Nonprocedural bleeding after left atrial appendage closure versus direct oral anticoagulants: A subanalysis of the randomized PRAGUE-17 trial

INTRODUCTION

Observational studies have shown low bleeding rates in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated by left atrial appendage closure (LAAC); however, data from randomized studies are lacking. This study compared bleeding events among patients with AF treated by LAAC and nonvitamin K anticoagulants (NOAC).

METHODS

The Prague-17 trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial that compared LAAC to NOAC in high-risk AF patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of a cardioembolic event, cardiovascular death, and major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH).

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 402 patients (201 per arm), and the median follow-up was 3.5 (IQR 2.6-4.2) years. Bleeding occurred in 24 patients (29 events) and 32 patients (40 events) in the LAAC and NOAC groups, respectively. Six of the LAAC bleeding events were procedure/device-related. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis, LAAC was associated with similar rates of ISTH major or CRNMB (sHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.44-1.27, p = 0.28), but with a reduction in nonprocedural major or CRNMB (sHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97, p = 0.039). This reduction for nonprocedural bleeding with LAAC was mainly driven by a reduced rate of CRNMB (sHR for major bleeding 0.69, 95% CI 0.34-1.39, p = .30; sHR for CRNMB 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-1.03, p = 0.059). History of bleeding was a predictor of bleeding during follow-up. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common bleeding site in both groups.

CONCLUSION

During the 4-year follow-up, LAAC was associated with less nonprocedural bleeding. The reduction is mainly driven by a decrease in CRNMB.

Whats new in ESC Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease?

The article summarize the most important changes regarding the management of valvular heart disease, which have been made in the ESC Guidelines 2021. Based on the randomized clinical study data, which were recently published, the most frequent changes were done in terms of the choice of mode of intervention in the aortic and mitral valves as well as in the management of the antithrombotic therapy.

Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study

Background

The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy.

Methods and Results

FFR/iFR were analyzed using a Verrata wire, and coronary flow reserve was analyzed using a Combomap machine (both Philips‐Volcano). The risk polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and for heme oxygenase‐1 were analyzed. In total, 1884 FFR/iFR measurements from 1564 patients were included. The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 393 measurements (20.9%): FFRp (positive)/iFRn (negative) type (264 lesions, 14.0%) and FFRn/iFRp (129 lesions, 6.8%) type. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 343 lesions, correlating better with iFR (R=0.56, P<0.0001) than FFR (R=0.36, P<0.0001). The coronary flow reserve value in FFRp/iFRn lesions (2.24±0.7) was significantly higher compared with both FFRp/iFRp (1.39±0.36), and FFRn/iFRn lesions (1.8±0.64, P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed (1) sex, age, and lesion location in the right coronary artery as predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy; and (2) hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency as predictors for FFRn/iFRp discrepancy. The FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy was significantly more frequent in patients with both risk types of polymorphisms (endothelial nitric oxide synthase_r+heme oxygenase‐1_r): 8 patients (24.2%) compared with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy: 2 patients (5.9%), P=0.03.

Conclusions

Predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy were sex, age, and location in the right coronary artery. Predictors for FFRn/iFRp were hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency. The risk type of polymorphism in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase‐1 genes was more frequently found in patients with FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy.

Registration

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03033810.

Stent Selection for Primary Angioplasty and Outcomes in the Era of Potent Antiplatelets. Data from the Multicenter Randomized Prague-18 Trial

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are the recommended stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to determine why interventional cardiologists used non-DES and how it influenced patient prognoses. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the different stents were also compared in patients treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor. Of the PRAGUE-18 study patients, 749 (67.4%) were treated with DES, 296 (26.6%) with bare-metal stents (BMS), and 66 (5.9%) with bioabsorbable vascular scaffold/stents (BVS) between 2013 and 2016. Cardiogenic shock at presentation, left main coronary artery disease, especially as the culprit lesion, and right coronary artery stenosis were the reasons for selecting a BMS. The incidence of the primary composite net-clinical endpoint (EP) (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, serious bleeding, or revascularization) at seven days was 2.5% vs. 6.3% and 3.0% in the DES, vs. with BMS and BVS, respectively (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.419–5.15, p = 0.002 for BMS vs. DES and 1.25 (0.29–5.39) p = 0.76 for BVS vs. DES). Patients with BMS were at higher risk of death at 30 days (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.01–4.76; for BMS vs. DES, p = 0.045) and at one year (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.19–3.69; p = 0.01); they also had a higher composite of cardiac death, reinfarction, and stroke (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.0–2.74; p = 0.047) at one year. BMS were associated with a significantly higher rate of primary EP whether treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. In conclusion, patients with the highest initial risk profile were preferably treated with BMS over BVS. BMS were associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular events whether treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Non-Warfarin Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: 4-Year Outcomes of PRAGUE-17

BACKGROUND

The PRAGUE-17 trial demonstrated that left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was non-inferior to non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for preventing major neurological, cardiovascular or bleeding events in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the pre-specified long-term (4-year) outcomes in PRAGUE-17.

METHODS

PRAGUE-17 was a randomized non-inferiority trial comparing percutaneous LAAC (Watchman or Amulet) with NOACs (95% apixaban) in non-valvular AF patients with a history of cardioembolism, clinically-relevant bleeding, or both CHA₂DS₂-VASc > 3 and HASBLED > 2. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardioembolic events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism), cardiovascular death, clinically-relevant bleeding, or procedure/device-related complications (LAAC group only). The primary analysis was modified intention-to-treat (mITT).

RESULTS

We randomized 402 AF patients (201 per group, age 73.3±7.0 years, 65.7% male, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.7+1.5, HASBLED 3.1+0.9). After 3.5 years median follow-up (1,354 patients-years), LAAC was non-inferior to NOAC for the primary endpoint by mITT (subdistribution hazard ratio[sHR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.56-1.18; p=0.27; p for non-inferiority=0.006). For the components of the composite endpoint, the corresponding sHRs (and 95% CIs) were 0.68 (0.39-1.20; p=0.19) for cardiovascular death, 1.14 (0.56-2.30; p=0.72) for all-stroke/TIA, 0.75 (0.44-1.27; p=0.28) for clinically-relevant bleeding, and 0.55 (0.31-0.97; p=0.039) for non-procedural clinically-relevant bleeding. The primary endpoint outcomes were similar in the per-protocol [sHR 0.80 (95% CI 0.54-1.18), p=0.25] and on-treatment [sHR 0.82 (95% CI 0.56-1.20), p=0.30] analyses.

CONCLUSION

In long-term follow-up of PRAGUE-17, LAAC remains non-inferior to NOACs for preventing major cardiovascular, neurological or bleeding events. Furthermore, non-procedural bleeding was significantly reduced with LAAC.

Clinical outcomes with drug-eluting stents, bare-metal stents, and bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in patients with AMI treated with primary PCI. Data from the Prague-18 trial

Background

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) are the recommended choice of stents for primary PCI.

Purpose/Methods

The study aimed to determine why interventional cardiologists used non-DESs and how they had influenced the patient prognosis. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the different stents were also compared in treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor.

Results

Of the PRAGUE 18 study patients, 749 (67.4%) were treated with DESs, 296 (26.6%) with BMS, and 66 (5.9%) with BVS. Cardiogenic shock at presentation and the left main disease, especially as culprit lesion, and right coronary artery stenosis were the reasons for BMS selection.

The incidence of the primary net-clinical EP (CV death, nonfatal MI, stroke, major bleeding, or revascularization) at 7 days was 2.6% vs. 6.5%, and 3.0% in the DESs, BMSs, and BVSs, respectively (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.419–5.15, P=0.002 for BMS vs. DES and 1.25 (0.29–5.39) for BVS vs. DES, P=0.76). Patients with BMSs were at higher risk of death at 30 days (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.01–4.76; for BMS vs. DES, P=0.045), and at one year (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.19–3.69; P=0.01); they also had higher composite of cardiac death, re-MI and stroke (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.0–2.74; P=0.047) at one year. BMSs were associated with significantly higher rate of primary EPs either treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.

Conclusion

Patients with the highest risk profile were preferably treated with BMS the contrary to BVS. BMSs were associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular events either treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Charles University Cardiovascular Research Program P-35 and Q-38, Charles University, Czech Republic

The prognostic significance of periprocedural infarction in the era of potent antithrombotic therapy. The PRAGUE-18 substudy

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study aims to investigate the incidence of periprocedural MI in the era of high sensitivity diagnostic markers and intense antithrombotics, and its impact on early outcomes of patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty (pPCI). Data from the PRAGUE-18 (prasugrel versus ticagrelor in pPCI) study were analyzed. The primary net-clinical endpoint (EP) included death, spontaneous MI, stroke, severe bleeding, and revascularization at day 7. The key secondary efficacy EP included cardiovascular death, spontaneous MI, and stroke within 30 days. The incidence of peri-pPCI MI was 2.3% (N = 28) in 1230 study patients. The net-clinical EP occurred in 10.7% of patients with, and in 3.6% of patients without, peri-pPCI MI (HR 2.92; 95% CI 0.91-9.38; P = 0.059). The key efficacy EP was 10.7% and 3.2%, respectively (HR 3.44; 95% CI 1.06-11.13; P = 0.028). Patients with periprocedural MI were at a higher risk of spontaneous MI (HR 6.19; 95% CI 1.41-27.24; P = 0.006) and stent thrombosis (HR 10.77; 95% CI 2.29-50.70; P = 0.003) within 30 days. Age, hyperlipidemia, multi-vessel disease, post-procedural TIMI <3, pPCI on circumflex coronary artery, and periprocedural GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor were independent predictors of peri-pPCI MI.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of intense antithrombotic therapy, the occurrence of peri-pPCI MI is despite highly sensitive diagnostic markers a rare complication, and is associated with an increased risk of early reinfarction and stent thrombosis.

Coronary flow reserve can explain some of FFR and iFR discrepancies. Results from international, multicenter and prospective trial

Background

The trial collected prospective data from physiology measurements of borderline lesions in five Czech, one Japan and one Argentinian cathlabs. The main purposes were to analyze diagnostic agreement between FFR (fractional flow reserve) and iFR (instantaneous wave free ratio) examinations and to find possible explanations for discrepant results.

Methods

FFR and iFR examinations were analyzed using Philips-Volcano console and coronary flow reserve (CFR) was analyzed by using Combomap machine Philips-Volcano. Hyperemia for FFR and CFR measurements was induced by intracoronary administration of adenosine. We used CFR as a truth for comparison between FFR and iFR, because CFR has higher impact on patients prognosis than pressures indices.

Results

Data were collected from February 2016 to June 2019 and the database includes 1.789 examinations from 1.492 patients (282 of them, 15.8%, with ACS). CFR were measured in 343 lesions in 293 patients. (ACS 31.2%). Overall correlation between FFR and iFR is high (R=0.86 p&lt;0.0001). The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 84 measurements (24.5%), more frequently it was FFRp (positive) / iFRn (negative) type of discrepancy (65, 18.9%) compare to FFRn/iFRp (19, 5.5%) one. There was no difference in occurrence of FFR/iFR discrepancy in stable patients and ACS ones (25.1%vs. 22.4%, p=0.59). The CFR correlated better with iFR than with FFR (R=0.56, p&lt;0.0001 vs. R= 0.36, p&lt;0.0001) (see table). In lesions with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy we found substantially higher CFR value compared to FFR/iFR agreement group (2.4±0.7 vs. 1.5±0.5, p&lt;0.0001). Unlike to FFRn/iFRp discrepancy, where CFR value was similar with agreement group (1.4±0.1 vs. 1.5±0.1, p=0.25)

Conclusion

The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in almost one quarter of examinations. Correlation between CFR and iFR is better than between CFR and FFR. High flow is probably one of the main reason for FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Czech Health Research Council

Relationship between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

Time delay is an important prognostic factor and indicator of quality of care for patients with AMI indicated for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Purpose

Assessment of total ischaemia time and its relationship to catheterization findings and the incidence of ischaemic events within 1 year in patients treated with primary PCI.

Method

The analysis included 1230 patients with AIM and primary PCI randomized in the Prague-18 study (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor). We evaluated the total ischaemia time and two the intermediate intervals: A - from the symptom onset to the arrival to the hospital and B - from the entry the hospital to balloon time. We assessed the time delay in relation to patient characteristics, PCI results and ischaemic endpoints (death, reIM, stroke) within 30 days and 1 year.

Results

Median total ischaemia time was 3.2 hours. Its prolongation resulted in more frequent incidence of TIMI flow &lt;2 before PCI (p=0.029), TIMI flow &lt;3 after PCI (p=0.004) and suboptimal PCI (p=0.018). The interval A was significantly prolonged in women (p=0.001) and obese patients with BMI ≥30 kg / m2 (p=0.001). The interval B &lt;30 min was achieved in 70% of patients, only 5.3% had interval &gt;90 min. In 717 (61,6%) patients with increased risk (at least 1 criterion: age &gt;70 years, STEMI anterior wall or LBBB, Killip II-IV, history of MI and CABG, SBP &lt;100 mmHG and HR &gt;100 / min), the prolongation of total ischaemia time (≤2 vs. 2.1–4 vs. 4.1–6 vs. &gt;6 hours) resulted in a more frequent incidence of combined ischaemic endpoints within 1 year (p=0.034) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (p=0.028).

Conclusion

The extension of total ischaemia time in patients treated with primary PCI resulted in a more frequent suboptimal result with TIMI flow &lt;3. Female gender, older age and obesity in women were associated with an increase in total ischaemia time. In patients with increased risk, time delay resulted in a higher incidence of combined ischaemic endpoints within 1 year and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry and discrepancy between fraction flow reserve and instantaneous wave free ratio

Background: We tested whether the level of endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry, and expressed as reactive hyperemia index (RHI), is related to occurrences of a discrepancy between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03033810).Methods: We examined patients with coronary stenosis in the range of 40-70%, assessed by both FFR and iFR (system Philips-Volcano) for stable angina. We included consecutive patients with FFR and iFR in one native coronary artery, and who had had no previous intervention.Results: We included 138 patients. Out of those, 24 patients (17.4%) had a negative FFR (with an FFR value >0.8) and positive iFR (with a iFR value ≤0.89) - designated the FFRn/iFRp discrepancy group, and 22 patients (15.9%) had a positive FFR (≤0.8) and negative iFR (>0.89) - designated the FFRp/iFRn discrepancy. RHI was higher in the discrepancy groups compared the group without discrepancy (1.73 ± 0.79 vs. 1.48 ± 0.50, p = 0.025). However, this finding was not confirmed in multivariant logistic regression analyses. Patients with any type of discrepancy differed from the agreement group by having a higher occurrence of diabetes mellitus [9 patients (21.4%) vs. 36 patients (39.6%), p = 0.029], active smoking (23 patients or 54.8% vs. 26 patients or 28.6%, p = 0.003) and lower use of calcium channel blockers (9 patients, 21.4%, vs. 43 patients, 46.7%, p = 0.004).Conclusion: The presence of endothelial dysfunction can be associated with a discrepancy in FFR/iFR. However, RHI correlated with risk factors of atherosclerosis, not with FFR or iFR.

P1727Prognosis predictors of patients with initial cardiogenic shock complicated acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intense antiplatelet therapy. PRAGUE-18 shock substudy

Background

Early reperfusion of the infarct related artery is the only treatment improving prognosis of patients with initial cardiogenic shock (CGS) complicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (Killip class IV at admission).

Purpose

The analysis focused on subgroup of patients with initial CGS randomized into the multicenter PRAGUE-18 study (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor in primary PCI).

Methods

In the PRAGUE-18 study, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1230) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were immediately randomized to prasugrel or ticagrelor with intended treatment duration of 12 months. 53.6% (n=659) switched to clopidogrel after discharge. Major ischemic and bleeding events were followed throughout the entire study period. Beside standard laboratory tests, efficacy of ticagrelor and prasugrel was measured by flow cytometric VASP evaluation in patients selected for a laboratory sub-study (n=218). Acute heart failure (KILLIP >1) was present in 11.8%, and 46 patients (3.7%) randomized to the study were in CGS.

Results

Patients with CGS were older [66.7 (48,3; 83,3) years] than those without CGS (KILLIP <4), and had the highest prevalence of bundle brunch block on the initial ECG (RBBB in 6.5%, LBBB in 8.7%, p=0.003 for difference in bundle brunch blocks). Time delay to hospital admission [1,7 (0,4; 36,0) hs] was significantly shorter than in patients KILLIP <4 [2,8 (0,8; 28,3hs; p=0.003]. Significantly more CGS patients had history of previous MI (19.6% vs 7.9%, p=0.011) and bypass graft surgery (6.5% vs 1.5%, p=0.041). 67.4% of CGS patients had multivessel disease and in 17.4% of these patients primary PCI was evaluated as suboptimal result or procedural failure (compared to 4.3% in patients without shock, p<0.001).

No difference was observed in clinical (primary and secondary endpoints, p=0.564) or laboratory efficacy between prasugrel and ticagrelor treated patients with CGS (p=0.800 for VASP index difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor 20±4 hs after loading doses). We did not find any difference in initial platelet activation (VASP index before P2Y12 inhibitors administration) in patients without acute heart failure (KILLIP I) [83.2 (54.1–94.2) %] and with KILLIP > I [82.5 (65.7–96.9), p=0.999], and this was also confirmed for the difference between KILLIP I and KILLIP IV patients (p=0.416).

Conclusion

Results of the present analysis and defined predictors of mortality showed that prognosis of patients with initial cardiogenic complicated AMI treated with pPCI cannot be influenced by more potent platelet inhibition (than in AMI patients without CGS). Furthermore, the concluding evidence underscored adherence to the current guidelines' recommendation of the earliest possible reperfusion of infarct related artery as well as administration of prasugrel or ticagrelor.

Interventional left atrial appendage closure vs novel anticoagulation agents in patients with atrial fibrillation indicated for long-term anticoagulation (PRAGUE-17 study)

Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 1% to 2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Without antithrombotic treatment, the annual risk of a cardioembolic event is 5% to 6%. The source of a cardioembolic event is a thrombus, which is usually formed in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Prevention of cardioembolic events involves treatment with anticoagulant drugs: either vitamin K antagonists or, recently, novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC). The other (nonpharmacologic) option for the prevention of a cardioembolic event involves interventional occlusion of the LAA.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether percutaneous LAA occlusion is noninferior to treatment with NOAC in AF patients indicated for long-term systemic anticoagulation.

STUDY DESIGN

The trial will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized noninferiority trial comparing 2 treatment strategies in moderate to high-risk AF patients (ie, patients with history of significant bleeding, or history of cardiovascular event(s), or a with CHA₂DS₂VASc ≥3 and HAS-BLED score ≥2). Patients will be randomized into a percutaneous LAA occlusion (group A) or a NOAC treatment (group B) in a 1:1 ratio; the randomization was done using Web-based randomization software. A total of 396 study participants (198 patients in each group) will be enrolled in the study. The primary end point will be the occurrence of any of the following events within 24months after randomization: stroke or transient ischemic attack (any type), systemic cardioembolic event, clinically significant bleeding, cardiovascular death, or a significant periprocedural or device-related complications.

CONCLUSION

The PRAGUE-17 trial will determine if LAA occlusion is noninferior to treatment with NOAC in moderate- to high-risk AF patients.

Relation Between Clinical Best Practices and 6-Month Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With CoreValve (from the ADVANCE II Study)

Best practices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve include patient screening and valve size selection using multislice computed tomography, adherence to manufacturer recommendations for oversizing, control of implant depth to 6 mm or less, and management of conduction disturbances according to international guidelines. The ADVANCE II study implemented these strategies and demonstrated their relation to clinical outcomes. From October 2011 to April 2013, 200 patients with severe aortic stenosis were enrolled, and 194 were implanted. All imaging and electrocardiographic data were analyzed by an independent core laboratory, and adverse events were adjudicated to valve academic research consortium-2 definitions. The mean age was 80.2 ± 6.7 years and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 7.2 ± 6.8% for the enrolled patients. At 6 months, all-cause mortality was 9.2%, stroke was 2.6%, and permanent pacemaker implantation was 19.2% for class I and II indications. In patients with implant depth ≤6 mm, both mortality and permanent pacemaker implantation were lower than in patients with depth >6 mm (2.5% vs 14.5%, p <0.01 and 18.1% vs 31.7%, p = 0.03, respectively). The rate of moderate and severe paravalvular leak was 9.8% at 7 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, decreasing to 4.3% at 6 months (p = 0.02). Valves were significantly more oversized in patients with mild or less paravalvular leak at day 7 compared with those with moderate or severe (15.8 ± 8.0% vs 11.8 ± 4.9%, p = 0.01). In conclusion, findings from the ADVANCE II study reinforce that adherence to best clinical practices improves patient outcomes.

Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Multicenter Randomized PRAGUE-18 Study

BACKGROUND

No randomized head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel has been published in the 7 years since the higher efficacy of these newer P2Y₁₂ inhibitors were first demonstrated relative to clopidogrel.

METHODS

This academic study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary or immediate percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1230 patients were randomly assigned across 14 sites to either prasugrel or ticagrelor, which was initiated before percutaneous coronary intervention. Nearly 4% were in cardiogenic shock, and 5.2% were on mechanical ventilation. The primary end point was defined as death, reinfarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, or serious bleeding requiring transfusion or prolonging hospitalization at 7 days (to reflect primarily the in-hospital phase). This analysis presents data from the first 30 days (key secondary end point). The total follow-up will be 1 year for all patients and will be completed in 2017.

RESULTS

The study was prematurely terminated for futility. The occurrence of the primary end point did not differ between groups receiving prasugrel and ticagrelor (4.0% and 4.1%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.73; P=0.939). No significant difference was found in any of the components of the primary end point. The occurrence of key secondary end point within 30 days, composed of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke, did not show any significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor (2.7% and 2.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-2.15; P=0.864).

CONCLUSIONS

This head-to-head comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor does not support the hypothesis that one is more effective or safer than the other in preventing ischemic and bleeding events in the acute phase of myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategy. The observed rates of major outcomes were similar but with broad confidence intervals around the estimates. These interesting observations need to be confirmed in a larger trial.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02808767.

Role of Adding Spironolactone and Renal Denervation in True Resistant Hypertension: One-Year Outcomes of Randomized PRAGUE-15 Study

This randomized, multicenter study compared the relative efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) versus pharmacotherapy alone in patients with true resistant hypertension and assessed the effect of spironolactone addition. We present here the 12-month data. A total of 106 patients with true resistant hypertension were enrolled in this study: 52 patients were randomized to RDN and 54 patients to the spironolactone addition, with baseline systolic blood pressure of 159±17 and 155±17 mm Hg and average number of drugs 5.1 and 5.4, respectively. Twelve-month results are available in 101 patients. The intention-to-treat analysis found a comparable mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure decline of 6.4 mm Hg, P=0.001 in RDN versus 8.2 mm Hg, P=0.002 in the pharmacotherapy group. Per-protocol analysis revealed a significant difference of 24-hour systolic blood pressure decline between complete RDN (6.3 mm Hg, P=0.004) and the subgroup where spironolactone was added, and this continued within the 12 months (15 mm Hg, P= 0.003). Renal artery computed tomography angiograms before and after 1 year post-RDN did not reveal any relevant changes. This study shows that over a period of 12 months, RDN is safe, with no serious side effects and no major changes in the renal arteries. RDN in the settings of true resistant hypertension with confirmed compliance is not superior to intensified pharmacological treatment. Spironolactone addition (if tolerated) seems to be more effective in blood pressure reduction.

Randomized comparison of renal denervation versus intensified pharmacotherapy including spironolactone in true-resistant hypertension: six-month results from the Prague-15 study

This prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation (Symplicity, Medtronic) versus intensified pharmacological treatment including spironolactone (if tolerated) in patients with true-resistant hypertension. This was confirmed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after excluding secondary hypertension and confirmation of adherence to therapy by measurement of plasma antihypertensive drug levels before enrollment. One-hundred six patients were randomized to renal denervation (n=52), or intensified pharmacological treatment (n=54) with baseline systolic blood pressure of 159±17 and 155±17 mm Hg and average number of drugs 5.1 and 5.4, respectively. A significant reduction in 24-hour average systolic blood pressure after 6 months (-8.6 [95% cofidence interval: -11.8, -5.3] mm Hg; P<0.001 in renal denervation versus -8.1 [95% cofidence interval: -12.7, -3.4] mm Hg; P=0.001 in pharmacological group) was observed, which was comparable in both groups. Similarly, a significant reduction in systolic office blood pressure (-12.4 [95% cofidence interval: -17.0, -7.8] mm Hg; P<0.001 in renal denervation versus -14.3 [95% cofidence interval: -19.7, -8.9] mm Hg; P<0.001 in pharmacological group) was present. Between-group differences in change were not significant. The average number of antihypertensive drugs used after 6 months was significantly higher in the pharmacological group (+0.3 drugs; P<0.001). A significant increase in serum creatinine and a parallel decrease of creatinine clearance were observed in the pharmacological group; between-group difference were borderline significant. The 6-month results of this study confirmed the safety of renal denervation. In conclusion, renal denervation achieved reduction of blood pressure comparable with intensified pharmacotherapy.

[The user´s reporting from the national registry of catheter aortic valve implantations (Czech TAVI Registry): the possibilities of the analytical reports based on the database system TrialDB2]

Assessment of the treatment procedures and their results is increasingly important in current medicine. The emphasis is put on an effective use of the health technologies (HTA). Unlike randomised studies, which involve strictly selected groups of patients who meet inclusion and exclusion criterias, the multicentre clinical registries provide a real-life picture of the treatment safety and effectiveness. Well prepared registries involve both research database and a friendly user interface enabling collection of parametric and easily analyzable data. Although there are some technological aspects aiming to ensure a maximum quality of entered data, cooperation with the users and data managers is essential. Such a registry, otherwise meaningful, must provide answers to previously defined medical hypotheses. Regular feedback to users (so called benchmarking or reporting) is considered to be of key importance. The Czech TAVI Registry (CTR) is a good example of reaching all of the above defined criterias. This registry contains data of approximately 95 % of all transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI) performed in the Czech Republic. It is based on a general system aimed at the design of clinical trials, namely the TrialDB2 (a database system for clinical registries developed by the Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses at the Masaryk University (IBA MU). CTR has been run as an English-language version under the auspices of the Czech Society of Cardiology and represents one of the top-quality registries maintained by IBA MU. This paper presents the currently available database systems and some reports from this particular registry.

Survival of patients ≤ 50 years of age after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The long-term efficacy and safety of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has recently been demonstrated. However, there is still debate about the outcome of younger patients who should be treated using myectomy, according to American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients ≤ 50 years of age after ASA for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive, highly symptomatic patients aged ≤ 50 years with HOCM who underwent ASA.

RESULTS

Institutional databases of 3 cardiovascular centres identified 290 patients with HOCM who underwent ASA; 75 (26%) of them were aged ≤ 50 years at the time of their first ASA. Median duration of follow-up was 5.1 years (range, 0.1-15.4 years). Four patients (5%) died during the study period (438 patient-years; the annual mortality rate was 0.91%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-2.34%; the annual mortality rate combined with the first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge was 1.43%; 95% CI, 0.52-3.10%). Survival free of all-cause mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97% (95% CI, 89-99%), 94% (95% CI, 84-98%), and 94% (95% CI, 84-98%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this first study focused on HOCM patients aged ≤ 50 years who underwent ASA suggest a low risk of all-cause death or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge in the long-term follow-up.

Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on troponin I release following percutaneous coronary intervention in nonemergency patients (from the TIP 3 study)

Several randomized studies have suggested that pretreatment with statins may reduce a periprocedural biomarker release in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, results remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a 1-day rosuvastatin therapy on troponin I release in patients who underwent nonemergency PCI. A total of 445 patients with angina pectoris were randomly assigned to therapy with rosuvastatin (20 mg 12 hours before coronary angiography + 20 mg immediately before PCI; rosuvastatin group, 220 patients) or PCI without statin therapy (control group, 225 patients). In patients taking statins (73%), rosuvastatin was added to their long-term statin therapy. The primary end point was the incidence of TnI microleak defined as TnI elevation >1.5× upper limit of normal, and the secondary end point was the incidence of post-PCI TnI elevation >3× upper limit of normal. The incidence of primary and secondary end point in the rosuvastatin versus control group was 13.6% versus 12% (p = 0.61) and 8.2% versus 7.1% (p = 0.67), respectively. Patients with C-reactive protein ≥2.0 mg/L had a decreased release of post-PCI TnI in the rosuvastatin group (0.032 [0.010 to 0.143] μg/L vs 0.056 [0.018 to 0.241] μg/L; p = 0.04). In conclusion, 1-day rosuvastatin therapy (20 mg twice a day) did not influence post-PCI TnI release in patients with angina. However, these results suggest that, in patients with an advanced inflammatory status, rosuvastatin loading therapy might have a cardioprotective effect.

[Conventional treatment of atrial fibrillation in the Czech Republic managed by outpatient cardiologists. Overview of diagnostic and treatment procedures, pharmacological treatment and hospitalisation]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyse general health data, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, pharmacological treatment and hospitalization of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who did not undergo AF catheter ablation and were in the care of outpatient cardiologists.

METHOD

Data concerning 306 patients (of which 94 women, aged 64 +/- 11 years) for the preceding 2 years were acquired through a questionnaire containing a set of standardized questions on a simple form sent out to outpatient cardiologists.

RESULTS

AF was paroxysmal, persistent or permanent in 141 (46%), 77 (25%) or 88 (28%) patients, respectively. The higher the age, the lower the proportion of paroxysmal AF and the higher the proportion of the permanent form of AF. AF was asymptomatic in 122 (39%) of patients. The most frequent among cardiovascular diseases was hypertension, detected in 220 patients (72%), IHD was present in 83 patients (27%). The mean LV EF was 55 +/- 11% and was significantly lower in patients with permanent AF than in patients with paroxysmal AF (phi 51 +/- 13% vs. phi 58 +/- 9%, P < 0,001). The mean left atrium transversal diameter was 47 +/- 7 mm and was significantly higher in patients with permanent AF than in those with paroxysmal AF (50 +/- 8 mm vs. 44 +/- 6 mm, P < 0,001). 230 patients (75%) received anticoagulation treatment and 43 patients (14%) received antiaggregation treatment. 274 patients (90%) were taking antiarrhythmic drugs (AA); 93 patients were taking 1, 168 patients 2 and 13 patients 3 AA drugs. 167 patients (55%) underwent electrical cardioversion in 362 procedures, 106 patients (35%) underwent pharmacological cardioversion in 239 procedures. Coronarography was performed in 79 patients (26%) of which 59 (75%) had normal results for coronary arteries. Pacemaker due to concomitant sinus node dysfunction was implanted to 27 patients (9%). Ablation for concomitant atrial flutter of type I was performed in 42 patients (14%). AF and associated conditions caused 250 hospitalisations in 144 patients (47%). The average length of hospitalisation was 4.2 +/- 3.2 days. Cardioembolic event was the cause of hospitalisation of 25 patients (8%) out of 29 hospitalisations with the mean length of hospital stay 8.2 +/- 2.9 days.

CONCLUSION

The study has shown, in the first place, very high standards of anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic treatment. It has also shown a relatively frequent indication for coronarography, pacemaker implant for relative sinus node dysfunction or ablation for concomitant atrial flutter of type I, i.e. intervention procedures with limited benefit for AF patients.

[Recurrent arrhythmias after catheter ablation of originally paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and results of repeat ablation]

AIMS

The aim is a description of the recurrent arrhythmias after previous ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), and the results of a repeat catheter ablation.

METHODS

A repeat ablation was performed in 76 patients (18 females, 54 +/- 11 years) in 96 procedures, which was 21% out of 362 patients, who had undergone the first ablation for a paroxysmal AF. The endpoints of the repeat ablation were re-isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) and termination of a spontaneous or induced arrhythmia and restoration of a stable sinus rhythm (SR), and possibly achievement of noninducibility of any arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Clinical left atrial tachycardia (LAT) was present in 10 (13%) patients before the first, and in 5 (25%) patients before the second repeat ablation. Arrhythmia arising from an arrhythmogenic PV due to the conduction recovery into the left atrium (LA) was found in 50 (66%) patients during the first, and in 7 (35%) patients during the second repeat ablation. Arrhythmias, predominantly of the reentry mechanism and originating in the LA free wall, were found in 26 (34%), respectively 13 (65%) during the first or the second repeat ablation. All arrhythmias from PVs were terminated by a PV encircling ablation. Substrate-related arrhythmias were terminated by ablation except for 2 (3%) patients during the first and 3 (15%) patients during the second repeat ablation. Persistent AF was mainly terminated via conversion into a LAT. In these cases, the ablation sites leading to the SR restoration were, similarly to the primary LATs, located predominantly in the LA anterior wall. During the 22 +/- 13 months follow-up, 68 (89%) patients were free of AF, 54 (71%) patients off the antiarrhythmic drugs and 14 (18%) patients with the class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs.

CONCLUSION

AF associated with PV-LA re-connection dominated prior to the first repeat ablation, then the proportion of the substrate-related arrhythmias from the LA free wall increased. Clinical efficacy of the repeat ablation is high.

Atrial macroreentry tachycardia in patients without obvious structural heart disease or previous cardiac surgical or catheter intervention: characterization of arrhythmogenic substrates, reentry circuits, and results of catheter ablation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial macroreentry tachycardia (AMRT) in patients without obvious structural heart disease or previous surgical or catheter intervention has not been characterized in detail.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electroanatomical mapping and ablation of right or left AMRT were performed in 33 patients. Right atrial central conduction obstacle was formed by an electrically silent area (ESA) in 15 (68%) patients and by a line of double potentials (DPs) in seven (32%) patients. Left atrial ESAs were found in all 11 patients with the left AMRT. Reentry circuit was reconstructed in 19 (86%) patients with right AMRT and seven (64%) patients with left AMRT. Of the ESA-related right AMRT, eight (50%) were double-loop reentry circuits utilizing a narrow critical isthmus within the ESA and eight (50%) were single-loop reentry circuits with a critical isthmus bounded by ESA and either ostium of the vena cava. Single-loop DP-related AMRTs had the critical isthmus between the DP line and the ostium of the inferior vena cava (IVC). Left AMRTs included a variety of single-, double-, or triple-loop reentry circuits and their critical isthmuses. During the 37 +/- 15 month follow-up, atrial tachyarrhythmia-free clinical outcome was achieved in 21 (95%) patients (18 patients, 82%, without antiarrhythmic drugs) with the right AMRT and in nine (82%) patients (six patients, 55%, without antiarrhythmic drugs) with the left AMRT.

CONCLUSION

The majority of right and left AMRTs were related to the presence of ESA. Ablation can be successful with a favorable risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.