Are Surgical Drains Needed in DIEP Flap Surgery? The Drain-Free DIEP Flap Concept

BACKGROUND

Studies support an inherent morbidity associated with the use of surgical drains-such as postoperative pain, infection, reduction in mobility, and delay in patient discharge-and they do not prevent seroma or hematoma. The authors' series aims to evaluate the feasibility, benefits, and safety of performing drainless deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery and to formulate an algorithm for when this can be used.

METHODS

A retrospective review of DIEP reconstruction outcomes of two surgeons was performed. Over the course of 24 months, consecutive DIEP flap patients were included from the Royal Marsden Hospital in London and Austin Hospital in Melbourne, and drain use, drain output, length of stay (LOS), and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 107 DIEP flap reconstructions were performed by two surgeons. Thirty-five patients had abdominal drainless DIEP flaps, and 12 patients had totally drainless DIEP flaps. Mean age was 52 years (range, 34 to 73 years) and mean body mass index was 26.8 kg/m 2 (range, 19.0 to 41.3 kg/m 2 ). Abdominal drainless patients showed a potential trend toward shorter hospital stays as compared with the ones with drains (mean LOS, 3.74 days versus 4.05 days; P = 0.154). Totally drainless patients had an even shorter, statistically significant, mean LOS of 3.10 days, as compared with patients with drains (4.05 days, P = 0.002), with no increase in complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The avoidance of abdominal drains in DIEP flaps reduces hospital stay without increasing complications, and this has become our standard practice for patients with a body mass index of less than 30 kg/m 2 . It is our opinion that the totally drainless DIEP flap procedure is safe in selected patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

The level of hypotension during hemorrhagic shock is a major determinant of the post-resuscitation systemic inflammatory response: an experimental study

Background

To evaluate whether the level of hypotension during hemorrhagic shock may influence the oxidative and inflammatory responses developed during post-ischemic resuscitation.

Methods

Fifteen rabbits were equally allocated into three groups: sham-operated (group sham); bled within 30 minutes to mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 mmHg (group shock-40); bled within 30 minutes to MAP of 30 mmHg (group shock-30). Shock was maintained for 60 min. Resuscitation was performed by reinfusing shed blood with two volumes of Ringer's lactate and blood was sampled for estimation of serum levels aminotransferases, creatinine, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, malondialdehyde (MDA) and total antioxidant status (TAS) and for the determination of oxidative burst of polymorhonuclears (PMNs) and mononuclear cells (MCs).

Results

Serum AST of group shock-30 was higher than that of group shock-40 at 60 and 120 minutes after start of resuscitation; serum creatinine of group shock-30 was higher than group shock-40 at 120 minutes. Measured cytokines, MDA and cellular oxidative burst of groups, shock-40 and shock-30 were higher than group sham within the first 60 minutes after start of resuscitation. Serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α of group shock-30 were higher than group shock-40 at 120 minutes (p < 0.05). No differences were found between two groups regarding serum MDA and TAS and oxidative burst on PMNs and MCs but both groups were different to group sham.

Conclusion

The level of hypotension is a major determinant of the severity of hepatic and renal dysfunction and of the inflammatory response arising during post-ischemic hemorrhagic shock resuscitation. These findings deserve further evaluation in the clinical setting.