Virulence-specific cell cycle and morphogenesis connections in pathogenic fungi

To initiate pathogenic development, pathogenic fungi respond to a set of inductive cues. Some of them are of an extracellular nature (environmental signals), while others are intracellular (developmental signals). These signals must be integrated into a single response whose major outcome is changes in the morphogenesis of the fungus. The regulation of the cell cycle is pivotal during these cellular differentiation steps; therefore, cell cycle regulation would likely provide control points for infectious development by fungal pathogens. Here, we provide clues to understanding how the control of the cell cycle is integrated with the morphogenesis program in pathogenic fungi, and we review current examples that support these connections.

MRN- and 9-1-1-Independent Activation of the ATR-Chk1 Pathway during the Induction of the Virulence Program in the Phytopathogen Ustilago maydis

DNA damage response (DDR) leads to DNA repair, and depending on the extent of the damage, to further events, including cell death. Evidence suggests that cell differentiation may also be a consequence of the DDR. During the formation of the infective hypha in the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis, two DDR kinases, Atr1 and Chk1, are required to induce a G2 cell cycle arrest, which in turn is essential to display the virulence program. However, the triggering factor of DDR in this process has remained elusive. In this report we provide data suggesting that no DNA damage is associated with the activation of the DDR during the formation of the infective filament in U. maydis. We have analyzed bulk DNA replication during the formation of the infective filament, and we found no signs of impaired DNA replication. Furthermore, using RPA-GFP fusion as a surrogate marker of the presence of DNA damage, we were unable to detect any sign of DNA damage at the cellular level. In addition, neither MRN nor 9-1-1 complexes, both instrumental to transmit the DNA damage signal, are required for the induction of the above mentioned cell cycle arrest, as well as for virulence. In contrast, we have found that the claspin-like protein Mrc1, which in other systems serves as scaffold for Atr1 and Chk1, was required for both processes. We discuss possible alternative ways to trigger the DDR, independent of DNA damage, in U. maydis during virulence program activation.

The fission yeast rDNA-binding protein Reb1 regulates G1 phase under nutritional stress

Yeast Reb1 and its mammalian ortholog TTF1 are conserved Myb-type DNA-binding proteins that bind to specific sites near the 3'-end of rRNA genes (rDNA). Here, they participate in the termination of transcription driven by RNA polymerase I and block DNA replication forks approaching in the opposite direction. We found that Schizosaccharomyces pombe Reb1 also upregulates transcription of the ste9(+) gene that is required for nitrogen-starvation-induced growth arrest with a G1 DNA content and sexual differentiation. Ste9 activates the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome ('APC/C') in G1, targeting B-cyclin for proteasomal degradation in response to nutritional stress. Reb1 binds in vivo and in vitro to a specific DNA sequence at the promoter of ste9(+), similar to the sequence recognized in the rDNA, and this binding is required for ste9(+) transcriptional activation and G1 arrest. This suggests that Reb1 acts as a link between rDNA metabolism and cell cycle control in response to nutritional stress. In agreement with this new role for Reb1 in the regulation of the G1-S transition, reb1Δ and wee1(ts) mutations are synthetically lethal owing to the inability of these cells to lengthen G1 before entering S phase. Similarly, reb1Δ cdc10(ts) cells are unable to arrest in G1 and die at the semi-permissive temperature.