Tuberculosis treatment without rifampin in kidney/kidney-pancreas transplantation: A case series report

BACKGROUND

The best approach to tuberculosis (TB) treatment in transplanted patients is still unknown. Current guidelines are based on evidence either extrapolated from other populations or observational. Rifampin-containing regimens have strong pharmacokinetic interactions with immunosuppressive regimens, with high rates of organ dysfunction and ∼20% mortality. This report describes the results obtained using non-rifampin-containing regimens to treat confirmed TB in adult patients with kidney/kidney-pancreas transplantation.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis from confirmed TB cases in adult kidney/kidney-pancreas transplant recipients (2006-2019), treated "de novo" with non-rifampin-containing regimens.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients had confirmed TB. Thirty patients were treated "de novo" with non-rifampin-containing regimens. These patients' mean age was 49.24 (±11.50) years. Induction immunosuppression was used in 22 patients. Maintenance immunosuppression was tacrolimus-mycophenolate-steroids in 13 (43%), sirolimus-mycophenolate-steroids in 6 (20%), and other immunosuppressive regimens in 11 (36%). Belatacept was used in four patients. TB localizations: pulmonary 43%; disseminated 23%; extrapulmonary 33%. Twenty-seven (90%) patients completed treatment with isoniazid, ethambutol, and levofloxacin (12 months, 23; 9 months, 3; 6 months, 1); 12 of these patients also received pyrazinamide for the first 2 months and were cured with functioning grafts. One patient (3%) lost the graft while on treatment. Two patients (7%) died while on TB treatment. Median (range) follow-up after completion of TB treatment was 32 (8-150) months. No TB relapses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Results with non-rifampin-containing TB treatments in this case series were better (in terms of mortality and graft dysfunction) than those previously described with rifampin-containing regimens in transplanted patients.

Adverse Events and Discontinuation Rates Associated with Sirolimus Treatment in Adult Renal Transplant Patients in Latin America vs Non-Latin American Countries

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection following renal transplantation. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to sirolimus discontinuation differ geographically.

METHODS

Rates of TEAEs, serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations were evaluated in 3 clinical trials of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus. Posttransplantation, patients were treated over 4 years (study 1), over 1 year (study 2), and over 2 years (study 3). TEAEs, SAEs, and discontinuation rates were compared between Latin America (LATAM) vs North America (NA) and Europe/rest of world (EU/ROW). Data from studies 2 and 3, with similar times to conversion, were pooled.

RESULTS

Study 1 comprised 551 patients (LATAM, n=189); studies 2/3 comprised 395 (LATAM, n=111). LATAM patients were significantly younger than NA or EU/ROW patients in study 1 and studies 2/3 (P < .0001), with a lower proportion of white patients and higher proportion of patients of other races in LATAM vs NA (P < .0001) and EU/ROW (P = .02) groups. Almost all patients reported TEAEs. Discontinuation because of medical events was significantly lower (P < .05) in LATAM vs NA or EU/ROW. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were more common, and anemia and peripheral edema less common in LATAM; diarrhea and proteinuria did not differ by region. Types of AEs leading to discontinuation did not differ by region.

CONCLUSION

LATAM renal transplant recipients converted to sirolimus were more likely to remain on therapy than patients in other regions.

Optimizing the clinical utility of sirolimus-based immunosuppression for kidney transplantation

While calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are effective for preventing acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, long-term use may cause chronic kidney injury and is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events, cancer, and infection-associated death. Immunosuppression strategies are needed to balance risks of acute and subclinical rejection with long-term benefits of improved kidney function. Sirolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, is used for immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Its clinical utility has evolved, over more than 15 years, including de novo sirolimus with and without concomitant CNIs and conversion from CNI-based regimens to sirolimus. Sirolimus-containing regimens are associated with preservation of good renal function, with promising characteristics for improving long-term graft and patient survival, including antiviral and anticancer effects. Based on clinical evidence, use of low-dose sirolimus in a de novo approach with tacrolimus/steroids in the immediate posttransplantation period is appropriate. A feasible alternative is a long term, CNI-free combination with mycophenolate mofetil (following CNI-to-sirolimus conversion at 3-6 months). These strategies are appropriate for a broad range of patients with various levels of immunologic risk, including those receiving expanded criteria donor kidneys or at increased risk of delayed graft function, particular challenges in Latin America and other global regions.

Safety and Efficacy Outcomes 3 Years After Switching to Belatacept From a Calcineurin Inhibitor in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a Phase 2 Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

In a phase 2 study, kidney transplant recipients of low immunologic risk who switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept had improved kidney function at 12 months postconversion versus those continuing CNI therapy, with a low rate of acute rejection and no transplant loss.

STUDY DESIGN

36-month follow-up of the intention-to-treat population.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

CNI-treated adult kidney transplant recipients with stable transplant function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 35-75mL/min/1.73m²).

INTERVENTIONS

At 6 to 36 months posttransplantation, patients were randomly assigned to switch to belatacept-based immunosuppression (n=84) or continue CNI-based therapy (n=89).

OUTCOMES

Safety was the primary outcome. eGFR, acute rejection, transplant loss, and death were also assessed.

MEASUREMENTS

Treatment exposure-adjusted incidence rates for safety, repeated-measures modeling for eGFR, Kaplan-Meier analyses for efficacy.

RESULTS

Serious adverse events occurred in 33 (39%) belatacept-treated patients and 36 (40%) patients in the CNI group. Treatment exposure-adjusted incidence rates for serious infections (belatacept vs CNI, 10.21 vs 9.31 per 100 person-years) and malignancies (3.01 vs 3.41 per 100 person-years) were similar. More patients in the belatacept versus CNI group had any-grade viral infections (14.60 vs 11.00 per 100 person-years). No posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder was reported. Belatacept-treated patients had a significantly greater estimated gain in mean eGFR (1.90 vs 0.07mL/min/1.73m² per year; P for time-by-treatment interaction effect = 0.01). The probability of acute rejection was not significantly different for belatacept (8.38% vs 3.60%; HR, 2.50 [95% CI, 0.65-9.65; P=0.2). HR for the comparison of belatacept to the CNI group for time to death or transplant loss was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.14-7.07; P=0.9).

LIMITATIONS

Exploratory post hoc analysis with a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching patients from a CNI to belatacept may represent a safe approach to immunosuppression and is being further explored in an ongoing phase 3b trial.

Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: a phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys

Recipients of extended-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long-term outcomes compared to standard-criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3-year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned (1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen, or cyclosporine. Three hundred twenty-three patients completed treatment by year 3. Patient survival with a functioning graft was comparable between groups (80% in MI, 82% in LI, 80% in cyclosporine). Mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was 11 mL/min higher in belatacept-treated versus cyclosporine-treated patients (42.7 in MI, 42.2 in LI, 31.5 mL/min in cyclosporine). More cyclosporine-treated patients (44%) progressed to GFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5) than belatacept-treated patients (27-30%). Acute rejection rates were similar between groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence was higher in belatacept-treated patients (two in MI, three in LI), most of which occurred during the first 18 months; four additional cases (3 in LI, 1 in cyclosporine) occurred after 3 years. Tuberculosis was reported in two MI, four LI and no cyclosporine patients. In conclusion, at 3 years after transplantation, immunosuppression with belatacept resulted in similar patient survival, graft survival and acute rejection, with better renal function compared with cyclosporine. As previously reported, PTLD and tuberculosis were the principal safety findings associated with belatacept in this study population.

Cyclosporine withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil-containing immunosuppressive regimen: results of a five-year, prospective, randomized study

Maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporine (CsA) is associated with nephrotoxicity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. This long-term study (core study + 4 yr of follow-up) investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of CsA withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimen. Seventy-seven patients were maintained on CsA, MMF, and steroids (CsA-MMF group), and 74 were given a CsA-free regimen of MMF and steroids (MMF group). Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were measured at 6-month intervals. Patient and graft survival, acute rejection episodes, malignancies, BP, and lipid profile were also recorded. At 5 yr, patient and graft survival was 93 and 88%, respectively, for the MMF group and 95 and 92%, respectively, for the CsA-MMF group. During follow-up, seven MMF patients experienced acute rejection episodes compared with one CsA-MMF patient (P = 0.0283). Nine grafts were lost to chronic rejection in the MMF group versus three in the CsA-MMF group. No demographic or immunologic characteristics were associated with acute or chronic rejection in the MMF group, but the doses of both MMF and steroids decreased significantly between 1 and 5 yr. The MMF group showed a trend toward improved creatinine clearance (67.4 versus 61.7 ml/min; P = 0.0500). Withdrawal of CsA from an MMF-containing immunosuppressive regimen resulted in an increased risk for acute rejection episodes and graft loss as a result of rejection throughout the 5-yr study period. The creatinine clearance-confirmed improvement in renal function observed at year 1 was maintained at 5 yr BP and cholesterol levels were well controlled in both groups.