Sex-based analysis of NSTEMI processes of care and outcomes by hospital: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Contemporary studies demonstrate that non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) processes of care vary according to sex. Little is known regarding variation in practice between geographical areas and centers.

METHODS

We identified 305 014 NSTEMI admissions in the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP), 2010-2017, including female sex (110 209). Hierarchical, multivariate logistic regression models were fitted assessing for differences in primary outcomes according to sex. Risk standardized mortality rates (RSMR) were calculated for individual hospitals to illustrate correlation with variables of interest. 'Heat-maps' were plotted to show regional and sex-based variation in opportunity-based quality-indicator score (surrogate for optimal processes of care).

RESULTS

Women presented older (77y vs. 69y, P < 0.001) and were more often Caucasian (93% vs. 91%, P < 0.001). Women were less frequently managed with an invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) (58% vs. 75%, P < 0.001) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (35% vs. 49%, P < 0.001)). In our hospital-clustered analysis, we show positive correlation between the RSMR and increasing proportion of women treated for NSTEMI (R2 = 0.17, P < 0.001). There was clear negative correlation between proportion of women who had an optimum OBQI score during their admission and RSMR (R2 = 0.22, P < 0.001), with weaker correlation in men (R2 = 0.08, P < 0.001). Heat-maps according to clinical commissioning group (CCG) demonstrate significant regional variation in OBQI score, with women receiving poorer quality care throughout the UK.

CONLUSION

There was a significant in variation of the management of patients with NSTEMI according to sex, with widespread geographical variation. Structural changes are required to enable improved care for women.

Impact of pre-existing vascular disease on clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study

Aims

Little is known about the outcomes and processes of care of patients with non ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who present with “polyvascular” disease.

Methods

We analysed 287,279 NSTEMI patients using the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) registry. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analysed according to history of affected vascular bed; coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), with comparison to a historically disease-free control group; comprising 167,947 patients (59%). Further analyses compared cumulative number of affected beds with our control.

Results

After adjusting for demographics and management, vascular bed disease was associated with increased likelihood of MACE (CAD OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01–1.12, P=0.02) (CeVD OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12–1.27, P&lt;0.001) (PVD OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13–1.33, P&lt;0.001) and in-hospital mortality (CeVD OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.16–1.32, P&lt;0.001) (PVD OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.21–1.46, P&lt;0.001). Patients with no vascular disease were less likely to be discharged on statins (PVD 88%, CeVD 86%, CAD 90% and control 78%), and those with moderate (EF 30–49%) or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) (EF&lt;30%) were less likely to be discharged on ACE inhibitors (CAD 82%, CeVD 77%, PVD 77%, control 74%). Patients with polyvascular disease were less likely to be discharged on DAPT (PVD 78%, CeVD 77%, CAD 80%, control 87%).

Conclusion

Polyvascular disease patients had a higher adjusted incidence of in-hospital mortality and MACE. Patients with no history of vascular disease were less likely to receive statins or ACE inhibitors/ARBs, but more likely to receive DAPT.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Ethnic disparities in ST-segment myocardial infarction outcomes and processes of care in patients with and without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors: a nationwide cohort study

Background

There is growing interest in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the absence of `standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors' (SMuRFs), which include current smoking, hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia. Recent trials have demonstrated how these “SMuRFless” patients can have poorer outcomes after STEMI then those patients with SMuRFs, but these trials have not looked at the role of ethnicity in outcomes (1).

Methods

We analysed 118,177 STEMI patients using the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) registry. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analysed using hierarchical logistic regression models according to the presence of ≥1 SMuRF (88,055) and compared to the “SMuRFless” cohort (30,122), with a subgroup analysis comparing the outcomes of white and ethnic minority patients (comprising Black, Asian, Mixed and other) depending on SMuRF status. Our primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and secondary outcomes were in-hospital cardiac mortality and major bleeding.

Results

SMuRFless patients had a higher incidence of MACE (OR 1.09, CI 1.02–1.16), in-hospital mortality (OR 1.09, CI 1.01–1.18), and cardiac-mortality (OR 1.08, CI 1.00–1.17) than those with SMuRFs after adjusting for baseline demographics, haemodynamic status, killip classification, cardiac arrest, and common comorbidities. There were no statistically significant differences in our outcome measures between white and ethnic minority patients. Ethnic minority patients were more likely to undergo revascularisation by PCI or CABG (ethnic minority with SMuRFs 88%, ethnic minority SMuRFless 87%, white with SMuRFs 80%, white SMuRFless 77%).

Conclusion

SMuRFless patients have a higher incidence of MACE, in-hospital mortality, and cardiac-mortality than those with SMuRFs, which persists after adjusting for baseline demographics, haemodynamic status, killip classification, cardiac arrest, and common comorbidities. Ethnic minority patients were more likely undergo ICA and revascularisation regardless of SMuRF status but did not have poorer outcomes when compared to white patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Histopathological features of coeliac disease in a sample of Sudanese patients

INTRODUCTION

Coeliac disease can occur at any age but is more common in children. Its diagnosis requires correlation between clinical presentations, serological results, endoscopic findings and histopathological classification using the modified Marsh grading system. This study of coeliac disease with biopsies received in the department of histopathology at Soba University Hospital, and Fedail Hospital aimed to gain insight into the demographic profile, clinical presentations and histopathological classification of patients with coeliac disease.

METHODS

This was a descriptive study carried out at Soba University Hospital and Fedail Hospital during the period from January 2010-December 2013. Haematoxylin & Eosin and CD3-stained slides of small intestinal biopsies of coeliac disease patients were reviewed for various histological features (1) intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) count per 100 enterocytes, (2) crypt hyperplasia and (3) degree of villous atrophy. Based on the histopathological findings, the cases were categorized according to the modified Marsh classification. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the patient request forms. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences Software (SPSS).

RESULTS

The study included 60 patients. Their age ranged from 2 to 70 years with a mean of 19.5 years (±15.7 SD). The most common age group was below 10 years old (41.6%). Male and female are equally affected. The most common clinical presentation was chronic diarrhoea (55.0%), followed by iron deficiency anemia (41.7%). The degree of villous atrophy ranged from complete atrophy (45.0%), marked atrophy (38.3%) to mild atrophy (16.6%). Marsh grade IIIC was the most common grade. The younger age-groups had a higher prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia and higher Marsh grade.