The Design and Validation of a New Algorithm to Identify Incident Fractures in Administrative Claims Data

Our study validated a claims-based algorithm for the identification of incident and recurrent fractures in administrative data. We used Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) claims from 2005 to 2014 linked to the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) database. Case qualifying (CQ) fractures were identified among participants with ≥12 months of fee-for-service coverage before first fracture claim and ≥6 months after. Recurrent fractures were defined as the first CQ fracture that occurred following a clean period of at least 90 days from the last claim associated with the preceding incident fracture. We used medical records (discharge summary, imaging, and surgical report) to adjudicate fractures. We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) for incident and recurrent fractures. Our study was not designed to assess the algorithm sensitivity or negative predictive value. We identified 2049 potential incident fractures from claims among 1650 participants. Record retrieval was attempted for 728 (35.5%) suspected incident fractures (prioritizing more recent CQ fractures associated with osteoporosis, but without explicitly requiring any osteoporosis ICD-9 diagnosis code). Our final sample included 520 claims-identified fractures with medical records, of which 502 (96.5%) were confirmed. The PPVs (95% CI) of the hip, wrist, humerus, and clinical vertebra-all exceeded 95%. We identified 117 beneficiaries with 292 ≥2 CQ fracture episodes at the same site, and attempted retrieval on 105 (36.0%) episodes. Our analytic sample included 72 (68.5%) CQ episodes from 33 participants. The PPVs for identifying recurrent clinical vertebral, hip/femur, and nonvertebral fractures with a 90-day clean period exceeded 95%. Although we could not ascertain sensitivity, our updated fracture identification algorithms had high PPV for the identification of incident and recurrent fractures of the same site. Although medical record review and clinical adjudication remain a gold standard, our claims-based algorithm provides an alternative approach to fracture ascertainment when high PPV is desired. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are associated with an increased risk of secondary vertebral compression fractures: a population-based cohort study

To better understand the risk of secondary vertebral compression fracture (VCF) following a vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, we compared patients treated with those procedures to patients with a previous VCF. The risk of subsequent fracture was significantly greater among treatment patients, especially within 90 days of the procedure.

INTRODUCTION

Predominantly uncontrolled studies suggest a greater risk of subsequent vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) associated with vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. To further understand this risk, we conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from a large regional health insurer.

METHODS

Administrative claims procedure codes were used to identify patients receiving either a vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty (treatment group) and a comparison group of patients with a primary diagnosis of VCF who did not receive treatment during the same time period. The main outcomes of interest, validated by two independent medical record reviewers, were any new VCFs within (1) 90 days, (2) 360 days, and (3) at adjacent vertebral levels. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association of vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty with new VCFs.

RESULTS

Among 48 treatment (51% vertebroplasty, 49% kyphoplasty) and 164 comparison patients, treated patients had a significantly greater risk of secondary VCFs than comparison patients for fractures within 90 days of the procedure or comparison group time point [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 6.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-26.9] and within 360 days (adjusted OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had undergone vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty had a greater risk of new VCFs compared to patients with prior VCFs who did not undergo either procedure.

A comparison of the effect of alendronate and risedronate on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: 24-month results from FACTS-International

OBJECTIVES

To compare alendronate 70 mg once weekly (OW) with risedronate 35 mg OW with respect to change in bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical markers and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tolerability over 24 months.

METHODS

This was a 12-month extension to the Fosamax Actonel Comparison Trial international study (FACTS). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis randomly assigned to either alendronate 70 mg OW or risedronate 35 mg OW for the 12-month base study continued taking the same double-blind study medication. Efficacy measurements were BMD at the hip trochanter, lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck and levels of four bone turnover markers at 24 months. The primary hypothesis was that alendronate would produce a greater mean per cent increase from baseline in hip trochanter BMD at 24 months.

RESULTS

Trochanter BMD increased significantly from baseline to month 24 in both groups, with a significantly larger increase with alendronate: adjusted mean treatment difference of 1.50% (95% confidence interval: 0.74%, 2.26%; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen at all BMD sites. Significant geometric mean per cent decreases (p < 0.001) from baseline were seen for all four bone turnover markers in both groups, with significantly larger decreases (p < 0.001) with alendronate: adjusted mean treatment differences ranged from 8.9% to 25.3%. No significant differences were seen in incidence of UGI or other adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate 70 mg OW yielded significantly greater BMD gains and larger decreases in bone turnover marker levels than risedronate 35 mg OW over 24 months, with no difference in UGI tolerability.

Alendronic Acid Produces Greater Effects than Risedronic Acid on Bone??Density and Turnover in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of alendronic acid once weekly relative to risedronic acid once weekly on bone mineral density (BMD), markers of bone turnover and tolerability in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-masked, double-dummy multicentre international study (75 centres in 27 countries in Europe, the Americas and Asia-Pacific). A total of 1303 women were screened and 936 with low bone density (T-score < or = -2.0 at the spine, hip trochanter, total hip or femoral neck) were randomised; 91% (n = 854) completed the study. Patients were randomised to treatment with either active alendronic acid 70 mg weekly (Fosamax) and placebo identical to risedronic acid weekly or active risedronic acid 35 mg weekly (Actonel) and placebo identical to alendronic acid weekly for 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in hip trochanter BMD at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included the percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD; biochemical markers of bone turnover (including serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BSAP] and urinary type I collagen N-telopeptides [NTx]); and safety and tolerability as assessed by reporting of adverse experiences.

RESULTS

Alendronic acid produced greater increases in BMD than did risedronic acid at 12 months at all sites measured. Mean percentage increases from baseline in hip trochanter BMD at month 12 were 3.56% and 2.71% in the alendronic acid and risedronic acid groups, respectively (treatment difference [95% CI]: 0.83% [0.22, 1.45; p = 0.008]). Mean percentage increases from baseline were greater with alendronic acid than risedronic acid at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD at month 12 (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p = 0.039, respectively). Increases in BMD with alendronic acid compared with risedronic acid were also significantly greater at 6 months at the trochanter and total hip. There was a greater reduction in bone turnover with alendronic acid compared with risedronic acid: NTx decreased 58% with alendronic acid compared with 47% with risedronic acid at 12 months (p < 0.001); and BSAP decreased 45% with alendronic acid compared with 34% with risedronic acid at 12 months (p < 0.001). Overall tolerability and upper gastrointestinal tolerability were similar for both agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronic acid once weekly produced greater BMD increases at both hip and spine sites and greater reductions in bone turnover relative to risedronic acid once weekly. Both agents were well tolerated with no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal adverse experiences. Clinicians should consider these results when making treatment decisions for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Patients with osteoporosis prefer once weekly to once daily dosing with alendronate

OBJECTIVES

Once weekly dosing of alendronate has been shown to provide equivalent efficacy to once daily dosing for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Whether patients will prefer weekly dosing to daily dosing for a chronic condition such as osteoporosis has not been studied. The aim of this international study was to assess preference for the weekly or daily dosing regimen of alendronate among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

METHODS

This randomised open-label crossover study was conducted at 45 study sites in 19 countries. Four hundred and six postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were assigned randomly to treatment with either alendronate 70 mg once weekly for 4 weeks followed by alendronate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks or vice versa. The main outcome was the responses of the participants to the Dosing Regimen Questionnaire administered at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Of the participants expressing a preference, 84% preferred the once weekly dosing regimen with alendronate to the once daily dosing regimen. In addition, the once weekly regimen was considered by 87% of the participants to be more convenient and was the regimen most of the participants (84%) would be more willing to take for a long period of time (P < 0.001 for each parameter).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis preferred the once weekly to the once daily dosing regimen of alendronate. Physicians should consider patient preference for dosing regimen when selecting the appropriate treatment for osteoporosis.

Upper gastrointestinal and overall tolerability of alendronate once weekly in patients with osteoporosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the upper gastrointestinal (GI) and overall tolerability profiles of alendronate 70 mg once weekly with placebo.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This 12-week international, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 449 postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis at 44 sites in 19 countries in Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Subjects were randomized to alendronate 70 mg once weekly or matching placebo in a 1:1 ratio.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The safety and tolerability of weekly alendronate and placebo were captured as clinical and laboratory adverse events. The primary endpoint was upper GI tolerability based on the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events. Secondary endpoints included the percentage of subjects who discontinued therapy due to a drug-related upper GI adverse event. Change from baseline in bone turnover as measured by the urinary N-telopeptide-collagen crosslinks corrected for creatinine (NTx/Cr) was assessed at 12 weeks as an indicator of efficacy.

RESULTS

The percentages of subjects reporting an upper GI tract adverse event in the alendronate 70 mg once weekly group (9.8%) and the placebo group (9.4%) were similar. The risk difference between the two treatment groups (alendronate minus placebo) was 0.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), -5.1%, 5.9%]. Percentages of subjects who discontinued due to a drug-related upper GI adverse event were also similar (alendronate 2.7%; placebo 2.2%; risk difference 0.4%, 95% CI, -2.4, 3.3). The overall tolerability profile of alendronate 70 mg once weekly, as measured by the percentage 8.0% (95% CI, 1.4%, 15.0%) increase in the of subjects reporting any adverse event, was similar to that of placebo (risk difference 2.1%, 95% CI -6.9, 11.0). There was a significant 43.3% (95% CI, -47.9%, -38.3%) decrease from baseline in urinary NTx/Cr in the alendronate group compared with an placebo group at Week 12.

CONCLUSION

Alendronate 70 mg administered once weekly to women and men with osteoporosis has an upper GI and overall tolerability profile similar to that of placebo.

Alendronate produces greater effects than raloxifene on bone density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone density: results of EFFECT (Efficacy of FOSAMAX versus EVISTA Comparison Trial) International

OBJECTIVES

Alendronate and raloxifene are antiresorptive agents with different mechanisms of action, each used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of alendronate to raloxifene in postmenopausal women with low-bone density.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-masked, double-dummy multicentre international study.

SETTING

Clinical trial centres in Europe, South America and Asia-Pacific.

SUBJECTS

A total of 487 postmenopausal women with low bone density, based on bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine or hip (T-score < or =-2.0). Interventions. Patients received either alendronate 70 mg once weekly and daily placebo identical to raloxifene or raloxifene 60 mg daily and weekly placebo identical to alendronate for 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Evaluations included BMD of the lumbar spine and hip and markers of bone turnover at 6 and 12 months and adverse event reporting.

RESULTS

Alendronate demonstrated substantially greater increases in BMD than raloxifene at both lumbar spine and hip sites at 12 months. Lumbar spine BMD increased 4.8% with alendronate vs. 2.2% with raloxifene (P < 0.001). The increase in total hip BMD was 2.3% with alendronate vs. 0.8% with raloxifene (P < 0.001). Reductions in bone turnover were significantly larger with alendronate than raloxifene. Overall tolerability was similar, however, the proportion of patients reporting vasomotor events was significantly higher with raloxifene (9.5%) than with alendronate (3.7%, P = 0.010). The proportion of patients reporting gastrointestinal events was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal women with low bone density, improvements in BMD and markers of bone turnover were substantially greater during treatment with alendronate compared to raloxifene.

Alendronate prevents loss of bone density associated with discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) will discontinue HRT and lose its bone-protective effect. Methods to preserve bone density in these women need to be explored. This multicenter, international, randomized, blinded, 12-month study was conducted to assess the effect of alendronate sodium on bone density in women who had recently discontinued HRT.

METHODS

The 144 postmenopausal women included in the study were diagnosed as having low bone mineral density (BMD) and had recently discontinued HRT. They were randomized to receive either a daily dose of 10 mg of alendronate sodium or matching placebo. The main outcome measures were spine, hip, and total body BMD; biochemical markers of bone turnover; and tolerability.

RESULTS

Alendronate treatment was associated with a 2.3% mean increase (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7%-3.0%) in spine BMD compared with a mean loss of 3.2% (95% CI, - 4.6% to - 1.7%) in patients receiving placebo, for a difference of 5.5% (95% CI, 4.2%-6.8%) between alendronate and placebo. Greater hip and total body BMD preservation was also observed with alendronate use. Bone turnover decreased significantly with alendronate (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase levels decreased by 20% and urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio by 47%), but increased in the placebo group (by 18% and 36%, respectively). Alendronate was well tolerated, with no increase in adverse events compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

A high rate of bone loss was observed in the first 12 to 15 months after discontinuation of HRT in postmenopausal women with low BMD. Treatment with alendronate increased or maintained both spine and hip BMD and prevented the increase in bone resorption seen with withdrawal of HRT in this population.

Performance of risk indices for identifying low bone density in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To examine the ability of 4 published osteoporosis risk indices to identify women with low bone density.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subjects included postmenopausal women 45 years and older consecutively recruited from US clinics, women from general practice centers in The Netherlands (age range, 50-80 years), women in the Rotterdam Study (The Netherlands) 55 years and older, and women aged 55 to 81 years old screened for a clinical trial of alendronate. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the femoral neck or lumbar spine; T scores represent the number of SDs below the mean for young healthy women. One risk index was calculated from age and weight; the other risk indices included up to 4 additional variables obtained by questionnaire. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for identifying women with BMD T scores of -2.5 or less or -2.0 or less in the US clinic sample and created 3 risk categories, using each of the 4 indices.

RESULTS

Data were available for 1102 women from the US clinic sample, 3374 women in the Rotterdam Study, 23,833 women screened for a clinical trial of alendronate, and 4204 women from general practice centers in The Netherlands. Specificity for identifying BMD T scores of -2.5 or less ranged from 37% to 58% (depending on risk index) when sensitivity was approximately 90%. The prevalence of osteoporosis (defined as T scores < or = -2.5) differed widely across the 3 risk categories, ranging from 2% to 4% for the low-risk category to 47% to 61% for the high-risk category in the US clinic sample. For spine BMD in the US clinic sample, the prevalence of T scores of -2.5 or less ranged from 7% (low risk) to 38% (high risk). The large differences in prevalence across risk categories were consistent across the other 3 samples of postmenopausal women in the United States and The Netherlands for all 4 risk indices.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend measuring BMD in women who are classified as having an increased risk of osteoporosis by using any of these risk indices because all 4 indices appear to predict low bone mass equally well. The Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool index is easiest to calculate and therefore may be most useful in clinical practice.

Alendronate improves bone mineral density in elderly women with osteoporosis residing in long-term care facilities. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many elderly female residents of long-term care facilities have osteoporosis and could benefit from intervention to increase bone density.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of alendronate for treatment of osteoporosis in elderly female residents of long-term care facilities.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-year study.

SETTING

25 long-term care facilities.

PATIENTS

327 elderly women with osteoporosis.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to receive alendronate, 10 mg/d, or placebo. All patients also received vitamin D, 400 IU/d, and some patients received supplemental calcium (total intake, approximately 1500 mg/d).

MEASUREMENTS

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip and biochemical markers of bone turnover.

RESULTS

Alendronate produced significantly greater increases in BMD than did placebo (24-month differences: spine, 4.4% [95% CI, 3.3% to 5.5%]; femoral neck, 3.4% [CI, 2.3% to 4.4%]). Alendronate produced greater decreases from baseline in biochemical markers of bone turnover than did placebo (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Alendronate increased BMD at both the spine and hip in elderly female residents of long-term care facilities.

Rechallenge of patients who had discontinued alendronate therapy because of upper gastrointestinal symptoms

BACKGROUND

There have been reports from physicians in clinical practice that up to 30% of patients taking bisphosphonate therapy develop upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms, many or most of which they assume to be related to the drug. However, in several large placebo-controlled clinical trials of bisphosphonates, the incidence of UGI symptoms has been > or =30%, even among patients receiving placebo, perhaps reflecting a high background incidence of UGI events in osteoporotic patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between alendronate treatment and UGI complaints in patients who had discontinued treatment with alendronate in clinical practice because of UGI symptoms, we compared the incidence of such events on rechallenge with alendronate or placebo.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind trial in which postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had previously discontinued alendronate therapy because of a UGI adverse experience were randomized to daily treatment with either alendronate 10 mg or matching placebo (1:1 ratio) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of discontinuations due to any UGI adverse experience. Secondary end points were the incidence of any clinical adverse experiences and the percentage change from baseline in urinary N-telopeptide adjusted for urinary creatinine at week 8.

RESULTS

A total of 172 women were included in the study. They were a mean of 20.9 years past menopause, ranging in age from 41 to 90 years (mean, 67.0 years); 90.7% were white. On rechallenge, 14.8% (13/88) of patients in the alendronate group and 16.7% (14/84) in the placebo group discontinued treatment because of UGI adverse experiences.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that many UGI adverse experiences reported during therapy with alendronate may reflect a high background incidence of UGI complaints and an increased sensitivity to detection of such complaints, rather than a causal relationship to therapy.

Comparison of alendronate and intranasal calcitonin for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

This study compared the effects of oral alendronate and intranasal calcitonin for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Women at least 5 yr postmenopause (n = 299) were randomized to either 10 mg alendronate, matching alendronate placebo, or open-label intranasal calcitonin 200 IU daily for 12 months. Hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover were measured, and safety and tolerability were assessed. Alendronate produced greater increases in BMD than calcitonin at 12 months at the lumbar spine (5.16% vs. 1.18%; P < 0.001), trochanter (4.73% vs. 0.47%; P < 0.001), and femoral neck (2.78% vs. 0.58%; P < 0.001). Changes in BMD with calcitonin were greater than with placebo at the femoral neck, but were not different from placebo at either the trochanter or lumbar spine. Greater decreases in bone turnover were seen with alendronate than with calcitonin (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, 43% vs. 9%, P < 0.001; urinary N-telopeptide, 62% vs. 11%, P < 0.001). Similar percentages of patients in each group reported an adverse experience during the study. We conclude that, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 12 months of therapy with alendronate produced significantly greater increases in BMD of the hip and spine and greater decreases in bone turnover than intranasal calcitonin.

What staging surgery should be performed on patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

While uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is an aggressive histologic subtype, it fortunately is not as common as some other histologic subtypes. Overall, patients with UPSC have a poor survival rate. Since the optimal surgical procedure to perform on patients with this tumor is unknown, the authors wanted to determine what the optimal surgical management of patients with UPSC should be.

METHODS

All patients with the preoperative or frozen section intraoperative diagnosis of UPSC were treated with a staging or cytoreductive procedure analogous to patients with serous carcinoma of the ovary. Patients analyzed underwent surgery from March 1983 to September 1995.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with UPSC were found. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I tumors, 6 stage II tumors, 8 stage III tumors, and 31 stage IV tumors. Twenty-nine patients had upper abdominal disease (17 gross disease and 12 microscopic disease only). Forty-eight patients underwent pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, with 6 of 48 having positive lymph nodes. All 14 patients with lymphovascular space invasion had stage IV disease. Thirty-one of sixty-five patients had positive cytology at the time of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Based on the clinical experience of these investigators, patients with UPSC should undergo a staging laparotomy similar to the procedure undertaken for patients with ovarian carcinoma. The surgery should include at least partial omentectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal washings, peritoneal biopsies, and pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy similar to an ovarian cancer staging procedure if no gross disease > or =2 cm is found at time of surgery. If disease > or =2 cm is found, cytoreduction should be undertaken when feasible.

Addition of alendronate to ongoing hormone replacement therapy in the treatment of osteoporosis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Alendronate and estrogen are effective therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis, but their efficacy and safety as combined therapy are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the addition of alendronate to ongoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 428 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, who had been receiving HRT for at least 1 yr, were randomized to receive either alendronate (10 mg/day) or placebo. HRT was continued in both groups. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed. Compared with HRT alone, at 12 months, alendronate plus HRT produced significantly greater increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (3.6% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001) and hip trochanter (2.7% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001); however, the between-group difference in BMD at the femoral neck was not significant (1.7% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.072). Biochemical markers of bone turnover (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urine N-telopeptide) decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months with alendronate plus HRT, and they remained within premenopausal levels. Addition of alendronate to ongoing HRT was generally well tolerated, with no significant between-group differences in upper gastrointestinal adverse events or fractures. This study demonstrated that, in postmenopausal women with low bone density despite ongoing treatment with estrogen, alendronate added to HRT significantly increased bone mass at both spine and hip trochanter and was generally well tolerated.

Precision and discriminatory ability of calcaneal bone assessment technologies

To determine if measuring skeletal status at the calcaneus is a potentially valuable technique for diagnosing osteoporosis, we examined five calcaneal assessment techniques in 53 young normal women and 108 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and compared these measurements to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the calcaneus, hip, and spine. The five instruments, including single-energy X-ray absorptiometry (SEXA) and four quantitative ultrasound (QUS) instruments, were evaluated for precision, ability to discriminate osteoporotic from young normal subjects, and correlation to the other instruments. The coefficient of variation (%CV) for instrument, positioning, interobserver, and short-term precision of the five calcaneal instruments ranged from 1.34-7.76%, 1.63-7.00%, 1.84-9.44%, and 1.99-7.04%, respectively. The %CVs for positioning, interobserver, and short-term precision were similar for calcaneal DEXA, calcaneal SEXA, and stiffness (as measured by Achilles). The %CVs for instruments precision were similar between calcaneal DEXA and SEXA. The ability of the five calcaneal instruments to discriminate osteoporotic from young normal subjects was similar based on the analysis of area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (range 0.88-0.93) and equivalent to DEXA of the calcaneus and hip (0.88-0.93). The correlations between the measurements of five calcaneal instruments were strong (0.80 < or = r < or = 0.91, p < 0.001). These data suggest that although the precision is variable, the calcaneal QUS and SEXA instruments can discriminate between osteoporotic patients and young normal controls and appear to be a useful technique for assessment of osteoporosis.

Precision and accuracy of computed digital absorptiometry for assessment of bone density of the hand

Widespread osteoporosis testing and diagnosis are currently limited due to the high capital cost and reduced portability of many existing bone densitometry techniques. In this study we evaluated an inexpensive, low radiation, X-ray-based technique for assessing bone density of the middle phalanx. The technique, termed computed digital absorptiometry (CDA), is similar to radiographic absorptiometry (RA), using a single-energy X-ray source, an aluminum alloy step-wedge, and a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector system to automatically compute bone mineral content (BMC, g) and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) in the middle phalanx of the third finger. The potential advantage of CDA over current RA techniques is that by using a filmless detector system, no off-site processing of radiographs is required and bone density results are obtained immediately after the test. Using human cadaveric specimens we determined the accuracy and short-term precision of CDA as well as its correlation with other hand and forearm bone densitometry methods. We obtained 26 cadaveric forearms (50% female, mean age 78 years, range 52-96 years). BMC and BMD of the middle phalanx of the third finger were determined using CDA and using RA. We assessed forearm BMC and BMD using single-energy and dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (SXA and DXA). Precision of CDA was assessed by measuring ten of the specimens five times each with repositioning between measurements. Finally, the middle phalanx was dissected and incinerated to determine ash weight. BMC estimates from CDA and from RA were strongly correlated with ash weight (r = 0.89, p < 0.001 and r = 0.93, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean coefficients of variation using CDA were 1.36% and 0.70% for phalanx BMC and BMD, respectively. BMC and BMD measured by CDA were strongly correlated with hand and forearm bone mineral measurements performed by SXA, DXA and RA (r = 0.74-0.91). These results indicate that CDA accurately and precisely predicts BMC of the middle phalanx. Thus, with further clinical verification, this technique may prove to be a useful tool for the widespread testing and assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk.

Extramammary Paget's disease of the vulva recurring in a skin graft

Extramammary Paget's disease of the vulva is an uncommon vulvar neoplasm with a high rate of recurrence. A 64-year-old white female with a history of extramammary Paget's disease of the vulva, excised in 1987 by skinning vulvectomy and treated again in 1993 by skinning vulvectomy with split-thickness skin grafting, presented in 1994 with recurrent Paget's disease in the area of the skin graft. Extramammary Paget's disease of the vulva may recur in an area previously totally excised and transplanted with autologous skin. Therefore, close follow-up is necessary in all patients with this pathologic entity.

Transforming growth factor-beta1 regulates steady-state PTH/PTHrP receptor mRNA levels and PTHrP binding in ROS 17/2.8 osteosarcoma cells

The effect of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) on the expression of mRNA for the parathyroid hormone receptor and binding of iodinated parathyroid hormone-related protein in ROS 17/2.8 osteosarcoma cells was evaluated. TGF-beta1 stimulated a 2-7-fold increase in steady state mRNA levels for the parathyroid hormone receptor at a maximal dose of 5 ng/ml, with increased levels of expression at 6 h of TGF-beta1-incubation, and peak levels at 8-24 h. Receptor binding studies revealed a significant increase in PTHrP-specific binding with TGF-beta1 doses as low as 0.5 ng/ml and a 55% increase in numbers of receptors with no alteration in binding affinity with 5.0 ng/ml TGF-beta1. Time course studies indicated that receptor binding was increased at 24 h with peak levels reached at 48 h of treatment. PTH-stimulated cAMP levels were significantly increased in ROS 17/2.8 cells treated with TGF-beta1 (0.5 ng/ml) for 48 h. These data indicate that TGF-beta1 upregulates steady-state mRNA, ligand binding and PTH/PTHrP receptor signaling in rat osteosarcoma cells. The effects of TGF-beta1 on bone may be attributed in part to regulation of the PTH/PTHrP receptor at the molecular level.

Reversal of severe osteoporosis with vitamin B12 and etidronate therapy in a patient with pernicious anemia

Pernicious anemia has recently been recognized as a risk factor for osteoporosis and fractures. Although vitamin B12 is important for osteoblast function, the effect of vitamin B12 replacement in states of vitamin B12 deficiency on bone density and fracture incidence is not known. We report 2-year follow-up data from a patient with severe osteoporosis, multiple vertebral compression fractures, and pernicious anemia who exhibited a dramatic response to treatment with vitamin B12 and cyclic etidronate. Serial bone density measurements demonstrated a 15% and 17% increase in the lumbar and greater trochanter regions, respectively, and a 79% increase in the femoral neck region over the 2-year follow-up period. In addition to normalization of bone density compared with age-matched controls, no subsequent vertebral fractures were noted in the 2-year period following initiation of vitamin B12 and etidronate therapy. This case demonstrates that osteoporosis associated with pernicious anemia may be markedly improved by vitamin B12 replacement and cyclic etidronate therapy.

Evaluation of the PACE 2 Neisseria gonorrhoeae assay by three public health laboratories

The Gen-Probe PACE 2 DNA probe assay for Neisseria gonorrhoeae was compared with conventional culture techniques in three Florida public health laboratories with 436 patients (271 females and 165 males). The prevalence rates based on culture were 19.9, 55.8, and 33.5% for females, for males, and overall, respectively. Twenty-seven probe-positive specimens gave negative culture results. Twenty of these specimens were resolved as true positives after retesting with a probe competition assay. The resolved sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 99.4, 99.6, 99.4, and 99.6%, respectively.

Lack of effects of neutralization of parathyroid hormone-related protein on calcium homeostasis in neonatal mice

Large quantities of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) are present in the milk of various species. It has been suggested that PTHrP may play a role in neonatal calcium homeostasis. In the present study we evaluated the effect of neutralization of amino-terminal PTHrP activity by passive immunization in 1-day-old mouse pups. Neutralization of amino-terminal PTHrP activity had no significant effect on serum calcium or whole-body calcium content in the neonatal mice. In additional studies, we demonstrated that subcutaneous administration of PTHrP-(1-34) increased serum calcium, whereas oral administration had no significant effect in 3-day-old pups. The studies therefore demonstrate that the amino terminus of PTHrP may not play a significant role in neonatal calcium homeostasis. Local effects of PTHrP cannot be excluded by the results of the present study.

Parathyroid hormone-related protein and calcium homeostasis in lactating mice

Parathyroid hormone (PTH)-related protein has been shown to be a factor responsible for hypercalcemia of malignancy. Recent studies have shown the presence of mRNA for PTH-related protein in lactating breast tissue, suggesting a physiological role for this peptide during lactation. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of neutralization of PTH-related protein activity in lactating mice (by passive immunization) on various parameters of maternal and neonatal calcium homeostasis. PTH-related protein bioactivity, as tested in the adenylate cyclase assay, was present in mouse milk, and this activity was completely neutralized by the antisera used in the present study. In lactating mice, the effects of injection of PTH-related protein antisera on maternal serum calcium concentrations, milk calcium and phosphorus concentration, pup growth, dam femur calcium content, and pup calcium content were similar to those of the injection of normal rabbit serum. Therefore, maternal PTH-related protein does not appear to have a role in calcium homeostasis during lactation.

Metastasis of a thin regressing malignant melanoma

A patient with a thin regressing malignant melanoma who presented with a pulmonary metastasis is described. The malignant potential of regression associated with a thin lesion is emphasized.

Perforating folliculitis in association with hemodialysis

Five patients developed pruritic, keratotic, perforating follicular papules and nodules within 2 months of starting maintenance hemodialysis. Clinically and histologically, the papules and nodules showed the features of perforating folliculitis with superimposed prurigo nodularis, a condition not previously described in patients on maintenance dialysis. The patients with perforating folliculitis constituted 10% of our patients on dialysis during the period of this study. Notably, all five patients were black and had chronic renal failure secondary to diabetic nephropathy. The precise pathogenesis of perforating folliculitis in these patients is unclear at this time.