Consensus conference statement on fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) ESSO course on fluorescence-guided surgery

BACKGROUND

Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) has emerged as an innovative technique with promising applications in various surgical specialties. However, clinical implementation is hampered by limited availability of evidence-based reference work supporting the translation towards standard-of-care use in surgical practice. Therefore, we developed a consensus statement on current applications of FGS.

METHODS

During an international FGS course, participants anonymously voted on 36 statements. Consensus was defined as agreement ≥70% with participation grade of ≥80%. All participants of the questionnaire were stratified for user and handling experience within five domains of applicability (lymphatics & lymph node imaging; tissue perfusion; biliary anatomy and urinary tracts; tumor imaging in colorectal, HPB, and endocrine surgery, and quantification and (tumor-) targeted imaging). Results were pooled to determine consensus for each statement within the respective sections based on the degree of agreement.

RESULTS

In total 43/52 (81%) course participants were eligible as voting members for consensus, comprising the expert panel (n = 12) and trained users (n = 31). Consensus was achieved in 17 out of 36 (45%) statements with highest level of agreement for application of FGS in tissue perfusion and biliary/urinary tract visualization (71% and 67%, respectively) and lowest within the tumor imaging section (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

FGS is currently established for tissue perfusion and vital structure imaging. Lymphatics & lymph node imaging in breast cancer and melanoma are evolving, and tumor tissue imaging holds promise in early-phase trials. Quantification and (tumor-)targeted imaging are advancing toward clinical validation. Additional research is needed for tumor imaging due to a lack of consensus.

Semi-automatic standardized analysis method to objectively evaluate near-infrared fluorescent dyes in image-guided surgery

Significance

Near-infrared fluorescence imaging still lacks a standardized, objective method to evaluate fluorescent dye efficacy in oncological surgical applications. This results in difficulties in translation between preclinical to clinical studies with fluorescent dyes and in the reproduction of results between studies, which in turn hampers further clinical translation of novel fluorescent dyes.

Aim

Our aim is to develop and evaluate a semi-automatic standardized method to objectively assess fluorescent signals in resected tissue.

Approach

A standardized imaging procedure was designed and quantitative analysis methods were developed to evaluate non-targeted and tumor-targeted fluorescent dyes. The developed analysis methods included manual selection of region of interest (ROI) on white light images, automated fluorescence signal ROI selection, and automatic quantitative image analysis. The proposed analysis method was then compared with a conventional analysis method, where fluorescence signal ROIs were manually selected on fluorescence images. Dice similarity coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the inter- and intraobserver variabilities of the ROI selections and the determined signal- and tumor-to-background ratios.

Results

The proposed non-targeted fluorescent dyes analysis method showed statistically significantly improved variabilities after application on indocyanine green specimens. For specimens with the targeted dye SGM-101, the variability of the background ROI selection was statistically significantly improved by implementing the proposed method.

Conclusion

Semi-automatic methods for standardized quantitative analysis of fluorescence images were successfully developed and showed promising results to further improve the reproducibility and standardization of clinical studies evaluating fluorescent dyes.

Colorectal polyps: Targets for fluorescence-guided endoscopy to detect high-grade dysplasia and T1 colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Differentiating high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and T1 colorectal cancer (T1CRC) from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in colorectal polyps can be challenging. Incorrect recognition of HGD or T1CRC foci can lead to a need for additional treatment after local resection, which might not have been necessary if it was recognized correctly. Tumor-targeted fluorescence-guided endoscopy might help to improve recognition.

OBJECTIVE

Selecting the most suitable HGD and T1CRC-specific imaging target from a panel of well-established biomarkers: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), folate receptor alpha (FRα), and integrin alpha-v beta-6 (αvβ6).

METHODS

En bloc resection specimens of colorectal polyps harboring HGD or T1CRC were selected. Immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections was used to determine the biomarker expression in normal epithelium, LGD, HGD, and T1CRC (scores of 0-12). The differential expression in HGD-T1CRC components compared to surrounding LGD and normal components was assessed, just as the sensitivity and specificity of each marker.

RESULTS

60 specimens were included (21 HGD, 39 T1CRC). Positive expression (score >1) of HGD-T1CRC components was found in 73.3%, 78.3%, and 100% of cases for CEA, c-MET, and EpCAM, respectively, and in <40% for FRα and αvβ6. Negative expression (score 0-1) of the LGD component occurred more frequently for CEA (66.1%) than c-MET (31.6%) and EpCAM (0%). The differential expression in the HGD-T1CRC component compared to the surrounding LGD component was found for CEA in 66.7%, for c-MET in 43.1%, for EpCAM in 17.2%, for FRα in 22.4%, and for αvβ6 in 15.5% of the cases. Moreover, CEA showed the highest combined sensitivity (65.0%) and specificity (75.0%) for the detection of an HGD-T1CRC component in colorectal polyps.

CONCLUSION

Of the tested targets, CEA appears the most suitable to specifically detect HGD and T1 cancer foci in colorectal polyps. An in vivo study using tumor-targeted fluorescence-guided endoscopy should confirm these findings.