Small cell carcinoma of the stomach: A report of two cases and a review of the literature

Primary small cell gastric carcinomas (SCGC) are rare tumors with an aggressive nature, characterized by early, widespread metastases and poor overall prognosis. SCGC shares similar clinicopathological and molecular characteristics with small cell lung carcinoma and is usually treated in a similar manner. Here, two cases of SCGC in young Caucasian male patients are presented. One patient had metastatic and the other locoregional disease. Multimodal treatment was applied in each case; the resulting survival time was 20.2 months in the patient with initially locoregional disease whereas the remains alive and disease-free 20 months after initial diagnosis. A review of the literature is also presented.

Nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

Background

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Thirty-nine pretreated patients [33 with taxane-based regimens (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil)] and 6 with combination of fluoropyrimidines plus cisplatin with locally advanced inoperable and metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m² d1, d8, d15 in cycles of 28 days).

Results

Partial response (PR) was documented in nine patients (23.1%; 95% confidence interval 10.1-37.2%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (28.2%) and disease progression in 18 (46.2%). The disease control rate (SD + PR + complete response) was 51.3%. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 10.2% and 5.1% of patients, respectively; grade 3 anemia in 5.1%; grade 3 neurotoxicity in 5.1%; and grade 2 pain in 5.1%. The median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (range 0.3-13.6) and the median overall survival 6.8 months (range 0.3-22).

Conclusion

Nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in locally advanced inoperable or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma is an active chemotherapy regimen with a manageable toxicity profile and merits further evaluation.

Risk-reduction and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a common adverse effect of several chemotherapeutic agents, has a significant impact on quality of life and may even compromise treatment efficacy, requiring chemotherapy dose reduction or discontinuation. CIPN is predominantly related with sensory rather than motor symptoms and the most common related cytotoxic agents are platinum compounds, taxanes and vinca alkaloids. CIPN symptoms may resolve after treatment cessation, but they can also be permanent and continue for years. Areas covered: We present an overview of CIPN pathophysiology, clinical assessment, prevention and treatment identified through a Pubmed search. Expert commentary: No substantial progress has been made in the last few years within the field of prevention and/or treatment of CIPN, in spite of remarkable efforts. Continuous research could expand our knowledge about chemotherapeutic-specific neuropathic pathways and eventually lead to the conception of innovative and targeted agents for the prevention and/or treatment of this debilitating chemotherapy adverse effect.

Extensive cutaneous metastases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

Herein, we present the case of a patient with pancreatic cancer and nonumbilical cutaneous metastasis. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas can develop extensive cutaneous metastases involving not only abdominal skin but also other unusual sites such as the scrotum.

Do elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer get the best out of recent advances in first-line treatment? A comparative study in two tertiary cancer centers in Greece

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are thought to receive suboptimal treatment mainly due to concerns for poor compliance and/or excessive toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the age of 70 years as the pre-defined cut-off, we compared elderly patients with advanced NSCLC suitable for first line chemotherapy with their younger counterparts in terms of: i) diagnosis and disease characteristics ii) adherence to treatment schedule, including dose intensity (DI), and relative dose intensity (RDI), iii) toxicity, tolerance, and efficacy outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 292 eligible patients, data were available for 245, of whom 107 (43.7%) belonged to the elderly group. This group was more likely to present with co-morbidities, non-smoking current status and diagnosis based on cytology alone. As compared to the non-elderly, elderly patients were more likely to receive single-agent therapy (8.0% vs. 29.2% respectively, p < 0.001) and less likely to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (80.3% vs. 57.9%, p < 0.001). Elderly patients also received docetaxel (24.3% vs. 40.4%), and bevacizumab (7.5% vs. 21.3%) significantly less often and received oral vinorelbine (24.3% vs. 11.8%) more frequently. Non-elderly patients were more likely to receive any of the cytotoxic drugs with RDI > 0.8 (49.6% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.012) and RDI > 0.9 (29.6% vs. 16%, p = 0.015). Substantial toxicity, as well as median overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Only one third of the elderly patients received at least 80% of the scheduled treatment intensity. Nearly half received diagnosis based on cytology alone, which may deprive them from new, histology-driven, therapeutic approaches.

Chemotherapy compliance, tolerance and efficacy in elderly and non-elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a single institution comparative study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receive chemotherapy of suboptimal intensity and duration, mainly due to fears of poor compliance and/or excessive toxicity.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis in a series of 94 mCRC patients. Using the cut-off of 70 years, we compared elderly patients with their younger counterparts in terms of treatment delivery [type, dose intensity (DI), relative dose intensity (RDI), duration], chemotherapy toxicity and efficacy [objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)].

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 72 patients (76.6%) among which 38 (52.8%) were elderly. As compared to the younger, elderly patients were more likely to receive single-agent chemotherapy (13.1 vs 0%, p<0.001). The mean number of chemotherapy cycles was 6.2 for the elderly and 8.3 for the non-elderly patients who received either the FOLFOX or FOLFIRI regimen (p=0.142) and 5.1 vs 5.0 for those who received either the XELOX or XELIRI regimen, respectively (p=0.831). In oxaliplatin-containing regimens, elderly patients received 42.8% of the planned dose, as compared to 78.4% for the younger ones (p=0.012). DI for oxaliplatin was higher in non-elderly than in the elderly (46.66 mg/ m(2)/week vs 32.47 mg/m(2)/week, p=0.008). No difference was observed in the rate of severe (grade III-IV) toxicities. ORR, PFS and OS were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite the inferior type and intensity of chemotherapy, elderly patients derived equivalent benefit to their younger counterparts. These data further support the use of optimal chemotherapy in elderly patients with mCRC.