Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of left adrenal gland masses

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Although the left adrenal gland is readily visible by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), there are few published data on the utility of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of this site. The aim of this study was to report our experience of EUS-FNA of left adrenal gland masses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective case series, we reviewed our EUS and cytology databases to identify consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of the left adrenal gland between January 1997 and January 2004. Medical records were reviewed and the results of EUS examinations and cytological investigations were abstracted.

RESULTS

Our searches resulted in the identification of a series of 38 consecutive patients who underwent EUS for the evaluation of a lung mass (n = 14), a pancreatic mass (n = 14), obstructive jaundice (n = 1), dysphagia (n = 2), an ampullary adenoma (n = 1), celiac block (n = 1), or a left adrenal gland mass (n = 5). The mean maximal left adrenal mass diameter was 24 mm (range 7-66 mm). Diagnoses after EUS-FNA (the mean number of passes was 3.6) were: metastatic lung cancer (n = 2), esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 1), melanoma (n = 1), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1); primary pheochromocytoma (n = 1); benign adrenal tissue (n = 21); and granulomatous inflammation (n = 1). Nine aspirations (24 %) were nondiagnostic. The absence of a discrete adrenal mass on EUS occurred more frequently in patients with nondiagnostic biopsies than in those with diagnostic biopsies (56 % vs. 7 %; odds ratio 23.4, 95 %CI 3.5 - 157.0; P = 0.004). No complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA of the left adrenal gland is safe and can be useful for the evaluation and staging of suspected malignancy. Nondiagnostic biopsies are more common when sampling diffusely enlarged glands, compared with glands with a focal mass.

Management of hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with progression to cirrhosis in approximately 20% of patients, 5 years postoperatively. Accelerated decompensation has also been noted when compared with cirrhosis in non-transplant patients. Different treatment strategies are available for recurrent HCV infection post-OLT, but efforts are hindered by the modest response rates, poor tolerability and the risk of rejection as well as graft loss. Anti-HCV immunoglobulin therapy to prevent graft infection with HCV has no established role at present but studies are ongoing. Treatment prior to transplantation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis has been evaluated but the results are too preliminary to make firm recommendations. Prophylactic interferon-based antiviral therapy in the early postoperative period to prevent graft infection was shown to have low response rates and high rates of adverse effects. Treatment of established recurrent HCV infection with combination peginterferon (pegylated interferon) and ribavirin is associated with 10-59% sustained virological response and the predictive value of a positive early virological response has been validated in the post-transplant setting. Improvement in inflammatory activity after viral eradication is well established, but fibrosis regression or stabilisation is less predictable and factors such as rejection and biliary complications may still contribute to graft loss. Most studies have initiated therapy at least 6 months postoperatively in order to optimise patient tolerance and enable the addition of ribavirin. The use of adjuvant agents to treat drug-induced neutropenia and anaemia in this population is evolving and becoming a crucial part of therapy. Determination of optimal doses of both pegylated interferon and ribavirin, and guidance on when to stop treatment, as well as improving tolerability are important steps in achieving higher response rates and minimising drug toxicity.

A multivariable model of clinical variables predicts advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

A noninvasive method to identify advanced hepatic fibrosis (AHF) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) could preclude the need for routine liver biopsy. Recent evidence suggests that obesity may contribute to hepatic fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infection.

GOALS

To determine whether clinical variables, including body mass index (BMI), can predict risk of AHF.

STUDY

Retrospective review of untreated CHC patients evaluated between 1993 and 2002 without clinical or physical evidence of end-stage liver disease. Liver biopsies were scored for fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation. Multivariable analysis was used to derive and internally validate a prediction equation. A clinical index was created from the equation by assigning points for each variable. The risk of AHF was measured for each risk category.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-six satisfied inclusion criteria, of which 86 (30%) had AHF. In the derivation subgroup (N=190), 5 factors were independently associated with AHF: diabetes mellitus, platelets count <150,000, aspartate aminotransferase > or =65 IU/mL, international normalized ratio > or =1.1, and bilirubin > or =0.85 mg/dL. The corresponding risk index contained 3 categories: low-risk (score of 0), intermediate risk (scores of 1 to 3), and high risk (scores of > or =4), in which the respective risks of AHF were 9%, 34%, and 92%. Inclusion of BMI did not improve model performance.

CONCLUSIONS

A model for estimating AHF risk in CHC performed well in this population. BMI had no effect on the risk of AHF. If this model can be validated in other patient cohorts, it could preclude the need for liver biopsy in patients with scores of 0 or > or =4.

Combination therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir for chronic hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Lamivudine suppresses hepatitis B replication, but drug-resistant mutants emerge with long-term therapy. In vitro data suggest that lamivudine and famciclovir might synergistically inhibit hepadnaviral replication. We reviewed our experience with lamivudine and famciclovir in 24 patients with chronic hepatitis B infection.

METHODS

Patients with chronic hepatitis B infection and detectable HBV DNA received lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy. The primary end point was HBV DNA suppression at week 48. Follow-up was reviewed for those who remained on combination therapy beyond the first 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirteen treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive subjects received 48 weeks of therapy; all had undetectable HBV DNA levels (less than 2.5 pg/mL) at week 48. Three patients underwent HBeAg seroconversion at week 48 and discontinued therapy. Ten patients remained on combination therapy; 3 developed YMDD (tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate) mutations at year 2, although HBV DNA levels remained below 2.5 pg/mL at a mean of 39 months. A second heterogeneous group of 5 subjects including interferon therapy failures and those with HBeAg-negative infection also received 48 weeks of combination therapy, with 1 subject developing redetection of HBV DNA by week 48. YMDD mutations were noted in the other 4 subjects at year 2, although just 1 subject had HBV DNA greater than 2.5 pg/mL at 39 months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small pilot study, 48 weeks of therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir was effective in suppressing HBV replication. A randomized controlled trial is required to define the role of combination therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir in delaying the clinical emergence of resistant strains.