Pelvic floor symptoms according to the severity of second-degree perineal tears within 12 months post-partum: A longitudinal prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Second-degree perineal tears following vaginal birth are common and presumed to be of little clinical importance. However, the extent of damage to the perineal body varies widely, and there is reason to believe that larger second-degree tears may be associated with more pelvic floor symptoms, compared to lesser form. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess differences in pelvic floor symptoms according to the severity of second-degree perineal tears up to 12 months post-partum, stratified by parity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted at Akershus University Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in Norway. The study sample consisted of 409 primiparas and 394 multiparas with vaginal births. Perineal tears were classified using the classification system recommended by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Further, second-degree tears were subclassified as 2A, 2B, or 2C, depending on the percentage of damage to the perineal body. Episiotomies were analyzed as a separate group. Pelvic floor symptoms were assessed using the Karolinska Symptoms After Perineal Tear Inventory (KAPTAIN). A linear mixed model was estimated to assess the trend in pelvic floor symptom scores according to perineal tear category and stratified by parity. The primary and secondary outcome measures were the mean sum scores of the KAPTAIN-Inventory, measured in pregnancy (at 18 weeks of gestation), at 3- and 12 months post-partum, and the reported impact of genital discomfort on quality of life measured in pregnancy and at 12 months post-partum.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in pelvic floor symptom scores over time, or at any timepoint, between no tear, first-degree tear, or second-degree tear subcategories, for primi-, and multiparas. Pelvic floor symptoms increased from pregnancy to 3 months post-partum and remained higher at 12 months post-partum compared to pregnancy in all perineal tear categories. Compared to primiparas, multiparas reported a significantly higher impact of genital discomfort on quality of life in pregnancy and at 12 months post-partum.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no statistically significant differences in pelvic floor symptoms according to the severity of second-degree perineal tears.

The severity of second-degree perineal tears and perineal pain during three months postpartum: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Second-degree perineal tears are common and can vary widely in the extent of tissue trauma. Therefore, a better understanding of perineal pain based on tissue trauma severity in second-degree tears is needed.

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to assess differences in perineal pain according to the severity of perineal tears, with a focus on subcategories of second-degree tears, during the first three months postpartum. The secondary aim was to assess the use of pain medication and breastfeeding patterns according to the severity of the second-degree tears.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, nulli- and multiparous women with singleton pregnancies were included during pregnancy. After birth, perineal tears were classified using the latest international classification system. In addition, second-degree tears were subcategorised according to percentage of damage to the perineum (<50 %=2A,>50 % but less than entire perineum=2B, affecting entire perineum, anal sphincter not involved=2C). Perineal pain, use of pain medication and breastfeeding patterns were assessed during a phone interview seven to ten days postpartum and through an electronic questionnaire three months postpartum.

FINDINGS

Out of 880 vaginal births, 852 participants completed the phone interview and 715 answered the electronic questionnaire. During the first three months postpartum, women with 2C-tears reported statistically significantly higher pain scores and more frequent use of pain medication compared to women with 2A-tears. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of participants not breastfeeding between second-degree tear subcategories.

CONCLUSION

Women with 2C-tears reported higher perineal pain scores and more use of pain medication compared to those with less severe tears during three months postpartum.

Detailed classification of second-degree perineal tears in the delivery ward: an inter-rater agreement study

INTRODUCTION

Second-degree perineal tears can vary widely as to the extent of trauma, which may be relevant for women's pelvic floor health postpartum. However, the short- and long-term consequences of second-degree perineal tears are poorly understood, likely due to the lack of a detailed classification system. Such a classification system for second-degree tears has been suggested but the inter-rater agreement has not yet been assessed. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-rater agreement of the already established classification system for perineal tears recommended by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG classification) among midwives. Further, we aimed to assess the inter-rater agreement of a classification system that provides three sub-categories for second-degree perineal tears.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was an inter-rater agreement study, conducted at Akershus University Hospital in Norway from 31 August to 29 November 2020. All midwives working in the delivery ward participated in the study. Midwives classified the integrity of the perineum of all women delivering vaginally within the study period. During the first month of the study, tears were classified by two midwives who were blinded to each other's findings, and the agreement of the RCOG classification was assessed. The following month, the detailed classification system was introduced to the midwifery staff. The last month, perineal tears were classified by two midwives using the detailed classification system, and the agreement was assessed. Inter-rater agreement was measured using Fleiss multirater kappa (k) and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (KCC_w ).

RESULTS

The inter-rater agreement for the RCOG classification was good to very good, with k = 0.705 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.79, P < 0.001), KCC_w  = 0.928 (P < 0.001). The inter-rater agreement for the detailed classification system was good to very good, with k = 0.748 (95% CI 0.67-0.83, P < 0.001), KCC_w  = 0.956 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The inter-rater agreement among midwives using both the RCOG classification and the detailed classification system among midwives was good to very good. The detailed classification system provides additional information about the extent of tissue trauma in second-degree tears, warranted for future research on women's pelvic floor health postpartum.