Anticholinergic burden and revisit risk in frail patients with pharmacological sleepiness

OBJECTIVE

Drug-induced sleepiness is a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) visits for frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of anticholinergic burden on 90-day revisitation risk for frail patients who visit the ED due to drug-induced sleepiness.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in which patients treated at a fragility care area of an ED who sought consultation for drug-associated sleepiness from June 2020 to June 2021 were included. To evaluate the 90-day revisitation risk factors, a multivariate analysis was performed, including those factors with a p<0.200 from a previous univariate model. A Cox regression model was performed to assess the impact of a high burden on the time until 90-day ED revisitation.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight patients were included (mean age 80.7±12.3 years). The median number of drugs that patients were currently on at emergency admission was eight (range 2-19), while at hospital discharge it was nine (range 2-20), with the median number of central nervous system (CNS) depressant drugs on admission being three (range 1-6). Thirty-five (23.6%) patients revisited the ED 90 days after discharge for sleepiness or agitation. In the multivariate model, a significant association was observed between a high anticholinergic burden during treatment at discharge (OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.36 to 9.71), chronic kidney disease (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.81), and the risk of 90-day revisitation. Patients with high anticholinergic burden had a shorter time to revisit than those with medium or low anticholinergic burden (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pharmacological sleepiness and a high anticholinergic burden in their chronic treatment carry a greater risk of revisitation to EDs, and should be considered candidates for specific interventions after visiting these units.

Are all JAK inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis equivalent? An adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib

INTRODUCTION

Comparisons of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are lacking. We assessed the relative efficacy and safety of four JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib) in this context.

METHOD

We performed an adjusted indirect comparison (IC) of randomized clinical trials using Bucher's method with an IC and mixed calculator. Endpoints were Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and American College of Rheumatology-20 (ACR20). Equivalence was assessed using the equivalent therapeutic alternatives (ETA) guidelines.

RESULTS

We included four of 133 potentially relevant studies. IC showed no statistically significant differences between the four JAKi regarding DAS28-CRP < 3.2. Results were similar in terms of ACR20 except for tofacitinib showing lower efficacy than upadacitinib (RAR -18.4% [IC95% -33.4 to -3.5], p=0.0157). Statistically significant differences were related to the relevant difference for tofacitinib in both endpoints. Despite no statistical differences for baricitinib, we observed a probably clinically relevant difference regarding DAS28-CRP. Probably clinically relevant differences were found for tofacitinib vs. upadacitinib in both endpoints, and for baricitinib vs. upadacitinib in DAS28-CRP. Safety, drug-drug interactions, and convenience considerations did not modify the result of therapeutic equivalence assessment based on efficacy data.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our results show that filgotinib and upadacitinib are ETA. Baricitinib and upadacitinib are also ETA due to a lack of clear differences and for showing superiority over placebo. The results for tofacitinib and upadacitinib show some inconsistency and more data are needed. Key Points • To date, neither a head-to-head comparison nor an indirect comparison between the Janus kinase inhibitors has been performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. • We performed an adjusted indirect comparison that included randomized clinical trials of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib to assess their equivalence in this scenario. • Our results show that baricitinib and filgotinib are equivalent therapeutic alternatives compared to upadacitinib. However, there is some inconsistency in the results of tofacitinib in front of upadacitinib.