Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study

Background

This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib.

Patients and methods

ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m² or docetaxel 75 mg/m², both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n = 72; chemotherapy, n = 35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–12.2] with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08–0.29); P < 0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17–0.59); median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3–10.8) with alectinib and 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.3–4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n = 24; chemotherapy, n = 16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P < 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 weeks versus 6.0 weeks).

Conclusion

Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750

Correlation between anemia and functional/cognitive capacity in elderly lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Elderly cancer patients are often excluded from clinical trials and no data are available on the impact of chemotherapy-related anemia on their functional status and cognitive functions. This observational study investigates the association between hemoglobin (Hb) level and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) variables (MMSE, ADL/IADL, GDS, CIRS and VAS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 42 consecutive lung cancer elderly patients undergoing chemotherapy that were evaluated at baseline and after each CT cycle at least until cycle 2. Hb association with CGA indexes was expressed using Spearman's non-parametric coefficient r.

RESULTS

Higher Hb values were significantly associated with more favourable values of all indexes measuring mental and functional capacity, depression and comorbidities. For all indexes except IADL, improvements from baseline were significantly related with concomitant Hb increases. In 14 patients given erythropoietin during the first two cycles, mean Hb increased from 9.2 to 10.8 g/dl, and the mean values of all CGA indexes were improved. On the contrary, in 18 patients not given erythropoietin, Hb varied from 13.0 to 11.2 g/dl and a parallel worsening in all CGA indexes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy-related anemia is associated with impairment of functional status and cognitive functions. In elderly cancer patients anemia correction or maintenance could be useful to preserve functional independency and protect from mental decay. However, the study results need to be confirmed on a larger series of patients within a controlled clinical trial.

The role of vindesine and lonidamine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized FONICAP trial. Italian Lung Cancer Task Force

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and treatment compliance in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of two chemotherapeutic agents with mild toxicity, 153 previously untreated patients aged over 70 years were randomized to receive lonidamine (450 mg daily p.o. until progression), vindesine (3 mg/m2/daily i.v. weekly for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks until progression), the combination of the two drugs at the same dose and schedule, or supportive therapy only in a four-arm factorial randomized trial.

METHODS

126 patients were included in the final analysis. Their median age was 75 years. Forty percent had stage IV disease and 60% stage III. Most patients were males (85%) and the majority had squamous histology (68%).

RESULTS

Among 104 patients evaluable for response there were only 3 PRs (1/30 in the lonidamine arm and 2/33 in the lonidamine + vindesine arm). Overall, 8.7% and 9.5% of the patients, respectively, progressed or died early, before response evaluation; another 9.4% refused treatment continuation because of poor compliance with the study protocol. Eighty-five patients were fully evaluable for toxicity, which was generally mild. Leukopenia grade 1-3 was found in less than 30% of patients treated with vindesine or vindesine + lonidamine. The most common complaints associated with lonidamine treatment were myalgia (70% of patients), fatigue (55% and 83% of patients treated with lonidamine or lonidamine + vindesine, respectively) and testicular pain in nearly 40% of cases. The overall median survival was 170 days, with no significant impact on survival of either lonidamine or vindesine.

CONCLUSIONS

The low response rate and survival together with the poor treatment compliance, even in the presence of mild toxicity, do not support the usefulness of these "gentle" chemotherapies in elderly NSCLC patients. The standard management of advanced NSCLC in elderly patients remains to be defined. Specifically designed studies to address this issue are warranted.

Cisplatin-vindesine-mitomycin (MVP) vs cisplatin-ifosfamide-vinorelbine (PIN) vs carboplatin-vinorelbine (CaN) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a FONICAP randomized phase II study. Italian Lung Cancer Task Force (FONICAP)

In the present multicentre randomized phase II trial, the activity and toxicity of three platinum-based combination regimens for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated. The three regimens were: MVP (mitomycin-C 6 mg m(-2) on day 1, vindesine 3 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) on day 1 every 28 days), PIN (cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) day 1, ifosfamide 3 g m(-2) day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) day 1 and 8 every 21 days) and CaN (carboplatin 350 mg m(-2) day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) days 1 and 8 every 28 days). A total of 140 chemotherapy-naive patients entered the study; 49 patients were treated with MVP, 48 with PIN and 43 with CaN. Sixty-seven per cent of the patients had stage IV disease. Response rates, calculated on an 'intention to treat' basis, were as follows: MVP, 14.3% (95% CI 5.94-27.2%); PIN, 16.7% (95% CI 7.4-30.2%); and CaN, 14% (95% CI 5.3-27.9%). The overall median survivals were 256, 269 and 243 days for patients treated with MVP, PIN and CaN respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity: grade 3-4 leucopenia was observed in 14.3%, 25% and 18.6% of patients treated with MVP, PIN and CaN respectively. This multicentre phase II randomized trial shows that MVP, PIN and CaN can be administered on an outpatient basis with acceptable toxicities. Unfortunately, the three regimens showed an activity significantly lower than that reported in previous single-institution phase II trials.

Osimertinib beyond disease progression in T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients: a multicenter study of clinicians' attitudes

BACKGROUND

In most cases, T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib developed "non-drugable" progression, as the patients with common EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with first-line osimertinib. In both settings, chemotherapy represents the standard treatment and local ablative treatments (LATs) are potential useful options in the case of oligo-progression.

METHODS

We conducted a study on "post-progression" (pp) outcomes of T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib, according to the therapeutic strategy applied: osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs), "switched therapies" or best supportive care only (BSC).

RESULTS

144 consecutive patients were evaluated: 53 (36.8%) did not received post-progression treatments (BSC), while 91 (63.2%) patients received at least 1 subsequent treatment; 50 patients (54.9%) received osimertinib beyond disease progression [19 (20.9%) of them with adjunctive LATs] and 41 (45.1%) a switched therapy. Median ppPFS (progression-free survival) and median ppOS (overall survival) of patients who received osimertinib beyond progression vs. switched therapies were 6.4 months vs. 4.7 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.35-0.92), p = 0.0239] and 11.3 months vs 7.8 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-0.98), p = 0.0446]. Among patients who received osimertinib beyond progression with and without LATs median ppPFS was 6.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively [HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.68-1.18), p = 0.4560], while median ppOS was 20.2 months and 9.9 months, respectively [HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-1.03), p = 0.0748]. At the univariate analysis, the only factor significantly related to the ppPFS was the therapeutic strategy in favor of osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs). Moreover, the only variable which was significantly related to ppOS at the multivariate analysis was osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that in clinical practice, in case of "non-druggable" disease progression, maintaining osimertinib beyond progression (with adjunctive LATs) is an effective option.

Patterns of CT lung injury and toxicity after stereotactic radiotherapy delivered with helical tomotherapy in early stage medically inoperable NSCLC

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate toxicity and patterns of radiologic lung injury on CT images after hypofractionated image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) in medically early stage inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

28 elderly patients (31 lesions) with compromised pulmonary reserve were deemed inoperable and enrolled to undergo SBRT. Patterns of lung injury based on CT appearance were assessed at baseline and during follow up. Acute (6 months or less) and late (more than 6 months) events were classified as radiation pneumonitis and radiation fibrosis (RF), respectively.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 4-20 months), 31 and 25 lesions were examined for acute and late injuries, respectively. Among the former group, 25 (80.6%) patients showed no radiological changes. The CT appearance of RF revealed modified conventional, mass-like and scar-like patterns in three, four and three lesions, respectively. No evidence of late lung injury was demonstrated in 15 lesions. Five patients developed clinical pneumonitis (four patients, grade 2 and one patient, grade 3, respectively), and none of whom had CT findings at 3 months post-treatment. No instance of symptomatic RF was detected. The tumour response rate was 84% (complete response + partial response). Local control was 83% at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that HT-SBRT can be considered an effective treatment with a mild toxicity profile in medically inoperable patients with early stage NSCLC. No specific pattern of lung injury was demonstrated.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Our study is among the few showing that HT-SBRT represents a safe and effective option in patients with early stage medically inoperable NSCLC, and that it is not associated with a specific pattern of lung injury.

Induction cisplatin-gemcitabine-paclitaxel plus concurrent radiotherapy and gemcitabine in the multimodality treatment of unresectable stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate feasibility and safety of induction three-drugs combination chemotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy in stage IIIB NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB NSCLC were treated with three courses of induction chemotherapy, cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1,8 of every 21 day cycle. Patients without distant progressive disease were then treated with radiotherapy and concurrent weekly gemcitabine (250 mg/m(2)). Toxicity and response of radio-chemotherapy treatment have been assessed.

RESULTS

Between Jan 01 and Nov 02, 46 patients were enrolled. Grade 3+ hematological and non-hematological toxicity during the induction phase were 41.3% and 13.1%, respectively. In 38 patients a Clinical Response or Stable Disease was recorded and these patients underwent to concurrent radio-chemotherapy. Grade 3+ hematological and non-hematological toxicities were 8.2% in this group. Further response was observed in 66% of patients. Overall median survival time was 17.8 months, with a 3-year survival rates of 23%.

CONCLUSION

Three-drugs induction chemotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy with weekly gemcitabine in locally advanced stage IIIB NSCLC is feasible and safe.

Duration of viral suppression in patients on stable therapy for HIV-1 infection is predicted by plasma HIV RNA level after 1 month of treatment

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of HIV RNA levels after 1 month of therapy on the long-term virologic outcome in an unselected general population of HIV-infected patients.

DESIGN

Analysis was conducted retrospectively on an ongoing clinical cohort of HIV-positive patients who were receiving antiretroviral treatment. Data on 575 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The HIV RNA value at 1 month was significantly correlated with the virologic outcome after 12 and 24 months of therapy (R = 0.258 and R = 0.44, respectively). The predictive value of the 1-month viral load was also statistically significant after stratification for baseline CD4 T-cell counts. Prediction was similar in highly compromised patients (CD4 < or = 100 cells/microl; R = 0.426; p = .001) or in patients with a better immunologic status (R = 0.419; p < .0001). It retained validity in patients who were naive or experienced for antiretroviral therapy.

CONCLUSION

HIV RNA level after 1 month of therapy is a useful prognostic marker in HIV-infected patients. It predicts long-term virologic and immunologic outcome. A cutoff level of 5000 copies/ml identifies patients most likely to fail current therapy. In these patients, a more aggressive strategy or specific diagnostic interventions to clarify the relative influence of viral resistance and/or subtherapeutic regimens is advised.

Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide in Patients with Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Interim Results of the MAURIS Phase IIIb Trial

BACKGROUND

MAURIS is an Italian multicenter, open-label, phase IIIb ongoing trial, aiming at evaluating the safety and effectiveness of atezolizumab + carboplatin/etoposide in patients with newly diagnosed, extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The primary objective is the safety evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received atezolizumab + carboplatin/etoposide Q3W for 4-6 cycles in the induction phase, followed by atezolizumab maintenance Q3W. We presented the interim analysis on safety (referring to the induction phase) and clinical effectiveness, in all patients (N = 154) and in subgroups that received ≤3 (N = 23), 4 (N = 43), and 5-6 cycles (N = 89) of induction.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, 139 patients (90.3%) discontinued treatment. Serious adverse events occurred in 29.9% of patients overall, and the rate was lower in patients with 5-6 cycles (19.1%) than in those with 4 (34.9%) or ≤3 (63.6%) cycles. Immune-mediated adverse events were reported in 14.9%, 15.7%, 11.6%, and 18.2% of patients, overall and by subgroup, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 10.7 and 5.5 months, respectively. Overall, 111 patients (71.6%) had a tumor response.

CONCLUSIONS

Interim results provide further evidences about safety and efficacy profile of atezolizumab + carboplatin/etoposide treatment in a ES-SCLC patient population closer to that observed in clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Eudract No. 2019-001146-17, NCT04028050.

Spirometric prediction equations for male Italians 7-18 years of age

The purpose of this study was to develop spirometric predictive equations (SPE) for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and maximum midexpiratory flow (MMF25-75) derived from a large sample of healthy italian boys and male adolescents. We used the univariate and multiple linear regression models and considered as independent variables age and the following anthropometric measurements: height, weight, chest circumference. The predictive power of multivariate models was slightly higher than that of the univariate model using height as independent variable for FVC, FEV1 and MMF25-75.

Effects of subinhibitory concentrations of moxifloxacin in an in-vitro dynamic model

The postantibiotic effect (PAE), sub-MIC effect (SME) and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect (PASME) of moxifloxacin were investigated in an in-vitro dynamic model reproducing in-vivo elimination kinetics of the antibiotic. The PAE was induced by exposing strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to 5 x MIC of the antibiotic for 1.5 hours. After induction, cultures were washed to eliminate the antibiotic and resuspended into the dynamic model either in the presence or absence of a subinhibitory concentration of the antibacterial agent of 0.5 x MIC. Unexposed controls were treated similarly. PASMEs were constantly longer than corresponding SMEs, but differences between them were not statistically significant. Both PASMEs (mean 11:17 hours, range from 8:17 to 14:57) and SMEs (mean 9:23 hours, range from 6:03 to 12:34) had an initial bactericidal effect and were significantly longer than PAEs (mean 1:31 hours, range from 0:21 to 2:14). The primary effect of moxifloxacin sub-MICs appears to be prevalent in PAE. The possibility of once-daily dosing of the drug is strengthened.

In-vitro activity of moxifloxacin combined with other antibacterials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Killing kinetic experiments were performed with moxifloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone, vancomycin, clarithromycin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, rifampicin and with moxifloxacin in combination with each of the above drugs against six methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Half of the strains were ciprofloxacin-resistant. The early bactericidal effect of moxifloxacin alone was substantially greater than that of the other tested drugs. No antagonism was observed between moxifloxacin and each of the other drugs. For each combination the mean decrease in the number of organisms (after 6 hours) was comparable to that achieved with moxifloxacin alone, however, when moxifloxacin was tested with gentamicin, a slight increase in the bactericidal effect was observed.

Predictors of Clinical Progression among HIV-1–Positive Patients starting HAART with CD4+ T-cell Counts ≥200 cells/mm3

Background

Baseline and follow-up predictors of new AIDS-defining events (ADE) or death among patients who started HAART with CD4+ T-cell counts ≥200 cells/mm3 have rarely been assessed simultaneously.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort study (1996–2002) is reported. HIV-infected patients initiating HAART with a CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm3 were studied. Baseline and time-varying factors were tested for the prediction of new ADE/death using Cox regression models.

Results

A total of 896 subjects were studied over a median of 5.1 years. The incidence of a new ADE was 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.3–2.1) per 100 person-years. Among baseline factors, higher CD4+ T-cell counts before HAART were associated with lower risk of ADE/death, but not after adjustment for time-varying factors. On a multivariable analysis including both baseline and time-varying covariates, longer delay from HIV diagnosis to HAART was an independent predictor of ADE/death (per year, hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; P=0.025) and was independent of CD4+ T-cell count before treatment. Longer time spent with HIV RNA <400 copies/ml (per month, HR 0.96; P=0.003) and higher latest CD4+ T-cell count (per log2 cells/mm3, HR 0.65; P<0.001) were found to be protective.

Conclusions

Patients with higher CD4+ T-cell counts before HAART initiation had a better prognosis. However, except for the delay in starting HAART, viro-immunological evolution outweighed the effect of baseline factors. Moreover, suppressing HIV replication for as long as possible could improve the clinical outcome. Prospective randomized clinical trials to assess the optimal timing of HAART initiation are both feasible and urgently needed.

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: role of induction chemotherapy in resectable N2 disease

Patients with resectable stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer should receive induction chemotherapy before surgery. The aim is to early control systemic disease, eventually cure the mediastinal tumor spread and improve patients' survival. A recent metanalysis of randomized trials with second-generation platinum-based combinations has reinforced the evidence concerning the benefit of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in resectable disease. Moreover a large number of phase II trials have explored the activity and feasibility of platinum-based combinations with third-generation drugs in the same setting. Still opened questions to address with current clinical research are the eventual role of radiotherapy as induction treatment, the impact of definite chemoradiation versus induction treatment followed by surgical resection on local control and survival and finally the non-easy choice between neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Virological and immunological responses to a once-a-day antiretroviral regimen with didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz

Current antiretroviral drugs cannot eradicate HIV infections, and persons living with HIV are often faced with very demanding daily therapeutic schedules that can induce poor adherence. More conveniently dosed and patient-friendly regimens are needed. We investigated, in this 48-week pilot study, a once-a-day highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz. Seventy-five consecutive antiretroviral-naive subjects were enrolled. Over the 48-week period, plasma HIV-RNA levels declined sharply, with a median decrease at the end of the observation time >3.4 log copies/ml. The proportion of patients achieving a plasma HIV-RNA level below the limit of detection (50 copies/ml) was 77% (intention to treat analysis) at the end of the study period. The mean CD4 cell count increased steadily over time from 251 to 459 cells/microl. Antiviral efficacy was similar in patients with a baseline HIV-RNA level above or below 100,000 copies/ml. However, patients with a baseline CD4 cell count <200 cells/microl showed a significantly worse virological response than that observed in patients with higher baseline CD4 counts. Overall 15 patients interrupted therapy. In four cases treatment interruption was due to lack of treatment response; three additional patients were lost to follow-up or withdrew informed consent. Eight patients stopped therapy because of adverse events. The once-daily combination of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz resulted in sustained viral suppression and was well-accepted by patients. This regimen may offer advantages in selected difficult-to-treat populations, allows directly observed therapy and can be a safe and effective alternative in antiretroviral-naive patients. These encouraging pilot results need to be confirmed in a comparative clinical trial.