Cost-Effectiveness of 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Among US Children with Underlying Medical Conditions

INTRODUCTION

A 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was recently recommended for use among US children. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCV20 among children aged 6 years with chronic medical conditions (CMC+) and children aged 6 years with immunocompromising conditions (IC) versus one and two doses of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), respectively.

METHODS

A probabilistic model was employed to depict 10-year risk of clinical outcomes and economic costs of pneumococcal disease, reduction in life years from premature death, and expected impact of vaccination among one cohort of children with CMC+ and IC aged 6 years. Vaccine uptake was assumed to be 20% for both PCV20 and PPSV23. Cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was evaluated from the US societal and healthcare system perspectives; deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA/PSA) were also conducted.

RESULTS

Among the 226,817 children with CMC+ aged 6 years in the US, use of PCV20 (in lieu of PPSV23) was projected to reduce the number cases of pneumococcal disease by 5203 cases, medical costs by US$8.7 million, and nonmedical costs by US$6.2 million. PCV20 was the dominant strategy versus PPSV23 from both the healthcare and societal perspectives. In the PSA, 99.9% of the 1000 simulations yielded a finding of dominance for PCV20. Findings in analyses of children with IC aged 6 years in the USA were comparable (i.e., PCV20 was the dominant vaccination strategy). Scenario analyses showed that increasing PCV20 uptake to 100% could potentially prevent > 22,000 additional cases of pneumococcal disease and further reduce medical and nonmedical costs by US$70.0 million among children with CMC+ and IC.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PCV20 among young children with CMC+ and IC in the USA would reduce the clinical burden of pneumococcal disease and yield overall cost savings from both the US healthcare system and societal perspectives. Higher PCV20 uptake could further reduce the number of pneumococcal disease cases in this population.

Cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in US infants

BACKGROUND

As of June 2023, two pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, 20- (PCV20) and 15- (PCV15) valent formulations, are recommended for US infants under a 3 + 1 schedule. This study evaluated the health and economic impact of vaccinating US infants with a new expanded valency PCV20 formulation.

METHODS

A population-based, multi cohort, decision-analytic Markov model was developed to estimate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of PCV20 from both societal and healthcare system perspectives over 10 years. Epidemiological data were based on published studies and unpublished Active Bacterial Core Surveillance System (ABCs) data. Vaccine effectiveness was based on PCV13 effectiveness and PCV7 efficacy studies. Indirect impact was based on observational studies. Costs and disutilities were based on published data. PCV20 was compared to both PCV13 and PCV15 in separate scenarios.

RESULTS

Replacing PCV13 with PCV20 in infants has the potential to avert over 55,000 invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) cases, 2.5 million pneumonia cases, 5.4 million otitis media (OM) cases, and 19,000 deaths across all ages over a 10-year time horizon, corresponding to net gains of 515,000 life years and 271,000 QALYs. Acquisition costs of PCV20 were offset by monetary savings from averted cases resulting in net savings of $20.6 billion. The same trend was observed when comparing PCV20 versus PCV15, with a net gain of 146,000 QALYs and $9.9 billion in net savings. A large proportion of the avoided costs and cases were attributable to indirect effects in unvaccinated adults and elderly. From a health-care perspective, PCV20 was also the dominant strategy compared to both PCV13 and PCV15.

CONCLUSIONS

Infant vaccination with PCV20 is estimated to further reduce pneumococcal disease and associated healthcare system and societal costs compared to both PCV13 and PCV15.

Cost-effectiveness and impact on infections and associated antimicrobial resistance of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in US children previously immunized with PCV13

AIM

The US Food and Drug Administration approved the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) to prevent pneumococcal disease. In the context of routine PCV20 vaccination, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness and public health and economic impact of a PCV20 catch-up program and estimated the number of antibiotic prescriptions and antibiotic-resistant infections averted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population-based, multi-cohort, decision-analytic Markov model was developed using parameters consistent with previous PCV20 cost-effectiveness analyses. In the intervention arm, children aged 14-59 months who previously completed PCV13 vaccination received a supplemental dose of PCV20. In the comparator arm, no catch-up PCV20 dose was given. The direct and indirect benefits of vaccination were captured over a 10-year time horizon.

RESULTS

A PCV20 catch-up program would prevent 5,469 invasive pneumococcal disease cases, 50,286 hospitalized pneumonia cases, 218,240 outpatient pneumonia cases, 582,302 otitis media cases, and 1,800 deaths, representing a net gain of 30,014 life years and 55,583 quality-adjusted life years. Furthermore, 720,938 antibiotic prescriptions and 256,889 antibiotic-resistant infections would be averted. A catch-up program would result in cost savings of $800 million. These results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

A PCV20 catch-up program could prevent pneumococcal infections, antibiotic prescriptions, and antimicrobial-resistant infections and would be cost-saving in the US.

Serum bactericidal activity against circulating and reference strains of meningococcal serogroup B in the United States: A review of the strain coverage of meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccines in adolescents and young adults

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is rare but associated with high morbidity and mortality. In the United States, the most vulnerable age groups are infants and adolescents/young adults, and the most common type of IMD is caused by serogroup B (MenB). MenB is preventable among adolescents and young adults with the use of two licensed vaccines, MenB-FHbp (Trumenba®, bivalent rLP2086; Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA) and MenB-4C (Bexsero®; GSK Vaccines, Srl, Italy). Because the effectiveness of MenB vaccination is dependent on broad vaccine coverage across circulating disease-causing strains, we reviewed the available clinical and real-world evidence regarding breadth of coverage of the two licensed vaccines in adolescents and young adults in the United States. Both vaccines protect against various MenB strains. More controlled data regarding breadth of coverage across MenB strains are available for MenB-FHbp compared with MenB-4C, whereas more observational data regarding US outbreak strain susceptibility are available for MenB-4C.

01. Serum Bactericidal Activity Against Circulating and Reference Strains of Meningococcal Serogroup B in the United States: A Review of Meningococcal Serogroup B (MenB) Vaccines in Adolescents and Young Adults

Background

US adolescents and young adults are at particular risk of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). In 2018, menincococcal serogroup B was responsible for 36% of IMD cases in the US overall and for 66% of cases in adolescents and young adults. This age group is at high risk of IMD during outbreaks, which result in significant response-related costs. MenB vaccine efficacy against IMD relies on its ability to provide broad protection against diverse disease-causing strains. MenB-FHbp (Trumenba) and MenB-4C (Bexsero) are MenB vaccines licensed in the US as 2-dose series with an interval of 6 mo or 1 mo, respectively, recommended in healthy adolescents and young adults. We review available data on vaccine coverage of serogroup B strains.

Methods

A literature review identified relevant information from peer-reviewed publications, congress presentations, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Previously presented but unpublished data from phase 2/3 studies were included.

Results

After 2 MenB-FHbp doses, percentages of adolescents and young adults achieving serum bactericidal activity assay using human complement (hSBA) titers ≥1:8 were 79%–99% for 4 heterologous representative test strains and 71%–97% for 10 additional strains, confirming cross-protection against a diverse strain panel (Figure 1; unpublished data). These 14 heterologous strains collectively represent ~80% of disease-causing strains in the US and Europe. In a published study with limited sample size, 44%–78% of subjects had hSBA titers ≥1:8 against strains from 4 US college outbreaks after 2 MenB-FHbp doses. After 2 MenB-4C doses, percentages of 10–25-year-olds achieving hSBA titers ≥1:5 against 3 reference strains homologous to the vaccine antigen were 82%–93% (published data); 15%–100% of adolescents achieved hSBA titers ≥1:4 against a panel of 14 strains (unpublished data). Of college students who received 2 MenB-4C doses, 53%–93% achieved hSBA titers ≥1:4 against 5 US outbreak strains (4/5 strains had antigenic similarity to MenB-4C; published data).

Conclusion

MenB-FHbp and MenB-4C protect against various serogroup B strains. As for the breadth of coverage provided by these vaccines, available data show that MenB-FHbp elicits robust immune responses to a wide variety of disease-causing strains prevalent in the US (Figure 2).

Disclosures

Tamera Coyne-Beasley, MD, MPH, Pfizer Inc and GlaxoSmithKline (Advisor or Review Panel member) Joseph Bocchini, MD, Pfizer Inc and Dynavax (Advisor or Review Panel member) Alejandro Cane, M.D., Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Cindy Burman, PharmD, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Maria J. Tort, PhD, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Jessica Presa, MD, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder)

Abstracts from the North American Rhinology & Allergy Conference, February 3, 2011, Puerto Rico

INTRODUCTION

To establish the efficacy of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution (bepotastine) 1.5%, a dual acting histamine H1 receptor antagonist approved for treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis, compared to placebo in relieving ocular itching and redness for subjects with active allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

METHODS

A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, confirmatory natural exposure study of bepotastine 1.5% and placebo was conducted during allergy season at 12 clinical sites throughout the U.S. Following a 7-day screening period, eligible subjects ≥12 years old were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to dosing OU b.i.d. either bepotastine 1.5% (n = 123) or placebo (n = 122). Subjects recorded instantaneous grades for their ocular symptoms prior to their next dose for 14 consecutive days. Clinically significant reduction in ocular sign or symptom grades between treatment groups required p ≤ 0.05 as determined by ANCOVA analysis.

RESULTS

Significant clinical effectiveness with bepotastine 1.5% was demonstrated over the 2-week treatment period in comparison to placebo in the intent-to-treat population for reducing mean instantaneous grades for both ocular itching (p = 0.007) and redness (p = 0.001). Investigator rating of efficacy over the 2-week treatment period across response categories was also superior for bepotastine 1.5% compared to placebo (p = 0.024). Only one subject discontinued participation in the study due to an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support bepotastine 1.5% as an effective treatment for allergen-induced signs and symptoms in a clinical study designed to closely resemble the conditions under which patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis would require treatment.

Two-week comparison study of olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray 0.6% versus azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray 0.1% in patients with vasomotor rhinitis

Olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray 0.6% (OLO) and azelastine nasal spray 137 micrograms (AZE) are effective in treating allergic rhinitis and AZE is indicated for nonallergic vasomotor rhinitis (VMR). This study evaluates the relative safety and efficacy of OLO and AZE in patients with VMR. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study compared OLO (an investigational use) with AZE over 14 days in patients (n = 129) ≥12 years of age with chronic VMR. Efficacy included the severity of nasal symptom scores. Safety included adverse events (AEs) and nasal examinations. Patient perceptions of treatment satisfaction and changes in allergy condition were determined using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and Patient Global Assessment scores. In the OLO and AZE groups, reflective scores for individual nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and sneezing) and total nasal VMR symptom scores decreased significantly from baseline to day 14 (p < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed (p > 0.05). No serious AEs were reported in either group. Overall, 22 and 20 AEs were reported in the OLO and AZE groups, respectively. The most common AE was taste disturbance, reported by three (5.3%) and six (10.3%) patients in the OLO and AZE groups, respectively. Patients in both groups reported similar treatment satisfaction scores and a majority of patients in both groups perceived an overall improvement in their rhinitis condition. OLO has a similar efficacy and safety profile to AZE for the management of VMR in patients ≥12 years of age.