Videos improve patient understanding of chemotherapy terminology in a rural setting

BACKGROUND

It is critical patients understand the terms used to describe oncology treatments; however, even basic chemotherapy terminology can be misunderstood. Rural communities tend to have especially low levels of health literacy compared with nonrural communities. To address low health literacy in rural communities, this study tested rural participants' understanding of previously developed educational chemotherapy videos that were designed for an underserved urban population. Participants were also asked for feedback to determine if the videos could be improved.

METHODS

Fifty English-speaking patients who reside in counties classified as rural according to the Rural-Urban Continuum Code designations (RUCC 4-9) participated in the study. Participants were asked to define 6 chemotherapy terms before and after viewing a short, animated video explaining the term in English. Rates of correct and incorrect definitions provided by participants were also compared with previously published results from an urban cohort.

RESULTS

All participants had statistically significantly higher rates of correct definitions for all 6 terms following the video intervention. Palliative chemotherapy understanding improved the most (10% correct prevideo and 76% postvideo intervention). For each video, the majority of participants (77%-92%) suggested no changes to the videos.

CONCLUSION

Given the prevalence of low health literacy in rural communities, it is important to have effective educational interventions to improve the understanding of basic oncology-treatment terminology. This study found that short, educational videos, originally designed for an underserved urban population, can significantly improve understanding of commonly misunderstood chemotherapy terminology in a rural setting as well.

LAY SUMMARY

Chemotherapy terminology can be confusing to patients. Understanding can be especially difficult in areas with low health literacy, such as underserved urban and rural communities. To address this concern, previously developed short, animated videos describing basic chemotherapy terminology were found to improve patient understanding in an underserved urban setting. In this study, the videos were tested in a rural population and their effectiveness was established. Participants in the rural setting were significantly more likely to correctly define all 6 tested terms after watching the videos. Educational tools for high-need populations are essential to ensure patients can understand the treatment they receive.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Road to Recovery Report: Learning From the COVID-19 Experience to Improve Clinical Research and Cancer Care

This report presents the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) evaluation of the adaptations in care delivery, research operations, and regulatory oversight made in response to the coronavirus pandemic and presents recommendations for moving forward as the pandemic recedes. ASCO organized its recommendations for clinical research around five goals to ensure lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience are used to craft a more equitable, accessible, and efficient clinical research system that protects patient safety, ensures scientific integrity, and maintains data quality. The specific goals are: (1) ensure that clinical research is accessible, affordable, and equitable; (2) design more pragmatic and efficient clinical trials; (3) minimize administrative and regulatory burdens on research sites; (4) recruit, retain, and support a well-trained clinical research workforce; and (5) promote appropriate oversight and review of clinical trial conduct and results. Similarly, ASCO also organized its recommendations regarding cancer care delivery around five goals: (1) promote and protect equitable access to high-quality cancer care; (2) support safe delivery of high-quality cancer care; (3) advance policies to ensure oncology providers have sufficient resources to provide high-quality patient care; (4) recognize and address threats to clinician, provider, and patient well-being; and (5) improve patient access to high-quality cancer care via telemedicine. ASCO will work at all levels to advance the recommendations made in this report.

Abstract CT061: Binimetinib in patients with tumors with NRAS mutations: NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group subprotocol EAY131-Z1A

Background: NRAS-mutations are established oncologic drivers in many malignancies with no effective targeted therapy options. Preclinical and clinical data have suggested that downstream inhibition with a MEK inhibitor, such as binimetinib, might be efficacious for NRAS-mutated cancers. Methods: Patients who enrolled in the multicenter NCI-MATCH trial master protocol underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling by targeted next generation sequencing with a custom Oncomine AmpliSeq™ panel. Patients with refractory solid tumors harboring codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS-mutations were enrolled in subprotocol Z1A, a single arm study of binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. Patients with melanoma were excluded. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A post-hoc analysis examined association of NRAS-mutation allele with outcome and histology. Results: 47 eligible patients with refractory solid tumors harboring codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS-mutations were treated on this trial. The most common cancer types enrolled on this subprotocol were colorectal adenocarcinoma (24/47, 51%), cholangiocarcinoma (7/47, 15%), low-grade papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary (3/47, 6%), and endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma patients (3/47, 6%). Observed toxicity was moderate, similar to previous reports, and 27.7% (13 of 47) of eligible patients discontinued binimetinib because of adverse events. The ORR was 2.1% (1 of 47 patients), and the median PFS was 3.5 months. The sole confirmed partial response (PR) was observed in a codon 61 NRAS-mutated indolent malignant ameloblastoma. One patient with a colorectal cancer harboring a NRAS codon 61 mutation had an unconfirmed PR, and two others with NRAS codon 61 mutated colorectal cancer had stable disease for at least 12 months. In a post-hoc analysis, patients with cancers bearing a codon 61 NRAS-mutation (n=22) had a significantly longer OS (p=0.04) and PFS (p=0.006) than those with tumors harboring codon 12 or 13 NRAS-mutations (n=25). Similarly, colorectal cancer patients with NRAS codon 61 mutations treated with binimetinib (n=8) had a significantly longer OS (p=0.03) and PFS (p=0.007) than those with NRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated (n=16) tumors. Conclusions: Single-agent binimetinib did not demonstrate promising efficacy in NRAS-mutated solid tumors. Further studies are needed to clarify whether the increased OS and PFS observed in codon 61 NRAS-mutated cancers reflects a more favorable prognosis for this subtype.

Citation Format: James M. Cleary, Victoria Wang, Rebecca Heist, Scott Kopetz, Edith P. Mitchell, James Zwiebel, Helen X. Chen, Shuli Li, Robert Gray, Lisa McShane, Larry Rubinstein, David Patton, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Melissa Dillmon, Mickey Williams, Stanley Hamilton, Barbara Conley, Peter O'Dwyer, Lyndsay Harris, Carlos Arteaga, Alice Chen, Keith Flaherty. Binimetinib in patients with tumors with NRAS mutations: NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group subprotocol EAY131-Z1A [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT061.

Caring for Colleagues and Loved Ones With Cancer

Throughout the arc of a career in medicine, physicians are universally faced with the difficult decision of when to provide care for a colleague and when to refer to another physician. Gauging the magnitude of your relationship, both professionally and personally, and then weighing how to add the roles of physician and patient to your preexisting relationship is complex. We review and discuss care of family and colleagues, address ethical boundaries both firm and flexible, and explore the emotional weight of those relationships.

Clinical practice guidelines for cancer care: utilization and expectations of the practicing oncologist

ASCO produces guidelines for oncologists, utilizing a systematic review process. Although this resource-intense process results in authoritative and widely cited guidelines, they can cover only a few specific clinical issues. Hence, the ASCO guidelines presently do not fully address many clinical situations. Expanding the scope of ASCO guidelines will require major revisions to the guidelines development process. Changes likely to improve the process include establishing disease-specific committees composed of content experts, improving methods to resolve conflicts of interest, simplifying steps to engage members to suggest topics for new guidelines, and linking guidelines utilization with quality indices. In a time of rapid change in practice and research in cancer, ASCO can play a pivotal role in patient care through major revisions to guideline development, accessibility, and integration with quality metrics.