Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine whether a protective diverting ileostomy improves short-term outcomes in patients with rectal resection and colonic J-pouch reconstruction for low anastomoses. Criteria for the use of a proximal stoma in rectal resections with colonic J-pouch reconstruction have not been defined sufficiently.

METHODS

In a multicenter prospective study, rectal cancer patients with anastomoses below 8 cm treated with low anterior resection and colonic J-pouch were randomized to a defunctioning loop ileostomy or no ileostomy. The primary study endpoint was the rate of anastomotic leakage, and the secondary endpoints were surgical complications related to primary surgery, stoma, or stoma closure.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2014, a total of 166 patients were randomized to 1 of the 2 study groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the overall leakage rate was 5.8% in the stoma group and 16.3% in the no stoma group (P = .0441). However, some patients were not treated according to randomization and only 70% of our patients with low anastomoses received a pouch. Therefore, we performed a second analysis as to actual treatment. In this analysis, as well, leakage rates (P = .044) and reoperation rates for leakage (P = .021) were significantly higher in patients without a stoma. In multivariate analysis, male gender (P = .0267) and the absence of a stoma (P = .0092) were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

Defunctioning loop ileostomy should be fashioned in rectal cancer patients with anastomoses below 6 cm, particularly in male patients, even if reconstruction was done with a J-pouch.

Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after resection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The relevance of type and severity of postoperative complications after curative resection for rectal cancer on survival and recurrence rates is a matter of controversy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcome after resection for rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a university teaching hospital by a specialized colorectal team.

PATIENTS

Between January 1984 and October 2008, 811 patients with rectal cancer underwent curative resection. Patients who experienced postoperative complications were divided into a minor complication group (grades I and II) and a major complications group (grades III and IV) according to the Clavien classification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The influence of several pathological and clinical factors, including complications in terms of overall and disease-free survival, was tested and compared in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Curative resection was performed in 811 patients; median age was 65 years. The Kaplan-Meier estimates (± SE) for 5- and 10-year overall cumulative survival were 70.3% ± 1.8% and 54.5% ± 2.4%; Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5- and 10-year disease-free survival were 64.0% ± 1.8% and 50.9% ± 2.3%. One hundred sixty-five patients (20.3%) had minor complications, and 103 patients (12.7%) had major complications. Twelve patients (1.48%) died within 30 days after surgery. There was no significant difference between patients with no complications, patients with minor complications, and patients with major complications in terms of overall (p = 0.41) or disease-free survival (p = 0.32).

LIMITATIONS

A possible limitation of our study is that the data represent a cohort study from a single center.

CONCLUSION

Following resection for rectal cancer, the severity of postoperative complications (minor or major) according to a standardized classification system does not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on either overall or disease-free survival.

Long-term quality of life in pouch patients compared with stoma patients following rectal cancer surgery

AIM

Low and ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis does not compromise oncological results compared with abdominoperineal excision. Although avoidance of a permanent colostomy is regarded as beneficial for a patient's quality of life (QoL), patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery may develop a number of functional problems. A colonic pouch significantly improves functional outcome after rectal resection and low anastomosis and may positively influence QoL. The aim of this study was to compare QoL in long-term survivors who underwent ultralow anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and colonic J-pouch anastomosis (CPA) with patients treated with abdominoperineal excision (APE) and end colostomy for rectal cancer.

METHOD

The medical records from our institution's prospectively maintained rectal cancer database of 151 patients who underwent surgery for ultralow rectal cancer from 2001 to 2007 were analysed. QoL in 59 eligible patients was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 core and Colorectal Cancer 29. Results were compared for patients with CPA and APE.

RESULTS

The median follow-up in the 59 patients was 74 (37-119) months. QoL was good in all patients, but it was better in CPA than in APE patients. Global health status (P = 0.009), physical functioning (P = 0.0002), role functioning (P = 0.03), cognitive functioning (P = 0.046), social functioning (P = 0.002), body image (P = 0.053), embarrassment (P = 0.002) and urinary frequency (P = 0.003) were significantly improved for patients with CPA.

CONCLUSION

QoL after rectal resection and CPA was better than after APE in several respects. However, QoL should not be regarded as an isolated concept but rather as one of several possible clinical outcomes of interest.

A prospective randomised phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with stage II colon cancer

The purpose of this trial was to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in stage II colon cancer. Patients with stage II colon cancer were randomised to either adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/LV (100 mg m⁻² LV+450 mg m⁻² 5-FU weekly, weeks 1–6, in 8 weeks cycles × 7) or surveillance only. Five hundred patients were evaluable for analyses. After a median follow-up of 95.6 months, 55 of 252 patients (21.8%) have died in the 5-FU/LV arm and 58 of 248 patients (23.4%) in the surveillance arm. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two treatment arms (hazard ratios, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61–1.27, P=0.49). The relative risk for tumour relapse was higher for patients on the surveillance arm than for those on the 5-FU/LV arm; however, this difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45–1.06, P=0.09). Consequently, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different between the two trial arms. In conclusion, results of this trial demonstrate a trend to a lower risk for relapse in patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU/LV for stage II colon cancer. However, in this study with limited power to detect small differences between the study arms, adjuvant chemotherapy failed to significantly improve DFS and OS.

Rectal cancer delivery of radiotherapy in adequate time and with adequate dose is influenced by treatment center, treatment schedule, and gender and is prognostic parameter for local control: Results of study CAO/ARO/AIO-94

PURPOSE

The impact of the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) on treatment results in rectal cancer patients is unknown.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The data from 788 patients with rectal cancer treated within the German CAO/AIO/ARO-94 phase III trial were analyzed concerning the impact of the delivery of RT (adequate RT: minimal radiation RT dose delivered, 4300 cGy for neoadjuvant RT or 4700 cGy for adjuvant RT; completion of RT in <44 days for neoadjuvant RT or <49 days for adjuvant RT) in different centers on the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. The LRR, DFS, and delivery of RT were analyzed as endpoints in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the centers and the delivery of RT. The overall delivery of RT was a prognostic factor for the LRR (no RT, 29.6% +/- 7.8%; inadequate RT, 21.2% +/- 5.6%; adequate RT, 6.8% +/- 1.4%; p = 0.0001) and DFS (no RT, 55.1% +/- 9.1%; inadequate RT, 57.4% +/- 6.3%; adequate RT, 69.1% +/- 2.3%; p = 0.02). Postoperatively, delivery of RT was a prognostic factor for LRR on multivariate analysis (together with pathologic stage) but not for DFS (independent parameters, pathologic stage and age). Preoperatively, on multivariate analysis, pathologic stage, but not delivery of RT, was an independent prognostic parameter for LRR and DFS (together with adequate chemotherapy). On multivariate analysis, the treatment center, treatment schedule (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant RT), and gender were prognostic parameters for adequate RT.

CONCLUSION

Delivery of RT should be regarded as a prognostic factor for LRR in rectal cancer and is influenced by the treatment center, treatment schedule, and patient gender.

Impact of blood transfusions on recurrence and survival after rectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine whether type or number of blood units transfused affected short-term and long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. The number of perioperative blood units is associated with postoperative mortality and overall survival by some authors. In addition, allogenic perioperative blood transfusion has been postulated to produce host immunosuppression and has been reported to result in adverse outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Autologous blood transfusion might improve results compared with allogenic transfusion.

METHODS

Clinical outcome for 597 patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer was analyzed according to their transfusion status. Results for type (autologous or allogenic) and number of blood units transfused were recorded.

RESULTS

Blood transfusion was associated with increased postoperative mortality at 60 days. Patients who received > 3 units had a postoperative mortality of 6 percent compared with 1 percent for patients who received 1 to 3 units and 0 percent for patients who did not require transfusions. No difference was found between patients who received autologous or allogenic blood. Blood transfusions were also associated with impaired overall survival in a univariate analysis, but this finding was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. The number or type of blood units transfused did not influence oncologic results. Local recurrence rates, distant metastases rates, and disease-free survival were not influenced by transfusion in our patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased numbers of blood units were associated with postoperative mortality. However, there is no reason, with respect to cancer recurrence or disease-free survival, to use a program of transfusion with autologous blood in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer.

A prospective randomised trial to study the role of levamisole and interferon alfa in an adjuvant therapy with 5-FU for stage III colon cancer

The purpose of this trial was to examine the efficacy of the addition of levamisole (LEV) or interferon alfa (IFN) to an adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with stage III colon cancer. According to a 2 × 2 factorial study design, 598 patients were randomly assigned to one of four adjuvant treatment arms. Patients in arm one received 5-FU weekly for 1 year, patients in arm two 5-FU plus LEV, in arm three 5-FU plus IFN and patients in arm four 5-FU, LEV and IFN. The relative risk of relapse and the relative risk of death were significantly higher for patients treated with LEV compared with those without LEV treatment (HR 1.452, 95% CI 1.135–1.856, P=0.0028; HR 1.506, 95% CI 1.150–1.973, P=0.0027, respectively). No significant impact on survival was observed for therapy with IFN in the univariate analysis. The addition of LEV to adjuvant 5-FU significantly worsened the prognosis of patients with stage III colon cancer. Interferon alfa had no significant influence on survival when combined with adjuvant 5-FU, but increased the toxicity of therapy substantially.

[Long-term outcome of stomach carcinoma achieved in an Austrian standard hospital with an oncologic focus]

INTRODUCTION

Although two large prospective and randomized planned European studies failed to show any benefit of radical D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer, the value of radical lymphadenectomy is still a matter of controversy.

METHODS

A radical surgical approach principally using D2, D3 lymphadenectomy, as defined by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer, has been prospectively performed since January 1984. Out of 729 patients with gastric cancer, 521 were surgically treated for potential cure between 1984 and 31 December, 1998. Clinical, histopathological and surgical factors were evaluated for their influence on long-term survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Tumor-specific 5- and 10-year survival rates for all patients were 58.5% and 57.5% for patients who underwent tumor resection 59% and 58%. For operated patients upon with the aim of achieving cures, the tumor-specific 5- and 10-year survival rates were 63.3% and 62.2% and the median survival time was more than 144 months. Postoperative hospital mortality was 7.7%, 4.6% for R0 resected patients, 8.6% for R1,2 resected patients and 21.3% for those undergoing palliative procedures. Multivariate analysis using the Cox model identified an age older than 65, total gastrectomy as well as high pN- and pT category as detrimental factors with an independent influence on survival.

CONCLUSION

After updating the long-term results of gastric cancer, as already published earlier, it is impressively obvious that also in a European setting of gastric cancer patients, with a presupposed appropriate surgical technique and experience, very constant cure rates are achievable with comparatively low mortality and morbidity.

Long-term prognosis for colon cancer related to consistent radical surgery: multivariate analysis of clinical, surgical, and pathologic variables

Despite the improvement in its prognosis in most Western countries, death from colon cancer is still a major problem. In a prospectively planned observation study, a large patient collective from a single institution in Austria was analyzed in terms of the surgical approach and factors influencing survival. A total of 696 patients with colonic carcinomas were admitted to our surgical department between January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1997. Radical surgery for localized tumors was consistently performed, including wide resection margins and complete removal of the regional lymph drainage zones. Clinical, histopathologic, and therapy-related factors were examined for their influence on long-term survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The overall tumor resection rate was 99.3% (691/696); complete tumor removal (R0) was possible for 84.8% (590/696) of all patients. The overall postoperative hospital mortality rate was 3.2% (22/696), and it was 13% (7/556) for potentially curative resections. Five- and ten-year tumor-specific survival rates for stage I to III R0 resections were 83.8% and 78.8%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduced tumor recurrence for stage III patients by 52.4%. The depth of tumor infiltration, lymph node status, and adjuvant chemotherapy were found to have an independent influence on survival as identified by the Cox models. In conclusion, a consistent radical surgical approach for potentially curative resected colonic cancer patients had survival rates that surpassed those of most published series without sacrificing low complication rates. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III substantially improved survival.

Long-term results of early gastric cancer accomplished in a European institution by Japanese-type radical resection

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival following Japanese-type radical surgery for 130 consecutively performed early gastric cancers (EGC) in a single Austrian institution between January 1, 1984 and May 31, 1998 was analyzed in terms of long-term survival, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.METHODS: Extended D2 lymphadenectomy as defined by the JRSGC was performed in 129 patients with EGC. The surgical process was consistent as nearly all patients were operated on by only two surgeons. Overall survival and factors influencing survival were analyzed with particular regard to the depth of tumor infiltration, histological type, tumor grading, Lauren classification, tumor diameter, macroscopic appearance, localization, and lymph node involvement.RESULTS: Of 678 gastric cancer patients surgically treated in the mentioned period, 130 patients (19.2%) were qualified as EGC. In 70 patients the tumor was limited to the mucosa and in 60 patients the tumor had not yet invaded the submucosa. The percentage of patients with positive lymph nodes increased from 2.9% with mucosal invasion to 21.7% with submucosal tumor involvement. The overall 5- and 10-year observed survival rate, postoperative mortality not excluded, was 74.6% and 62.1%, respectively, and 91.1% and 91.1%, respectively, when calculated as tumor specific. The 5- and 10-year observed survival rate of tumors limited to the mucosa was 77.2% and 72.1%, respectively, and 98.1% and 98.1%, respectively, when calculated as tumor specific. The respective values for submucosal invasion were 71.6% and 51.7%, and 82.7% and 82.7%. Postoperative complications occurred in 17 patients (13.1%) and postoperative hospital mortality totaled 1.5% (2/130). In multivariate analysis, only lymph node metastases were found to have independent prognostic influence on survival ( P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 8.25).CONCLUSION: Japanese-type radical lymph node dissection for EGC in a European surgical institution yielded long-term survival nearly identical to that reported repeatedly by Japanese authors. Postoperative morbidity and mortality was not sacrificed by our comparatively radical surgical approach.

Long-term results of radical surgery for rectal cancer: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors influencing survival and local recurrence

AIMS

To evaluate consistent radical surgery performed over a 13-year period for rectal cancer in terms of local tumour control and long-term survival.

METHODS

Radical surgical procedure principally using total mesorectal excision (TME) for middle and lower rectal tumours, high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and sphincter-saving resections (SSR) whenever possible, has been performed prospectively since January 1984.

RESULTS

Tumour resection was possible in 98.8% (636/644), potentially curative resections (UICC/AJCC R0 resection) in 85.7% (552/644) and sphincter preservation in 71.7% (462/644). Five- and 10-year observed survival rates, surgical mortality not excluded, for all patients were 49.2% and 37.4%. Tumour-adjusted 5- and 10-year survival rates were 60.5% and 55.3%. For curatively operated patients (UICC/AJCC R0) 5- and 10-year observed survival rates were 56.3% and 42.6% and tumour-adjusted survival rates were 68.6% and 62.7%. The 5- and 10-year local recurrence rates for R0 resected patients were 12.0% and 12.6%. Post-operative hospital mortality was 3.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariate analysis using Cox's model identified increasing pT category and pN category, old age and low tumour location as detrimental factors having independent influence on survival. For local tumour failure only pT and pN category as well as adjuvant radiation therapy were identified in the Cox model as having an independent detrimental influence.