Outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: role of triggers and complement abnormalities in the response to C5 inhibition

BACKGROUND

Atypical-hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy often due to uncontrolled complement activation, characterized by high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Eculizumab has improved the outcome, however, its efficacy varies among patients and its discontinuation is debated.

METHODS

To identify characteristics associated with treatment response, we analyzed 244 aHUS patients referred to our center. Patients were classified according to the presence/absence of complement abnormalities and/or triggers at onset in 4 categories: (1) primary (complement abnormality without trigger), (2) secondary (trigger without complement abnormality), (3) combined (trigger and complement abnormality), (4) idiopathic (no trigger, no complement abnormality). Response to treatment was evaluated by comparing the response to eculizumab with that of conventional therapy. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated with the relapse rate after discontinuation of C5-inhibition.

RESULTS

Patients had a better outcome with eculizumab compared to conventional treatment, with a response rate of 81.9% vs 56.9%, p < 0.001 and a long-term cumulative incidence of ESKD of 5.8% vs 22.5% (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.80). The excellent global response was driven by the primary and combined groups (89.8% vs 54.0% and 89.3% vs 54.2%, respectively). The relapse rate following discontinuation of the C5-inhibitor was as high as 66.7% in the primary group, 18.7% in the combined, and 0% in the secondary and idiopathic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show a better outcome in aHUS patients treated with C5-inhibition, particularly in the primary and combined forms, which have a high risk of relapse after discontinuation that is not observed in the secondary and idiopathic forms.

Multiple, random spot urine sampling for estimating urinary sodium excretion

The measurement of sodium intake may be important for the management of hypertension. Dietary surveys and 24-h urinary collection are often unreliable and/or impractical. We hypothesized that urinary sodium excretion can be accurately estimated through multiple spot urine samples from different days. All enrolled subjects were children of the coauthors of the study. Fifty-two 24-h urinary collections (4 per subject) for measuring sodium excretion and the 297 related urinary samples (1 per voiding) were collected for calculating the urinary sodium/urinary creatinine ratio in 13 children. The mean of 4 measured sodium excretions served as the individual "gold standard". Twenty-four urinary collections were used to generate the equation predicting the mean measured sodium excretion from the mean of 4 urinary sodium/urinary creatinine [= 0.016 × urinary sodium (mmol/L) / urinary creatinine (mmol/L) ratio + 3.3)]; the remaining 28 urinary collections and 153 urinary samples were used for the external validation. All subjects underwent an additional validation procedure involving 12 urinary samples randomly collected on different days 6 months apart. The performance of sodium excretion calculated from a total of over 22,000 possible means of 4 out of all the available urinary samples, randomly taken on different days, was analyzed as to precision (by means of the coefficient of variation) and as to accuracy (by means of the P30). The coefficients of variations of measured vs. calculated sodium excretion were 25.3% vs. 25.8%, and the P30 of calculated sodium excretion was 100%. The excellent performance of calculated sodium excretion was confirmed both by external validation and by samples collected 6 months apart with mean P30s, all between 86 and 100%.Conclusion: In the described experimental conditions, urinary sodium excretion was estimated with equal precision and more accurately (and practically) by the mean of 4 urinary sodium/urinary creatinine ratios from random samples from different days than by a single urinary collection. In real life, with several errors systematically affecting urinary collection, the superiority of calculated sodium excretion is likely to be even greater. What is Known: • The measurement of sodium intake with the current standards of care (dietary survey or 24-h urinary collection) is laborious and can be inaccurate. What is New: • The study provides evidence that sodium intake can be estimated equally precisely, more accurately and more practically with the urinary sodium-to-urinary creatinine ratio from 4 urine samples taken on different days than with a single urinary collection.