Current and novel therapeutic opportunities for systemic therapy in biliary cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a group of rare and aggressive malignancies that arise in the biliary tree within and outside the liver. Beyond surgical resection, which is beneficial for only a small proportion of patients, current strategies for treating patients with BTCs include chemotherapy, as a single agent or combination regimens, in the adjuvant and palliative setting. Increased characterisation of the molecular landscape of these tumours has facilitated the identification of molecular vulnerabilities, such as IDH mutations and FGFR fusions, that can be exploited for the treatment of BTC patients. Beyond targeted therapies, active research avenues explore the development of novel therapeutics that target the crosstalk between cancer and stroma, the cellular pathways involved in the regulation of cell death, the chemoresistance phenotype and the dysregulation of RNA. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic opportunities currently available in the management of BTC patients, and explore the strategies that can support the implementation of precision oncology in BTCs, including novel molecular targets, liquid biopsies and patient-derived predictive tools.

Is there an oligometastatic state in pancreatic cancer? Practical clinical considerations raise the question

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a local ablative treatment (LAT) in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients affected by histologically confirmed stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis. Endpoints are local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2017, a total of 41 patients were treated with SBRT on 64 metastases. Most common sites of disease were lung (29.3%) and liver (56.1%). LC at 1 and 2 years were 88.9% (95% CI 73.2-98.6) and 73.9% (95% CI 50-87.5), respectively. Median LC was 39.9 months (95% CI 23.3-not reached).PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 21.9% (95% CI 10.8-35.4) and 10.9% (95% CI 3.4-23.4), respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI 3.1-11.3).OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 79.9% (95% CI 63.7-89.4) and 46.7% (95% CI 29.6-62.2). Median OS was 23 months (95%CI 14.1-31.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results, although based on a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients, show that patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer may benefit from local treatment with SBRT. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Selected patients affected by oligometastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can benefit from local ablative approaches, like SBRT.

The evolving treatment paradigm of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: putting all the pieces back together

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become notably complex in recent years. With this review, we aimed to put the most recent findings in perspective and tried to delineate the rapidly changing treatment algorithm.

RECENT FINDINGS

The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has become the new first-line standard of care treatment for unresectable HCC after the positive results of the phase 3 IMbrave150 study. Nivolumab monotherapy failed to demonstrate advantage versus sorafenib in the CheckMate 459 trial, while two different therapeutic strategies (sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar and donafenib) outperformed sorafenib in two phase 2/3 studies conducted in the Chinese population. Several immunotherapy combinations are currently under study in large phase 3 trials after promising results in earlier phase studies. About further lines of treatment, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab was approved for sorafenib-pretreated patients after the positive results of the phase 1/2 CheckMate 040 study and apatinib was proven effective in the Chinese population in a phase 2/3 study, while pembrolizumab as monotherapy did not show statistically significant superiority when compared with placebo in the KEYNOTE-240 study.

SUMMARY

Because of the growing complexity of advanced HCC treatment, the implementation of predictive biomarkers of response is eagerly needed.

The Role of Cabozantinib as a Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Landscape and Future Challenges

The systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly changed over the last years, with the introduction of two new standard-of-care first-line treatments (lenvatinib and the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab) and the success of several new agents in second line. In particular, after the approval of regorafenib, ramucirumab and cabozantinib, the landscape of second-line treatment has become notably complex, providing a serious challenge in clinical practice. In this review, we focus on cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor which was proven effective in improving overall and progression-free survival of patients previously treated with sorafenib in the randomized Phase III CELESTIAL trial. CELESTIAL is the only phase III study to have included patients in the third-line setting and cabozantinib efficacy was confirmed in several post hoc analyses, irrespective of alpha-fetoprotein levels, albumin-bilirubin score, age, and duration of previous sorafenib treatment. The safety profile of cabozantinib in the CELESTIAL trial was comparable with other multikinase inhibitors used for HCC and the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, hypertension, and aspartate aminotransferase increase. Tolerability did not differ between younger and older patients and quality of life was significantly improved compared to placebo during the treatment. In this review, we also make a particular mention to the use of cabozantinib in populations which are normally excluded from clinical trials, such as older patients and Child-Pugh B patients. Finally, we present the new treatment strategies in which cabozantinib is being tested, most notably the combination of cabozantinib and atezolizumab in the first-line setting in the phase III COSMIC-312 trial and the use of cabozantinib after progression on immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Hepatotoxicity in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

Hepatitis is a relatively frequent immune-related adverse event in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving immunotherapy, but risk factors and clinical course are unclear. Herein, we show that the development of high-grade hepatitis is associated with increased baseline ALT levels and infectious etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (related to prior hepatitis B or C virus exposure). In addition, when resolved, high-grade hepatitis does not preclude treatment resumption and does not affect subsequent time to treatment failure. Analysis of baseline tumor specimens, at a preliminary level, suggests that biological features reminiscent of the hepatocellular carcinoma “immune class” could protect against high-grade hepatitis development, thereby warranting further investigation.

Abstract

Risk factors for hepatic immune-related adverse events (HIRAEs) in patients with advanced/unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unclear. We investigated: (i) clinical and morpho-pathological predictors of HIRAEs in 27 pretreatment tumor specimens, including surrogate biomarkers of the HCC immune class (based on intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structures, and glutamine synthase, CD3, and CD79 expression); and (ii) the relationship between HIRAE onset and subsequent treatment outcomes. Fifty-eight patients were included—20 (34%) received ICIs alone, and 38 (66%) received ICIs plus targeted agents as first- or further-line treatment. After a median time of 0.9 months (range, 0.4–2.7), nine patients (15.5%) developed grade ≥ 3 hepatitis, which was significantly associated with higher baseline ALT levels (p = 0.037), and an infectious HCC etiology (p = 0.023). ICIs were safely resumed in six out of nine patients. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was not significantly different in patients developing grade ≥ 3 hepatitis vs. lower grades (3.25 vs. 3.91 months, respectively; p = 0.81). Biomarker surrogates for the HCC immune class were not detected in patients developing grade ≥ 3 hepatitis. Grade ≥ 3 hepatitis has a benign course that does not preclude safe ICI reintroduction, without any detrimental effect on TTF.

Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?

The therapeutic landscape in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has undergone a significant paradigm shift in recent years with the rising adoption of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). This comprehensive approach entails administering chemotherapy and radiation therapy before surgery, followed by optional adjuvant chemotherapy. To establish and deliver the optimal tailored treatment regimen to the patient, it is crucial to foster collaboration among a multidisciplinary team comprising healthcare professionals from various specialties, including medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, and pathology. This review aims to provide insights into the current state of TNT for LARC and new emerging strategies to identify potential directions for future research and clinical practice, such as circulating tumor-DNA, immunotherapy in mismatch-repair-deficient tumors, and nonoperative management.

Tackling Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Future Perspectives

Substantial improvements have characterized the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) over the past 20 years. Besides strong evidence that supports the use of RAS and BRAF status as prognostic and predictive indicators of disease and response, novel technologies have made possible the incorporation of emerging biomarkers for the management of mCRC. On one hand, the discovery of point mutations, amplifications, fusions, and gene expression profiles highlights the genomic and dynamic complexity of CRC. On the other, such discoveries are leading to newer biomarker-driven strategies that add to existing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti-angiogenic approaches. In addition, the availability of a wide molecular profiling has relevant implications for patient prognosis and treatment benefits. Here, we will review the molecular underpinnings and clinical data supporting novel targeted treatments under development for refractory mCRC harboring BRAF mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, HER2 amplification, and less common molecular alterations, such as the re-arrangements of NTRK, ALK, and ROS1. Additionally, we will discuss novel strategies driving the rechallenge of EGFR antibodies and the incorporation of newer anti-angiogenic agents in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Implementing Pre-Therapeutic UGT1A1 Genotyping in Clinical Practice: A Real-Life Study

Current guidelines recommend pre-therapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping to guide irinotecan dosing, but the usefulness of this approach remains to be clarified. In 247 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers undergoing irinotecan-based chemotherapy, we prospectively performed UGT1A1*28 genotyping and we analyzed the incidence of severe neutropenia according to genotype-guided dose reductions. Overall, 28 (11.3%) and 92 (37.2%) patients were homozygous or heterozygous UGT1A1*28 carriers, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was reported in 39% of homozygous patients receiving an upfront dose reduction of irinotecan (median 40%, range 22–58%), in 20% of heterozygous or wild-type patients receiving full dose (OR_{vs*28/*28 genotype} = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.14–1.03; p = 0.058), and in 15.3% of those receiving a reduced dose for clinical reasons (OR _{vs*28/*28 genotype} = 0.28, 95% IC: 0.12–0.67; p = 0.004). Occurrence of severe neutropenia was inversely associated with dose reduction in UGT1A1*28 homozygous carriers (OR_{x10 unit} = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.27–1.40, p = 0.249) and UGT1A1 heterozygous or wild-type patients (OR_{x10 unit} = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.59–1.28, p = 0.478). Incidence of severe neutropenia was related to irinotecan doses and UGT1A1 polymorphisms. Upfront irinotecan dose reductions do not reduce the burden of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia in UGT1A1*28 homozygous carriers.

Liver injury by immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

341

Background: In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and baseline liver dysfunction, hepatic immune-related adverse events (HIRAEs) during immunotherapy have not been adequately characterized and their impact on subsequent treatment outcomes is not known. Methods: 40 patients with advanced/unresectable HCC and Child Pugh score A have been enrolled in first and second-line clinical trials of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). HCC etiologies were: hepatitis C (32.5%), hepatitis B (7.5%), alcohol abuse (27.5%), other (32.5%). 7 received anti-PD-1 mAbs alone and 33 received combined regimens that included anti-PD-1 mAbs plus either anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (30.4%) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (54.5%), or both (15.1%). We reviewed their liver function tests and HIRAEs onset was related to time to treatment failure (TTF). Results: Overall, 12 patients (30%) developed grade ≥ 3 hepatitis according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4.03, resulting in 4 cases of grade 2 drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Time between therapy initiation and hepatitis onset was 1.4 months (0.4-2.8) and median peak aminotransferase (AT) level was 258 IU/L (85-869). Out of 6 permanent treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), 4 were linked to hepatitis. Higher AT median levels at baseline were significantly linked to grade ≥ 3 hepatitis compared with lower grades (95 IU/L vs. 36 IU/L, respectively; p = 0.008). Etiology, age, treatment did not predict HIRAEs onset. TTF in patients in patients with grade ≥ 3 hepatitis was shorter than in the whole cohort (1.4 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.041), while overall survival did not differ (p = 0.125). Conclusions: We observed a 30% incidence of clinically significant HIRAEs. HIRAEs represent the most frequent AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in patients with HCC undergoing treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Baseline AT levels may identify patients at increased risk of grade ≥ 3 hepatitis.

Current options and future directions of systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are aggressive tumors arising from different portions of the biliary tree and classified according to the anatomical location in intrahepatic (i) cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), and distal CCA (dCCA), gallbladder cancer (GBC), and ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC). Due to their silent behavior, BTCs are frequently diagnosed at advanced stages when the prognosis is poor. The available chemotherapeutic options are palliative and unfortunately, most patients will die from their disease between 6 and 18 months from diagnosis. However, over the last decade, amounting interest has been posed on the genomic landscape of BTCs and deep-sequencing studies have identified different potentially actionable driver mutations. Hence, the promising results of the early phase clinical studies with targeted agents against isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 mutation or fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR) 2 aberrations inintrahepatic tumors, and other agents against humanepidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 overexpression/mutations, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions or B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) mutations across different subtypes of BTCs, have paved the way for a "precision medicine" strategy for BTCs. Moreover, despite the modest results when used as monotherapy, beyond microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, possibly further expanding the therapeutic landscape of advanced BTCs. This review aims to provide an overview of the approved systemic therapies, the promising results, and the ongoing studies to explore the current and future directions of advanced BTC systemic treatment.

Prognostic factors and disease course in patients enrolled onto clinical trials of second-line therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

406

Background: Prognostic factors of survival and disease course in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and preserved liver reserves, enrolled onto clinical trials of second-line treatments after sorafenib, are unclear. Methods: This single-center database analysis included all patients with Child-Pugh A score and ECOG performance status (PS) 0 - 1 participating between 2012 and 2017 in clinical trials of second-line systemic treatments for advanced HCC. Patients received first-line sorafenib and experienced either disease progression (PD) to sorafenib or were sorafenib-intolerant. Their clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with overall survival (OS, calculated from the first day of second-line treatment to death or last visit available), and post-treatment survival (PTS, calculated from the date of end-of-treatment to death or last follow-up). Results: Ninety-nine patients (21 sorafenib-intolerant, 78 progressors) were enrolled onto trials of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI, 23 patients), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI, 44 patients) versus best supportive care (BSC, 24 patients), open-label TKI (8 patients). Overall, median OS was 9.4 months (9.6, 9.8, and 8.0 months for CPI, TKI and BSC, respectively; p = 0.493). Median time-to-treatment failure was 3.5, 4.4, 3.7 months for CPI, TKI and BSC, respectively (p = 0.561). In multivariable analyses, worse OS was linked to high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (Hazard Ratio, HR = 1.13; p = 0.005) and macrovascular invasion [(MVI), HR = 2.59; p < 0.001]. Second-line treatment discontinuation due to liver failure independently conferred worse PTS than adverse events (HR = 2.32; p = 0.111) or PD (HR = 3.44; p = 0.002), as did ECOG PS > 1 at EOT (HR = 3.05; p = 0.002). Death rate within 30 days of end-of-treatment was 4.2% on placebo versus 10.5% on IO versus 22.9% on TKI. Conclusions: In this homogeneous cohort of compensated HCC patients pre-treated with sorafenib, MVI and NLR at start of second-line clinical trial are prognostic factors of OS. Besides ECOG PS and liver failure, further predictors of subsequent PTS to inform treatment options beyond second-line were not identified.

Fruquintinib as new treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: is there an optimal sequence?

INTRODUCTION

Available treatments for colorectal cancer are limited. However, in the last few years several advances and new treatment options became available and expanded the continuum of care in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

AREAS COVERED

Fruquintinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in heavily pretreated mCRC progressing to trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD/TPI) or regorafenib or both. Preclinical studies have shown that fruquintinib inhibits with high selectivity VEGFR 1-2-3, leading to a blockade in angiogenesis process, but also acts, with weak inhibition, on RET, FGFR-1, and c-kit kinases. Fruquintinib demonstrated good efficacy and tolerance in chemorefractory mCRC in two phase III trial: FRESCO and FRESCO 2. These results led to FDA approval of fruquintinib for pretreated mCRC patients who received prior fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Fruquintinib is a valid therapeutic option for heavily pretreated mCRC patients. However, an optimal sequence of treatments is yet to be defined. In this review, we propose an algorithm for later lines of treatment to integrate fruquintinib as a standard of care together with the new therapeutic combinations that recently showed clinical benefit for chemorefractory mCRC, in both molecularly selected (e.g. KRASG12C or HER2 amplification) and in non-oncogenic driven patients.