1
|
Gannesen AV, Ziganshin RH, Zdorovenko EL, Klimko AI, Ianutsevich EA, Danilova OA, Tereshina VM, Gorbachevskii MV, Ovcharova MA, Nevolina ED, Martyanov SV, Shashkov AS, Dmitrenok AS, Novikov AA, Zhurina MV, Botchkova EA, Toukach PV, Plakunov VK. Epinephrine extensively changes the biofilm matrix composition in Micrococcus luteus C01 isolated from human skin. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:1003942. [PMID: 36204611 PMCID: PMC9530943 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1003942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The importance of the impact of human hormones on commensal microbiota and microbial biofilms is established in lots of studies. In the present investigation, we continued and extended the research of epinephrine effects on the skin commensal Micrococcus luteus C01 and its biofilms, and also the matrix changes during the biofilm growth. Epinephrine in concentration 4.9 × 10-9 M which is close to normal blood plasma level increased the amount of polysaccharides and extracellular DNA in the matrix, changed extensively its protein, lipid and polysaccharide composition. The Ef-Tu factor was one of the most abundant proteins in the matrix and its amount increased in the presence of the hormone. One of the glucose-mannose polysaccharide was absent in the matrix in presence of epinephrine after 24 h of incubation. The matrix phospholipids were also eradicated by the addition of the hormone. Hence, epinephrine has a great impact on the M. luteus biofilms and their matrix composition, and this fact opens wide perspectives for the future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei V. Gannesen
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Rustam H. Ziganshin
- Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Evelina L. Zdorovenko
- N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alena I. Klimko
- Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena A. Ianutsevich
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga A. Danilova
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vera M. Tereshina
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Maria A. Ovcharova
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina D. Nevolina
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey V. Martyanov
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander S. Shashkov
- N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey S. Dmitrenok
- N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrei A. Novikov
- Faculty of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Gubkin University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina V. Zhurina
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina A. Botchkova
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Gubkin University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Philipp V. Toukach
- N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir K. Plakunov
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gannesen AV, Zdorovenko EL, Botchkova EA, Hardouin J, Massier S, Kopitsyn DS, Gorbachevskii MV, Kadykova AA, Shashkov AS, Zhurina MV, Netrusov AI, Knirel YA, Plakunov VK, Feuilloley MGJ. Composition of the Biofilm Matrix of Cutibacterium acnes Acneic Strain RT5. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1284. [PMID: 31293526 PMCID: PMC6598116 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In skin, Cutibacterium acnes (former Propionibacterium acnes) can behave as an opportunistic pathogen, depending on the strain and environmental conditions. Acneic strains of C. acnes form biofilms inside skin-gland hollows, inducing inflammation and skin disorders. The essential exogenous products of C. acnes accumulate in the extracellular matrix of the biofilm, conferring essential bacterial functions to this structure. However, little is known about the actual composition of the biofilm matrix of C. acnes. Here, we developed a new technique for the extraction of the biofilm matrix of Gram-positive bacteria without the use of chemical or enzymatic digestion, known to be a source of artifacts. Our method is based on the physical separation of the cells and matrix of sonicated biofilms by ultracentrifugation through a CsCl gradient. Biofilms were grown on the surface of cellulose acetate filters, and the biomass was collected without contamination by the growth medium. The biofilm matrix of the acneic C. acnes RT5 strain appears to consist mainly of polysaccharides. The following is the ratio of the main matrix components: 62.6% polysaccharides, 9.6% proteins, 4.0% DNA, and 23.8% other compounds (porphyrins precursors and other). The chemical structure of the major polysaccharide was determined using a nuclear magnetic resonance technique, the formula being →6)-α-D-Galp-(1→4)-β-D-ManpNAc3NAcA-(1→6)-α-D-Glcp-(1→4)-β-D-ManpNAc3NAcA-(1→3)-β-GalpNAc-(1→. We detected 447 proteins in the matrix, of which the most abundant were the chaperonin GroL, the elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G, several enzymes of glycolysis, and proteins of unknown function. The matrix also contained more than 20 hydrolases of various substrata, pathogenicity factors, and many intracellular proteins and enzymes. We also performed surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy analysis of the C. acnes RT5 matrix for the first time, providing the surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) profiles of the C. acnes RT5 biofilm matrix and biofilm biomass. The difference between the matrix and biofilm biomass spectra showed successful matrix extraction rather than simply the presence of cell debris after sonication. These data show the complexity of the biofilm matrix composition and should be essential for the development of new anti-C. acnes biofilms and potential antibiofilm drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei V. Gannesen
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Centre «Fundamentals of Biotechnology», Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Evelina L. Zdorovenko
- Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina A. Botchkova
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Centre «Fundamentals of Biotechnology», Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, Gubkin University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Julie Hardouin
- Laboratory of Polymers, Biopolymers, Surfaces UMR 6270 PBS, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| | - Sebastien Massier
- Laboratory of Polymers, Biopolymers, Surfaces UMR 6270 PBS, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| | - Dmitry S. Kopitsyn
- Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, Gubkin University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Alexandra A. Kadykova
- Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Higher Chemical College of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Mendeleyev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander S. Shashkov
- Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina V. Zhurina
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Centre «Fundamentals of Biotechnology», Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Yuriy A. Knirel
- Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir K. Plakunov
- Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Centre «Fundamentals of Biotechnology», Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marc G. J. Feuilloley
- EA4312 Laboratory of Microbiology Signals and Microenvironment, Rouen University, Evreux, France
| |
Collapse
|