Esophageal Symptoms and Lumbosacral Back Pain

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Esophageal symptoms, that is, heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, and chest pain are common in the general population. Also common are symptoms of back pain related to pathology in the lumbosacral spine. The right crus of the diaphragm that forms the esophageal hiatus, originates from lumbar spine, may be affected by lumbar spine pathology resulting in esophageal symptoms. We studied whether there was an association between esophageal symptoms and spine symptoms.

METHODS

Two patient groups of 150 each were investigated: group 1 (ES); patients referred to the esophageal manometry study for assessment of esophageal symptoms, group 2 (SC); patients undergoing screening colonoscopy (control group). Both groups completed standardized questionnaires assessing esophageal and spine symptoms.

RESULTS

Back pain was reported by 74% of patients in the ES group as compared to 55% of patients in the SC group. Thirty percent of patients in the SC group reported one or more esophageal symptoms and these patients were regrouped with the ES group, resulting in 2 groups, ES1 and SC1, with and without esophageal symptoms, respectively. The ES1 group was 3.3 times more likely to experience back pain compared to the SC1 group (95% confidence interval: 1.95-5.46). Thoracolumbar was the most common site of pain in both groups. Pain score was greater for the group with esophageal symptoms compared to controls. Narcotic intake for most patients in the ES1 group was for back pain.

CONCLUSION

A strong association between esophageal symptoms and thoracolumbar back pain raises the possibility that structural and functional changes in the esophageal hiatus muscles related to thoracolumbar spine pathology lead to esophageal dysmotility and symptoms.

Impaired sliding between the lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm (esophageal hiatus) in patients with achalasia esophagus

Swallow-related axial shortening of the esophagus results in the formation of phrenic ampulla in normal subjects; whether it is the case in achalasia esophagus is not known. The goal is to study axial shortening of the esophagus and relative movement between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) in normal subjects and patients with achalasia. A novel method, isoimpedance contour excursion at the lower edger of LES, as a marker of axial esophageal shortening was validated using X-ray fluoroscopy (n = 5) and used to study axial shortening and separation between the LES and CD during peristalsis in normal subjects (n = 15) and patients with achalasia type 2 esophagus (n = 15). Abdominal CT scan images were used to determine the nature of tissue in the esophageal hiatus of control (n = 15) and achalasia patients (n = 15). Swallow-induced peristalsis resulted in an axial excursion of isoimpedance contours, which was quantitatively similar to the metal clip anchored to the LES on X-ray fluoroscopy (2.3 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 1.4 cm with deep inspiration and 2.7 ± 0.6 cm vs. 2.7 ± 0.6 cm with swallow-induced peristalsis). Esophageal axial shortening with swallows in patients with achalasia was significantly smaller than normal (1.64 ± 0.5 cm vs. 3.59 ± 0.4 cm, P < 0.001). Gray-level matrix analysis of CT images suggests more "fibrous" and less fat in the hiatus of patients with achalasia. Lack of sliding between the LES and CD explains the low prevalence of hiatus hernia, and low compliance of the LES in achalasia esophagus, which likely plays a role in the pathogenesis of achalasia.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Swallow-related axial shortening of the esophagus is reduced, and there is no separation between the lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm (CD) with swallowing in patients with achalasia esophagus. Fat in the hiatal opening of the esophagus appears to be replaced with fibrous tissue in patients with achalasia, resulting in tight anchoring between the LES and CD. The above findings explain low prevalence of hiatus hernia and the low compliance of the LES in achalasia esophagus.

Bolus flow and biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall during primary esophageal peristalsis: Effects of bolus viscosity and posture

BACKGROUND

Studies show that intraluminal impedance recordings of the esophagus allow one to measure the luminal distension during peristalsis, an important parameter for calculation of the biomechanical properties of esophageal wall. The goal was to determine the effect of subject posture and bolus viscosity on the biomechanical properties of esophageal wall, and the rate of bolus flow along the length of the esophagus during primary peristalsis.

METHODS

High-resolution manometry impedance recordings were obtained in 14 normal healthy subjects. Swallows of 10 ml saline and viscous bolus were recorded in the supine and Trendelenburg positions. User identified the region of interest, and a custom-designed software extracted parameters of interest such as bolus flow rate, esophageal wall tension, and esophageal wall distensibility in four equal segments of the esophagus.

KEY RESULTS

Bolus flow rate decreases along the length of the esophagus, being slowest in the distal esophagus. Bolus flow rate is smaller in the Trendelenburg position and with viscous bolus as compared with supine position and saline bolus. Esophageal wall tension is greater in the Trendelenburg position and with viscous bolus as compared with the supine position and saline bolus. The esophageal wall distensibility is larger in the distal as compared with proximal esophagus, which is true for both the saline and viscous bolus.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

We report, for the first time, bolus flow rate and biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall during swallow-induced primary peristalsis. Future studies may investigate biomechanical basis of esophageal motility disorders using the methodology described.

Novel gel bolus to improve impedance-based measurements of esophageal cross-sectional area during primary peristalsis

INTRODUCTION

Intraluminal esophageal impedance (ILEE) has the potential to measure esophageal luminal distension during swallow-induced peristalsis in the esophagus. A potential cause of inaccuracy in the ILEE measurement is the swallow-induced air in the bolus.

AIM

Compare a novel gel bolus to the current alternatives for the measurement of impedance-based luminal distension (cross-sectional area, CSA) during primary peristalsis.

METHODS

12 healthy subjects were studied using high-resolution impedance manometry (HRMZ) and concurrently performed intraluminal ultrasound (US) imaging of the esophagus. Three test bolus materials were used: 1) novel gel, 2) 0.5 N saline, and 3) commercially available Diversatek EFTV viscous. Testing was performed in the supine and Trendelenburg (-15°) positions. US imaging assessed air in the bolus and luminal CSA. The Nadir impedance values were correlated to the US measured CSA. A custom Matlab software was used to assess the bolus travel times and impedance-based luminal CSA.

RESULTS

The novel gel bolus had the least amount of air in the bolus during its passage through the esophagus, as assessed by US image analysis. The novel gel bolus in the supine and Trendelenburg positions had the best linear fit between the US measured CSA and nadir impedance value (R²  = 0.88 & R²  = 0.90). The impedance-based calculation of the CSA correlated best with the US measured CSA with the use of the novel gel bolus.

CONCLUSION

We suggest the use of novel gel to assess distension along with contraction during routine clinical HRM testing.

Circular and longitudinal muscles shortening indicates sliding patterns during peristalsis and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation

Esophageal axial shortening is caused by longitudinal muscle (LM) contraction, but circular muscle (CM) may also contribute to axial shortening because of its spiral morphology. The goal of our study was to show patterns of contraction of CM and LM layers during peristalsis and transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR). In rats, esophageal and LES morphology was assessed by histology and immunohistochemistry, and function with the use of piezo-electric crystals and manometry. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve was used to induce esophageal contractions. In 18 healthy subjects, manometry and high frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging during swallow-induced esophageal contractions and TLESR were evaluated. CM and LM thicknesses were measured (40 swallows and 30 TLESRs) as markers of axial shortening, before and at peak contraction, as well as during TLESRs. Animal studies revealed muscular connections between the LM and CM layers of the LES but not in the esophagus. During vagal stimulated esophageal contraction there was relative movement between the LM and CM. Human studies show that LM-to-CM (LM/CM) thickness ratio at baseline was 1. At the peak of swallow-induced contraction LM/CM ratio decreased significantly (<1), whereas the reverse was the case during TLESR (>2). The pattern of contraction of CM and LM suggests sliding of the two muscles. Furthermore, the sliding patterns are in the opposite direction during peristalsis and TLESR.

Esophageal distension during bolus transport: can it be detected by intraluminal impedance recordings?

BACKGROUND

Esophageal multiple intraluminal impedance (MII) measurement has been used to detect gastro-esophageal reflux and bolus transport. It is not clear if MII can detect changes in luminal cross sectional area (CSA) during bolus transport. Intraluminal ultrasound (US) images, MII, and high resolution manometry (HRM) were recorded simultaneously to determine temporal relationship between CSA and impedance during esophageal bolus transport and to define the relationship between peak distension and nadir impedance.

METHODS

Studies were conducted in five healthy subjects. MII, HRM, and US images were recorded 6 cm above LES. Esophageal distensions were studied during swallows and injections of 0.5 N saline bolus into the esophagus.

KEY RESULTS

Temporal change in esophageal CSA correlates with changes in impedance (r-value: mean ± SD = -0.80 ± 0.08, range: -0.94 to -0.66). Drop in impedance during distension occurs as a two-step process; initial large drop associated with onset of CSA increase, followed by a small drop during which majority of the CSA increase occurs. Peak CSA and nadir impedance occur within 1 s of each other. Increase in swallow and injection volumes increased the CSA, had no effect on large drop but increased the small drop amplitude. We observed a significant correlation between peak CSA and nadir impedance (r = -0.90, p < 0.001) and a better correlation between peak CSA and inverse impedance (r = 0.94, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Further studies are needed to confirm that intraluminal impedance recordings may be used to measure luminal CSA during esophageal bolus transport.

Purse-string morphology of external anal sphincter revealed by novel imaging techniques

The external anal sphincter (EAS) may be injured in 25-35% of women during the first and subsequent vaginal childbirths and is likely the most common cause of anal incontinence. Since its first description almost 300 years ago, the EAS was believed to be a circular or a "donut-shaped" structure. Using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound imaging, MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and muscle fiber tracking, we delineated various components of the EAS and their muscle fiber directions. These novel imaging techniques suggest "purse-string" morphology, with "EAS muscles" crossing contralaterally in the perineal body to the contralateral transverse perineal (TP) and bulbospongiosus (BS) muscles, thus attaching the EAS to the pubic rami. Spin-tag MRI demonstrated purse-string action of the EAS muscle. Electromyography of TP/BS and EAS muscles revealed their simultaneous contraction and relaxation. Lidocaine injection into the TP/BS muscle significantly reduced anal canal pressure. These studies support purse-string morphology of the EAS to constrict/close the anal canal opening. Our findings have implications for the effect of episiotomy on anal closure function and the currently used surgical technique (overlapping sphincteroplasty) for EAS reconstructive surgery to treat anal incontinence.