Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in patients diagnosed with epithelial type ovarian cancer

Introduction

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed critical challenges in providing care to ovarian cancer (OC) patients, including delays in OC diagnosis and treatment initiation. To accommodate for delays in OC surgery, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommended preferential use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in patients diagnosed with OC.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with stage II-IV ovarian cancer of epithelial subtype between 01/01/2017-06/30/2021 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), a large integrated healthcare system in the United States. Ovarian cancer patients diagnosed between 2017-2020 were identified from KPSC's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-affiliated cancer registry. Patients diagnosed in 2021 were identified from the electronic medical records (EMR) using ICD-10 diagnosis codes, followed by medical chart review to validate diagnosis and extract information on histology and stage at diagnosis. March 4, 2020 was used as the cut-off to define pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between OC diagnosis and treatment completion were excluded. Data on neoadjuvant chemotherapy use were extracted from the cancer registry and EMR, supplemented by chart review. Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association of the pandemic with neoadjuvant chemotherapy use.

Results

Of 566 OC patients, 160 (28.3%) were diagnosed in the pandemic period. Patients diagnosed in the pandemic period were slightly younger (mean age 62.7 vs 64.9 years, p=0.07) and had a higher burden of Charlson comorbidities (p=0.05) than patients diagnosed in pre-pandemic period. No differences in time to treatment initiation were observed by pandemic periods. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use was documented in 58.7% patients during the pandemic period compared to 47.3% in pre-pandemic period (p=0.01). After adjusting for covariates, patients diagnosed in the pandemic period were 29% more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy than patients diagnosed in pre-pandemic period [RR(95%CI): 1.29(1.12-1.49)].

Discussions

Ovarian cancer patients diagnosed in the COVID-19 pandemic were more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy than patients diagnosed before the pandemic. Future research on patient outcomes and trends in the post-pandemic period are warranted.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (HR-LACC).

METHODS

This retrospective study identified and randomly selected adults diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset. For patients initially treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we estimated real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) among those with persistent disease, real-world time on CCRT, and recurrence-free survival (rwRFS) using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

The cohort included 300 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years. 53.7 % were White and 30.0 % were Black; 52.0 % were premenopausal; 89.3 % had squamous cell histology; 75.3 % had stage III disease, and 92.7 % had no evidence of performance status impairment. Initial treatment included CCRT (N = 229), surgery (N = 28), antineoplastics only (N = 11), and radiation only (N = 5). Twenty-seven patients were untreated. Baseline characteristics for the CCRT-first patients were similar to the overall cohort; their median real-world time on treatment was 1.6 months; 78.2 % received cisplatin for a median of 1.2 months; 28.4 % received antineoplastics after CCRT, and 11.8 % initiated a second antineoplastic therapy. Of the CCRT-first patients, 27/143 with a complete response had subsequent recurrent disease (median rwRFS not reached). 179 patients had persistent disease, among whom median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS was 29.7 (16.9-59.3) months.

CONCLUSION

In this study of United States-based clinical practices, most HR-LACC patients received CCRT as initial treatment. Many patients developed persistent disease after CCRT indicating a need for improved first treatment and maintenance options.

Health care services utilization in patients with ovarian cancer receiving PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment in a US community oncology setting

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to describe healthcare resource use (HCRU) in addition to treatment patterns and discontinuations, in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) initiating PARP inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance treatment in a US community oncology setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with OC initiating PARPi monotherapy maintenance during 01/01/2017 to 06/30/2019 (followed until 12/31/2019). Patients aged ≥18 years at first diagnosis of OC with ≥2 visits within The US Oncology Network were included. Structured and chart review data as well as claims data were used to describe treatment patterns and HCRU.

RESULTS

Of the 162 charts reviewed, the median age of patients was 66 years and 80% had stage III or IV disease at diagnosis. In the niraparib, rucaparib and olaparib groups, proportions of patients experiencing dose interruptions were 51%, 50%, and 28%, and discontinuations due to toxicity were 37%, 17% and 15%, respectively. Within the first 6 months, mean numbers of total claims were 43.5, 56.4, and 36.0 in the niraparib, rucaparib, and olaparib groups, and laboratory claims were 13.9, 19.4, and 15.6, respectively. Proportions of patients with hospitalizations (niraparib 40%, rucaparib 32%, olaparib 19%; p = 0.03), also differed as did emergency department visits (niraparib 37%, rucaparib 23%, olaparib 16%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Despite patients initiating niraparib having higher rates of dose management events and toxicity-related discontinuations, outpatient and laboratory utilization were similar across all three PARPi. Adequate monitoring of these medications, with differing toxicities, should be emphasized to potentially decrease dose reductions and toxicities.

The burden of ovarian cancer in the USA from 2007 to 2018: evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Aim: To evaluate the economic and humanistic burden of ovarian cancer in the USA. Methods: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2007-2018) were used to estimate all-cause healthcare resource use and costs for economic burden and examine the activities of daily living and quality-of-life (QoL) measures for humanistic burden between ovarian cancer patients and a non-cancer population. Results: Compared with controls, patients with ovarian cancer had more comorbidities and worse QoL. Their predicted number of annual hospitalizations and office-based visits was significantly higher, as were their estimated annual all-cause total healthcare costs. Total costs were driven by hospitalization costs. Conclusion: The study identified the burden of ovarian cancer and demonstrated that patients with ovarian cancer have greater healthcare resource use, higher costs and worse QoL than the non-cancer population. Future research is needed to develop strategies for managing ovarian cancers and inform decision-making to reduce disease burden.

Patient profiles, treatment patterns, and outcomes among persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer patients under routine care in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer have poor prognosis. While recent advances have expanded treatment options, real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes in this population are lacking.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified adult females with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset who received systemic therapy on or after August 15, 2014. Patients were followed from persistent, recurrent, or metastatic diagnosis through third-line (3 L) therapy, death, end of record, or study end (June 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for the three most common first-line (1 L) regimens to analyze real-world time on treatment (rwToT), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and real-world overall survival (rwOS). Analyses were stratified by bevacizumab receipt by treatment line.

RESULTS

307 patients were included (mean [standard deviation] age 51.5 [13.2] years, 70.7% White). 91.2% of patients had metastatic disease, 8.5% had persistent disease, and <1% had recurrent disease. The most common 1 L regimen was carboplatin+paclitaxel+bevacizumab (40.7%) with median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwToT of 3.5 (2.9-4.4) months. 57.0% of patients proceeded to second line (2 L), and 25.7% went to 3 L. Median (95% CI) rwPFS was 7.2 (6.4-8.1) months, and median (95% CI) rwOS was 16.5 (14.2-19.9) months, from initiation of 1 L.

CONCLUSIONS

1 L regimens received in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer generally followed clinical guidelines, and the rwOS agrees with clinical trials. This study highlights the burden of disease and unmet need for specific treatments in these patients.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biomarker Testing to Guide First-Line PARP Inhibitor Maintenance for Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Response to First-Line Platinum Chemotherapy in the USA

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance treatments are available for platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer. Olaparib (O) is available for BRCA mutation patients or in combination with bevacizumab (O+B) for patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD+); niraparib (N) is available for all patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of biomarker testing and maintenance treatments (mTx) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer in the USA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten strategies were evaluated (S1-S10), representing biomarker testing (none, BRCA or HRD), and mTx (O, O+B, N or B). PAOLA-1 data were used to build a model estimating progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS (PFS2) and overall survival for O+B. PFS was modelled through mixture cure models; PFS2 and overall survival were modelled by standard parametric models. Hazard ratios of PFS for O+B versus B, N and O were obtained from the literature to estimate PFS for B, N and O. PFS2 and OS for B, N and O were informed by PFS benefits.

RESULTS

S2 (no testing, B) had the lowest cost while S10 (HRD testing, O+B for HRD+ and B for HRD-) had the highest quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). All niraparib strategies were dominated. S2, S4 (BRCA testing, O for BRCA+ and B for BRCA-), S6 (BRCA testing, olaparib plus bevacizumab for BRCA+ and bevacizumab for BRCA-) and S10 were the non-dominated strategies with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $29,095/QALY, $33,786/QALY and $52,948/QALY for S4 versus S2, S6 versus S4 and S10 versus S6, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Homologous recombination deficiency testing followed by O+B for HRD+ and B for HRD- is a highly cost-effective strategy for patients with platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer. A HRD biomarker-guided approach provides most QALYs with good economic value.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Olaparib in Combination with Bevacizumab Compared with Bevacizumab Monotherapy for the First-Line Maintenance Treatment of Homologous Recombination Deficiency-Positive Advanced Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

In the PAOLA-1 trial, olaparib plus bevacizumab demonstrated significant clinical benefit following partial or complete response to platinum-based chemotherapy in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive ovarian cancer. Our study evaluated the cost effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone as a maintenance treatment for women in this population.

METHODS

Our model was a cohort-level partitioned survival model with a lifetime horizon from a US healthcare system perspective. Its four health states were progression-free, post first progression, post second progression, and death, modeled using time to first progression (PFS1), second progression (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) from PAOLA-1. We modeled PFS1 through mixture survival modeling, and PFS2 and OS by fitting standard parametric models. Time-on-treatment was sourced directly from PAOLA-1, with treatment capped at 24 months for olaparib and 15 months for bevacizumab. Costs included drug acquisition and administration, adverse events, disease management, biomarker testing, and subsequent treatments. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the results.

RESULTS

Compared with bevacizumab alone, olaparib plus bevacizumab increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; +2.89) and life-years (LYs; +3.43) at an incremental cost of $164,209, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $56,863 per QALY. Olaparib plus bevacizumab had a 97.0% probability of being cost effective compared with bevacizumab alone at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY.

CONCLUSION

The addition of olaparib to bevacizumab led to clinically significant increases in progression-free survival, resulting in substantial predicted LYs and QALYs gained, while being cost effective in the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with HRD in the US.

Cost comparison of adverse event management among breast and ovarian cancer patients treated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: analysis based on phase 3 clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The economic impact of adverse events (AEs) for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in ovarian or breast cancer has not been widely evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

Compare PARPi-related AE management costs from a US payer perspective.

METHODS

The frequency of treatment-related grade 3-4 AEs was obtained from published clinical trials of PARPis for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). AE management costs per patient (2020 USD) per treatment course were calculated by multiplying the AE unit costs by the frequency of AEs for each arm of each trial. Sensitivity analyses were conducted according to the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval for AE rates and unit costs, respectively. Scenarios were also performed to explore the uncertainty of outcomes.

RESULTS

Total AE management costs in AOC were: $3,904, olaparib; $5,595, olaparib plus bevacizumab; and $12,215, niraparib. In PSROC, total costs were: $3,894, olaparib; $6,001, rucaparib; and $11,492, niraparib, and in MBC: $3,574, olaparib; and $9,489, talazoparib. Hematological toxicities were the key drivers of AE management costs for PARPis.

CONCLUSIONS

The main AEs among PARPis were hematological. Olaparib was associated with lower AE costs compared to other PARPis.

Patients' and oncologists' preferences for second-line maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer

Aim: To understand the preferences of US patients and oncologists for PARP inhibitors as second-line maintenance (2LM) for epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted to assess the preferences of treatment attributes. Results: The most valued attributes were risk of grade 3/4 AEs (patients, n = 204) and PFS (oncologists, n = 151). To accept a 37% increased risk of grade 3/4 AEs, PFS would need to increase by 27.9 months (patients) and 6.3 months (oncologists). The least valued attributes were dosing form/frequency (patients) and grade 3/4 anemia risk (oncologists). Conclusion: Patients' and oncologists' willingness to make benefit-risk trade-offs in the 2LM setting suggests that the PFS gains observed in selected studies of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in BRCA-mutated disease are worth the toxicity risk.

A Critical Appraisal and Recommendations for Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women in the US. With poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors having shown promising results in ongoing trials, there is interest in better understanding their economic value.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review and evaluate the quality of published cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), and provide recommendations for CEAs in this setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted in June 2019 to identify CEAs of PARP inhibitors in treating advanced ovarian cancer from peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Key information from the identified publications were extracted and reviewed. The quality of full-text studies was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. Recommendations for future CEAs were developed based on the findings from the literature review.

RESULTS

Eighteen CEAs (five in full texts) met the inclusion criteria. Most adopted a US healthcare or societal perspective. The majority of the studies did not clearly display the economic model structure. No studies reported the validation of model projections based on internal or external data. Surrogate outcomes such as incremental costs per progression-free life-year gained were the most common outcomes reported. The majority of studies drew their conclusions based on surrogate outcomes, even with no theoretical or empirical threshold for cost effectiveness. All five full-text studies included some type of sensitivity or scenario analyses. The key drivers of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were treatment duration, effects, and costs, health utility, and prevalence of BRCA mutations.

CONCLUSION

In the existing CEAs for PARP inhibitors, there were uncertainties and challenges leading to variation in quality. We provided recommendations to improve consistency and quality of CEAs in this setting, which will help to better understand the value of PARP inhibitors, improve decision making, and reduce potential misallocation of resources.

Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma treated with brentuximab vedotin

Data are limited on the real-world utilization and costs of brentuximab vedotin (BV) among patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (rrHL) in the United States. A total of 219 BV patients identified from the Truven MarketScan^® databases were followed up for a median of 2.9 years before and 1.0 year after initiation of BV. Of these patients, 109 (50.6%) received systemic therapy after BV (post-BV ST). Median duration of treatment was short for BV (2.1 months) and post-BV ST treatment (1.3 months); time to next treatment was 6.2 and 9.1 months, respectively. Average total US dollar 2014 costs/person for BV and post-BV ST line of therapy were $167,152 and $132,115, respectively; mean per-patient-per-month costs for BV and post-BV ST were $30,434 and $29,138, respectively. Findings underscore the unmet medical need and substantial economic burden in BV-treated patients with rrHL.

Venous and arterial thromboembolism in severe sepsis

The burden of thromboembolism (TE) in severe sepsis is largely unknown. We assessed the prevalence of venous and arterial TE in patients with severe sepsis over a four-week period. We performed a retrospective analysis of a pooled database of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials of two novel pharmacological agents for the treatment of severe sepsis, drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA)and secretory phospholipase A2 inhibitor (sPLA2I). The study was conducted at intensive care units of the participating institutions. A total of 2,649 patients with known or suspected infection and sepsis-associated acute organ dysfunction were enrolled in the three trials and were assigned to treatment groups (DrotAA=850; sPLA2I =578; placebo=1221). The database was queried for venous and arterial TE, using investigator reports of serious adverse events. Eighty-four of 2,649 patients (3.2%; 95% confidence interval, 2.5% to 3.9%) developed at least one thromboembolic event over 28 days. Nearly threequarters of episodes were atheroembolic (n=62); 25% involved the deep venous system (n=25). Ischemic stroke (n=30) and venous thromboembolism (n=25) each occurred in about 1% of patients. Ischemic stroke and acute coronary syndrome had a higher peak incidence during the first five days compared to venous TE onset, which was more constant over the 28-day period. Subgroup analysis by pooled treatment groups yielded TE rates of 2.0% (DrotAA), 3.5% (placebo), and 4.0% (sPLA2I), respectively. Clinically manifest TE occurred in about 3% of severe sepsis patients treated in the intensive care unit over a 28-day period. Arterial TE may be more common than previously recognized. More accurate estimates of TE prevalence and relationship to sepsis await future studies.

Economic burden associated with adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

There are currently many approved agents for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM), the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Treatments may include systemic therapies such as ipilimumab, dacarbazine, temozolomide, high-dose interleukin 2, interferon α, dacarbazine- or temozolomide-based combination chemotherapy/biochemotherapy, paclitaxel, paclitaxel/cisplatin, and paclitaxel/carboplatin, as well as the targeted therapies vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and trametinib for patients with BRAF V600 mutation. However, all treatment options are associated with different adverse events (AEs) and, in some instances, considerable toxicity. The occurrence of such treatment-related AEs can lead to higher health care resource utilization and increasing treatment and patient management costs. An understanding of the economic burden of these AEs will therefore enable better management of health care expenditures, not just for existing therapies, but also for new and novel treatments in development.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incremental health care costs of specific AEs among patients with MM treated with paclitaxel, vemurafenib, ipilimumab, dacarbazine, temozolomide, high-dose interleukin 2, or interferon α, along with AEs known to be associated with dabrafenib and trametinib.

METHODS

This cohort study employed a retrospective administrative claims-based analysis of MarketScan commercial and Medicare supplemental databases from July 1, 2004, to April 30, 2012. Patients included those aged ≥ 18 years who had diagnosed melanoma (ICD-9-CM code 172.xx)with ≥ 1 diagnosis of metastasis and ≥ 1 claim for any of the 7 study treatments. Health care encounters for AEs of interest were based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis/procedure codes. Incremental cost per AE was determined by comparing the 30-day expenditures in patients with the event to patients without the event based on a shadow event date. Multivariate generalized linear models (GLMs) with a log-link function and gamma distribution were utilized to control for baseline differences between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2,621 patients with MM were included. Mean age was 56.0 years (SD ± 13.0); 64% were male; and 24% had a diagnosis of primary or secondary brain cancer at the time of MM diagnosis. GLM-based estimate of 30-day incremental costs by AE category were metabolic, $9,135 (95% CI = $6,404-$12,392); hematologic/lymphatic, $8,450 (95% CI = $6,528-$10,633); cardiovascular, $6,476 (95% CI = $4,667-$8,541); gastrointestinal, $6,338 (95% CI = $4,740-$8,122); skin/subcutaneous, -$900 (95% CI = -$1,899-$237); central nervous system/psychiatric, $5,903 (95% CI = $3,842-$8,313); and pain, $5,078 (95% CI = $3,392-$7,012).

CONCLUSIONS

Incremental costs associated with many MM treatment-related AEs are substantial. New approaches to prevent and/or better manage these events may reduce overall health care costs.

Concurrent pemetrexed and radiation therapy in the treatment of patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of completed and ongoing studies

Current standard for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is combined concurrent therapy with a platinum-based regimen. Preclinical synergistic activity of pemetrexed with radiation therapy (RT) and favorable toxicity profile has led to clinical trials evaluating pemetrexed in chemoradiation regimens. This literature search of concurrent pemetrexed and RT treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC included MEDLINE database, meeting abstracts, and the clinical trial registry database. Nineteen unique studies were represented across all databases including 11 phase I studies and eight phase II studies. Of the six phase II trials with mature data available, median overall survival ranged from 18.7 to 34 months. Esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in 0-16% and 0-23% of patients, respectively. Of the ongoing trials, there is one phase III and four phase II trials with pemetrexed in locally advanced NSCLC. Pemetrexed can be administered safely at full systemic doses with either cisplatin or carboplatin concomitantly with radical doses of thoracic radiation therapy. While results from the ongoing phase III PROCLAIM trial are needed to address definitively the efficacy of pemetrexed-cisplatin plus RT in stage III NSCLC, available results from phase II trials suggest that this regimen has promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and radiation for malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant pemetrexed plus cisplatin was administered, followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and hemithoracic radiation (RT), to assess the feasibility and efficacy of trimodality therapy in stage I to III malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Requirements included stage T1-3 N0-2 disease, no prior surgical resection, adequate organ function (including predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second > or = 35%), and performance status 0 to 1. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) for four cycles. Patients without disease progression underwent EPP followed by RT (54 Gy). The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients received chemotherapy. All four cycles were administered to 83% of patients. The radiologic response rate was 32.5% (95% CI, 22.2 to 44.1). Fifty-seven patients proceeded to EPP, which was completed in 54 patients. Three pCRs were observed (5% of EPP). Forty of 44 patients completed irradiation. Median survival in the overall population was 16.8 months (95% CI, 13.6 to 23.2 months; censorship, 33.8%). Patients completing all therapy had a median survival of 29.1 months and a 2-year survival rate of 61.2%. Radiologic response of complete or partial response was associated with a median survival of 26.0 months compared with 13.9 months for patients with stable disease or progressive disease (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter trial showed that trimodality therapy with neoadjuvant pemetrexed plus cisplatin is feasible with a reasonable long-term survival rate, particularly for patients who completed all therapy. Radiologic response to chemotherapy, but not sex, histology, disease stage, or nodal status, was associated with improved survival.

Phase II trial of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

Pemetrexed and gemcitabine have single-agent activity in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The combination of pemetrexed/gemcitabine has not previously been studied in MPM to our knowledge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologic or cytologic diagnosis of MPM were included. Cohort 1 received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 8, and cohort 2 received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days; all patients were supplemented with folic acid and vitamin B(12) and received dexamethasone.

RESULTS

One hundred eight patients (cohort 1, n = 56; cohort 2, n = 52) with pleural mesothelioma were enrolled. Among assessable patients, response rate was 26.0% in cohort 1 and 17.1% in cohort 2. Median time to disease progression was 4.34 months for cohort 1 and 7.43 months for cohort 2. Median survival was 8.08 months for cohort 1 (1-year survival = 31.14%) and 10.12 months for cohort 2 (1-year survival = 45.80%). In cohorts 1 and 2, incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was 25.0% and 29.4%, grade 4 thrombocytopenia was 14.3% and 3.9%, grade 3 or 4 anemia was 5.4% and 5.9%, and grade 3 or 4 fatigue was 23.2% and 15.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine resulted in moderate clinical activity in MPM. However, the median survival times are similar to those with single-agent pemetrexed and inferior to outcomes observed with cisplatin in combination with an antifolate.

Initial results of a phase II study of biweekly pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with advanced NSCLC

7128

Background: Pemetrexed (P), a multi-targeted antifolate, is synergisitic with gemcitabine (G) in preclinical models. A phase I study examining a biweekly schedule established a recommended phase 2 dose of G 1500 mg/m2 followed by P 500mg/m2. Methods: Patients with Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or IV NSCLC, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, no prior systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological therapy were enrolled. G was infused over 30 minutes, followed immediately by P given intravenously over 10 minutes once on day 1 every 14 days. Cycles were repeated until 12 treatments or progressive disease. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12 and steroid prophylaxis. Results: Data on 53 patients (29 male, 24 female) are currently available. Median age: 64 (range: 35, 80), ECOG performance status 0:1 = 38%:60%, Stage IIIB:IV = 19%:81%. Three hundred twelve cycles of treatment were administered with 14 dose reductions (26.4%); median number of doses was 5 for both G and P, and median dose intensity was 98.05% for both G and P. Response data included 1 complete response (1.9%), 14 partial responses (26.4%), 24 stable diseases (45.3%), and 10 progressive diseases (18.9%), with a response rate of 28.3% (95% CI: 16.8–42.3%). Patient-based Grade 3/4 hematologic events included febrile neutropenia (9.4%), neutropenia (28.3%), and thrombocytopenia (1.9%). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic events included fatigue (22.6%), dyspnea (7.5%), dehydration (7.5%), diarrhea (5.7%), constipation (3.8%), and pneumonia (1.9%). Preliminary median survival was 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.0–10.8) with 43.4% patients censored and median TTPD was 4.6 months (95% CI: 2.8–6.1). Conclusion: Biweekly G and P appear to be well tolerated in advanced NSCLC. A clinical benefit rate (ORR + SD) of 73.6% indicates activity in patients with advanced NSCLC. The dose intensity for biweekly G and P is higher than a previously reported 6-cycle, 21-day regimen with median dose intensity of 83.2% for P and 82.2% for G (West, et al. Proc ASCO 2005; 7117).

[Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of pemetrexed (P) in elderly cancer patients (pts)

8544

Background: P, a novel multitargeted antifolate, has demonstrated antitumor activity in a broad range of tumor types. Approximately 60% of all new cases of cancer and 70% of all cancer-related deaths occur in the elderly population. However, few studies have specifically analyzed the utility of chemotherapy in this population. The objective of this posthoc analysis was to understand the efficacy and tolerability of pemetrexed (alone or in combination) when used in the elderly cancer population. Methods: Data from three pemetrexed registration trials conducted between April 1999 and February 2003 were pooled together. Pts in these studies were diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma, NSCLC, or advanced pancreatic cancer. Pts receiving P as monotherapy or in combination with another drug (gemcitabine or cisplatin) who received at least one cycle of therapy were included in this analysis (n=764). In all studies, P 500 mg/m2 was administered every 21 days. Demographics, efficacy, and safety data from pts receiving P were stratified by age ± 65 years. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and time to PD. Cox regression model was also used to test the survival effect of pemetrexed on age after adjusting for disease stage, performance status, gender, and type of tumors, the prognostic factors considered to influence survival. Results: * P<.05 from fisher’s exact test. The adjusted hazard ratio of elderly patients over younger patients was 1.074 with p-value 0.42. Conclusions: P produced similar treatment effects in older and younger patients and appeared to be well tolerated in the elderly population. CTC grade 3/4 Lab and Non-Lab toxicity between two age groups were similar except, as expected, the elderly group had modestly higher myelosuppression. Non-hematologic toxicities were similar between the two age groups.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Phase II trial of cisplatin (C), etoposide (E) and radiation (RT) followed by gemcitabine (G) vs G and docetaxel (D) in stage III A/B unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

7120

Background: SWOG 9504 demonstrated the benefit of D consolidation after E + C with radiation therapy in pts with locally advanced NSCLC. This study was developed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of consolidation with either G alone or with D after the same chemoradiation schedule as SWOG 9504. Methods: The treatment schema included concurrent C 50 mg/m2 Day 1, 8 + E 50 mg/m2 Day 1–5 for two 28-day cycles + RT 180 cGy daily for 7 weeks after which pts were randomized to consolidation treatment of either G 1000 mg/m2 Day 1, 8 (Arm A) or G 1000 mg/m2 Day 1, 8 + D 75 mg/m2 Day 1 (Arm B) every 21 days for 3 cycles. Forty-six pts have been accrued; data is currently available in 28. Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate that G or G + D following chemoradiation in locally advanced NSCLC is well tolerated. The doublet, as expected, results in more toxicity, particularly myelosuppression and fatigue. Response, survival and TTP data will be presented at the time of the meeting.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]