Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Routine symptom and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessments can engage patients, give provider feedback, and improve doctor/patient communication.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the impact of a technology-assisted symptom monitoring system versus usual care on HRQOL and doctor/patient communication in early-stage prostate cancer (PCa) survivors.

METHODS

Men (N = 94) were on average 62-years old, mostly African American (AA; 61.7%), and 10-19 months post-treatment. They were randomized to symptom monitoring plus feedback (SM + F; n = 49) or usual care (UC; n = 45). SM+F participants completed a 12-item telephoneassisted monitoring intervention. All participants completed a baseline and 2 follow-up interviews.

RESULTS

Among the SM+F participants, perceptions of the monitoring system were positive: 97.1% endorsed it as easy/very easy to use and 85% felt all patients could benefit from it. At baseline, men reported favorable general and cancer-specific HRQOL and doctor/patient communication, but poorer urinary and sexual function. Although there was no overall impact of the intervention, post hoc exploratory analyses indicated that among AA men, those who received SM+F improved relative to UC on doctor/patient communication (P < .05), general HRQOL (P < .06), and sexual function (P < .05).

LIMITATIONS

Variability in survivor follow-up care, limited access to eligible participants, and minimal physician training in the use of reports likely decreased physician investment.

CONCLUSION

Overall, PCa survivors were receptive to this monitoring system. Exploratory analyses suggest that this technology-assisted monitoring system may be of particular benefit to African American men. Additional studies with larger samples, more intervention time-points, and increased physician training are needed to strengthen the intervention's impact.

Drug-eluting stents versus repeat vascular brachytherapy for patients with recurrent in-stent restenosis after failed intracoronary radiation

Recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) following intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) continues to be a therapeutic challenge. The present study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation versus repeat IRT for recurrent ISR after brachytherapy failure. A cohort of 88 patients who were previously treated with brachytherapy for ISR and presented with angina and recurrence of angiographic restenosis were evaluated for treatment with either DES [sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES); n = 34] or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and repeat radiation (gamma or beta radiation; n = 54). The two groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. The in-hospital outcomes were similar between both groups. At long-term follow-up of 9.7 +/- 4.1 months for the DES group and 10.3 +/- 3.5 months for the repeat IRT group, there were no deaths or myocardial infarctions (MI). There was a trend toward more target vessel revascularization-major adverse cardiac events (TVR-MACE) in the DES group (p = 0.09). In addition, the patients in the DES group had a significantly lower survival rate compared to those in the repeat IRT group (p = 0.018). For patients who had recurrent ISR following IRT, either DES implantation or repeat radiation is safe and is associated with excellent immediate outcomes. Yet, at long-term follow-up, repeat IRT was associated with less recurrences and need for repeat revascularization when compared to DES implantation. Therefore, repeat IRT should be considered as an option for this difficult patient subset.

Intracoronary radiation therapy using a novel beta emitter for in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary beta-radiation therapy reduces in-stent restenosis (ISR). We aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) utilizing tungsten (188W), a beta emitter.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with angiographic evidence of ISR in a previously treated native coronary artery underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; balloon angioplasty, ablation by atherectomy, or laser angioplasty). After the intervention, a noncentered delivery catheter with a side guide 0.014-in. wire carrying a tungsten (188W) coil, with an active length of 33 mm, was inserted. Patients were randomized to a radiation dose of 18, 22, or 25 Gy at 2 mm from the center of the source. Aspirin and Plavix, at 300 mg loading dose, were administered prior to intervention. Plavix 75 mg/day was prescribed for 6 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

At 6 months follow-up, the overall binary angiographic restenosis rate was 18.8%. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 23% and target lesion revascularization related major adverse cardiac events (TLR-MACE) was 13.3%, without any intergroup differences. A comparison with the original Washington Radiation for In-stent restenosis Trial (WRIST) radiation cohort utilizing an 192Iridium source (prescription dose 15 Gy at 2 mm from the source) showed similar TVR and TLR-MACE rates of 30% and 18%, respectively. The TVR and TLR-MACE rates in the WRIST placebo cohort were 70% and 66%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular brachytherapy with tungsten (188W) is feasible and safe. The 6-month clinical outcomes are similar to the original WRIST radiation group.

Use of restenting should be minimized with intracoronary radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis

Restenting at the time of intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) potentially increases the risk of late total occlusion (LTO) of the treated vessel. Prolonged antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel (6 months) has been shown to be effective in reducing LTO risk. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of restenting on clinical outcomes following IRT for ISR with 6 months of clopidogrel. We retrospectively evaluated 1,275 patients with 6-months clinical follow-up who were enrolled in radiation trials for ISR using gamma- and beta-emitters conducted at Washington Hospital Center. Patients were analyzed according to whether additional stents were deployed at the time of IRT. The predominant indication for restenting was to optimize the final angiographic result in the event of tissue prolapse or to cover edge dissections. All patients received a minimum of 6 months of clopidogrel. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the restented and nonrestented groups. Radiation was delivered successfully in all cases. At 6 months, patients treated with additional stents and IRT had a significantly higher rate of target vessel revascularization than patients without additional stents (24.6% vs. 18.7%; P = 0.011). Restenting caused more frequent late thrombosis, late total occlusion, and Q-wave myocardial infarction than no restenting (4.0% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.09; 6.1% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.14; and 1.9% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.009, respectively). Restenting for the treatment of ISR is associated with increased adverse events and should be avoided after intracoronary radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis, as restenting results in a higher recurrence rate and the potential for increased late total occlusion.

Excimer laser coronary angioplasty and intracoronary radiation for in-stent restenosis: six-month angiographic and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 6-month clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients treated with excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and intracoronary radiation (ICR) for in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS

A consecutive series of 175 patients with ISR treated with ELCA+ICR (gamma and beta emitters) were compared to 33 patients with ISR treated with ELCA alone. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. ELCA+ICR and ELCA-alone patients had similar lesion lengths (25.0+/-12.0 vs. 24.0+/-16.8 mm, P=NS) in predominantly saphenous vein grafts (SVG, 38% vs. 42%, P=NS).

RESULTS

Procedural success was high (ELCA+ICR, 97.0% vs. ELCA alone, 98.5%, P=NS), with no perforations or acute vessel closures. ELCA+ICR therapy reduced target vessel revascularization (TVR; 27% vs. 64%, P<.0001) and major adverse cardiac events [MACE: death, myocardial infarction (MI), or TVR; 30% vs. 64%, P<.0001] compared to ELCA alone. Late loss was 0.66+/-0.90 mm in ELCA+ICR patients and 0.85+/-0.60 mm in ELCA-alone patients (P=NS). Angiographic binary restenosis (>50%) was significantly reduced with adjunctive ICR (28% vs. 54%, P=.014).

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy with ELCA significantly reduces angiographic binary restenosis at 6 months in patients with diffuse ISR, driven predominantly by reduced percutaneous TVR.

Treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder with irradiation and concomitant 5-fluorouracil infusion

Twenty patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were treated with radiation and concomitant continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil with or without Mitomycin. Nineteen of 20 patients were assessed for response. Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) obtained a complete response within 3 to 6 months. An additional three patients (15%) acquired and maintained a complete response after local transurethral resection of the tumor and intravesical chemotherapy, raising the overall complete response (CR) rate to 17/19 (89%). Of the two patients with persistent disease, one is alive and well after salvage cystectomy. Eighteen of 20 patients were evaluated for survival with a median follow-up of 38 months. Seven patients remain alive and well 51 to 78 months, whereas three patients died from intercurrent disease. Eight patients died of either distant metastatic disease (7 patients) or regional disease (1 patient). An adjusted survival calculated by the Life Table Method was 53.6% at 5 years, whereas the overall survival was 39%. The combined modality therapy was well tolerated with no need for treatment interruption or reduction in dose. Late bladder complications include one patient with hemorrhagic cystitis, two patients with dysuria, and two with symptoms of irritable bladder. One patient required a colostomy for a chronic hemorrhagic proctitis. Bladder preservation was achieved in 19/20 patients.