1
|
Chang TC, Chen L, Das B, Evrard YA, Karlovich CA, Vilimas T, Chapman A, Nair N, Romero L, Fong AJL, Peach A, Fullmer B, Dutko L, Benauer K, Rivera G, Cantu E, Jiwani S, Neishaboori N, Forbes T, Camalier C, Stockwin L, Mullendore M, Eugeni MA, Newton D, Hollingshead MG, Williams MP, Doroshow JH. Abstract 1913: Quality control workflows developed for the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository using low pass whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Derived Models Repository (NCI PDMR; pdmr.cancer.gov) is developing a variety of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models for pre-clinical drug studies. All NCI PDMR models undergo quality control (QC) processes. Two unique QC challenges are: a) to assess genomic stability across PDX model passages; and b) to confirm the suitability of PDX-derived cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) as germline surrogates when blood is not available. Multiple bioinformatics QC assessments have been developed to measure the genomic fidelity in these PDX models using low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) and in CAFs using whole exome sequencing (WES).
Methods: LP-WGS was performed on 502 PDX samples from 38 models of rare cancer across passages 2 through 9 and WES was performed on 92 CAFs from 32 different histologies. In the QC workflow for estimating the genomic stability of passages within models, BBSplit was used for the assessment of human/mouse DNA content. CNVkit was utilized for copy number (CN) detection. The fraction of genome changed was calculated by comparing the copy numbers of each passage sample to the original patient sample. To evaluate purity of CAFs, three QC steps were constructed: a) plot of SNP variant allele frequency (ideogram); b) variant annotation using OncoKB (www.oncokb.org); c) percentage of genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH), based on a set of ~800,000 heterozygous SNPs from a population-level genomic database (gnomAD) based on WES data.
Results: PDX models showed genomic stability in CN profile when measured by LP-WGS. Human tumor DNA content remains stable ranging from 75-85% across different tiers of PDX passages from Donor +1 to Donor +6 and more. No models showed statistically significant evolution in CN profile, given the average 5 samples per model in each tier of passages. The QC workflow for CAFs generated five categories based on SNP ideograms, the presence/absence of oncogenic variants and LOH. Following observations were made: a) 72.5% CAFs were confirmed as matched diploid CAFs (category 1); b) 6.6% of CAFs were diploid and had >= 1 germline oncogenic variant - classified as category 2. CAFs in category 1&2 were suitable as germline surrogates; c) 12% of CAFs (category 3) showed putative polyploidy on SNP ideograms with no oncogenic variants and suitable for somatic variant calling; d) 8.8% of CAFs (category 4) had polyploidy and oncogenic variants present; e) LOH high CAF (category 5) - we identified a CAF with 42% LOH, later confirmed to be a tumor cell line by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Other CAFs (n=91) showed little variance, ranging from 0.6%-1.7% LOH.
Conclusions: We developed standard QC workflows to evaluate genomic stability of PDX models during passaging and qualify CAFs as germline surrogates for pre-clinical study.
Citation Format: Ting-Chia Chang, Li Chen, Biswajit Das, Yvonne A. Evrard, Chris A. Karlovich, Tomas Vilimas, Alyssa Chapman, Nikitha Nair, Luis Romero, Anna J. Lee Fong, Amanda Peach, Brandie Fullmer, Lindsay Dutko, Kelly Benauer, Gloryvee Rivera, Erin Cantu, Shahanawaz Jiwani, Nastaran Neishaboori, Tomas Forbes, Corinne Camalier, Luke Stockwin, Michael Mullendore, Michelle A. Eugeni, Dianne Newton, Melinda G. Hollingshead, Mickey P. Williams, James H. Doroshow. Quality control workflows developed for the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository using low pass whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1913.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Chia Chang
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Li Chen
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Biswajit Das
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Yvonne A. Evrard
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Tomas Vilimas
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Alyssa Chapman
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Nikitha Nair
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Luis Romero
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Anna J. Lee Fong
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Amanda Peach
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Brandie Fullmer
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Lindsay Dutko
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Kelly Benauer
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Gloryvee Rivera
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Erin Cantu
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | - Tomas Forbes
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Corinne Camalier
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Luke Stockwin
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Michelle A. Eugeni
- 2National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Biological Testing Branch, Frederick, MD
| | - Dianne Newton
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen L, Pauly R, Chang TC, Das B, Evrard YA, Karlovich CA, Vilimas T, Chapman A, Nair N, Romero L, Fong AL, Peach A, Jiwani S, Neishaboori N, Dutko L, Benauer K, Rivera G, Cantu E, Camalier C, Forbes T, Gottholm-Ahalt M, Carter J, Borgel S, McGlynn C, Mallow C, Delaney E, Miner T, Eugeni MA, Newton D, Hollingshead MG, Williams PM, Doroshow JH. Abstract 80: Genomic characterization of PDX models from rare cancer patients in the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Derived Models Repository (NCI PDMR; https://pdmr.cancer.gov) has developed a large number of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from a diverse set of rare cancers. These models have been genomically characterized using whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNAseq. The resource provides a unique opportunity to explore the genomic features of rare tumor models in NCI PDMR and to understand the oncogenic processes in pre-clinical models to identify biomarkers associated with therapeutic responses.
Methods: Genomic characterization was done in 4-6 PDX samples across multiple passages and lineages from each model. As the samples exhibited a high level of genomic stability within each model, consensus mutation and copy number variation (CNV), microsatellite instability (MSI), genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH), homologous recombination deficiency score (scarHRD), and mutational signature data were generated from WES. Fusions were identified from RNASeq data using Star-Fusion and FusionInspector. Gene set enrichment analysis was conducted from the gene expression data obtained from RNAseq.
Results: 1) 233 PDX models have been developed and characterized from more than 45 different rare malignancies. Most frequent cancer types are different sarcomas (n=63), head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (n=61), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) (n=11); 2) TP53 was the most frequently altered gene, mutated in 51% of models, followed by NOTCH1 (16%) and PIK3CA (11%). In terms of CNVs, ovarian epithelial cancer (OVT) showed relatively high chromosomal instability, while uterine endometrioid carcinoma (UEC) and synovial sarcoma (SYNS) had low instability; 3) MSI-H was observed in only 7 models. Esophageal adenocarcinoma (ESCA), OVT, and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC) had high scarHRD and genomic LOH scores, while both scores were low in UEC and anal squamous cell carcinoma (ANSC). COSMIC v2 mutational signature 3 is significantly associated with a high scarHRD score (p-value < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum test); 4) Characteristic fusions were observed in certain sarcoma models: SS18-SSX1 and ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusions were observed in SYNS and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) models respectively. EWSR1-FLI1 fusion was present in 2 out of 3 Ewing sarcoma (ES) models. 5) Gene set enrichment analysis from RNASeq data showed that epithelial-mesenchymal transition score could accurately distinguish carcinoma from sarcoma models, confirming the divergent gene expression programs.
Conclusion: Comprehensive genomic characterization of NCI PDMR models generated from rare cancers solves an unmet need in the community. It will serve as a valuable resource for translational researchers interested in pre-clinical drug development and discovery.
Citation Format: Li Chen, Rini Pauly, Ting-Chia Chang, Biswajit Das, Yvonne A. Evrard, Chris A. Karlovich, Tomas Vilimas, Alyssa Chapman, Nikitha Nair, Luis Romero, Anna Lee Fong, Amanda Peach, Shahanawaz Jiwani, Nastaran Neishaboori, Lindsay Dutko, Kelly Benauer, Gloryvee Rivera, Erin Cantu, Corinne Camalier, Thomas Forbes, Michelle Gottholm-Ahalt, John Carter, Suzanne Borgel, Chelsea McGlynn, Candace Mallow, Emily Delaney, Tiffanie Miner, Michelle A. Eugeni, Dianne Newton, Melinda G. Hollingshead, P. Mickey Williams, James H. Doroshow. Genomic characterization of PDX models from rare cancer patients in the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 80.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Chen
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Rini Pauly
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Ting-Chia Chang
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Biswajit Das
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Yvonne A. Evrard
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Tomas Vilimas
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Alyssa Chapman
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Nikitha Nair
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Luis Romero
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Anna Lee Fong
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Amanda Peach
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | - Lindsay Dutko
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Kelly Benauer
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Gloryvee Rivera
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Erin Cantu
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Corinne Camalier
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Thomas Forbes
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - John Carter
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Suzanne Borgel
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Chelsea McGlynn
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Candace Mallow
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Emily Delaney
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Tiffanie Miner
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Dianne Newton
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Timme CR, Alcoser SY, Breen D, Carter J, Chang TC, Chen A, Chen L, Cooley K, Das B, Delaney E, Eugeni MA, Gottholm-Ahalt MM, Grinnage-Polley T, Hull J, Karlovich C, Klarmann K, Jiwani S, Mallow C, McGlynn C, Mills J, Morris M, Mullendore M, Newton D, Shearer T, Stottlemyer J, Uzelac S, Walsh T, Williams PM, Evrard YA, Hollingshead MG, Doroshow JH. Abstract 3012: Patient-derived models of rare cancers in the National Cancer Institute's patient-derived models repository. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-3012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
There is an unmet need for preclinical models of rare cancers and rare disease sub-types. The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Derived Models Repository (NCI PDMR; https://pdmr.cancer.gov) is developing quality-controlled, early-passage, clinically-annotated patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs), in vitro tumor cell cultures (PDCs), cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and patient-derived organoids (PDOrg) and has focused on addressing unmet needs in the preclinical model space including developing models from adult and pediatric patients with rare cancers. To date, NCI has created and molecularly characterized over 150 preclinical models of rare cancer including indications such as Hurthle cell carcinoma, osteosarcomas, Merkel cell carcinomas, salivary gland cancers, synovial sarcomas, and carcinosarcomas. Rare cancer models developed to date will be reviewed and their histopathologic and molecular characteristics compared to that reported in the clinical setting. A pipeline to identify fusion proteins in these rare cancers such as the Ewing sarcoma EWSR1-FLI1 fusion and NAB2-STAT6 fusions in solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) has been implemented. Four malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) PDX models are available for researches; these models were developed from patients diagnosed between the ages of 37-68. At the time of model development, two patients were treatment naïve and two had prior radiotherapy. Two of the MPNST PDX models have NF1 oncogenic mutations, three have deep deletions in CDKN2A/B, and three have a mutation in either EED or SUZ12 consistent with the reported molecular characteristics of patients with MPNST. Also of clinical relevance, of two mesothelioma models available, one carries an NF2 driver mutation and the other BAP1 and LATS2 and a PDX model for Hurthle cell carcinoma has wide-spread loss of heterozygosity (LOH 80%). Models for other rare cancers are in development, including four cholangiocarcinoma PDXs with histopathologic confirmation that are currently being expanded for molecular characterization and distribution. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E
Citation Format: Cindy R. Timme, Sergio Y. Alcoser, Devynn Breen, John Carter, Ting-Chia Chang, Alice Chen, Li Chen, Kristen Cooley, Biswajit Das, Emily Delaney, Michelle A. Eugeni, Michelle M. Gottholm-Ahalt, Tara Grinnage-Polley, Jenna Hull, Chris Karlovich, Kimberly Klarmann, Shahanawaz Jiwani, Candace Mallow, Chelsea McGlynn, Justine Mills, Malorie Morris, Michael Mullendore, Dianne Newton, Tia Shearer, Jesse Stottlemyer, Shannon Uzelac, Thomas Walsh, P. Mickey Williams, Yvonne A. Evrard, Melinda G. Hollingshead, James H. Doroshow. Patient-derived models of rare cancers in the National Cancer Institute's patient-derived models repository [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 3012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy R. Timme
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Devynn Breen
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - John Carter
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Ting-Chia Chang
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Alice Chen
- 3National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD
| | - Li Chen
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Kristen Cooley
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Biswajit Das
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Emily Delaney
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | | | - Jenna Hull
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Chris Karlovich
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | - Candace Mallow
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Chelsea McGlynn
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Justine Mills
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Malorie Morris
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Dianne Newton
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Tia Shearer
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Shannon Uzelac
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | - Thomas Walsh
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Yvonne A. Evrard
- 1Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patidar R, Chen L, Karlovich CA, Das B, Evrard YA, Vilimas T, McCutcheon JN, Peach AL, Nair NV, Forbes TD, Fullmer BA, Fong AJL, Romero LE, Chapman AK, Conley KA, Harrington RD, Jiwani SS, Wang P, Ahalt MMG, Cantu EN, Rivera G, Dutko LM, Benauer KM, Kannan VR, Borgel SD, Carter JP, Stottlemyer JM, Miner TL, Breen DR, Delaney ET, McGlynn CA, Mallow CN, Radzyminski M, Uzelac SN, Alcoser SY, Grinnage-Pulley TL, Eugeni MA, Newton DL, Hollingshead MG, Williams PM, Doroshow JH. Abstract 3554: Genomic landscape of acquired uniparental disomy in NCI PDMR patient derived xenograft models. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-3554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Acquired Uniparental Disomy (aUPD) is relatively common in cancer. Occurrence of aUPD is more frequent in some tumor histologies (e.g., serous ovarian, colorectal) and may be relevant for choice of therapy. The Patient-Derived Models Repository (PDMR; https://pdmr.cancer.gov) developed by The National Cancer Institute (NCI) includes patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from multiple tumor histologies with different passages and lineages. The associated clinical annotation and genomic data make it possible to assess the prevalence of aUPD in the PDMR cohort and the stability of aUPD in different passages and lineages within a PDX model.
Methods: High tumor purity in the PDX specimens (after removal of mouse reads representing the stroma) enabled highly accurate assessment of loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Variants called by GATK Haplotype caller from whole exome sequencing (WES) data were used to identify segments of homozygosity using BCFtools/RoH (runs of homozygosity). The RoH segments were then intersected with the bed file for chromosome arms to get %LOH at the arm level. If %LOH on a chromosome arm was >90%, we considered the sample to have aUPD at the arm level. WES was also used to look for associations between DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway alterations and aUPD.
Results: We made the following observations: a) aUPD was observed most frequently in chr18q (75/427, 17.6%) and chr3p (69/427, 16%) of PDX models; b) aUPD was observed more frequently in certain tumor histologies, e.g., clear cell renal cell carcinoma (6/8), small cell lung cancer (3/4) and non-small cell lung cancer (25/38); c) extensive aUPD was observed in 4 PDMR models (>50% of evaluated chromosome arms in these models have aUPD); d) aUPD was not observed in some tumor histologies, i.e., synovial sarcoma, uterine endometrioid carcinoma; e) in the vast majority of PDMR models (>90%), aUPD is maintained faithfully across lineages and through multiple passaging; f) subclonal aUPD events were observed in some models across different lineages; g) significant enrichment of double strand DNA break repair (DSBR) pathway alterations was observed in PDMR models without aUPD (p=0.0007, Fisher's exact test) suggesting defects in DSBR are not associated with aUPD; and h) aUPD was rarely observed in MSI-high models (1/30) suggesting mutual exclusivity of mismatch repair (MMR) pathway defects and aUPD.
Conclusion: We observed a relatively high frequency of UPD in the PDMR models (at least 1 arm of a chromosome). UPD was more frequently observed in specific chromosomal arms. The frequency of aUPD was higher in some tumor histologies and absent in others. aUPD was stably maintained across passages and lineages, although some heterogeneity was observed. Our data suggest aUPD is not associated with defects in DSBR and MMR pathways. Preclinical drug studies using NCI PDMR models may suggest appropriate therapeutic options for cancers with aUPD.
Citation Format: Rajesh Patidar, Li Chen, Chris A. Karlovich, Biswajit Das, Yvonne A. Evrard, Tomas Vilimas, Justine N. McCutcheon, Amanda L. Peach, Nikitha V. Nair, Thomas D. Forbes, Brandie A. Fullmer, Anna J. Lee Fong, Luis E. Romero, Alyssa K. Chapman, Kelsey A. Conley, Robin D. Harrington, Shahanawaz S. Jiwani, Peng Wang, Michelle M. Gottholm Ahalt, Erin N. Cantu, Gloryvee Rivera, Lindsay M. Dutko, Kelly M. Benauer, Vishnuprabha R. Kannan, Suzanne D. Borgel, John P. Carter, Jesse M. Stottlemyer, Tiffanie L. Miner, Devynn R. Breen, Emily T. Delaney, Chelsea A. McGlynn, Candace N. Mallow, Marianne Radzyminski, Shannon N. Uzelac, Sergio Y. Alcoser, Tara L. Grinnage-Pulley, Michelle A. Eugeni, Dianne L. Newton, Melinda G. Hollingshead, Paul M. Williams, James H. Doroshow. Genomic landscape of acquired uniparental disomy in NCI PDMR patient derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3554.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Patidar
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Li Chen
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Chris A. Karlovich
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Biswajit Das
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Yvonne A. Evrard
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Tomas Vilimas
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Justine N. McCutcheon
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Amanda L. Peach
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Nikitha V. Nair
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Thomas D. Forbes
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Brandie A. Fullmer
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Anna J. Lee Fong
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Luis E. Romero
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Alyssa K. Chapman
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Kelsey A. Conley
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Robin D. Harrington
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Shahanawaz S. Jiwani
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Peng Wang
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Michelle M. Gottholm Ahalt
- 3Biological Testing Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD
| | - Erin N. Cantu
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Gloryvee Rivera
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Lindsay M. Dutko
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Kelly M. Benauer
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Vishnuprabha R. Kannan
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Suzanne D. Borgel
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - John P. Carter
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | | | - Tiffanie L. Miner
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Devynn R. Breen
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Emily T. Delaney
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | | | - Candace N. Mallow
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | | | - Shannon N. Uzelac
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Sergio Y. Alcoser
- 3Biological Testing Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD
| | - Tara L. Grinnage-Pulley
- 3Biological Testing Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD
| | - Michelle A. Eugeni
- 3Biological Testing Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD
| | - Dianne L. Newton
- 2Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - Melinda G. Hollingshead
- 3Biological Testing Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD
| | - Paul M. Williams
- 1Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI), Frederick, MD
| | - James H. Doroshow
- 4Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|