brain was available, antibodies were associated with demyelinating disease, or >1 concurrent antibody was present. Demographics, CSF profile, antibody subtype and group (group 1 intracellular antigen or group 2 extracellular antigen), and MR imaging features at symptom onset were reviewed. Imaging and clinical features were compared across antibody groups using χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

Eighty-five cases of autoimmune encephalitis constituting 16 distinct antibodies were reviewed. The most common antibodies were anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (n = 41), anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (n = 7), and anti-voltage-gated potassium channel (n = 6). Eighteen of 85 (21%) were group 1; and 67/85 (79%) were group 2. The median time between MR imaging and antibody diagnosis was 14 days (interquartile range, 4-26 days). MR imaging had normal findings in 33/85 (39%), and 20/33 (61%) patients with normal MRIs had anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies. Signal abnormality was most common in the limbic system (28/85, 33%); 1/68 (1.5%) had susceptibility artifacts. Brainstem and cerebellar involvement were more common in group 1, while leptomeningeal enhancement was more common in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Sixty-one percent of patients with autoimmune encephalitis had abnormal brain MR imaging findings at symptom onset, most commonly involving the limbic system. Susceptibility artifact is rare and makes autoimmune encephalitis less likely as a diagnosis. Brainstem and cerebellar involvement were more common in group 1, while leptomeningeal enhancement was more common in group 2.

The global syndemic of metabolic diseases in the young adult population: a consortium from the Global Burden of Disease 2000-2019

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

A large proportion of premature deaths are related to metabolic diseases in the young adult population. We examined the global trends and mortality of metabolic diseases using estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 in individuals aged below 40 years.

Methods

From 2000-2019, global estimates of prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were described for metabolic diseases (type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM], hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD]). Global estimates were limited to mortality and DALYs for risk factors (hyperlipidemia and obesity). Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex, geographical regions and Socio-Demographic Index (SDI). Age-standardized prevalence, death, and DALYs were presented per 100,000 population with 95% uncertainty intervals (UI).

Findings

The prevalence for all metabolic diseases increased from 2000-2019, with the most pronounced increase in males and high SDI countries. In 2019, the highest age-standardised death rates were observed in hypertension (133·88 [121·25-155·73]; males, 160·13 [138·91-180·79]; females, 119·66 [102·33-136·86]), followed by obesity (62·59 [39·92-89·13]; males, 66·55 [39·76-97·21]; females, 58·14 [38·53-81·39]), hyperlipidemia (56·51 [41·83-73·62]; males, 67·33 [50·78-86·43]; females, 46·50 [32·70-62·38]), T2DM (18·49 [17·18-19·66]; males, 19·94 [18·50-21·32]; females, 17·30 [15·62-18·70]) and NAFLD (2·09 [1·61-2·60]; males, 2·38 [1·82-3·02]; females, 1·82 [1·41-2·27]). Similarly, obesity (1932·54 [1276·61-2639·74]) had the highest age-standardised DALYs, followed by hypertension (2885·57 [2580·75-3201·05]), hyperlipidemia (1207·15 [975·07-1461·11]), T2DM (801·55 [670·58-954·43]) and NAFLD (53·33 [40·73-68·29]). Mortality rates decreased over time in hyperlipidemia (-60%), hypertension (-47%), NAFLD (-31%) and T2DM (-20%), but not in obesity (107% increase). The highest metabolic-related mortality was observed in the Eastern Mediterranean and low SDI countries.

Conclusion

The growing prevalence of metabolic diseases, increasing obesity-related mortality trends, and the sex-regional-socioeconomic disparities evident in young adulthood, present the concerning global burden of metabolic diseases now and in the years ahead.

Pathophysiologic mechanism for MYOcarditis in COVID-19 VAccinations ("MYOVAx" Study)

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): NMRC COVID-19 Research Fund

Objective

This is the first prospective cohort study in Singapore to investigate the COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis to understand its pathophysiology.

Introduction

Acute myocarditis and other cardiovascular symptoms have been observed to be associated with the two mRNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines—namely Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273)—currently in-use in Singapore. The mechanisms through which myocarditis occurs are unknown, hence our study aims to understand the pathophysiology of myocarditis associated with COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods

Patients with onset of cardiac manifestations were recruited from multiple hospital outpatient clinics between November 2021 and September 2022. Clinical history and physical examination data was collected with blood sample collection, echocardiography, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), coronary angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at recruitment and 6-month follow-up. Analysis of biomarkers, genetic, serological and MRI data was conducted.

Results

As of 6 September 2022, a total of 5 patients have been enrolled (4 males, 1 female). The most commonly reported symptoms across all patients were chest pain/discomfort (80%), followed by palpitations (40%). MRI evidence of myocarditis has been detected in 2 (50%) of the male patients, of which both reported two or more symptoms occurring 1-2 days post-vaccination. Both patients have each received at least two doses of either the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine or Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. Their MRI findings were consistent with myocarditis. On late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, epicardial enhancement at the basal inferolateral segment and mid-wall enhancement at the apical anterior, lateral and inferior walls were observed in one patient. Patchy, mid-wall LGE in the basal inferior/inferolateral wall was observed in the other patient. No MRI evidence of myocarditis was available for the sole female patient.

Conclusion

While more data is needed to definitively prove the association of the two mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines with post-vaccination myocarditis, we believe our findings may support further investigations to enable risk stratification for vaccine-associated myocarditis and identify potential preventative strategies accordingly.

Global burden of metabolic diseases: data from Global Burden of Disease 2000-2019. A cosortium of metabolic disease

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

The growing prevalence of metabolic diseases is a major concern. We sought to examine the global trends and mortality of metabolic diseases using estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019.

Methods

Global estimates of prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life year (DALYs) from 2000-2019 were examined for metabolic diseases (type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM], hypertension, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD]). For metabolic risk factors (hyperlipidemia and obesity), estimates were limited to mortality and DALYs. Death rates was compared across sex, World Health Organisation regions and Socio-demographic Index (SDI) quintiles. Age-standardised prevalence and death rates were presented per 100,000 population with 95% uncertainty intervals (UI).

Findings

From 2000 to 2019, prevalence rates increased for all metabolic diseases, with the most pronounced increase in high SDI countries. In 2019, the mean (95%UI) age-standardised prevalence per 100,000 population was estimated to be 15,023 (13,493-16,764) for NAFLD, 5,283 (4,864–5,720) for T2DM and 234 (171-313) for hypertension. The highest age-standardised death rates were observed in obesity (62·59 [39·92-89·13]; males, 66·55 [39·76-97·21]; females. 58·14 [38·53-81·39]), followed by hyperlipidemia (56·51 [41·83-73·62]; males, 67·33 [50·78-86·43]; females, 46·50 [32·70-62·38]), T2DM (18·49 [17·18-19·66], males, 67·33 [50·78-86·43]; females, 46·50 [32·70-62·38]), hypertension (15·16 [11·20-16·75]; males, 14·95 [10·32-16·75]; females, 15·05 [11·51-17·09]) and NAFLD (2·09 [1·61-2·60]; males, 2·38 [1·82-3·02]; females, 1·82 [1·41-2·27]). Mortality rates decreased over time in hyperlipidemia (-154%), hypertension (-52%) and NAFLD (-52%), but not in T2DM and obesity. The highest mortality for metabolic diseases was found in Eastern Mediterranean, and low to low-middle SDI countries.

Conclusion

The global prevalence of metabolic diseases has risen over the past two decades regardless of SDI. Attention is needed to address the unchanging mortality rates attributed to metabolic disease and the regional, socioeconomic, and sex disparities in mortality from metabolic disease.

Evaluating Quality-of-Life, Length of Stay and Cost-Effectiveness of a Front-Door Geriatrics Program: An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Study

BACKGROUND

The Emergency Department Interventions for Frailty (EDIFY) program was developed to deliver early geriatric specialist interventions at the Emergency Department (ED). EDIFY has been successful in reducing acute admissions among older adults.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the effectiveness of EDIFY in improving health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and length of stay (LOS), and evaluate EDIFY's cost-effectiveness.

DESIGN

A quasi-experiment study.

SETTING

The ED of a 1700-bed tertiary hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (≥85 years) pending acute hospital admission and screened by the EDIFY team to be potentially suitable for discharge or transfer to low-acuity care areas.

INTERVENTION

EDIFY versus standard-care.

MEASUREMENTS

Data on demographics, comorbidities, premorbid function, and frailty status were gathered. HRQOL was measured using EQ-5D-5L over 6 months. We used a crosswalk methodology to compute Singapore-specific index scores from EQ-5D-5L responses and calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. LOS and bills in Singapore-dollars (SGD) before subsidy from ED attendances (including admissions, if applicable) were obtained. We estimated average programmatic EDIFY cost and performed multiple imputation (MI) for missing data. QALYs gained, LOS and cost were compared. Potential uncertainties were also examined.

RESULTS

Among 100 participants (EDIFY=43; standard-care=57), 61 provided complete data. For complete cases, there were significant QALYs gained at 3-month (coefficient=0.032, p=0.004) and overall (coefficient=0.096, p=0.002) for EDIFY, whilst treatment cost was similar between-groups. For MI, we observed only overall QALYs gained for EDIFY (coefficient=0.102, p=0.001). EDIFY reduced LOS by 17% (Incident risk ratio=0.83, p=0.015). In a deterministic sensitivity analysis, EDIFY's cost-threshold was SGD$2,500, and main conclusions were consistent in other uncertainty scenarios. Mean bills were: EDIFY=SGD$4562.70; standard-care=SGD$5530.90. EDIFY's average programmatic cost approximated SGD$469.30.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory proof-of-concept study found that EDIFY benefits QALYs and LOS, with equivalent cost, and is potentially cost-effective. The program has now been established as standard-care for older adults attending the ED at our center.

MicroRNA biomarkers of platelet function

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation (BHF), VASCage (Centre for Promoting Vascular Health in the Ageing Community) of the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG (COMET program - Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies)

Introduction

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) leads to reduced morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease but some still have thrombotic events. Tailoring APT to platelet function is currently limited by a lack of suitable platelet function tests. It has been previously shown that different circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are derived from platelets and their measurement could provide new markers of platelet reactivity.

Purpose

To compare the release of different platelet miRNAs in response to different platelet agonists.

Methods

Measurements of platelet function were performed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in participants of the 2015 follow-up of the Bruneck study (n=338), using the following agonists: arachidonic acid (1mM), adenosine diphosphate (5µM, 20µM), collagen (0.4 µg/ml, 4 µg/ml, 10µg/ml), TRAP-6 amide (25µM) and U46619 (10µM). LTA platelet releasates were then used for RT-qPCR measurements of five platelet-enriched miRNAs (miR-21, miR-126, miR-150, miR-197, miR-223). Platelet-poor plasma (PPP) served as negative control.

Results

Platelet activation led to aggregation and extracellular release of miRNAs, with aspirin users (n=155) showing significantly lower miRNA release than non-aspirin users (n=183). Agonist responsiveness differed among miRNAs, with miR-21 being hyperresponsive to arachidonic acid and miR-150 being hyperresponsive to adenosine diphosphate, whilst release of miR-126, miR-197 and miR-223 was strongest to collagen (10µg/ml). In non-aspirin users, inflammation markers such as granulocyte counts or C-reactive protein correlated positively with platelet-derived miRNAs measured in PPP, whilst they correlated negatively with platelet-derived miRNAs measured in releasates. These effects were absent in aspirin users.

Conclusions

MiRNAs released from activated platelets can be reliably detected in PPP and platelet releasates. Preferential release of miRNAs in response to specific agonists suggests a selective release mechanism. Elevated PPP levels and decreased releasate levels of platelet-derived miRNAs in inflammatory environments suggest platelet exhaustion ex vivo due to platelet pre-activation.

OP0142 COMPARISON OF ATTAINMENT AND PROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF THE LUPUS LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED VERSUS ESTABLISHED SLE - A MULTICENTRE PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Background

Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) attainment has been reported to be associated with reduced damage accrual, flare, and mortality, as well as improved quality of life, in cohorts of SLE patients with established disease. Whether these associations are present in recent-onset disease is less well known.

Objectives

To evaluate the associations of LLDAS attainment with outcomes in patients with recent onset SLE.

Methods

Data from a 13-country longitudinal SLE cohort (ACR/SLICC criteria) were collected prospectively between 2013 and 2020 using standard templates. Organ damage and flare were captured using SLICC Damage Index and SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index, respectively. LLDAS was defined as Golder et al., 2019 [1]. An inception cohort was defined based on duration since SLE diagnosis<1 year at enrolment. Patient characteristics between inception and non-inception cohorts were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum (continuous variables) or Pearson’s Chi-squared tests (categorical variables). Survival analyses were performed to examine the association between LLDAS attainment and damage accrual and flare.

Results

The study cohort included 4,106 patients of whom 680 (16%) were recruited within 1 year of SLE diagnosis (inception cohort). Compared to the non-inception cohort, inception cohort patients were significantly younger, had higher disease activity (SLEDAI-2K and physician global assessment), used more glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants but had less organ damage at enrolment and only 88 (13.6%) patients accrued damage during a median 2.2 years follow-up (Table 1).

Table 1.Non-inception cohortInception cohortp-valuen=3426n=680Age at enrolment (years), median [IQR]40 [31, 51]33 [25, 44]<0.001Age at diagnosis (years), median [IQR]28 [21, 38]33 [25, 43]<0.001SLE duration at enrolment (years), median [IQR]10 [5, 16]1 [0, 1]<0.001Study duration (years), median [IQR]2.5 [1.0, 5.4]2.2 [0.9, 3.7]<0.001Females, n (%)3155 (92.1%)623 (91.6%)0.68Asian ethnicity, n (%)3037 (89.1%)595 (88.1%)0.49Prednisolone (PNL) use - ever, n (%)2865 (83.6%)620 (91.2%)<0.001Time adjusted mean (TAM)-PNL, median [IQR]5.0 [2.2, 8.6]6.2 [3.2, 10.3]<0.001Cumulative PNL (g), median [IQR]3.4 [0.5, 9.7]3.8 [1.1, 8.5]0.26Anti-Malarial use - ever, n (%)2669 (77.9%)569 (83.7%)<0.001Immunosupressant use -ever, n (%)2367 (69.1%)521 (76.6%)<0.001AMS (TAM-SLEDAI-2K), median [IQR]2.8 [1.2, 4.6]3.1 [1.6, 5.0]0.002TAM-PGA, median [IQR]0.4 [0.2, 0.7]0.4 [0.3, 0.8]<0.001Mild/moderate/severe flare ever, n (%)1789 (52.2%)391 (57.5%)0.012Organ damage accrual, n (%)629 (20.8%)88 (13.6%)<0.001LLDAS at baseline, n (%)1730 (50.5%)195 (28.7%)<0.001LLDAS-ever (at least once), n (%)2637 (78.2%)492 (73.9%)0.014≥50% time in LLDAS (LLDAS-5), n (%)1612 (50.6%)256 (41.1%)<0.001

Significantly fewer inception cohort patients were in LLDAS at enrolment than the non-inception cohort (29% vs. 51%, p<0.001). However, 74% of inception and 78% of non-inception cohort patients achieved LLDAS at least once during follow-up. Limiting analysis only to patients not in LLDAS at enrolment, time to first LLDAS attainment was assessed: inception cohort patients were 60% more likely to attain their first LLDAS (HR = 1.60 (95%CI: 1.40, 1.82), p<0.001) than non-inception cohort patients. LLDAS attainment was significantly protective against flare in the inception (HR, 95% CI) and non-inception (HR, 95% CI) cohorts. Trends towards protection against damage accrual in association with LLDAS in the inception cohort were not significant.

Conclusion

LLDAS attainment is protective from flare in recent onset SLE. Significant protection from damage accrual was not observed, due to low rates of damage accrual in the first years after SLE diagnosis.

References

[1]Golder, V., et al., Lupus low disease activity state as a treatment endpoint for systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective validation study. The Lancet Rheumatology, 2019. 1(2): p. e95-e102.

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients participating in the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) cohort, and all data collectors for their ongoing support for APLC research activities.

The APLC has received unrestricted project grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lily, Janssen, Merck Serono, and UCB to support data collection contributing to this work.

Disclosure of Interests

Vera Golder: None declared, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake: None declared, Worawit Louthrenoo: None declared, Yi-Hsing Chen Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra and Zeneca, Sanofi, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead, Grant/research support from: Yes. Clinical trials and/or research grants from Pfizer, Norvatis, BMS, Abbevie, Johnson & Johnson, Roche,Sanofi, Guigai, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, MSD, Astra-Zeneca,Astellas, Gilead, Jiacai Cho: None declared, Aisha Lateef: None declared, Laniyati Hamijoyo Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbot, Shue Fen Luo: None declared, Yeong-Jian Jan Wu Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, Sandra Navarra Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Astellas, Grant/research support from: Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Leonid Zamora: None declared, Zhanguo Li Speakers bureau: Eli, Lilly, Novartis, GSK, AbbVie, Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Roche, Johnson, Consultant of: Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Yuan An: None declared, Sargunan Sockalingam Speakers bureau: Yes. Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Roche and Novartis, Yasuhiro Katsumata Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Glaxo-Smithkline K.K., and Sanofi K.K., Masayoshi Harigai Speakers bureau: MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc.,Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd, Consultant of: MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd. and Teijin Pharma., Grant/research support from: MH has received research grants from AbbVie Japan GK, Asahi Kasei Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc.,Eisai Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Sekiui Medical, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Yanjie Hao: None declared, Zhuoli Zhang Speakers bureau: Norvatis, GSK, Pfizer, BMDB Basnayake: None declared, Madelynn Chan Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Consultant of: Advisory Board member for Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Jun Kikuchi: None declared, Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corp. Bristol-Myers Squibb Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Eisai Co., Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp. Pfizer Japan Inc. Sanofi K.K., Consultant of: Astellas Pharma, Inc. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Grant/research support from: AbbVie Asahikasei Pharma Corp. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp. Sanofi K.K, Sang-Cheol Bae: None declared, Sean O’Neill Paid instructor for: Advisory board member for GSK, Fiona Goldblatt: None declared, Shereen Oon: None declared, Kathryn Gibson Speakers bureau: UCB, Consultant of: Novartis – co-chair for NSW and steering committee member for ARISE meeting Feb 2021

Janssen Pharmaceuticals – advisory board, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Employee of: Eli Lilly, Kristine Ng Speakers bureau: speaker fees and advisory board (Abbvie, Novartis, Janssen), Annie Law: None declared, Nicola Tugnet: None declared, Sunil Kumar: None declared, Cherica Tee: None declared, Michael Tee: None declared, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Abbvie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Abbvie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead, Janssen, C.S. Lau Shareholder of: Pfizer, Sanofi and Janssen, Mandana Nikpour Speakers bureau: Actelion, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: UCB, Consultant of: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Certa Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Actelion, Astra Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, UCB, Alberta Hoi Consultant of: AH is on the advisory board for Abbvie and GSK, Grant/research support from: AH has received research support from AstraZeneca, GSK, BMS, Janssen, and Merck Serono, Eric F. Morand Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca, Paid instructor for: Eli Lilly, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Biogen, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Janssen, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Janssen

Postoperative outcomes in surgical patients with obstructive sleep apnoea diagnosed by sleep studies: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Identifying surgical patients with obstructive sleep apnoea may assist with anaesthetic management to minimise postoperative complications. Using trial sequential analysis, we evaluated the impact of obstructive sleep apnoea diagnosed by polysomnography or home sleep apnoea testing on postoperative outcomes in surgical patients. Multiple databases were systematically searched. Outcomes included: total postoperative complications, systemic complications (cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, renal, infectious) and specific complications (atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, combined hospital and intensive care unit re-admission, mortality). The pooled odds ratios of postoperative complications were evaluated by the Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects model. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted, and the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Twenty prospective cohort studies with 3756 patients (2127 obstructive sleep apnoea and 1629 non-obstructive sleep apnoea) were included (9 in non-cardiac surgery and 11 in cardiac surgery). Postoperative complications were almost two-fold higher with obstructive sleep apnoea, OR (95%CI) 1.92 (1.52-2.42), p < 0.001; certainty of evidence, moderate. Obstructive sleep apnoea was associated with a 1.5 times increased risk of postoperative cardiovascular complications, OR (95%CI) 1.56 (1.20-2.02), p = 0.001; certainty of evidence, moderate; an almost two-fold increase in respiratory complications, OR (95%CI) 1.91 (1.39-2.62), p < 0.001; certainty of evidence, moderate; and hospital and ICU re-admission, OR (95%CI) 2.25 (1.21-4.19), p = 0.01; certainty of evidence, low. Trial sequential analysis showed adequate information size for postoperative complications. Baseline confounding factors were adjusted by meta-regression, and the sub-group analysis did not materially change our results. This increased risk occurred especially in patients in whom obstructive sleep apnoea had been newly diagnosed, emphasising the importance of pre-operative screening.

A148 IMPACT OF EXAMINATION UNDER ANESTHESIA PRIOR TO ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR THERAPY ON FISTULA HEALING FOR PERIANAL CROHN’S DISEASE PATIENTS: A COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY

Background

Current guidelines recommend a combined approach consisting of an examination under anesthesia (EUA) and anti-TNF therapy for perianal Crohn’s Disease (PCD). However, the impact of this approach on fistula healing and long-term outcomes is unknown.

Aims

To assess the effect of EUA on fistula healing and long term outcomes in patients with perianal Crohn’s disese who are treated with anti-TNF therapy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-center, comparative cohort study between 2009 and 2019. We compared patients with PCD who received EUA prior to anti-TNF therapy (combined therapy) to anti-TNF therapy alone. Our primary outcome was fistula closure by clinical assessment. Secondary outcomes included subsequent local surgery and fecal diversion. Logistic regression and multivariable cox-proportional hazard models adjusted for abscesses, concomitant immunomodulators, and time to anti-TNF initiation were performed.

Results

A total of 155 patients underwent 188 distinct anti-TNF starts: 66 (35%) after an EUA. Patients who underwent an EUA prior to anti-TNF therapy were more likely to have an abscess (50% vs. 15%; p &lt; 0.001) and concomitant immunomodulator usage (64% vs. 50%; p = 0.07). Otherwise, there were no differences between cohorts in age, smoking status, disease duration, and location of luminal disease. There were no significant differences in fistula closure at 3, 6, or 12 months between cohorts overall (Table 1). The results remained consistent in sensitivity analyses that excluded patients with abscesses and prior biologic treatment failure. The results were also similar when defining the combined therapy group as those with setons. After a median follow-up of 4.6 years (IQR, 5.95) patients who underwent an EUA prior to anti-TNF therapy were more likely to require a subsequent EUA (aHR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3–3.6) (Figure 1) but not fecal diversion (aHR 1.3; 95% CI, 0.45–3.9).

Conclusions

In this single center study, combined therapy (EUA prior to anti-TNF therapy) was not associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with anti-TNF therapy alone. These findings suggest that EUA may not be necessary in every patient with PCD prior to initiation of anti-TNF therapy. Future prospective studies that control for fistula complexity are warranted.

Table 1: Unadjusted rates of fistula closure after anti-TNF therapy comparing patients with and without an exam under anesthesia

Funding Agencies

University of Ottawa Department of Medicine

Host inflammatory response is the major marker of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in older adults

OBJECTIVES

We aim to study the viral kinetics and host inflammatory response of RSV infection in older adults, and their correlation with disease severity.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study in adults with RSV infection. We serially collected nasal-throat swabs for quantification of RSV-A and RSV-B viral load, and peripheral blood samples for measurement of cytokine/chemokine concentrations. The study endpoints were (i) requiring supplemental oxygen therapy, and (ii) non-invasive ventilation, intensive care, or died within 30 days of admission. We performed multivariable logistic regression models to identify independent variables for severe disease.

RESULTS

We enrolled 71 hospitalized patients and 10 outpatients treated for RSV infection (median age 75 years, 51% male, and 74% with comorbidities). Among hospitalized patients, 61% required supplemental oxygen therapy, and 18% had severe disease requiring non-invasive ventilation or intensive care, or died within 30 days. Inflammatory cytokine/chemokines IL-6, CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 increased significantly during the acute phase of illness. IL-6 concentration was independently associated with severe disease after adjusting for confounding factors. RSV viral load was not associated with disease severity throughout the course of illness.

CONCLUSION

Host inflammatory response is a major marker of severe disease in older adults with RSV infection.

Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO-Virgo Observing Run

We search for gravitational-wave signals produced by cosmic strings in the Advanced LIGO and Virgo full O3 dataset. Search results are presented for gravitational waves produced by cosmic string loop features such as cusps, kinks, and, for the first time, kink-kink collisions. A template-based search for short-duration transient signals does not yield a detection. We also use the stochastic gravitational-wave background energy density upper limits derived from the O3 data to constrain the cosmic string tension Gμ as a function of the number of kinks, or the number of cusps, for two cosmic string loop distribution models. Additionally, we develop and test a third model that interpolates between these two models. Our results improve upon the previous LIGO-Virgo constraints on Gμ by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude depending on the model that is tested. In particular, for the one-loop distribution model, we set the most competitive constraints to date: Gμ≲4×10^{-15}. In the case of cosmic strings formed at the end of inflation in the context of grand unified theories, these results challenge simple inflationary models.

Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO-Virgo Observing Run

We search for gravitational-wave signals produced by cosmic strings in the Advanced LIGO and Virgo full O3 dataset. Search results are presented for gravitational waves produced by cosmic string loop features such as cusps, kinks, and, for the first time, kink-kink collisions. A template-based search for short-duration transient signals does not yield a detection. We also use the stochastic gravitational-wave background energy density upper limits derived from the O3 data to constrain the cosmic string tension Gμ as a function of the number of kinks, or the number of cusps, for two cosmic string loop distribution models. Additionally, we develop and test a third model that interpolates between these two models. Our results improve upon the previous LIGO-Virgo constraints on Gμ by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude depending on the model that is tested. In particular, for the one-loop distribution model, we set the most competitive constraints to date: Gμ≲4×10^{-15}. In the case of cosmic strings formed at the end of inflation in the context of grand unified theories, these results challenge simple inflationary models.

POS0028 DEFINING THE PREVALENCE OF UNMET NEED IN SLE: DATA FROM A LARGE MULTINATIONAL LONGITUDINAL SLE COHORT

Background:

The recent prospectively validated definition of the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) allows characterisation of patients not achieving a treatment goal, providing impetus for an analysis of unmet needs in SLE using formal definitions. Other recently described definitions of high disease burden include disease activity over time, high disease activity status (HDAS) episodes, and the combination of high disease activity, serological activity and glucocorticoid (GC) use (HDAS+SA+GC).

Objectives:

To determine the prevalence of formal categories of unmet need, and the association of these with adverse outcomes, in SLE.

Methods:

Data from a 13-country longitudinal SLE cohort (ACR/SLICC criteria) were collected between 2013 and 19 using standard templates. Unmet need was defined as (i) patients never attaining LLDAS defined as in Golder et al., 2019 [1], (ii) having persistently active disease (time adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K (AMS) > 4), (iii) ever exhibiting high disease activity status (HDAS; SLEDAI-2K ≥10[2]), or (iv) ever exhibiting all of SLEDAI≥10, serological activity, and glucocorticoid use (HDAS+SA+GC)[3]. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using SF36 (v2) surveys and damage accrual using SLE Damage Index (SDI).

Results:

3,384 SLE patients were followed for 30,313 visits over median [IQR] 2.4 [0.4, 4.3] years. 53% of all visits were not in LLDAS; 813 patients (24%) never achieved LLDAS during observation. Median AMS was 3.0 [1.4, 4.9] and 34% of patients had AMS > 4 throughout the study. 25% of patients had at least one episode of HDAS, representing 8% of visits. 702 patients (21%) had at least one episode of HDAS+SA+GC, representing 8% of visits. Each of never-LLDAS, AMS>4, ever-HDAS, and ever-HDAS+SA+GC were associated with significantly greater number of physician visits, higher mean glucocorticoid dose, lower HRQoL and higher mortality. 31%, 58% and 83% of never-LLDAS, AMS>4, and ever-HDAS patients respectively were also HDAS+SA+GC on at least one occasion.

Conclusion:

Data from a multinational longitudinal SLE cohort indicate that unmet need, defined by LLDAS-never, AMS>4, HDAS, or HDAS+SA+GC, is prevalent in SLE, and that these definitions are associated with poor outcomes.

References:

[1]Golder, V., et al., Lupus low disease activity state as a treatment endpoint for systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective validation study. The Lancet Rheumatology, 2019. 1(2): p. e95-e102.

[2]Koelmeyer, R., et al., High disease activity status suggests more severe disease and damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med, 2020. 7(1).

[3]van Vollenhoven, R.F., et al., Belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: high disease activity predictors of response. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2012. 71(8): p. 1343-1349.

Acknowledgements:

The APLC acknowledges all the Data Collectors and Patients for their valuable contributions to research.

Disclosure of Interests:

Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake: None declared, Worawit Louthrenoo: None declared, Alberta Hoi Consultant of: Abbvie and GSK, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, GSK, BMS, Janssen, and Merck Serono, Vera Golder: None declared, Yi-Hsing Chen Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Norvatis, BMS, Abbevie, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Sanofi, Guigai, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, MSD, Astra-Zeneca, Astellas, Gilead, Shue Fen Luo: None declared, Yeong-Jian Jan Wu Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, Aisha Lateef: None declared, Jiacai Cho: None declared, Laniyati Hamijoyo Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbot, Chak Sing Lau Shareholder of: Pfizer, Sanofi, and Janssen, Sandra Navarra Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Astellas, Grant/research support from: Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Leonid Zamora: None declared, Zhanguo Li Speakers bureau: Eli, Lilly, Novartis, GSK, AbbVie, Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Roche, Johnson., Consultant of: Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Yuan An: None declared, Sargunan Sockalingam Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Roche and Novartis, Yasuhiro Katsumata Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Glaxo-Smithkline K.K., and Sanofi K.K., masayoshi harigai Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc.,Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd. and Teijin Pharma., Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Asahi Kasei Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc.,Eisai Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Sekiui Medical, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd., Yanjie Hao: None declared, Zhuoli Zhang Speakers bureau: Norvatis, GSK, Pfizer, Jun Kikuchi: None declared, Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corp. Bristol-Myers Squibb Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Eisai Co., Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp. Pfizer Japan Inc. Sanofi K.K., Consultant of: Astellas Pharma, Inc. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahikasei Pharma Corp. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp. Sanofi K.K., BMDB Basnayake: None declared, Fiona Goldblatt: None declared, Madelynn Chan Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Consultant of: Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Kristine Ng Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Novartis, Janssen, Sang-Cheol Bae: None declared, Shereen Oon: None declared, Sean O’Neill Consultant of: GSK, Kathryn Gibson Speakers bureau: UCB, Consultant of: Novartis, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sunil Kumar: None declared, Nicola Tugnet: None declared, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Abbvie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Asahi-Kasei, Eisai, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Mandana Nikpour Speakers bureau: Actelion, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: UCB, Consultant of: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Certa Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Actelion, Astra Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, UCB, Eric F. Morand Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca, Paid instructor for: Eli Lilly, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Biogen, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Janssen, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, BristolMyersSquibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Janssen.

A phase I study of binimetinib (MEK 162), a MEK inhibitor, plus carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

MEK inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase I study evaluates the MEK inhibitor binimetinib plus carboplatin and pemetrexed in stage IV non-squamous NSCLC patients (NCT02185690).

METHODS

A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. Binimetinib 30 mg BID (dose level 1 [DL1]) or 45 mg BID (dose level 2 [DL2]) was given with standard doses of carboplatin and pemetrexed using an intermittent dosing schedule. The primary outcome was determination of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and safety of binimetinib. Secondary outcomes included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and an exploratory analysis of response based on mutation subtype.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (6 DL1, 7 DL2) were enrolled: 7 KRAS, 5 EGFR, and 1 NRAS mutation. The RP2D was binimetinib 30 mg BID. Eight patients (61.5%) had grade 3/4 adverse events, with dose limiting toxicities in 2 patients at DL2. Twelve patients were evaluated for response, with an investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) of 50% (95% CI 21.1%-78.9%; ORR 33.3% by independent-review, IR), and disease control rate 83.3% (95% CI 51.6%-97.9%). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI 2.6 months-NA), with a 6-month and 12-month PFS rate of 38.5% (95% CI 19.3%-76.5%) and 25.6% (95% CI 8.9%-73.6%), respectively. In an exploratory analysis, KRAS/NRAS-mutated patients had an ORR of 62.5% (ORR 37.5% by IR) vs. 25% in KRAS/NRAS wild-type patients. In MAP2K1-mutated patients, the ORR was 42.8%.

CONCLUSION

The addition of binimetinib to carboplatin and pemetrexed appears to have manageable toxicity with evidence of activity in advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

A173 INNOVATIVE CARE FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: USE OF BEDSIDE INTESTINAL ULTRASOUND TO OPTIMIZE MANAGEMENT

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant alterations in the ability to deliver outpatient care to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including endoscopic evaluation. This has highlighted the need for alternative, accurate, non-invasive strategies to safely assess disease activity.

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe the impact of point of care intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in a university-based tertiary care IBD urgent access clinic.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated a comprehensive care pathway which incorporated outpatient sigmoidoscopy and intestinal ultrasound with the purpose of directing further ambulatory clinical care and avoiding hospitalization or hospital-based investigations including endoscopy during the COVID pandemic for patients with established IBD with symptoms suggestive of a disease flare, or those at high risk of a new diagnosis of IBD. Non-invasive markers C Reactive Protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (fCal) were collected where available. Patients were pre-screened for influenza-like illness, as COVID-19 testing was not available for this population during the study period. Substantial management changes were defined as addition of any medications, biologic switch/ optimization, and or referral for surgical consultation.

Results

Between March 15^th and June 30^th 2020, a total of 72 patients were seen in the urgent access clinic. All patients were seen within 7 days of referral. The majority were female 57% (41/72) and/ or had Crohn’s disease 65.5% (47/72) (Table 1). Of these, 84.7% (61/72) underwent a substantial management change based on features of active inflammation detected by either IUS alone (53% 38/72) sigmoidoscopy alone (12.5% 9/72) or combination IUS with in-clinic sigmoidoscopy (32% 23/72) in addition to CRP and fCal. Three new diagnoses of IBD were made: one colonic Crohn’s and 2 with ulcerative colitis. One pregnant patient avoided all acute care utilization. Five patients were referred to colorectal surgery for urgent resection including two patients admitted directly for emergent operations. No patients required visits to the emergency department. Furthermore, there have been no unscheduled hospitalizations occurred in this cohort since inception March 23, 2020 til November 15^th 2020.

Conclusions

The implementation of IUS in a centralized, urgent access clinic pathway resulted in efficient and meaningful changes in IBD management while sparing the need for acute care services including ER visits, need for in-hospital endoscopy, and hospitalization. The pandemic highlights the utility of this patient-center tool and supports expansion of wider IUS adoption.

Funding Agencies

None

GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M_{⊙}

On May 21, 2019 at 03:02:29 UTC Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observed a short duration gravitational-wave signal, GW190521, with a three-detector network signal-to-noise ratio of 14.7, and an estimated false-alarm rate of 1 in 4900 yr using a search sensitive to generic transients. If GW190521 is from a quasicircular binary inspiral, then the detected signal is consistent with the merger of two black holes with masses of 85_{-14}^{+21}  M_{⊙} and 66_{-18}^{+17}  M_{⊙} (90% credible intervals). We infer that the primary black hole mass lies within the gap produced by (pulsational) pair-instability supernova processes, with only a 0.32% probability of being below 65  M_{⊙}. We calculate the mass of the remnant to be 142_{-16}^{+28}  M_{⊙}, which can be considered an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH). The luminosity distance of the source is 5.3_{-2.6}^{+2.4}  Gpc, corresponding to a redshift of 0.82_{-0.34}^{+0.28}. The inferred rate of mergers similar to GW190521 is 0.13_{-0.11}^{+0.30}  Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}.

Perioperative intravenous contrast administration and the incidence of acute kidney injury after major gastrointestinal surgery: prospective, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the impact of preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast for CT and the risk of developing postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre cohort study included adults undergoing gastrointestinal resection, stoma reversal or liver resection. Both elective and emergency procedures were included. Preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast was defined as exposure to contrast administered for the purposes of CT up to 7 days before surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of AKI within 7 days. Propensity score-matched models were adjusted for patient, disease and operative variables. In a sensitivity analysis, a propensity score-matched model explored the association between preoperative exposure to contrast and AKI in the first 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 5378 patients were included across 173 centres. Overall, 1249 patients (23·2 per cent) received intravenous contrast. The overall rate of AKI within 7 days of surgery was 13·4 per cent (718 of 5378). In the propensity score-matched model, preoperative exposure to contrast was not associated with AKI within 7 days (odds ratio (OR) 0·95, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 1·21; P = 0·669). The sensitivity analysis showed no association between preoperative contrast administration and AKI within 48 h after operation (OR 1·09, 0·84 to 1·41; P = 0·498).

CONCLUSION

There was no association between preoperative intravenous contrast administered for CT up to 7 days before surgery and postoperative AKI. Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy should not be used as a reason to avoid contrast-enhanced CT.

OP0046 TARGETING IRAK1 AND 4 SIGNALING WITH R835, A NOVEL ORAL SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITOR: A POTENTIAL NEW TREATMENT FOR SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Background:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by loss of immunological tolerance, hyperactivation of immune cells, proinflammatory cytokine production and, ultimately, end organ damage due to immune complex deposition. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which are essential to the innate immune response to microbes and other danger signals, play a key role in the pathogenesis of SLE by recognition of self-molecules (1). Interleukin receptor associated kinases (IRAK)1 and 4 are responsible for initiating MyD88-dependent signaling from most TLRs and Interleukin-1 Receptors (IL-1R) and represent attractive targets for the therapeutic treatment of SLE (2). We have identified a potent and selective IRAK1/4 inhibitor, R835, that substantially suppressed the elevation of LPS (TLR4 agonist)-induced serum cytokines in healthy human volunteers in a recently completed phase 1 study.

Objectives:

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of IRAK1/4 selective inhibition as potential therapeutic approach for SLE. We evaluated the effect of our clinical candidate R835 on TLR7 signaling and in a mouse model of lupus-like disease.

Methods:

Human primary dendritic cells and whole blood were stimulated with gardiquimod (TLR7 agonist) to evaluate the effect of R835 on Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) production. R835 was further evaluated for its efficacy on survival and disease progression in lupus-prone NZB/W F1 mice with early or active signs of disease.

Results:

R835 inhibited TLR7-induced cytokine production in human dendritic cells and whole blood. Given orally to mice, R835 dose-dependently decreased serum IFN-α in response to administration of a TLR7 agonist. Furthermore, treatment of NZB/W F1 lupus-prone mice with R835 reversed the progression of lupus-like disease and the establishment of a pro-inflammatory environment, as demonstrated by decreased levels of proteinuria, blood urea nitrogen and autoantibodies, and reversal of renal pathology.

Conclusion:

To our knowledge, R835 is the first dual IRAK1/4 inhibitor to enter clinical development and provides an attractive approach to treat a range of autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, including lupus.

References:

[1]Signals via the Adaptor MyD88 in B cells and DCs Make Distinct and Synergistic Contributions to Immune Activation and Tissue Damage in Lupus. Lino L. Teichmann, Dominik Schenten, Ruslan Medzhitov, Michael Kashgarian, and Mark J. Shlomchik. Immunity. 2013 March 21; 38(3): 528–540.

[2]Suppression of IRAK1 or IRAK4 Catalytic Activity, but Not Type 1 IFN Signaling, Prevents Lupus Nephritis in Mice Expressing a Ubiquitin Binding-Defective Mutant of ABIN1. Nanda SK, Lopez-Pelaez M, Arthur JS, Marchesi F, Cohen P. J Immunol. 2016 Dec 1;197(11):4266-4273.

Disclosure of Interests:

Chrystelle Lamagna Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Meagan Chan Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Art Bagos Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Ernest Tai Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Chi Young Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Yan Chen Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Lu Chou Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Gary Park Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Esteban Masuda Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Vanessa Taylor Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals

OP0133 PRECLINICAL EFFICACY OF R835, A NOVEL IRAK1/4 DUAL INHIBITOR, IN RODENT MODELS OF JOINT INFLAMMATION

Background:

Interleukin receptor associated kinases (IRAK) 1 and 4 are kinases involved in Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) and Interleukin-1 Receptor (IL-1R) signaling pathways, which regulate innate immunity and inflammation. Dysregulation of IRAK1/4 signaling can lead to a variety of inflammatory conditions including rheumatoid and gouty arthritis. As a result, IRAK1/4 are promising therapeutic targets for rheumatic diseases (1). We have identified a potent and selective IRAK1/4 inhibitor, R835, that substantially suppressed the elevation of LPS (TLR4 agonist)-induced serum cytokines in healthy human volunteers in a recently completed phase 1 study.

Objectives:

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of IRAK1/4 selective inhibition as a potential therapeutic approach for rheumatological diseases. We evaluated the inhibition by our clinical candidate, R835, on TLR-, IL-1R- and NLRP3 inflammasome-induced cytokine production, as well as in preclinical models of arthritis.

Methods:

The effect of R835 on TLR- or IL-1R-induced cytokine production was evaluated in vitro using THP-1, human primary endothelial cells and human primary dendritic cells. The activity of R835 on the NLRP3 inflammasome was also tested in vitro using THP-1 cells. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of R835 was evaluated in a mouse model of IL-1b-induced cytokine release. Mice were pre-treated orally with vehicle or R835 prior to challenge; serum cytokine and plasma compound levels were determined. The efficacy of IRAK1/4 inhibition by R835 in rodent models of joint inflammation was evaluated in a mouse model monosodium (MSU)-induced peritonitis, in rat model of MSU-induced gouty arthritis and in a rat model of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA).

Results:

In human cells, R835 blocked proinflammatory cytokine production in response to TLR, IL-1R and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. In mice, R835 dose-dependently decreased serum cytokines in response to administration of IL-1b. Mice pre-treated with R835 demonstrated dose-dependent reductions in MSU crystal-induced serum and peritoneal cytokine levels, as well as neutrophil influx in the peritoneal cavity. Prophylactic and therapeutic treatment with R835 also resulted in significant inhibition of MSU crystal-induced knee edema and pain in a rat model of human gouty arthritis. In the rat model of CIA, R835 blocked both onset and progression of disease, by reducing inflammation, cartilage degeneration and synovial inflammation.

Conclusion:

R835 is a promising clinical candidate for the treatment of a range of cytokine-driven rheumatological diseases. R835 has proven to have desirable pharmacokinetic properties, was well tolerated and suppressed LPS-induced serum cytokines in healthy volunteers in a recent phase 1 study.

References:

[1]Bahia M S, Kaur M, Silakari P, Silakari O. Interleukin-1 receptor associated kinase inhibitors: Potential therapeutic agents for inflammatory- and immune-related disorders. Cellular Signalling 27 (2015) 1039–1055.

Disclosure of Interests:

Chrystelle Lamagna Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Meagan Chan Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Ernest Tai Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Stacey Siu Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Roy Frances Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Sothy Yi Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Chi Young Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Vadim Markovtsov Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Yan Chen Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Lu Chou Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Gary Park Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Esteban Masuda Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Vanessa Taylor Shareholder of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Rigel Pharmaceuticals

AB0384 MEDICATION USE IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS – DATA FROM A MULTICENTRE COHORT STUDY

Background:

In the absence of evidence-based treatment guidelines, medication use in SLE is highly variable. Low rates of remission and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) suggest that suboptimal responses to standard medications, which include glucocorticoids (GC), anti-malarial (AM) drugs and immunosuppressive (IS) agents, are common. Understanding the utility of current medications will facilitate the selection of patients for advanced therapies as they emerge.

Objectives:

To examine medication use patterns in a large multicentre SLE cohort.

Methods:

We used 2013-18 data from the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) cohort in which disease activity (SLEDAI-2K) and medication details were captured at every visit. LLDAS was defined as in Golderet al., 2019 (1). We examined the use of medication (med) categories (GC &/or AM &/or IS) by SLE disease activity and LLDAS at the visit level. Additionally, we performed Cox regression analyses to determine the time-to-discontinuation of meds stratified by SLE disease activity, ranked by time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K, and by percent-time spent in LLDAS.

Results:

We analysed data from 19,804 visits of 2,860 patients. We observed 8 med categories: no meds; GC, AM or IS only; GC+AM; GC+IS; AM+IS and GC+AM+IS (triple therapy). Triple therapy was the most frequent med pattern (32%); single agents were used in 21% of visits and biologicals in only 3%. Among visits where SLEDAI-2K was ≥10, triple therapy was used in 46%, with median [IQR] GC dose 10 [6, 24] mg/day; in contrast, among visits with SLEDAI-2K≤4 triple therapy was used in 28% (p<0.01). Patients in LLDAS received less combination therapy than those who were not in LLDAS.

Med persistence (survival analysis) varied widely, with lowest survivals for IS. Patients with time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K ≥10 had lower discontinuation of GC and higher discontinuation of IS including azathioprine, leflunomide and cyclosporine (Table 1). In contrast, increased time in LLDAS was associated with reduced discontinuation of AM and azathioprine.

GCAMISMPhMPhAAZAMTXCyALEFOverall med survival, days to 25% discontinuation (95%CI)1048(938, 1197)1267(1113, 1428)175(175, 182)387(252, 756)409(350, 476)525(219, 686)268(182, 350)329(190, 524)Univariable associations,HR (95% CI) p-valueDisease activity≤41.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00>4 & <100.69 (0.56,0.84)p<0.0011.15 (0.92,1.44)0.20.92 (0.80,1.05)0.21.37 (0.78,2.42)0.31.16 (0.97,1.39)0.111.11 (0.72,1.71)0.61.26 (0.90,1.77) 0.181.88 (1.07,3.30) 0.03≥100.65 (0.35,1.21) 0.181.56 (0.94,2.59) 0.080.84 (0.45,1.57)0.61.92 (0.80,4.63)0.142.69 (1.86,3.91) p<0.0011.85 (0.92,3.71) 0.082.66 (1.36,5.21) 0.0041.62 (1.13,2.32)0.009LLDAS<50%1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00≥50%1.30 (1.09, 1.55)0.0030.67 (0.54, 0.84)<0.0011.22 (1.08, 1.40)0.0020.83 (0.44,1.57)0.60.83 (0.69, 1.00)0.0540.70 (0.46, 1.07)0.101.29 (0.92, 1.83)0.140.43 (1.5, 1.25)0.12

Conclusion:

In a large multicentre SLE cohort, most patients were receiving combination treatment. AM treatment survival was high and associated with low disease activity, GC survival was high and associated with high disease activity, while IS survival was low. Patients with high disease activity received more medication combinations but had reduced IS survival. These data suggest ongoing unmet need for improved medications for treatment of SLE.

Reference:

Golder, V., et al Lancet Rheum. 2019 1(2):e95-102

Disclosure of Interests:

Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake Grant/research support from: The APLC has received financial (non-restricted educational) grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly and UCB for the LLDAS Validation Study., Worawit Louthrenoo: None declared, Shue Fen Luo: None declared, Yeong-Jian Wu Consultant of: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Yi-Hsing Chen Grant/research support from: Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan Department of Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, GSK, Pfizer, BMS., Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead., Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Lilly, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, Astellas, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma., Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, Astra& Zeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead., Vera Golder: None declared, Aisha Lateef: None declared, Jiacai Cho: None declared, Sandra Navarra Speakers bureau: Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, Leonid Zamora: None declared, Laniyati Hamijoyo Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Tanabe, Abbot, Dexa Medica, Roche, Sargunan Sockalingam: None declared, Yuan An: None declared, Zhanguo Li: None declared, Yasuhiro Katsumata: None declared, masayoshi harigai Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Oxford Immuotec, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Teijin Pharma Ltd. MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Teijin Pharma., Yanjie Hao: None declared, Zhuoli Zhang: None declared, Madelynn Chan: None declared, Jun Kikuchi: None declared, Tsutomu Takeuchi Grant/research support from: Eisai Co., Ltd, Astellas Pharma Inc., AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, UCB Pharma, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Consultant of: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Astellas Pharma Inc., Eli Lilly Japan KK, Speakers bureau: AbbVie GK, Eisai Co., Ltd, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corp., Eisai Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Sanofi K.K., Dainippon Sumitomo Co., Ltd., Fiona Goldblatt: None declared, Sean O’Neill: None declared, Chetan Karyekar Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC. Previously, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Abbott Labs., Jennifer H. Lofland Employee of: Janssen, Sang-Cheol Bae: None declared, Chak Sing Lau: None declared, Alberta Hoi: None declared, Mandana Nikpour: None declared, Eric F. Morand Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca

60 Post Inpatient Fall Medical Assessment (PIFMA) Performa Quality Improvement Project

Introduction

Inpatient falls are the most commonly reported patient safety incidents and in the United Kingdom, there are 250,000 reported falls per year 1. A rapid response report (RRR) issued in 2011 by the NPSA highlighted need for improvement in identifying fractures and neurological observations. These figures reflect significant implications to patients’ health and financial burden to the NHS.

Aims

To improve assessment and documentation of inpatient falls assessment.

Methods

Two PDSA cycles were completed. First PDSA cycle established a baseline of post fall assessment and documentation in which raising awareness and teaching (RAT) to junior doctors was done. Second PDSA cycle identified room for further improvement and post inpatient fall medical assessment (PIFMA) Performa was developed to aid assessment and documentation for use of junior doctors. Feedback regarding the usefulness of the PIFMA Performa was collected via survey.

Results

The RAT intervention involved 30 patients of the Elderly wards in November and December 2017 and the PIFMA intervention involved 29 patients in all Medical wards in January and February 2019. The PIFMA Performa improved the time taken to review patients as per doctors survey. On comparing the RAT against PIFMA Performa interventions, documentation improved in the categories of physical examination (from 80% to 97%), neurological observations (from 49% to 98%), medication review (from 53% to 83%), and measuring lying standing blood pressure (from 83% to 90%).

Conclusions

Feedback from junior doctors states that the PIFMA Performa was certainly a very useful guidance tool and help to speed up documentation. These improvements only translated if junior doctors utilize the PIFMA Performa and so this is now being implemented in the trust policy. Further PDSA cycle can reassess if improvements truly represent the population cross-section.

References

1. The incidence and costs of inpatient falls in hospitals (2017), NHS improvement.

2. National Patient Safety Agency NPSA/2011/RRR001 (13 January 2011).

107 Increased Hospitalisation Associated with Nasogastric Feeding in Advanced Dementia: Experience of A Geriatric Unit in Singapore

Introduction

Tube feeding is not recommended in persons with advanced dementia and dysphagia; it does not improve nutrition, reduce infections or mortality. In Singapore, limited data exists on the prevalence of oral versus tube feeding in persons with advanced dementia, and the alignment between the mode of administering food and fluids and a prior advanced care plan (ACP) discussion.

Methods

Retrospective review of 120 patients from January to October 2017 was conducted to examine the prevalence of oral and tube feeding in advanced dementia patients with ACP, and the alignment of the chosen mode of intake with their ACP. Outcomes include rates of readmission, pneumonia, ACP revisions and mortality at six months.

Results

42 subjects fulfilling criteria were analysed. 81.0% continued oral feeding. There was a statistically significant difference in the decision for tube insertion between oral and tube feeding groups (p=0.02), which was influenced by the ACP discussion. Concordance with ACP discussion in the tube feeding group was mixed, with 50% agreeing for tube insertion and 33.3% who were clinically guided. Surrogates made the decisions in 90.5% of the discussions.

Six-month readmission rate was 32.4% for orally-fed patients versus 75% for tube-fed patients (p=0.045). 52.9% of admissions were attributed to pneumonia. 8.8% of orally fed patients revised their ACP to opt for a trial of treatment in their own home instead of readmission to the hospital. There was no difference in 6-month mortality (p=0.123).

Conclusions

Oral feeding was continued for most advanced dementia patients. Tube feeding does not offer survival benefit or prevent aspiration at 6 months, yet is associated with increased hospitalisations. ACP discussion should be initiated earlier to provide persons with dementia the opportunity to express their preferences for the mode of food and fluid intake.

Environmental Exposures Such as Smoking and Low Vitamin D Are Predictive of Poor Outcome in Cutaneous Melanoma rather than Other Deprivation Measures

A lack of basic resources within a society (deprivation) is associated with increased cancer mortality, and this relationship has been described for melanoma. We have previously reported the association of smoking and low vitamin D levels with melanoma death. In this study, we further explored the associations of these with melanoma in addition to deprivation and socio-economic stressors. In this analysis of 2,183 population-ascertained primary cutaneous melanoma patients, clinical, demographic, and socio-economic variables were assessed as predictors of tumor thickness, melanoma death and overall death. Using the Townsend deprivation score, the most deprived group did not have thicker tumors compared to the least deprived. Of the World Health Organization 25x25 risk factors for premature death, smoking and body mass index (BMI) were independently associated with thicker tumors. Low vitamin D was also independently associated with thicker tumors. No socio-economic stressors were independent predictors of thickness. Smoking was confirmed as a key predictor of melanoma death and overall death, as were low vitamin D levels, independent of other measures of deprivation. Neither BMI nor the Townsend deprivation score were predictive in either survival analysis. We report evidence for the role of smoking, vitamin D, and BMI in melanoma progression independent of a postcode-derived measure of deprivation.