A Randomized Trial of Mometasone Furoate 0.1% to Reduce High-Grade Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation

PURPOSE

A 2-arm, double-blinded randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 0.1% mometasone furoate (MF) versus Eucerin Original (E) cream in preventing the development of moderate to severe acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) in breast cancer patients receiving postmastectomy radiation (PMRT).

METHODS

Breast cancer patients undergoing chest wall with or without nodal radiation therapy (RT) (50 Gy) were eligible. Randomization (1:1) was to MF or E, applied twice daily from day 1 of PMRT to 14 days after PMRT. Patients were stratified by RT technique, body mass index, and reconstruction status. Daily bolus of 3 to 10 mm was applied in all patients. The primary endpoint was the development of provider-assessed grade ≥2 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) ARD with moist desquamation or any grade ≥3 dermatitis. Secondary endpoints were time to occurrence of maximum-grade dermatitis and patient-reported skin symptoms using a skin-related quality of life questionnaire, Skindex-16. Assessments were performed at baseline, weekly during PMRT, and 2 weeks after PMRT.

RESULTS

124 patients were enrolled between May 2013 and February 2016. Of those, 35% had pathologic stage III disease, 6% had cT4d disease, and 68% underwent reconstruction. Sixty percent received 3-dimensional conformal RT with photons only to the chest wall, 18% received electrons and photons, and 23% received inverse-planned intensity modulated RT. Groups were well balanced for age, skin type, and stage. The rate of moist desquamation was 54.8% in the entire cohort, with a significantly reduced incidence in the MF arm than in the E arm (43.8% vs 66.7%; P = .012). The MF arm had a lower incidence of maximum skin toxicities (P = .036) and longer time to development of grade 3 dermatitis (46 days vs 35.5 days, respectively; P ≤ .001). There was no difference in patient-reported skin outcomes between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer patients receiving MF during PMRT experienced significantly reduced rates of moist desquamation in comparison with a control cream.

Daily Fractionation of External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation to 40 Gy Is Well Tolerated and Locally Effective

PURPOSE

Most studies examining accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) have used twice-daily fractionation. Cosmesis with this approach has produced mixed results, and the optimal fractionation scheme remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of APBI with a total dose of 40 Gy in 10 daily fractions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2010 and 2014, we prospectively enrolled 106 patients to receive APBI after lumpectomy for invasive or in situ node-negative breast cancer. Radiation was administered via 3-dimensional conformal techniques.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years (range, 39-85), and all patients underwent APBI per protocol. With a median follow-up of 58 months, we evaluated patient-reported local toxicity and recurrence outcomes. Of 106 patients, 16 (15%) experienced grade ≥2 skin toxicity. The most common significant toxicities were acute cutaneous changes at 4 to 9 weeks after radiation therapy, including grade 2 erythema in 2 patients (1.8%) and skin color changes in 4 patients (3.8%). Only 2 instances of grade 3 toxicity were reported, including 1 patient with acute moist desquamation after radiation therapy and another with fibrosis at 2 years. Planning target volume and breast V₂₀ were significantly predictive of skin/subcutaneous toxicity, with evidence that limiting breast V₂₀ to <45% may improve tolerability. Overall, 3 breast cancer recurrences arose: 1 local recurrence in the original quadrant (3 years after APBI), 1 in a different ipsilateral quadrant (5 years after APBI), and 1 with distant disease 2 years after APBI.

CONCLUSIONS

In an appropriately selected group of patients with early stage breast cancer, APBI to a dose of 40 Gy in 10 daily fractions was well tolerated, with most patients (99%) reporting excellent/good cosmesis. Planning target volume and breast V₂₀ should be carefully constrained to limit local morbidity. Longer follow-up will be needed to establish efficacy and subsequent local recurrence rates.

10-Year Breast Cancer Outcomes in Women ≤35 Years of Age

PURPOSE

Breast cancer diagnosis at a very young age has been independently correlated with worse outcomes. Appropriately intensifying treatment in these patients is warranted, even as we acknowledge the risks of potentially mutagenic adjuvant therapies. We examined local control, distant control, overall survival, and secondary malignancy rates by age cohort and by initial surgical strategy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Female patients less than or equal to 35 years of age diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2010, were identified. Control groups of those aged 36 to 50 years (n = 6246) and 51 to 70 years (n = 7294) were delineated from an institutional registry. Clinicopathologic and follow-up information was collected. Chi-squared test was used to compare frequencies of categorical variables. Survival endpoints were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 529 patients ≤35 years of age met criteria for analysis. The median age of diagnosis was 32 years (range 20-35). Median follow-up was 10.3 years. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with overall survival (OS) were tumor size (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, P = .02), presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.2, P <.001), estrogen receptor positivity (HR 0.64, P = .015), receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.52, P = .035), and black race (HR 2.87, P <.001). The ultra-young were more likely to experience local failure compared with the aged 36 to 50 group (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.6, P < .001) and aged 51 to 70 group (HR 3.1, 95% CI 2.45 - 3.9, P <.001). The cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies at 5 and 10 years was 2.2% and 4.4%, respectively. Receipt of radiation was not significantly associated with secondary malignancies or contralateral breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Survival and recurrence outcomes in breast cancer patients ≤35 years are worse compared with those aged 36 to 50 or 51 to 70 years. Based on our data, breast conservation therapy is appropriate for these patients, and the concern for second malignancies should not impinge on the known indications for postoperative radiation therapy.

Morphologic Features of Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Surrogate of Capsular Contracture in Breast Cancer Patients With Implant-based Reconstructions

PURPOSE

Capsular contracture (CC) is a serious complication in patients receiving implant-based reconstruction for breast cancer. Currently, no objective methods are available for assessing CC. The goal of the present study was to identify image-based surrogates of CC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed a retrospective data set of 50 patients who had undergone both a diagnostic MRI scan and a plastic surgeon's evaluation of the CC score (Baker's score) within a 6-month period after mastectomy and reconstructive surgery. The MRI scans were assessed for morphologic shape features of the implant and histogram features of the pectoralis muscle. The shape features, such as roundness, eccentricity, solidity, extent, and ratio length for the implant, were compared with the Baker score. For the pectoralis muscle, the muscle width and median, skewness, and kurtosis of the intensity were compared with the Baker score. Univariate analysis (UVA) using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test and multivariate analysis with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was performed to determine significant differences in these features between the patient groups categorized according to their Baker's scores.

RESULTS

UVA showed statistically significant differences between grade 1 and grade ≥2 for morphologic shape features and histogram features, except for volume and skewness. Only eccentricity, ratio length, and volume were borderline significant in differentiating grade ≤2 and grade ≥3. Features with P<.1 on UVA were used in the multivariate least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis showed a good level of predictive power for grade 1 versus grade ≥2 CC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78, sensitivity 0.78, and specificity 0.82) and for grade ≤2 versus grade ≥3 CC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.75, sensitivity 0.75, and specificity 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The morphologic shape features described on MR images were associated with the severity of CC. MRI has the potential to further improve the diagnostic ability of the Baker score in breast cancer patients who undergo implant reconstruction.

Osimertinib and Capmatinib Combination Therapy to Overcome MET Y1003N-Mediated Resistance in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Case Report

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the frontline standard in the treatment of metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Although osimertinib is effective, disease progression occurs in virtually all patients, mediated by a heterogeneous array of resistance mechanisms. Activation of the MET signaling pathway by means of amplification has been implicated in resistance to osimertinib, but activation caused by point mutations in MET has not been well described.

Here, we present the case of a 65-year-old female with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC whose disease progressed on osimertinib owing to emergence of MET Y1003N mutation. She subsequently received capmatinib in combination with osimertinib and achieved a partial response. This case illustrates a potential role for dual EGFR/MET inhibition in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with resistance driven by activating MET mutations.

Consolidation ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Versus Durvalumab or Observation After Chemoradiation in Unresectable Stage III ALK-Positive NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC typically have poor response to immunotherapy; the benefit of consolidation durvalumab in patients with unresectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC remains unclear. Herein, we compare the efficacy and safety of consolidation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) versus durvalumab or observation after concurrent chemoradiation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using a multicenter study of 17 institutions globally. Patients with unresectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC treated between 2015 and 2022 were included. Patients received ALK TKI, durvalumab, or observation after concurrent chemoradiation. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were classified by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Outcomes were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were included, of whom 39 (58%) were female. Median age was 57 (interquartile range: 49-67) years. Furthermore, 15 received consolidation ALK TKI, 30 received durvalumab, and 22 underwent observation. Baseline characteristics were similar across the three groups other than differences in race. After adjusting for stage, age, and nodal status, median rwPFS was significantly longer for ALK TKI (rwPFS not reached, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.7- not reached) versus durvalumab (11.3 mo, 95% CI: 8.9-18.5, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.026-0.5, p-adjusted [p-adj] = 0.006) or observation (7.2 mo, 95% CI: 3.4-10.6, HR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.009-0.2, p-adj < 0.0001). Durvalumab significantly improved median rwPFS compared with observation (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19-0.71, p-adj = 0.002). Median OS in the ALK TKI and durvalumab cohorts was significantly improved compared with patients on observation (ALK TKI-observation: p = 0.04; durvalumab-observation: p = 0.03). TrAE of any grade occurred in eight (53%) and 11 (37%) patients treated with ALK TKI and durvalumab, respectively. Grade greater than or equal to three trAEs occurred in 27% (n = 4) of patients treated with ALK TKI and 6.7% of patients treated with durvalumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC experience significantly improved rwPFS when treated with consolidation ALK TKI therapy, surpassing outcomes found with either durvalumab or observation. Although both ALK TKI therapy and durvalumab offer an extension in OS compared with observation alone, it seems that ALK TKI therapy is the superior choice, underscoring its pivotal role in enhancing patient survival.

Overcoming the hurdles: surmounting acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most prevalent cancer type in the United States, with an alarming incidence and mortality rate, especially among individuals younger than 50 years. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), essential for cell proliferation and survival, has surfaced as a promising therapeutic target for metastatic colorectal cancer and has demonstrated success in various clinical trials. Monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab and panitumumab have proven to be effective against EGFR by blocking vital downstream signaling pathways and inhibiting gene transcription and cell proliferation. Despite this promise, most patients eventually develop resistance to anti-EGFR treatment, thereby limiting its long-term efficacy. Genomic alterations, such as mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF, often bypass the EGFR receptor, promoting resistance to therapy. Although our understanding of primary resistance to anti-EGFR therapy has improved, acquired resistance remains a significant hurdle. This review explores the potential mechanisms underpinning this acquired resistance and strategies to overcome it.

Preliminary results from a single-arm, phase II study assessing the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer

95

Background: Two trials have demonstrated overall response rates of 19% with immune checkpoint inhibitors alone in chemotherapy-resistant triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Radiation therapy (RT) is frequently used to enhance local control in TNBC and has been reported to induce distant (abscopal) tumor responses when combined with immunotherapy. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of RT and pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in a single-arm, two-stage, phase II study in metastatic TNBC. Results from the first stage are reported. Methods: Eligibility criteria includes women with biopsy-proven TNBC, ECOG performance status 0-2, ≥ 2 measurable sites of metastatic disease with at least one site requiring RT. A total RT dose of 3000 cGy is delivered in one week in 5 fractions. Pembrolizumab is given intravenously at 200 mg/kg D1+/- 3 days and then every 3 weeks until disease progression as defined by RECIST v 1.1. The primary endpoint is overall response rate at week 13 in the non-targeted, non-irradiated lesions. Secondary endpoints include safety and overall survival. Tumor biopsies are obtained at baseline and at week 7. PD-L1 expression was not required for study entry. Results: Nine patients were enrolled in the first phase and assessed for antitumor activity and safety. Median age was 52 years (range 37-73). Three patients died secondary to disease-related complications (at weeks 2, 6 and 8) and 1 came off study due to disease progression prior to week 13. Of the 5 patients evaluable at week 13, 2 had a partial response, 1 had stable disease and 2 had disease progression. Common toxicities were mild and included fatigue, myalgia and nausea. One grade 3 event was reported - hyperbilirubinemia not attributable to study therapy after one dose of pembrolizumab. Conclusions: The combination of pembrolizumab and RT was well-tolerated in the first stage of a phase II study. Responses were observed outside of the RT fields in 2 of 5 patients who were evaluable at 13 weeks. The contribution of RT to pembrolizumab is unknown and will be investigated in the second stage of the study, which is ongoing. Correlative studies are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02730130.

Consolidation Osimertinib Versus Durvalumab Versus Observation After Concurrent Chemoradiation in Unresectable EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Durvalumab improves survival when used as consolidation therapy after chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with stage III NSCLC. The optimal consolidation therapy for patients with EGFR-mutant (EGFRmut) stage III NSCLC remains unknown.

METHODS

In this multi-institutional, international retrospective analysis across 24 institutions, we evaluated outcomes in patients with stage III EGFRmut NSCLC treated with concurrent CRT followed by consolidation therapy with osimertinib, durvalumab, or observation between 2015 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS, primary end point) and overall survival (secondary end point). Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) during consolidation treatment were defined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

Of 136 patients with stage III EGFRmut NSCLC treated with definitive concurrent CRT, 56 received consolidation durvalumab, 33 received consolidation osimertinib, and 47 was on observation alone. Baseline characteristics were similar across the three cohorts. With a median follow-up of 46 months for the entire cohort, the median duration of treatment was not reached (NR) for osimertinib (interquartile range: NR-NR) and was 5.5 (interquartile range: 2.4-10.8) months with durvalumab. After adjusting for nodal status, stage III A/B/C, and age, patients treated with consolidation osimertinib had significantly longer 24-month rwPFS compared to those treated with durvalumab or in the observation cohorts (osimertinib: 86%, durvalumab: 30%, observation: 27%, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). There was no difference in rwPFS between the durvalumab and the observation cohorts. No significant difference in overall survival across the three cohorts was detected, likely due to the limited follow-up. Any-grade trAE occurred in 52% (2 [6.1%] grade ≥3) and 48% (10 [18%] grade ≥3) of patients treated with osimertinib and durvalumab, respectively. Of 45 patients who progressed on consolidation durvalumab, 37 (82%) subsequently received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Of these, 14 (38%) patients developed trAEs including five patients with pneumonitis (14%; 2 [5.4%] grade ≥3) and five patients with diarrhea (14%; 1 [2.7%] grade ≥3).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that among patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC with a sensitizing EGFR mutation, consolidation osimertinib was associated with a significantly longer rwPFS compared to durvalumab or observation. No unanticipated safety signals were observed with consolidation osimertinib.