Antibiotic use in infants at risk of early-onset sepsis: results from a unicentric retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic use for early-onset sepsis represents a high percentage of antibiotic consumption in the neonatal setting. Measures to assess infants at risk of early-onset sepsis are needed to optimize antibiotic use. Our primary objective was to assess the impact of a departmental guideline on antibiotic use among term infants with suspected EOS not confirmed, in our neonatal unit.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study, to compare antibiotic use in term infants during a baseline period of January to December 2018, and a postintervention period from October 2019, to September 2020, respectively. The primary outcome was antibiotic use measured by days of therapy, the antibiotic spectrum index, the antibiotic use rate, and the length of therapy.

RESULTS

We included 71 infants in the baseline period and 66 infants in the postintervention period. Compared to those in the baseline period, there was a significant reduction in overall antibiotic measures in the postintervention period, (P < 0.001). The total days of therapy/1000 patient-days decreased from 63/1000 patient-days during the baseline period to 25.8/1000 patient-days in the postintervention period, representing a relative reduction of 59%. The antibiotic use rate decreased by more than half of the infants, from 3.2% during the baseline period to 1.3% in the postintervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a departmental guideline to assess infants at risk of early-onset sepsis based on their clinical condition and prompt discontinuation of antibiotics, is a simple and low-cost measure that contributed to an important decrease in antibiotic use.

Breastfeeding practices in neonatal wards in Spain. Neo-BFHI international survey

INTRODUCTION

In 2017, a worldwide survey was conducted on compliance with the practices promoted by Neo-BFHI (Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative expansion to neonatal wards).

OBJECTIVE

To present the results of the Spanish wards that participated in the global survey and compare them with those obtained internationally.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cross-sectional study through a survey on compliance with the Neo-BFHI ("Three basic principles", "Ten steps adapted to neonatal wards" and "the compliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes" and subsequent relevant World Health Assembly resolutions). Compliance was calculated as the mean in each indicator and a final mean score for each neonatal unit. For the partial and final scores for each country and at the international level, the median was used. All scores ranged between 0 and 100.

RESULTS

The response rate in Spain was 90%. The range of the national mean for neonatal wards were from 37 to 99, with no differences in the final score according to the level of care. The global score for Spain (72) is below the international median (77) and this also occurs in 8 of 14 items. The neonatal wards from BFHI designated hospitals, obtained a significantly higher mean global score, and in 9 of 14 items than the non-accredited ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Both international and national results indicate an improvement in breast feeding practices in neonatal units. The benefits of the BFHI accreditation of maternity reach neonatal wards. Spain has several key points below the international score.

[Breastfeeding practices in neonatal wards in Spain. Neo-BFHI international survey]

INTRODUCTION

In 2017, a worldwide survey was conducted on compliance with the practices promoted by Neo-BFHI (Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative expansion to neonatal wards).

OBJECTIVE

Present the results of the Spanish wards that participated in the global survey and compare them with those obtained internationally.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cross-sectional study through a survey on compliance with the Neo-BFHI ("Three basic principles", "Ten steps adapted to neonatal wards" and "the compliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes" and subsequent relevant World Health Assembly resolutions). Compliance was calculated as the mean in each indicator and a final mean score for each neonatal unit. For the partial and final scores for each country and at the international level, the median was used. All score ranged between 0 and 100.

RESULTS

The response rate in Spain was 90%. The range of the national mean for neonatal wards were from 37 to 99, with no differences in the final score according to the level of care. The global score for Spain (72) is below the international median (77) and this also occurs in 8 of 14 items. The neonatal wards from BFHI designated hospitals, obtained a significantly higher mean global score, and in 9 of 14 items than the non-accredited ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Both international and national results indicate an improvement in breastfeeding practices in neonatal units. The benefits of the BFHI accreditation of maternity reach neonatal wards. Spain has several key points below the international score.