Rapid Transformation from Face to Face to Virtual Simulation During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Impact on the Simulation Process during "The Little Room of Horrors"

Objective

1. To explore the feasibility of a rapid transformation from face to face to virtual simulation and its impact on the simulation process 2. To explore the efficacy of a rapid transformation from face to face to virtual simulation and its impact on the simulation process.

Methods

The simulation process (preparation, pre-briefing, simulation, and debriefing) was investigated for feasibility and efficacy from the perspective of the educators and students. This study took place very early in the pandemic, thus highlighting the speed at which it needed to be conducted and acknowledging the limitations of technology at the time. The faculty (n = 3) involved in the virtual simulation experiment and year one medical students(n = 61) were invited to participate in the study voluntarily. The module chosen for this study was the Introduction to the Practice of Medicine, where the students were introduced to the concept of patient safety using simulation-based education. The "Little Room of Horrors" - is a simulation based educational session emphasising the importance of patient safety. Students were taken into a simulated medical ward that demonstrated common hospital-based errors. The learners were timed and asked to identify and document as many patient safety hazards as possible. The semi structured questionnaire was analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results

The Educator's perspective reflected that virtual simulation was technologically dependent and had limitations during debriefing but was also a sustainable and portable standardised process. The student's perspective revealed that the objectives were met, and the session helped them support the theory previously learned. The average rating was 4.09 on a 5-point scale.

Innovation

When resources of the simulation center like space, mannikins, and faculty cannot be accessed for reasons like social distancing during a pandemic, virtual simulation was developed and used as a feasible alternative for our students without impacting the learning objectives.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the use of virtual simulation as a valuable option for teaching when face to face simulation is challenging or not possible.

High-fidelity simulation versus case-based tutorial sessions for teaching pharmacology: Convergent mixed methods research investigating undergraduate medical students' performance and perception

INTRODUCTION

Medical educators strive to improve their curricula to enhance the student learning experience. The use of high-fidelity simulation within basic and clinical medical science subjects has been one of these initiatives. However, there is paucity of evidence on using simulation for teaching pharmacology, especially in the Middle East and North Africa region, and the effectiveness of this teaching modality, relative to more traditional ones, have not been sufficiently investigated. Accordingly, this study compares the effects of high-fidelity simulation, which is designed in alignment with adult and experiential learning theories, and traditional case-based tutorial sessions on the performance and perception of undergraduate Year 2 medical students in pharmacology in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

METHODS

This study employed a convergent mixed methods approach. Forty-nine medical students were randomly assigned to one of two groups during the 16-week pharmacology course. Each group underwent one session delivered via high-fidelity simulation and another via a case-based tutorial. A short multiple-choice question quiz was administered twice (immediately upon completion of the respective sessions and 5 weeks afterwards) to assess knowledge retention. Furthermore, to explore the students' perceptions regarding the two modes of learning delivery (independently and in relation to each other), an evaluation survey was administered following the delivery of each session. Thereafter, the iterative joint display analysis was used to develop a holistic understanding of the effect of high-fidelity simulation in comparison to traditional case-based tutorial sessions on pharmacology learning in the context of the study.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in students' knowledge retention between high-fidelity simulation and case-based tutorial sessions. Yet, students expressed a greater preference for high-fidelity simulation, describing the corresponding sessions as more varied, better at reinforcing learning, and closer to reality. As such, the meta-inferences led to expansion of the overall understanding around students' satisfaction, to both confirmation and expansion of the systemic viewpoint around students' preferences, and lastly to refinement in relation to the perspective around retained knowledge.

CONCLUSION

High-fidelity simulation was found to be as effective as case-based tutorial sessions in terms of students' retention of knowledge. Nonetheless, students demonstrated a greater preference for high-fidelity simulation. The study advocates caution in adapting high-fidelity simulation, where careful appraisal can lend itself to identifying contexts where it is most effective.