Laparoscopic repair of a large symptomatic epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of symptomatic epiphrenic esophageal diverticula is uncommon. Even less common are published reports regarding the efficacy of laparoscopic repair of this malady.

METHODS

We report the case of a 59-year-old male patient with Parkinsonism found to have a large, symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum and discuss the surgical treatment performed. The patient presented with a 6-month history of worsening dysphagia to both solids and liquids, regurgitation of undigested food, and weight loss. Barium esophagram identified the presence of a large distal esophageal diverticulum. Esophagoscopy confirmed the epiphrenic location of the diverticulum and the absence of other pathology. Laparoscopic transhiatal diverticulectomy was performed utilizing a gastrointestinal endoscopic stapler. Intraoperative esophagoscopy was performed to confirm resection of the diverticulum without constriction of the lumen.

RESULTS

The patient resumed intake of liquids on postoperative day 1 after a water-soluble contrast esophagram revealed no extravasation. The patient was discharged on hospital day 3. He reported residual dysphagia to solids postoperatively, which appeared to resolve after pneumatic dilation.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that laparoscopic epiphrenic diverticulectomy is technically feasible and safe. The comorbidity of Parkinsonism adds complexity to the diagnosis and treatment of this uncommon disorder.

What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative imaging modalities for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) include conventional computed tomography (CT), aortography with a marking catheter, and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT). Although each technique has advantages, to date no study has compared in a prospective manner the reproducibility of measurements and impact on graft selection of all three modalities. The objective of this study was to determine the most useful imaging studies in planning EVAR.

METHODS

Twenty patients being considered for EVAR were enrolled prospectively to undergo a conventional CT scan and aortography. The CT scans were then reconstructed into 3D images using Preview Treatment Planning Software (Medical Media Systems, West Lebanon, NH). Four measurements of diameter and six of length were made from each modality in determining the proper graft for EVAR.

RESULTS

Measurements from all three modalities were reproducible with intraobserver correlation coefficients of 0.79 to 1.0 for aortography, 0.87 to 1.0 for CT, and 0.96 to 1.0 for 3D CT. Measurements between observers were also similar from each modality; interobserver correlations were 0.70 to 0.97 for aortography, 0.76 to 0.97 for CT, and 0.73 to 0.99 for 3D CT. Significant differences ( P < .01) in diameter measurements were noted at D2 with aortography compared with 3D CT, whereas differences in length measurements were found between CT and 3D CT at L4 (nonaneurysmal right iliac) ( P < .01). The correlation between CT and 3D CT for most length measurements was acceptable (0.63 to 1.0). Aortography for diameters correlated poorly (0.35 to 0.67) with 3D CT. When the endograft selected by aortography/CT or 3D CT alone was compared with the actual endograft used, there was agreement in 11 of 11 patients when adjusted for +/- one size in diameter or length.

CONCLUSION

Reproducible and comparable measures of diameter and length can be obtained by each of three imaging modalities available for endograft sizing. As a single imaging modality, 3D CT appears to have the best correlation for both diameters and lengths; however, the difference is not sufficient enough to alter endograft selection. Three-dimensional CT may be reserved for challenging aortic anatomy where small differences in measurements would affect patient or graft selection for EVAR.

Endovascular assisted in situ bypass grafting: a simplified technique for saphenous vein side branch occlusion

The in situ bypass procedure for lower extremity limb salvage requires a long continuous incision or multiple interrupted incisions over the greater saphenous vein to ligate the saphenous vein side branches. This can result in wound complications that frequently prolong hospital stay and threaten the graft. In an effort to reduce the incidence of wound complications, alternate methods of occluding the vein side branches have been used. One method is to deliver coils under angioscopic vision into the saphenous vein side branches. This report details a simplified technique that uses widely available catheter-based equipment to perform saphenous vein side branch occlusion under fluoroscopic guidance.

Percutaneous arterial closure in peripheral vascular disease: a prospective randomized evaluation of the Perclose device

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral vascular disease have been excluded from initial studies of percutaneous suture-mediated closure devices (SMCD) despite representing a significant proportion of those requiring endovascular intervention. We sought to determine whether these devices could be safely used in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

METHODS

Patients were stratified into two groups and five subgroups on the basis of indication for arteriography, and they were prospectively randomized at the end of the procedure to receive either the SMCD or manual compression. Ankle-brachial index was determined and duplex ultrasound scanning of the accessed femoral artery was performed, before and after the procedure. Ultrasound data included peak systolic velocity, minimum intraluminal vessel diameter, and presence or absence of calcified plaque. Time to hemostasis, ambulation, and discharge were recorded, and major or minor complications were noted.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients included in the study, 52 patients were randomized to receive the SMCD. There was no difference in ankle-brachial index, minimum intraluminal vessel diameter, or peak systolic velocity in the accessed vessel after closure with SMCD or manual compression. Time to hemostasis, ambulation, and discharge was significantly less in the SMCD group (P =.001). Presence of calcified plaque was not associated with complications (P =.146). In the SMCD group, hemostasis was achieved with 49 of 52 devices (94.2%). There were six complications (5.9%), two of which were major and required operative intervention. All complications were hemorrhagic and not occlusive. There was no difference in overall complication rate between SMCD (7.7%) and manual compression (4.0%) groups (P =.678). No infection was noted in any of the 102 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Suture-mediated percutaneous arterial closure can be safely performed in patients with peripheral vascular disease, even in the presence of calcified plaque. This closure technique enables shorter time to hemostasis, ambulation, and hospital discharge. There are observed differences in minor, but not major, complication rates for MC versus percutaneous arterial closure in patients with peripheral vascular disease, but these differences did not achieve statistical significance in this small series.

Mesenteric venous thrombosis in a patient with prothrombin 20210A mutation and antithrombin III deficiency: challenges to conventional anticoagulation--a case report

Mesenteric venous thrombosis presents as vague abdominal pain in patients with a medical or family history suggestive of a hypercoagulable state. Classic computed tomography findings will often confirm the diagnosis, and the presence of persistent abdominal pain or tenderness will determine the need for surgical intervention. Expeditious anticoagulation is the treatment of choice. This case demonstrates the CT findings for mesenteric venous thrombosis and discusses the challenges of anticoagulation in a patient with 2 hypercoagulable disorders.

Review of standards for competence in catheter-based endovascular procedures: a resource and strategy for the interventional vascular surgeon

The field of peripheral vascular disease management is evolving. As such, vascular surgeons can no longer be complacent and expect to be included in the rapidly expanding practice of endovascular intervention. If not engaged, vascular surgeons risk losing not only the patients who have largely driven this evolution but also their role as leaders in the management of vascular disease. Therefore vascular surgeons and vascular surgical training programs find themselves in an awkward and sometimes confrontational circumstance attempting to gain experience and training in catheter-based procedures. Individual societies, both surgical and nonsurgical, have put forth competence standards for catheter-based procedures. However these standards are not always consistent and the definition of competence is often a heated debate. In addition, combining the acquisition of endovascular skills with the multitude of available endovascular training experiences, didactic and "hands-on," is not well coordinated. The objectives of this review are to summarize the literature as it relates to catheter-based endovascular competence, including publications from nonsurgical catheter-based specialties, and to place the acquisition of basic endovascular skills in context with the available endovascular courses in a stepwise strategy. A final objective is to provide a literature-based resource that outlines specific phases in the development of interventional vascular surgeons and training programs as they advance into the arena of catheter-based endovascular therapies.