Defining Personas of People Living with Chronic Pain: An Ethnographic Research Study

Introduction

Pain is the leading reason for which people seek medical care in the United States, and chronic pain (CP) affects approximately 50 million people in the US Pain perception is deeply personal, is highly correlated with behavioral and emotional disorders, and is greatly influenced by physiological and environmental factors. The patient-provider relationship can have profound implications for clinical outcomes within the context of treating CP. However, limited access to pain specialists, the complex nature of many CP-causing conditions, the absence of instruments for objective pain measurement, and the need to foster a trust-based patient-provider relationship throughout treatment pose unique challenges.

Objective

To support a more optimal CP care delivery system that leverages a healthy therapeutic patient-provider relationship, we systematically gathered deeper knowledge of the behaviors, interpersonal dynamics, home environment, values, and mindsets of people who experience CP.

Methods

We employed ethnographic research methods to collect and analyze data on views, habits, strategies, attitudes, and life circumstances of a range of participants living with CP. We aggregated, analyzed, and summarized participant data to identify trends and similarities.

Results

Our findings suggest that patients can be broadly categorized into five predominant pain typologies, or "personas", which are characterized by respective symptom durations, care management preferences, values, communication styles, and behaviors.

Conclusion

Identifying CP personas may enhance the ability to personalize CP care and help foster more robust therapeutic relationships, which may lead to greater trust, improved patient satisfaction, and better clinical outcomes.

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Postoperative Pain Following Thoracic Surgery: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is defined as persistent pain following a thoracotomy and has an incidence of 21-61%. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a form of neuromodulation that modulates pain signal transmission to the spinal cord. The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy of DRG-S for the management of PTPS and to assess the role of thoracic paravertebral blocks (t-PVB) as a tool for prediction of success of DRG-S.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, we included all patients undergoing thoracic surgery, with PTPS not responding to pharmacotherapy and treated with DRG-S from September 2018 to February 2019. t-PVB followed by a percutaneous DRG-S trial was performed on all patients. Pain intensity was assessed through a numeric rating scale (NRS) and Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) at baseline, post-trial, at 14 days, 90 days, and at one year after DRG-S implantation. Data summarized as continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviations (SDs), and categorical variables were expressed as raw numbers and percentages.

RESULTS

Four patients out of 51 who underwent thoracic surgery at our institution surveyed were included (mean age ± SD, 56 ± 16 years old). Mean NRS and DN4 were, respectively, 7.2 ± 0.96 SD and 8.2 ± 0.5 SD at baseline, 2.5 ± 0.6 SD and 3.2 ± 0.5 SD after t-PVB, 2.2 ± 0.5 SD and 2.2 ± 0.5 SD at 14 days, 90 days, and at one year after DRG-S implantation. No complications or side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results show that DRG-S is an effective therapy for PTPS after thoracic surgery. In addition, thoracic paravertebral blocks performed prior to DRG-S correlated with a positive outcome with treatment.

Challenges and opportunities in pain management disparities research: implications for clinical practice, advocacy, and policy

Due to high profile initiatives at the national level, awareness of inadequate pain care affecting many groups in our society has never been greater. Nevertheless, increased awareness of pain disparities and the initiatives to address these disparities have yielded only modest progress, most notably in the form of growing appreciation that pain disparities likely result from multiple factors, including biological, psychological, environmental, health system, and cultural factors. Much less progress has been made in developing interventions that target these multiple determinants to reduce pain management disparities. In this paper we discuss key ethical and methodological challenges that undermine our capacity to investigate and develop meaningful interventions to improve pain outcomes among vulnerable populations. Key challenges in the areas of research engagement, recruitment, design, and measurement are discussed from both scientific and normative standpoints. Specific opportunities within emerging research paradigms to improve designs and measures are also discussed. Finally, we conclude with identifying potential synergies between the pain management disparities research agenda and the broader areas of clinical practice, advocacy, and policy that could help to move the field forward.

PERSPECTIVE

Researchers studying disparities in pain care face a number of ethical and methodological challenges that must be addressed to advance the field towards eliminating disparities. We discuss these ethical and methodological challenges and propose opportunities for paradigmatic revisions in areas of research engagement, design, measurement, advocacy, and policy.